Enslin

Question about picture Image:Amphibienfahrzeug D.jpg

What model is this?

Is this a Mercedes-Benz ? If so, please write it in the description for the picture and categorize it :-) G®iffen 15:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

This car is not a Mercedes-Benz:

Amphi-Ranger 2800SR

The Amphi-Ranger was a purpose built amphibious four wheel drive vehicle. A fresh start makes for fewer compromises in the design. The hull is made of sea-water resistant aluminium alloy Water drive is by a propeller which is retracted by an electric motor. The front wheels do the steering in water.

Made in Germany by RMA Maschinen & Armaturenbau Faulhaber & Truttenbach KG, Deutschland.

The last one was built in 1995 and is owned by Alberto Dubini. 66 or 85 depending on who to believe where built. 15 or 19 (left hand drive) where sold to Japan. Some found there way to Australia. --Enslin 07:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Mercedes Benz Museum Photo

Hello Enslin. I'm Torme, a user of the spanish wikipedia. i'm working in the spanish articule about Ben van Berkel and I saw a very good quality photo in the Deutsch articule. Can I use it?. Or if you want to colaborate you can put it in the articule. Gracias.

The image is in the article - OK. --Enslin 20:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Dank Sie Torme

new

Image deletion notification

Image:Schoental-jagst-1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rosenzweig 12:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

is OK, --Enslin 22:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

LKW´s

Hallo Enslin, Du hast die Bilder Image:Mercedes-benz-museum-benz-lastwagen1912-3to.jpg und Image:Kaelble-zugmaschine-stuttgart-2005.jpg gemacht und nun möchte ich Dich bitten, mir Dein Erlaubnis zu geben, die zwei Bilder hier Image:Trucks.gif und Image:Trucks1.gif als GFDL einfügen zu dürfen. Wenn ich richtig verstand ist {cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0} auf commons ungeeignet!? Gruß --Magellan ^@_/" 21:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Ist OK - habe Lizenz auf GFDL reduziert. --Enslin 18:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Danke. --Magellan ^@_/" 13:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Enslin, habe erst heute Nachmittag erfahren, dass CC-BY auf Commons in Ordnung ist. Wenn Du meinst, kannst Du die Bilder wieder auf CC-BY zurückbenennen (kein muss), dann werde ich die nötigen Angaben bei der neu entstandenen .gif Bild einsetzen. --Magellan ^@_/" 18:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Magellan, eine kleine Info am Rande, ein Zurücknehmen einer einmal erteilten GFDL Lizenz geht nicht, also vorher überlegen. Gruß --Martin 18:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Landkreiskats

Hallo Enslin, wenn dir der Zusatz „, Germany“ ebenso missfällt wie mir, gebe ich dir hiermit offiziell die Erlaubnis, ihn wegzulassen ;-). Die Benennung der Landkreise ist hier sowieso nicht einheitlich und demnächst werden alle auf ein Lemma ohne den Zusatz umgestellt.--Borheinsieg 16:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. - --Enslin 17:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Herr Enslin,

können Sie mir bitte mitteilen-falls es Ihnen zufällig geläufig ist- ab wann das Wappen MAISENBACH erstmalig erwähnt wurde ?

leider unbekannt -einfach im Rathaus nachfragen - müsste dort bekannt sein.--Enslin (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Freundliche Grüße Bettina Ivancic

Category:Coats of arms from the Eifelkreis Bitburg-Prüm

Du solltest nur wissen, dass es diese Kategorie existiert :-).--Borheinsieg 17:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Danke - war zu spät ...--Enslin 21:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 20:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Wappenkategorien

Hallo Enslin! Ich hatte vor ein paar Wochen die Category:Former coats of arms from Baden-Württemberg angelegt, um dort die ehemaligen Gemeindewappen einzusortieren. Findest du, dass eine solche Kategorie für die Wappen der ehemaligen Gemeinden sinnvoll ist? Wäre am Besten jetzt zu klären, damit ich nicht umsonst Edits mache. Gruß --Notschrei 13:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• Noch eine Wappen-Kategorie - nein - in den Listen der Wappen der Landkreise wird deutlich unterschieden nach ehemaligen Gemeinden - bei einigen Stadtteilen wurden Wappen beibehalten und sogar neue Wapppen angelegt - siehe Karlsruhe. Gruß --Enslin 18:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • OK, dann schmeiße ich das ganze wieder raus. Der Name wäre nicht so unbedingt ein Problem, es wäre nur darum gegangen, alle nicht amtlich geführten Wappen in eine eigene Kat zu bringen. So, dann versuche ich mal, das ganze per Bot wieder zu entsorgen. gruß--Notschrei 12:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

About Image:Wappen Rommersheim.png

Please, what kind of birds are there in the Coat of arms? (In order to do the classification)

Thank you my friend

--Gustavo 21:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• This are Crows - Common Raven (Corvus corax) - Grettings from Stuttgart --Enslin 08:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Karlsruher Suedtstadt.png

