Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Biantez!

Fotos para ilustrar artigos

edit

Caso seja do seu interesse, achei um site onde tem várias fotos colocadas sob licença livre, da pra usar na Wikipédia, pra ilustrar os artigos de várias escolas:

Coloquei várias de outras escolas, mas agora deu preguiça de continuar. Se não quiser, desconsidere a mensagem. Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Império Rubro-Negro

edit

Não sei onde o intérprete e a porta-bandeira estão, posso perguntar quando vê-los on-line no facebook. O mestre-sala foi pra Unidos de Bangu. A maioria dos segmentos não foi pra nova escola. Aliás, nem sei se algum foi. Eu não fui. Leandro Rocha (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

De onde você tirou que o samba do Império Rubro-Negro foi encomendado? Não foi. Eu estive na final da disputa de samba, apoiando um concorrente. O samba vencedor foi do Anderson Samara e parceria, bom samba até. Foram 4 sambas pra final, que foi realizada no Arrastão de Cascadura. Leandro Rocha (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Respondi sua última mensagem. Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fotos do Carnaval 2013

edit

Biantez, postei esses artigos:

Vc que conhece melhor os desfiles, saberia conferir se os nomes das escolas estão certos, e os que estiverem errados, ou que estiverem sem nenhum nome de nenhuma escola, você poderia renomear pro nome da escola? Leandro Rocha (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Esses tb:

Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

RE

edit

Quando vc cumprir o prazo mínimo de bloqueio de um ano, solicite o desbloqueio, e aprenda a colocar fontes nas suas edições, assim não o reverterão. Ok!!!--Leon saudanha (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Desbloqueei seu IP, desculpe pelo erro, reverti minha edição justamente por que você avisou... Quanto parar de editar a wiki, o aconselho a esfriar a cabeça, e tentar ser paiente. Aposto que você é jovem e tem a vida inteira pela frente. Se divirta, aproveite a vida real, cante, dance, viage amem deixe a wiki e os prolemas que teve lá de lado. E se ao fim de tudo isso você decidir que ainda quer editar a wiki, tente recomeçar. Após isso, tenho certeza que nunca mais você será bloqueado ou revertido--Leon saudanha (talk) 23:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Re Alexandre Neves 70

edit

Se vc tiver diferenciais que indiquem que se trata de um fantoche do Quintinense, me avise que eu verei o que pode ser feito. Mas acho que não é esse, e sim este aqui. Só não consegui identificar ainda um diff que demonstre a relação. Até falei com o Fabiano, que eu estava achando que esse usuário era o Quintinense ou você, mas agora acho que não é você mesmo não. Quanto ao seu bloqueio, voce^não pode editar, pois está banido, por isso te bloqueei, se continuar com as ofensas, pedirei seu bloqueio aqui também Leon saudanha (talk) 17:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

RE

edit

Olá Biantez, boa noite. Você sabe que está bloqueado na WP, e que não pode contornar o bloqueio. Por isso lhe bloqueio sempre...Leon saudanha (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

RE

edit

Se não foi você que fez, não tem que se preocupar, não é?Leon saudanha (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sirlanz

edit

Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Iniciativa do Arquivo Nacional

edit

Oi! Vi que tem categorizado várias imagens relacionadas ao acervo do Arquivo Nacional. Por que não se une a nosso esforço, na iniciativa? Aqui o link para mais detalhes: [1]. Espero que se interesse. Subimos centenas de arquivos por mês, que certamente precisam de curadoria. Bom trabalho! --Joalpe (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dúvida

edit

Olá Biantez, tudo bem? Uma dúvida: por que está a movimentar categorias de Roraima para Roraima (state)? Sturm (talk) 01:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

[[Category:Aricia Silva]]

edit

Hello, I hope you understand English because from the previous messages on your talk page I assume that you speak Portuguese.

I created [[Category:Barbara Fialho]] which you moved to [[Category:Aricia Silva]] (a totally different person, I don't why you did that). Then you redirected these two categories to [[Category:Female models from Brazil]], probably because the pictures that used to be in the category were removed from Commons.

You've been recently creating elements on Wikidata linked to the Commons category [[Category:Aricia Silva]] which you then delete from the Wikidata element because they have nothing to do with that category. Because [[Category:Aricia Silva]] was originally [[Category:Barbara Fialho]], the category that I had created, everytime you create a new Wikidata element linked to [[Category:Aricia Silva]] I receive a notification. I kindly ask you to please stop using this Commons category to create Wikidata elements so I can stop receiving useless notifications every day, and this category is not related with the Wikidata elements that you create anyway.

Thank you and have a nice day! Mirliz (talk) 11:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ivete_Silveira

edit
 

Category:Ivete_Silveira has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Przelijpdahl (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Associação_Desportiva_Confiança

edit
 

Associação Desportiva Confiança has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Brasilesports (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Agronomy_Engineers

edit
 

Agronomy Engineers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


186.172.4.12 11:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Carnival_Princesses

edit
 

Category:Carnival_Princesses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


 — billinghurst sDrewth 06:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply