ISSUE-185: There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions
WebWide Not
There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Mike O'Neill
- Opened on:
- 2012-10-28
- Description:
- We should not have a "silent" web-wide exception API, to accompany the suggested site-wide one.
As there is now no safety check UI for the site-wide API ,or potential for one as it is now synchronous, it would be very easy for a 1st party site to maliciously or accidentally set a web-wide API, without the user being informed.
I agree that new site-wide API is a good idea, as it will be simpler to implement and does not have the problem of bombarding users with exception dialogs, but it would be a bad idea to project this onto the web-wide one.
I therefore suggest we either remove the web-wide API or insist that it is implemented as it was before, with a browser UI informing the user and getting agreement. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-16)
- Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from singer@apple.com on 2013-04-16)
- Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-04-15)
- Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-04-15)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
- ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-04-12)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-04-12)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from david@appnexus.com on 2013-04-12)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-04-12)
- Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-12)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-01-30)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-01-29)
- Re: ISSUE Cleanup: Please reconfirm your support of Raised ISSUES (by Jan 30) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-01-24)
- Re: ISSUE Cleanup: Please reconfirm your support of Raised ISSUES (by Jan 30) (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2013-01-21)
- ISSUE Cleanup: Please reconfirm your support of Raised ISSUES (by Jan 30) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-01-21)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-12-06)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from singer@apple.com on 2012-12-05)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-05)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-12-05)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-05)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from singer@apple.com on 2012-12-04)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from singer@apple.com on 2012-12-04)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-04)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-12-04)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-04)
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from singer@apple.com on 2012-12-03)
- ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-03)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-12-03)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-03)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-12-03)
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-12-02)
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-10-28)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from craigs@otalliance.org on 2012-10-28)
- tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-10-28)
Related notes:
Thanks for the input. I understand this concern. However, I believe that your concern is addressed: While the API is synchronous, user agents may reconfirm user's agreement with site-wide exceptions before storing them in the database. We may emphasize in the TPE spec that this behavior is permitted and then close iSSUE-185.
Matthias Schunter, 21 Jan 2013, 14:18:34Closed (unless I receive further feebdack by April 16):
- We reached agreement that there will be an API for web-side exceptions
- The discussion how to ensure that sites obtain proper consent before registering a web-wide exception will continue under ISSUE-193
Display change log