Skip to content

docs: minor typos fixed #31945

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

maitreytalware
Copy link
Contributor

Minor typos fixed

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 14, 2025

✔️ Linting Passed

All linting checks passed. Your pull request is in excellent shape! ☀️

Generated for commit: 5a922e9. Link to the linter CI: here

@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ def test_check_array_links_to_imputer_doc_only_for_X(input_name, retype):
assert extended_msg not in ctx.value.args[0]

if input_name == "X":
# Veriy that _validate_data is automatically called with the right argument
# Verfiy that _validate_data is automatically called with the right argument
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the Github action:

Suggested change
# Verfiy that _validate_data is automatically called with the right argument
# Verify that _validate_data is automatically called with the right argument

Copy link
Contributor Author

@maitreytalware maitreytalware Aug 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @thomasjpfan, updated the PR now. Should be good to go

@thomasjpfan thomasjpfan merged commit 75cd236 into scikit-learn:main Aug 20, 2025
39 of 40 checks passed
@lesteve
Copy link
Member

lesteve commented Aug 21, 2025

@maitreytalware while you are at it can you do the PyPi => PyPI replacement in line 3 of the README?

Note: it seems like rst doesn't care about the inconsistency since the PyPI badge is still shown, or maybe GitHub does the right thing not sure ...

Edit: Apparently from the rst doc for substitutions:

Matches are case-sensitive but forgiving; if no exact match is found, a case-insensitive comparison is attempted.

@maitreytalware
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lesteve, the PR was merged yesterday. I can add it as todo for my next PR or we can make issue

lucyleeow pushed a commit to lucyleeow/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
Co-authored-by: Work <Work@Maitreys-MacBook-Pro.local>
@lesteve
Copy link
Member

lesteve commented Aug 22, 2025

Yes I know. I was suggesting you open a new PR to fix it if you feel like it 🙏!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants