ISSUE-1 |
CLOSED |
Example issue to be closed, so people can see what an issue looks like. |
2011-09-21 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-2 |
CLOSED |
What is the meaning of DNT (Do Not Track) header? |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-3 |
CLOSED |
What is the granularity of the choice we expect users to make? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-4 |
CLOSED |
What is the default for DNT in client configuration (opt-in or opt-out)? |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-5 |
CLOSED |
What is the definition of tracking? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-6 |
CLOSED |
What are the underlying concerns? Why are we doing this / what are people afraid of? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-7 |
CLOSED |
What types of tracking exist, and what are the use cases for these types of tracking? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-8 |
CLOSED |
How do we enhance transparency and consumer awareness? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-9 |
CLOSED |
Understand all the different first- and third-party cases. |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-10 |
CLOSED |
What is a first party? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-11 |
CLOSED |
Document a longer list of use cases -- what's going on today |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-12 |
CLOSED |
How does tracking require relation to unique identities, pseudonyms, etc.? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-13 |
CLOSED |
What are the requirements for DNT on apps/native software in addition to browsers? |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-14 |
CLOSED |
How does what we talk about with 1st/3rd party relate to European law about data controller vs data processor? |
2011-09-21 |
Global Considerations |
0 |
| ISSUE-15 |
CLOSED |
What special treatment should there be for children's data? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-16 |
CLOSED |
What does it mean to collect, retain, use and share data? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-17 |
CLOSED |
Data use by 1st Party |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-18 |
CLOSED |
Collection definition (not sure I said the prefix before?) |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-19 |
CLOSED |
Data collection / Data use (3rd party) |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-20 |
CLOSED |
Different types of data, what counts as PII, and what definition of PII |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-21 |
CLOSED |
Enable external audit of DNT compliance |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-23 |
CLOSED |
Possible exemption for analytics |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-26 |
CLOSED |
Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-27 |
CLOSED |
How should the "opt back in" mechanism be designed? |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-28 |
CLOSED |
Exception for mandatory legal process |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-29 |
CLOSED |
Tracking that may be required by law enforcement |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-30 |
CLOSED |
Will Do Not Track apply to offline aggregating or selling of data? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-33 |
CLOSED |
Complexity of user choice (are exemptions exposed to users?) |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-34 |
CLOSED |
Possible exemption for aggregate analytics |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-35 |
CLOSED |
How will DNT interact with existing opt-out programs (industry self-reg, other)? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-36 |
CLOSED |
Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization? |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-37 |
CLOSED |
Granularity based on business types and uses |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-38 |
CLOSED |
Granularity for different people who share a device or browser |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-39 |
CLOSED |
Tracking of geographic data (however it's determined, or used) |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-40 |
CLOSED |
Enable Do Not Track just for a session, rather than being stored |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-41 |
CLOSED |
Consistent way to discuss tracking with users (terminology matters!) |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-42 |
CLOSED |
Feedback to the user from the browser when Do Not Track is turned on |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-43 |
CLOSED |
Sites should be able to let the user know their options when they arrive with Do Not Track |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-45 |
CLOSED |
Companies making public commitments with a "regulatory hook" for US legal purposes |
2011-09-21 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-46 |
CLOSED |
Enable users to do more granular blocking based on whether the site responds honoring Do Not Track |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-47 |
CLOSED |
Should the response from the server indicate a policy that describes the DNT practices of the server? |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-48 |
CLOSED |
Response from the server should indicate the server will honor it |
2011-09-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-50 |
CLOSED |
Are DNT headers sent to first parties? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-51 |
CLOSED |
Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-52 |
CLOSED |
What if conflict between opt-out cookie and DNT? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-53 |
CLOSED |
How should opt-out cookie and DNT signal interact? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-54 |
CLOSED |
can first parties use declared data while in a 3rd party context? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-55 |
CLOSED |
What is relationship between behavioral advertising and tracking, subset, different items? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-56 |
CLOSED |
What if DNT is unspecified and an opt-out cookie is present? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-57 |
CLOSED |
What if an opt-out cookie exists but an "opt back in" out-of-band is present? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-58 |
CLOSED |
