Papers by Jamie B. Turner
Religions, 2024
In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed w... more In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed within the Islamic tradition. Specifically, I consider two religious epistemological trends within the tradition: Islamic Rationalism and Islamic Traditionalism. In examining the approaches of both trends toward addressing the epistemic problem, I suggest that neither is wholly adequate. Nonetheless, I argue that both approaches offer insights that might be relevant to building a more adequate response. So, I attempt to combine insights from both by drawing a distinction between inferential and noninferential reflective responsibility. Given this distinction, I argue that it may be possible for a theist to remain steadfast in upholding their tradition-specific theistic belief, without having to hold that belief by way of inference; but nevertheless, having to be sufficiently reflectively responsible in forming their theistic belief noninferentially.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Faith and Philosophy, 2024
The problem of religious disagreement between epistemic peers is a potential threat to the episte... more The problem of religious disagreement between epistemic peers is a potential threat to the epistemic justification of one's theistic belief. In this paper, I develop a response to this problem which draws on the central epistemological thesis of skeptical theism concerning our inability to make proper judgements about God's reasons for permitting evil. I suggest that this thesis may extend over to our judgements about God's reasons for self-revealing, and that when it does so, it can enable theists to remain steadfast amid disagreement with epistemic peers who hold a contrary theistic belief (i.e., atheistic belief). For if we're unable to make proper judgements about God's reasons for self-revealing, then for all we know, God has some reason for not revealing Himself to our apparent epistemic peer. Thus, their epistemic credentials needn't provide reason to reduce one's confidence to such a degree as to no longer uphold one's theistic belief.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
1000-Word Philosophy, 2023
An accessible 1000 word introduction to the thesis that belief in God can be reasonable for a per... more An accessible 1000 word introduction to the thesis that belief in God can be reasonable for a person even if they have no good argument for their belief!
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology, 2023
This chapter aims to lay out a map of the diverse epistemological perspectives within the Islamic... more This chapter aims to lay out a map of the diverse epistemological perspectives within the Islamic theological tradition, in the conceptual framework of contemporary analytic philosophy of religion.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Palgrave Macmillan, 2023
In the contemporary philosophy of religion (PoR) in recent decades, there has been much talk of w... more In the contemporary philosophy of religion (PoR) in recent decades, there has been much talk of what has been coined “the epistemology of religious belief.” Like many topics in PoR, Alvin Plantinga often features prominently in the discussion. Much of Plantingian thought seems to have its roots in the intuitions of the “common-sense philosophy” championed by Thomas Reid (d. 1796 CE). However, some of the ideas that come to contemporary expression in Plantingian thought can be seen as having a much longer history outside of exclusively Christian and European circles. It is the aim of this chapter, to suggest that in fact, the essence of these ideas can be found in the theological epistemology of the Damascene Islamic theologian, Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328 CE).
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Routledge, 2023
This chapter aims to draw on the critical threads of those vibrant theological conversations with... more This chapter aims to draw on the critical threads of those vibrant theological conversations within the formative years of Islamic thought in considering the different theological models of the Divine within the broader Islamic tradition under the purview of classical theism as it is understood today in the contemporary philosophy of religion. In doing so, it makes reference to the major strands within the theological (‘ilm al-kalām & atharī scripturalism) and philosophical (falsafa) schools of the Islamic tradition. It aims to consider how these different trends, schools, and thinkers construct a model of God in light of the classical and neo-classical theistic model of God.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2022
This article seeks to outline how a Muslim believer can deflect a defeater for Islamic belief put... more This article seeks to outline how a Muslim believer can deflect a defeater for Islamic belief put forward by Erik Baldwin and Tyler McNabb. In doing so, it aims to reject the suggestion that an Islamic religious epistemology is somehow antithetical to a model of Reformed epistemology (RE) which is not fully compatible with Plantingian. Taken together with previous work on Islam and RE, the article not only aims to provide reason to think that Baldwin and McNabb's proposed epistemic defeater for Islamic belief isn't problematic, it also seeks to show how the concerns raised by Baldwin and McNabb over a Plantingian model of RE in Islamic milieu, are no longer tenable.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Religious Studies, 2021
This article aims to draw on the 'Qur'anic Rationalism' of Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyya (1263-1328 CE... more This article aims to draw on the 'Qur'anic Rationalism' of Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyya (1263-1328 CE) in elucidating an Islamic epistemology of theistic natural signs, in the lens of contemporary philosophy of religion. In articulating what Ibn Taymiyya coins 'God's method of proof through signs (istidlāluhu taʿālā bi'l-āyāt)', it seeks aid in particular from the work of C. Stephen Evans and other contemporary philosophers of religion, in an attempt to understand the relevance and force of this alternative to natural theology within the Islamic tradition. In doing so, it aims to respond to existing criticisms of Ibn Taymiyya's perspective in the literature, and to consider the implications of a Taymiyyan reading of theistic natural signs, on the epistemic function of Qur'anic āyāt as theistic evidence.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Philosophy East and West, 2019
In reference to the philosophical theology of medieval Islamic theologian Ibn Taymiyya, this pape... more In reference to the philosophical theology of medieval Islamic theologian Ibn Taymiyya, this paper outlines a parallel between Taymiyyan thought and Alvin Plantinga’s thesis of ‘Reformed Epistemology’. In critiquing a previous attempt to build an account of ‘Islamic externalism’, the Taymiyyan model offers an account that can be seen as wholly ‘Plantingan’.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book Reviews by Jamie B. Turner
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Jamie B. Turner
Book Reviews by Jamie B. Turner