Skip to content

Add reference to biclustering example in biclustering.rst documentation #31392

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Soumyaatanna
Copy link

Reference Issues/PRs

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Any other comments?

#30621
This PR improves the documentation for the biclustering module by adding a reference to the corresponding example script located in the examples/ directory.

Specifically:

Added a link to the plot_bicluster_newsgroups.py example in biclustering.rst

This helps users quickly access a runnable example, improving the learnability and usability of the module

This change follows the standard documentation guidelines for cross-linking examples and enhances the overall developer experience.

Copy link

❌ Linting issues

Merging with upstream/main might fix / improve the issues if you haven't done that since 21.06.2023.

This PR is introducing linting issues. Here's a summary of the issues. Note that you can avoid having linting issues by enabling pre-commit hooks. Instructions to enable them can be found here.

You can see the details of the linting issues under the lint job here


ruff check

ruff detected issues. Please run ruff check --fix --output-format=full locally, fix the remaining issues, and push the changes. Here you can see the detected issues. Note that the installed ruff version is ruff=0.11.7.

Generated for commit: 413fd0a. Link to the linter CI: here

@StefanieSenger
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this, since #31393 does correctly address the same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants