Berlinschneid
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Wolffsohn.JPG
editThis media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wolffsohn.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Wolffsohn.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:Wolffsohn.JPG
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Wolffsohn.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wolffsohn.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Wolffsohn2011.jpg was uncategorized on 26 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jk kjf158.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jk kjf158.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Sarkana frag den ℑ Vampir 21:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Frage bitte den Picasa-Nutzer (Jürgen Hardt), ob er eine einheitliche Lizenz wählen kann. -- RE rillke questions? 21:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Michael Wolffsohn -64.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Wolffsohn -64.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Michael Wolffsohn -64.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Bus in der Nacht in Berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Filmaufnahmen auf der Swinmünder Brücke 21 03 48 037000.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Berlin Prinzenalle um1915.png
editCopyright status: File:Berlin Prinzenalle um1915.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Berlin Prinzenalle um1915.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 15:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
WikiCon vs. Wikimedia Conference
editHallo Berlinschneid; du hattest ein paar Fotos von der Wikimedia Conference 2017 in Berlin in Category:WikiCon 2017 kategorisiert. Das passt nicht, da es sich um eine andere Konferenz handelt. Die Wikimedia Conference ist ein Treffen der Wikimedia-Organisationen. Das Treffen der deutschsprachigen Community WikiCon hingegen fand 2017 in Leipzig statt ;-) Ich habe die Kategorisierung daher rückgängig gemacht; dies nur zur Erklärung. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Ah okay. Vielen Dank für Deinen geduldigen und ausführlichen Hinweis. Berlinschneid (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Wolfgang Uhrig.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Wolfgang Uhrig.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Uhrig.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 01:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Buckow Oktober 2021 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Karlheinz Kas 2020.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Karlheinz Kas 2020.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Karlheinz Kas 2020.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Berlin in den 70ern
editHallo! Du hattest das file image:Field Excursion Berlin 01.jpg getaggt als Berlin in the 1970s. Jetzt wollte ich mal nachfragen, ob du das entweder aus meiner Datumsangabe 1969-1972 approximiert hast oder ob du irgendwelche genaueren Hinweise auf dem Foto gefunden hast? Falls Zweiteres,könntest du mir den Hinweis mitteilen? Dann würde ich gerne die Datumsangabe korrigieren und das auch auf alle anderen Fotos aus der Serie, die du hier User:FlocciNivis/Field excursion Berlin finden kannst. Viele Grüße FlocciNivis (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ne, leider keine weiteren Hinweise. Ich fand das Foto historisch interessant und wenn es nur unter Bundesautobahn 100 kategorisiert ist, findet es eine historisch interessierte Person nicht ohne weiteres. Wir könnten ja die 60er noch hinzunehmen. --Berlinschneid (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Schade, aber das ergibt Sinn. Ich würde persönlich noch etwas warten. Vielleicht findet ja noch jemand einen Hinweis um das Datum etwas eingrenzen zu können. Ansonsten ist 60s/70s hinzuzufügen vielleicht eine gute Idee. FlocciNivis (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Professor Helger Peters 2022.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Professor Helger Peters 2022.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Berlinschneid, der Urheber muss eine Bestätigung der gewählten freien Lizenz an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS) schicken. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Beschreibung
editHallo Berlinschneid, ich gehe mal davon aus, dass du die Beschreibung deiner beiden Uploads [1] und [2] nicht ernst meinst, sondern dass das ein — allerdings erstaunlicher — "Tippfehler" war. Ich habe es nun jedenfalls korrigiert. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- OMG, das ist natürlich eine krasse Unaufmerksamkeit von mir. Gut, dass es Dir aufgefallen ist!! Danke für die Korrektur! --Berlinschneid (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Block?
editI can find no record of you being blocked on commons Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick answer. This is, what I read, when I try to edit something:
Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, diese Seite bearbeiten:
Deine IP-Adresse wurde automatisch gesperrt, da sie von einem anderen Benutzer genutzt wurde, der von Gbawden gesperrt wurde. Als Grund wurde angegeben:
Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Cordcs". The reason given for Cordcs's block is "Uploading unfree files after warnings".
Beginn der Sperre: 14:32, 12. Feb. 2023 Ablauf der Sperre: 14:32, 13. Feb. 2023 Sperre betrifft: 193.17.232.1 Du kannst Gbawden oder einen der anderen Administratoren kontaktieren, um über die Sperre zu diskutieren.
Du kannst die „E-Mail an diesen Benutzer“-Funktion nutzen, wenn eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse in deinen Benutzerkonto-Einstellungen eingetragen ist und diese Funktion für dich nicht gesperrt wurde.
Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 193.17.232.1, und die Sperr-ID ist 448620. Bitte füge alle Informationen jeder Anfrage hinzu, die du stellst.
Maybe thats helps to solve the problem. --Berlinschneid (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed the block from the IP address that Cordcs last used - this should resolve the issue Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, everything is fine know. --Berlinschneid (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Parisreise 2018 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Heinrich Steiner 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 12:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Jungwikipedianer im U-Bahnhof Karl-Marx-Straße.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Festival of Lights 2020 13 32 05 235000.jpeg
- File:Festival of Lights 2020 13 32 10 729000.jpeg
- File:Festival of Lights 2020 13 32 16 627000.jpeg
- File:Festival of Lights 2020 13 32 25 522000.jpeg
- File:Festival of Lights 2020.jpeg
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Tegeler Brücke, Ersatzbau 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Krippenfiguren von Wolfgang Reuter.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Krippenfiguren von Wolfgang Reuter.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Krippenfiguren von Wolfgang Reuter.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)