like, okay, consent does literally just mean agree. which is what enables this little rhetorical trick. because there’s all this cultural emphasis on sexual consent, which is just expressed as consent, a lot of phrases whose intended meanings are “rape is bad” can be taken literally to mean “i should get to agree to everything that happens in my vicinity.”
for an example, “i didn’t agree to seeing you wear that shirt” is straightforwardly a fucking insane thing for someone to say, but people regularly make use of this trick to make the (functionally identical) statement “i didn’t consent to seeing that”
Strongly recommend that people familiarize themselves with the white supremacist concept of “right to comfort” because of how scarily that concept aligns with this behavior
THIS is where the logic comes from that drives misogynistic control of what women wear, how fat people exist in public, how disabled people exist in public, miscontrues kink-related fashion as the same as sex itself, and prevents people breastfeeding their children in clean environments.
Its interesting what demographics are effected most negatively by this huh
Whoever wrote that Vanguard message did so with shaking hands, between sobs & swigs of bourbon straight from the bottle.
They’re right, though. Now is exactly the wrong time to make dramatic investment moves. Everybody’s shit is doing the same thing; unless you need your retirement money in the next twelve months or whatever, you’re better off leaving it alone and waiting for the eventual correction. Like, this is not a comforting lie, this is good advice!
Adultier adult here, having had to talk to my retirement management people earlier this week. (I hate it. It’s useless. But I told them to divest me from anything that holds TSLA in the portfolio/fund because Elon is an asshole and the company’s financials are shit.)
This week has caused about three percent (3%) of my 401(k) to vanish.
And that’s okay.
I can’t touch that money without a tax penalty (or emergency) until the 2030’s. It’s not paying for cat food or keeping my electricity on. This is a privilege not everyone enjoys (yet).
If you’re in a position to have any kind of investments, don’t do anything rash and/or bananas with important chunks of money. (My financial guy gave me this advice, too. I specifically asked about cashing out the whole fucking thing.)
Still can’t believe the entire campaign relied on people not googling “Tariff” and spending like a minute to read the definiton. “I’m going to introduce tariffs” as a campaign promise is LITERALLY saying “I’m going make the price of things even higher than they already are, for you (usamerican)”
He literally won by telling people to their faces that he’s going to make inflation worse. Joke country.
hate how the moderate liberal position is “trans people can play sports as long as they don’t ever win”
every single liberal is like “haha you complete fucking idiot! you think trans women are dominating at sports! check this out! *pulls up example of trans women losing at sports* checkmate, conservatives”, up until the exact moment that a trans woman is good, heaven forbid. then suddenly they don’t have an argument anymore and they’re just like “hmm. shit dude. maybe you probably shouldn’t compete actually. your joy and success is really making us feel uncomfortable”
trans women: ugh i’m so tired of being seen as a disgusting worthless sex object
50% of people: aww don’t worry i see you as a desireable sex object <3
other 50% of people: i just combed through your social media account and found out you have expressed sexuality several times before, even as recently as just last week. if you’re not gonna be perfectly chaste and completely repress this emotion that most people have then you can’t expect people not to see you as a sex object. you basically are one anyways
“Fears that Nebraska’s annual spring migration of sandhill cranes could be the avian equivalent of a “superspreader” event have been completely abated, as a record-setting stopover in Nebraska of thousands of birds was enjoyed without any sign of a bird flu outbreak.
Three-quarters of a million cranes migrating north to their spring habitat landed in the Platte River in Nebraska. The number is deemed an underestimation, but you try counting more than 700,000 birds.
Fears that the highly contagious new strain of bird flu H5N1 could carry over to the cranes from livestock have been assuaged as the birds are beginning to move off again without a single dead crane being observed, local news reports.
Aside from the mini celebration of bird flu’s absence, the real celebration—that this year was the largest on-record for the sandhill crane migration—can begin.
The official estimate of 738,000 animals was made during aerial surveys by the Crane Trust, a nonprofit whose raison d’etre is to protect these magnificent birds and this unforgettable spectacle.
ALT
Pictured: Crane migration in Nebraska
These cranes have been visiting an 80-mile-long stretch of the Platte River, braided in some sections, for 9 million years, which these days lies between the towns of Chapman and Overton, Nebraska.
“What makes the central Platte River valley attractive to sandhill cranes is the river that we help manage,” says Matt Urbanski, a spokesman for the Crane Trust, to KSNB’s Madison Smith. “We will make sure that there’s not a ton of vegetation choking the river out. We’ll make sure that it can widen, so the sandhill cranes have six to eight inches of water to sit in during the nighttime.”
The sandhill crane stands between 3 and 4 feet tall, and is easily identifiable for its crown of red feathers and their rattling bugle-like call. It is one of only 2 species of crane that live in North America…
Interestingly, though the cranes have visited this site for eons, they did so even before there was a river there. Additionally, they now spend much of their time feeding on spare corn kernels leftover from nearby harvests, and spend the night standing in the water where they’re safe from predators.
Arrivals and departures are staggered over several weeks, but at peak stopover, it’s one of the great sights of natural America.
“There is nothing else like it in the world,” says Marcos Stoltzfus, director of the Iain Nicolson Audubon Center at Rowe Sanctuary in Gibbon, Nebraska, to News Channel Nebraska.”
One of the many perils of engaging with Internet Discourse is that sometimes you realize after the fact that the person you were responding to is a literal child who has mistaken their first big feeling about a wildly complex adult topic for an informed opinion, at which point you have to just stare wearily into the middle distance like: ah, yes, this is my cosmic punishment for having once also been fourteen and convinced I knew everything.
Like. I’m not saying teens shouldn’t have access to these conversations or that they should be forced to identify themselves by age, because the negatives in both instances profoundly outweigh the positives. But I do think that, regardless of age, we should collectively start reintroducing a cultural respect for the idea that some people know more than you; that having feelings about something is not the same as understanding it; and that, while engaging in debate can be a good way to improve your grasp of a topic, this doesn’t apply if your starting position is a baseline level of hostility towards anything that doesn’t line up with the little you already think you know. There’s no shame in being less knowledgeable about something than others - by definition, everyone starts out with Baby’s First Opinion! - but you do need to understand that it is Baby’s First Opinion. You have to want to learn, and you simply can’t do that if you’ve mistaken knowing that a given issue exists for properly comprehending it.
i guess what i’m saying is that something certain novelists understand that certain philosophers don’t is that relationships with beautiful things are complicated. they’re met with resentment, obsession, and all sorts of things french theory freaks are into. they haunt, torture, torment.
do people know that a french ex-president (nicolas sarkozy, from 2007 to 2012) is currently wearing an electronic bracelet after he was sentenced for corruption and influence peddling? do people know? i want everyone to know 😌
and that bernard squarcini, the head of internal security (DGSI) during sarkozy’s presidency, just got convicted for influence peddling and has to wear an ankle bracelet for at least two years? 😌🙏
and that marine le pen, leader of the far-right party et one of the (ex)favorites for the 2027 presidential elections, has to wear an ankle bracelet for at least two years and is ineligible for five years?? 😌🙌✨️
My American ass watching other presidents face some form of consequence for wrongdoing…
ALT
