Curtis K. Chan
Curtis K. Chan is an ethnographer and qualitative field researcher whose interests focus on how people experience and navigate the tensions of their occupations and professions, within the context of their workplace organizations. He has studied how these experiences shape workplace gender inequality, surveillance dynamics, organizational control, professional reform, and professional legitimacy. Specializing in utilizing in-depth, inductive field studies to theorize novel, hidden processes of worker interpretation and experience, he has conducted studies of airport screeners at the Transportation Security Administration, consultants at a strategy consultancy, university career advisers in business schools, teachers at a Finnish school, and graphic facilitators.
Professor Chan’s scholarly research is published, forthcoming, or conditionally accepted in Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and the Academy of Management Annals. He also has written pieces appearing in the Harvard Business Review, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Work and Occupations, and the Industrial and Labor Relations Review. His research has received distinctions such as the 2014 Best Student Paper Award from the Organization and Management Theory Division of the Academy of Management, the 2016 Saroj Parasuraman Award for Outstanding Publication on Gender and Diversity from the Gender and Diversity in Organizations Division of the Academy of Management, the 2017 Best Article Award from the Academy of Management Annals, and the 2021 ONE-SIM Outreach Award from the Organizations and the Natural Environment and Social Issues in Management Divisions of the Academy of Management. His research has been mentioned in media outlets such as The Atlantic, Axios, and Scientific American, as well as in popular books like Bob Sutton’s The Asshole Survival Guide and podcasts like Adam Grant’s WorkLife.
He has received a “Teaching Star” distinction from the Dean and teaching committee at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management for outstanding teaching, based on having received most favorable evaluations from students, while also challenging them intellectually. He was named one of the Poets&Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Professors Of 2020.
Professor Chan serves on the Editorial Review Boards for Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Review and Organization Science.
He received his Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior and master’s degree in Sociology from Harvard University. Before entering graduate school, Professor Chan worked in the management and strategy consulting industry at the firm Innosight. He earned his bachelor’s degree in social anthropology and a secondary field in psychology from Harvard College, graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. During college, he conducted ethnographic research on the cultural values of street dancers in New England and Miami, and the undergraduate thesis he wrote on this topic was awarded a Thomas T. Hoopes Prize for outstanding thesis research.
Supervisors: Michel Anteby, Leslie Perlow, Christopher Winship, and Frank Dobbin
Professor Chan’s scholarly research is published, forthcoming, or conditionally accepted in Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and the Academy of Management Annals. He also has written pieces appearing in the Harvard Business Review, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Work and Occupations, and the Industrial and Labor Relations Review. His research has received distinctions such as the 2014 Best Student Paper Award from the Organization and Management Theory Division of the Academy of Management, the 2016 Saroj Parasuraman Award for Outstanding Publication on Gender and Diversity from the Gender and Diversity in Organizations Division of the Academy of Management, the 2017 Best Article Award from the Academy of Management Annals, and the 2021 ONE-SIM Outreach Award from the Organizations and the Natural Environment and Social Issues in Management Divisions of the Academy of Management. His research has been mentioned in media outlets such as The Atlantic, Axios, and Scientific American, as well as in popular books like Bob Sutton’s The Asshole Survival Guide and podcasts like Adam Grant’s WorkLife.
He has received a “Teaching Star” distinction from the Dean and teaching committee at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management for outstanding teaching, based on having received most favorable evaluations from students, while also challenging them intellectually. He was named one of the Poets&Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Professors Of 2020.
Professor Chan serves on the Editorial Review Boards for Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Review and Organization Science.
He received his Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior and master’s degree in Sociology from Harvard University. Before entering graduate school, Professor Chan worked in the management and strategy consulting industry at the firm Innosight. He earned his bachelor’s degree in social anthropology and a secondary field in psychology from Harvard College, graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. During college, he conducted ethnographic research on the cultural values of street dancers in New England and Miami, and the undergraduate thesis he wrote on this topic was awarded a Thomas T. Hoopes Prize for outstanding thesis research.
Supervisors: Michel Anteby, Leslie Perlow, Christopher Winship, and Frank Dobbin
less
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Naim Kapucu
University of Central Florida
Bob Jessop
Lancaster University
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Patrick Vonderau
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Geoffrey Kron
University of Victoria
Anna Katharina Mangold
Europa-Universität Flensburg
Mauro Grondona
University of Genova
Mateusz Stępień
Jagiellonian University
InterestsView All (13)
Uploads
Papers by Curtis K. Chan
performing those tasks is undesirable, this allocation has unfavorable implications for that group’s experienced job quality. We articulate the processes by which task segregation can lead to workplace inequality in job quality through an inductive, interview-based case study of airport security screening workers in a unit of the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at a large urban airport. Female workers were disproportionately allocated to the patdown task, the manual screening of travelers for prohibited items. Our findings
suggest that this segregation led to overall poorer job quality outcomes for women. Task segregation overexposed female workers to processes of physical exertion, emotional labor, and relational strain, giving rise to work intensity, emotional exhaustion, and lack of coping resources. Task segregation also
seemed to disproportionately expose female workers to managerial sanctions for taking recuperative time off and a narrowing of their skill set that may have contributed to worse promotion chances, pay, satisfaction, and turnover rates for women. We conclude with a theoretical model of how task segregation can act as a mechanism for generating within-job inequality in job quality.
performing those tasks is undesirable, this allocation has unfavorable implications for that group’s experienced job quality. We articulate the processes by which task segregation can lead to workplace inequality in job quality through an inductive, interview-based case study of airport security screening workers in a unit of the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at a large urban airport. Female workers were disproportionately allocated to the patdown task, the manual screening of travelers for prohibited items. Our findings
suggest that this segregation led to overall poorer job quality outcomes for women. Task segregation overexposed female workers to processes of physical exertion, emotional labor, and relational strain, giving rise to work intensity, emotional exhaustion, and lack of coping resources. Task segregation also
seemed to disproportionately expose female workers to managerial sanctions for taking recuperative time off and a narrowing of their skill set that may have contributed to worse promotion chances, pay, satisfaction, and turnover rates for women. We conclude with a theoretical model of how task segregation can act as a mechanism for generating within-job inequality in job quality.