PEP 489: Fix syntax highlighting #4456
Conversation
|
Umm... Does this historical document really need updating to current publication standards? |
|
No, It's not absolutely needed, but would improve readability: the doc still exists and I was referred to it via python-pillow/Pillow#8983. I guess I should have looked up the real docs instead :) Anyway, I can ditch the second commit if it makes it easier to review, and/or add the canonical docs banner to the top (to https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/module.html#multi-phase-initialization ?) to make it clearer this is history? |
|
I think this is fine to change, it's editorial/style rather than the content, which is the class of changes we tend to take more exception to. A |
That's the thing to do :) It would be nice to get python/cpython#135126 in before that, and link to its new |
Most of the code blocks are C, so set that as the document highlight, and use Python on blocks where needed.
Also add inline code formatting.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4456.org.readthedocs.build/