What if DNT is explicitly set to 0 and an opt-out cookie is present? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-59 |
CLOSED |
Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-60 |
CLOSED |
Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-61 |
CLOSED |
A site could publish a list of the other domains that are associated with them |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-62 |
CLOSED |
The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-63 |
CLOSED |
Should there be a popup dialog or something like that which should override DNT? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-64 |
CLOSED |
How do we describe non-identifiable data |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-65 |
CLOSED |
How does logged in and logged out state work |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-66 |
CLOSED |
Can user be allowed to consent to both third party and first party to override general DNT? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-67 |
CLOSED |
Should opt-back-in be stored on the client side? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-68 |
CLOSED |
Should there be functionality for syncing preferences about tracking across different browsers? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-69 |
CLOSED |
Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy) |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-70 |
CLOSED |
Does a past HTTP request with DNT set affect future HTTP requests? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-71 |
CLOSED |
Does DNT require purging or modifying data collected in the past (not under DNT)? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-72 |
CLOSED |
Basic principle: independent use as an agent of a first party |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-73 |
CLOSED |
In order for analytics or other contracting to count as first-party: by contract, by technical silo, both silo and contract |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-74 |
CLOSED |
Are surveys out of scope? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-75 |
CLOSED |
How do companies claim exemptions and is that technical or not? |
2011-09-22 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-76 |
CLOSED |
Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-77 |
CLOSED |
How does a website determine if it is a first or third party and should this be included in the protocol? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-78 |
CLOSED |
What is the difference between absence of DNT request header and DNT = 0? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-79 |
CLOSED |
Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-80 |
CLOSED |
Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make sense to use a well-known location for this policy? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-81 |
CLOSED |
Do we need a response at all from server? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-82 |
CLOSED |
Should the DNT header be extensible with additional parameters? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-83 |
CLOSED |
How do you opt out if already opted in? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-84 |
CLOSED |
Make DNT status available to JavaScript |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-85 |
CLOSED |
DOM property and its access generally and specifically to web apps |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-86 |
CLOSED |
Do we have general extensibility capability for header response? |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-87 |
CLOSED |
Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I don't know what my policy is" |
2011-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-88 |
CLOSED |
different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content |
2011-09-23 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-89 |
CLOSED |
Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. |
2011-10-05 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-90
caching |
CLOSED |
Interaction of DNT with caching and intermediaries |
2011-10-11 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-91 |
CLOSED |
Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT |
2011-10-12 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-92 |
CLOSED |
If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking? |
2011-10-19 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-93 |
CLOSED |
Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? |
2011-10-19 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-94 |
CLOSED |
Is "Do Not Track" the right name to use? |
2011-10-24 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-95 |
CLOSED |
May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? |
2011-10-31 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-96 |
CLOSED |
The doNotTrack attribute should mirror the value of the header (potentially empty, extensions, etc.) |
2011-10-31 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-98 |
CLOSED |
Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir |
2011-11-01 |
Global Considerations |
0 |
| ISSUE-100 |
CLOSED |
What is a user? |
2011-11-09 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-101 |
CLOSED |
What is a user? add to defns |
2011-11-09 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-102 |
CLOSED |
Short names & titles of specifications |
2011-11-13 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-103 |
CLOSED |
We're not sure where the exceptions should be and ensure they are categorically captured in the base 3rd party prohibition statement. |
2011-11-23 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-104 |
CLOSED |
Could use a better defn of user agent, rather than browser |
2011-11-28 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-105 |
CLOSED |
Response header without request header? |
2011-12-19 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-106 |
CLOSED |
Response header on cacheable objects? |
2011-12-19 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-107 |
CLOSED |
Exact format of the response header? |
2011-12-19 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-108 |
CLOSED |
Should/could the tracking preference expression be extended to other protocols beyond HTTP? |
2011-12-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-109 |
CLOSED |
siteSpecificTrackingExceptions property has fingerprinting risks: is it necessary? |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-110 |
CLOSED |
