Skip to content

DOC Add link to spectral coclustering #31422

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 28, 2025

Conversation

sidrtx
Copy link
Contributor

@sidrtx sidrtx commented May 24, 2025

Reference Issues/PRs

Towards #30621
Continues PR #29606

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Fixed the indentation that was requested and added link of spectral coclustering to doc/modules/biclustering.rst

Any other comments?

this continues the work from PR #29606

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 24, 2025

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: dae44ae. Link to the linter CI: here

Copy link
Contributor

@StefanieSenger StefanieSenger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sidrtx,

thanks for your contribution to take up a stalled PR.

Differing from the previous review in #29606, I would not add this link to doc/modules/biclustering.rst, since it is already mentioned there (in li. 47 and 152) and we try to keep the docs rather clean. That was probably an oversight.

I would kindly ask you to remove this link again from doc/modules/biclustering.rst . Sorry about that.

Otherwise it looks fine.

@@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ class SpectralCoclustering(BaseSpectral):
array([0, 0], dtype=int32)
>>> clustering
SpectralCoclustering(n_clusters=2, random_state=0)

For a more detailed example, see the following:
:ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_bicluster_plot_spectral_coclustering.py`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
:ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_bicluster_plot_spectral_coclustering.py`
:ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_bicluster_plot_spectral_coclustering.py`.

Nit suggestion to add a dot.

@sidrtx
Copy link
Contributor Author

sidrtx commented May 27, 2025

Hi @StefanieSenger

Thank you for pointing out the references in lines 47 and 152—I must have missed those. I agree that removing them helps keep the documentation uncluttered. I’ve updated my PR accordingly. Thanks again for your attention to detail!

Copy link
Contributor

@StefanieSenger StefanieSenger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your work and removing the other links, @sidrtx!

It looks fine to me now.

@adrinjalali or @betatim, do you want to have a look?

@betatim betatim enabled auto-merge (squash) May 28, 2025 07:51
@betatim betatim merged commit 398e8fe into scikit-learn:main May 28, 2025
37 of 38 checks passed
@betatim
Copy link
Member

betatim commented May 28, 2025

There were some CI workflows that needed approval to run, I gave that approval and enabled auto-merge. Thanks for helping make the examples more discoverable!

jeremiedbb pushed a commit to jeremiedbb/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
Co-authored-by: Cloponaclock1 <ctramill2017@outlook.com>
elhambbi pushed a commit to elhambbi/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2025
Co-authored-by: Cloponaclock1 <ctramill2017@outlook.com>
jeremiedbb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Co-authored-by: Cloponaclock1 <ctramill2017@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants