✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

_{Generated for commit: ac8c656. Link to the linter CI: here}

Example here

TODO:

1. Address Olivier's comment (during a call). He mentioned that the ReprHTMLMixin could be set-up in a way that we only add documentation link of estimators that have similar HTML structure.
2. Test for broken links
3. The "?" link is too small, but it's the same size of the text. latest doc built - It seems that having the same text for each hyperlink is different than the recommended "best practices".

tested on the example you linked and it worked fine except for the C parameter of LogisticRegression. Maybe the text fragment requires more than 1 character ?

Thanks for the feedback! - the link to C that you mention works for me locally. But the link to my example doesn't work (the whole example, not the parameter link). Maybe on the next doc build I can see it.. ?
I addressed some of the comments you left. I'll work on the rest.

Example here

Could you please adjust the CSS to make the parameter docstring preview larger (a bit more than 80 character large) and avoid the centering?

The idea of a tooltip with the parameter description is interesting. I find the font a bit small though but bigger might make the tooltip take too much space. I also think that it's currently missing the parameter type (i.e. the first line of the param description: name: type).

If we go for the tooltip, then I don't think that a link for each parameter is needed anymore. The link for the estimator is enough then. And the tooltip could be displayed on hovering over the param name cell.

Thought for later: another tooltip could be displayed on hovering over the param value cell to show a complete list of valid types and (ranges of) values, read from the _parameter_constraints dict.

I think I added to the tooltip all the feedback, including the two last comments: avoid centring the text, get a wider text area and add params names and types. I also modified the code that was suggested -- to add the tooltip -- as it was "buggy".

Everything works well locally, and I'm able to build the examples that the ci is complaining about. So, not sure what to do next - I pushed a few times to restart the process with no success.

Please note that when I try to build the examples locally following the instructions from the documentation it took more than 6 minutes - and there were many warnings and errors. But I get the same ones building on the main branch. Still, the example gets built.

edit: 6min for one example only. The examples get built here as well - I just noticed. But there is the ci error.

Docs build failure unrelated. See #31918 (comment)