Is top-level-origin for outgoing requests workable for site-specific tracking exceptions? |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-111 |
CLOSED |
Signaling state/existence of site-specific exceptions |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-112 |
CLOSED |
How are sub-domains handled for site-specific exceptions? |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-113 |
CLOSED |
Should there be a JavaScript API to prompt for a Web-wide exception? |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-114 |
CLOSED |
Guidance or mitigation of fingerprinting risk for user-agent-managed site-specific tracking exceptions |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-115 |
CLOSED |
Should sites be able to manage site-specific tracking exceptions outside of the user-agent-managed system? |
2012-01-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-116 |
CLOSED |
How can we build a JS DOM property which doesn't allow inline JS to receive mixed signals? |
2012-01-11 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-117 |
CLOSED |
Terms: tracking v. cross-site tracking |
2012-01-13 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-118 |
CLOSED |
Should requesting a user-agent-managed site-specific exception be asynchronous? |
2012-01-20 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-119 |
CLOSED |
Specify "not tracking" or "None" |
2012-01-26 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-120 |
CLOSED |
Should the response header be mandatory (MUST) or recommended (SHOULD) |
2012-01-30 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-121 |
CLOSED |
Should DNT header field be sent with an empty field value if user agent supports DNT but the user has not set a preference? |
2012-01-31 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-122 |
CLOSED |
Should we have use limitations on referrer data? |
2012-02-01 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-124 |
CLOSED |
How shall we express responses from a site to a user agent (headers, URIs, ...)? |
2012-02-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-125 |
CLOSED |
Way to test if a given user agent supports DNT |
2012-02-08 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-126 |
CLOSED |
DNT-extension syntax includes characters not safe to embed in JSON |
2012-02-15 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-127 |
CLOSED |
Comparison of well-known URI and response headers: Pro's and Con's of both? |
2012-02-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-128 |
CLOSED |
HTTP error status code to signal that tracking is required? |
2012-03-07 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-129 |
CLOSED |
User-granted Exceptions a) Site-wide Exceptions (mysite, any-third party) |
2012-03-26 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-130 |
CLOSED |
User-granted Exceptions b) Web-wide Exception for Third Parties (thisthirdparty, anywhere) |
2012-03-26 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-132 |
CLOSED |
Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance? |
2012-04-10 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-133 |
CLOSED |
What effect does legal liability or consistent data practices between affiliates have on the definition of breadth of a party? |
2012-04-10 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-136
depends |
CLOSED |
Resolve dependencies of the TPE on the compliance specification |
2012-04-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-137 |
CLOSED |
Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (s) |
2012-04-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
1 |
| ISSUE-138 |
CLOSED |
Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI |
2012-04-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-139 |
CLOSED |
Should we have Web-Wide Exception via a Well-Known URI? |
2012-04-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-140 |
CLOSED |
Do we need site-specific exceptions, i.e., concrete list of permitted thirdparties for a site? |
2012-04-13 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-142 |
CLOSED |
How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks? |
2012-04-25 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-143
Reciprocal Consent |
CLOSED |
Activating a Tracking Preference must require explicit, informed consent from a user |
2012-04-25 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-144 |
CLOSED |
User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests? |
2012-05-02 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-145 |
CLOSED |
Minimal attribute-set for the well-known URI |
2012-05-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-146 |
CLOSED |
Well-known URIs and maintainability for large sites |
2012-05-12 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-149 |
CLOSED |
Compliance section for user agents |
2012-05-30 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-151
Ninja Marnau |
CLOSED |
User Agent Requirement: Be able to handle an exception request |
2012-06-06 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-152 |
CLOSED |
User Agent Compliance: feedback for out-of-band consent |
2012-06-10 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-153 |
CLOSED |
What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them? |
2012-06-20 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
1 |
| ISSUE-154 |
CLOSED |
Are First parties allowed to use data (either offline or online) from third parties |
2012-06-20 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-155 |
CLOSED |
Remove the received member from tracking status |
2012-06-21 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-157 |
CLOSED |
Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like |
2012-07-18 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-158
redirects |
CLOSED |
What is the effect of re-directs for content on the operation of exceptions? |
2012-08-09 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-160
except-query |
CLOSED |
Do we need an API that will tell a host what its current exception status is? |
2012-08-09 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-161 |
CLOSED |
Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance? |
2012-08-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-162 |
CLOSED |
If we have a mechanism for indicating partial compliance, how do we convey to the user why, and what is |
2012-08-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-163 |
CLOSED |
How in the spec should we ensure user agents don't twist a user preference one way or another? |
2012-09-19 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-164 |
CLOSED |
To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking status resource be required |
2012-09-22 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-165
mikeo |
CLOSED |
|
2012-09-24 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-166
mikeo |
CLOSED |
|
2012-09-24 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-167 |
CLOSED |
Multiple site exceptions |
2012-09-24 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-168 |
CLOSED |
What is the correct way for sub-services to signal that they are taking advantage of a transferred exception? |
2012-09-27 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-169 |
CLOSED |
What do we mean by tracking? |
2012-10-03 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-171 |
CLOSED |
How can the exception API be used to grant site-wide exceptions to multiple sites? |
2012-10-03 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-173 |
CLOSED |
The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the normal meaning |
2012-10-03 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-174 |
CLOSED |
How do we create straightforward compliance for implementers retaining data for N weeks or less? |
2012-10-04 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-176 |
CLOSED |
Requirements on intermediaries/isps and header insertion that might affect tracking |
2012-10-04 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-177 |
CLOSED |
Should we specify compliance requirements for software and hardware other than user agents? For example, is a web server package compliant if it tweaks DNT headers? |
2012-10-04 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-178
marketing-permitted |
CLOSED |
Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document |
2012-10-04 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-179 |
CLOSED |
Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT. |
2012-10-04 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
ISSUE-180
advertising-permitted |
CLOSED |
Add "advertising" as a Permitted Use in the Compliance Document |
2012-10-04 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-181 |
CLOSED |
Finalize language regarding multiple first parties |
2012-10-08 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-182 |
CLOSED |
protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party |
2012-10-20 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-185
WebWide Not |
CLOSED |
There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions |
2012-10-28 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-186
Chapell |
CLOSED |
Ensure that browsers communicae DNT functionality accurately |
2012-11-05 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-187 |
CLOSED |
What is the right approach to exception handling? |
2012-11-07 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-190 |
CLOSED |
Sites with multiple first parties |
2013-01-08 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-191
Descriptive DeID |
CLOSED |
Non-normative Discussion of De-Identification |
2013-01-15 |
Compliance Next |
0 |
| ISSUE-192 |
CLOSED |
Should exceptions have expiry date, secure flag or other cookie-like attributes? |
2013-02-13 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-193
Delta |
CLOSED |
Gap analysis on DNT:0 |
2013-03-21 |
Global Considerations |
1 |
| ISSUE-195 |
CLOSED |
Flows and signals for handling "potential" out of band consent |
2013-04-16 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-197
Ninja Marnau |
CLOSED |
How do we notify the user why a Disregard signal is received? |
2013-05-07 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-198 |
CLOSED |
Define new word for yellow state due to the fact that the process of de-identification spans all three states (red,yellow and green). |
2013-05-15 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-204 |
CLOSED |
Definitions of collection / retention and transience / network interaction |
2013-06-25 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-208 |
CLOSED |
Requirements on unknowing collection, retention and use |
2013-06-27 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
ISSUE-213
partial |
CLOSED |
Partial Compliance |
2013-06-30 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-215 |
CLOSED |
data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity |
2013-07-10 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
ISSUE-216
Contracts and Branding |
CLOSED |
Does “Contractual relationships and branding” provide an equal level of privacy controls as “ownership and branding” in the context of DNT? |
2013-10-01 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-217 |
CLOSED |
Terminology for user action, interaction, and network interaction |
2013-10-02 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-224
Clarification of Compliance to User Choice |
CLOSED |
Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) |
2013-10-02 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
ISSUE-225
Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE |
CLOSED |
Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE |
2013-10-02 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-228
Network Interaction |
CLOSED |
Revise the Network Interaction definition |
2013-10-02 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-229
Party Definition |
CLOSED |
Adjustment to Party definition |
2013-10-02 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
ISSUE-231
Permitted Uses |
CLOSED |
General Principles for Permitted Uses |
2013-10-02 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
ISSUE-232
Permitted Uses: Transparency |
CLOSED |
Permitted Uses: Transparency |
2013-10-02 |
Compliance Current |
0 |
| ISSUE-239 |
CLOSED |
Should tracking status representation include an array of links for claiming compliance by reference? |
2013-12-08 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
ISSUE-240
Context |
CLOSED |
Do we need to define context? |
2013-12-18 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-241 |
CLOSED |
Distinguish elements for site-internal use and elements that can be re-used by others (1/3) |
2014-01-08 |
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) |
0 |
| ISSUE-261 |
CLOSED |
requirement on UAs for user-granted exceptions |
2014-07-13 |
TPE Last Call |
0 |