Hi, this file depicts not the coat of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts. It belongs maybe to the Bürger-Gesellschaft Südstadt and I hoped to get the name of the originator and owner in Wikipedia. --Kawana 09:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• I found it here: http://www.karlsruhe.de/stadt/stadtteile/suedstadt/wappen_suedstadt.de - no author - no owner. --Enslin 13:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • you have found it. I see. No further questions. --Kawana 17:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Hirschstangen

Im Rahmen der Umkategorisierung der baden-württembergischen Wappen bin ich immer wieder auf die Hirschstangen gestoßen, für die es aber bis jetzt noch keine eigene Kategorie gibt. Eine englische Übersetzung konnte ich bis jetzt noch nicht ausfindig machen, oder wie würdest du das handhaben? Einfach die deutsche Bezeichnung nehmen? Vielleicht ganz unkompliziert Category:Hirschstange, das "in heraldry" kann man sich ja sparen, da es sowieso ausschließlich eine Wappenfigur ist. Was meinst du? Gruß--Notschrei 10:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

So, ich habe die Category:Hirschstangen jetzt mal angelegt, eine Umkategorisierung auf einen anderen Namen kann man später innerhalb von Sekunden per Bot erledigen. Zumindest besser als am Ende nochmal alle Wappen auf die Hirschstangen durchzugehen :-).--Notschrei 10:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Nochwas: Einige Wappen enthalten Abtsstäbe, die ich bis jetzt auch noch nicht im Kategoriesystem unterbringen konnte. Wüsstest du hier eine passende englische Bezeichnung?--Notschrei 10:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Der de:Krummstab heißt englisch en:Crosier--Enslin 14:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

OK, danke. Abtstab war leider bis vor einer Minute noch kein Redirect auf Krummstab. Die Kategorie gibt es auch schon (Category:Croziers in heraldry). Dann werde ich noch mal die Wappenlisten auf die Abtstäbe durchgehen.--Notschrei 15:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wappen_Zillhausen.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen_Zillhausen.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ritter-sport-emailschild-1950.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Ritter-sport-emailschild-1950.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Benn Newman 02:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Kategorien...

Hi! Jetz wo ich sicher schon deine Beobachtungsliste gesprengt habe, hab ich gedacht ich lass dir mal ein paar Grüße als Entschädigung hier ;) VLG aus Stuttgart --Stefan-Xp 20:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Torpedo-werke-ffm-roedelheim.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Torpedo-werke-ffm-roedelheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Fred J 17:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Altes-schloss-stuttgart-1931.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Altes-schloss-stuttgart-1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rosenzweig 20:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pizza Calzone.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pizza Calzone.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Neukirch im Schwarzwald.png

welches ist die genaue Quelle dieses Bildes? (Link!) Schwarzwälder 06:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Hallo Schwarzwälder,

die Quelle stammt aus deinem Upload in der deutschen Wikipedia - habe Source ergänzt -sorry - Original-Download und Bearbeitung/Common-Upload lagen 2 Wochen auseinander --Enslin 06:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Dann stammt das Bild also wie vermutet nicht von www.furtwangen.de sondern ist mein eigenes Foto, bei dem auch der Urheber weiterhin genanant werden sollte. Bitte korrigiere das. Schwarzwälder 14:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

• Sorry - Quellenangabe wurde am 21.10.2007 ergänzt - Gruß aus Stuttgart --Enslin 14:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Albert-boehringer-senior.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert-boehringer-senior.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 16:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Muehlhofen.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry "PD-Coa-Germany" was added - --Enslin (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)----

Bitte Fundort angeben

Hallo Enslin,

wenn du ein Wappen hochlädst, dann gib doch bitte auch an, woher du die Grafik hast. Und wenn du wie bei File:Wappen Freudenbach.png eine neue bessere Version drüberlädst, dann gib bitte auch da an, wo sie her ist, denn jetzt steht in der Beschreibung, sie sei von http://www.creglingen.de/uebuns/content/uebuns_con04.html, was aber nur für die erste Version zutrifft und deswegen falsch ist. Ein bisschen mehr Sorgfalt wäre sehr wünschenswert. Bitte trag also die noch fehlenden URLs oder sonstigen Quellen für die Wappengrafiken nach. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig δ 16:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

2nd version: http://www.freudenbach.de Modified, transparency added and converted into PNG format by User:Enslin - Gruß - --Enslin (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Danke. Gruß --Rosenzweig δ 21:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Useless rename requests

Enslin, please stop your useless rename requests like this one. Multichill (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Useless media rename requests. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

I stopped the renaming--Enslin (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Enslin!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Wappen Adelsberg (Gmuenden).png is uncategorized since 22 March 2009.
• Image:Kreis-esslingen-altes-wappen.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Logo-region-stuttgart.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Wappen Landkreis Lauf an der Pegnitz.png was uncategorized on 25 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Wappen Landkreis Nuernberger Land.png was uncategorized on 25 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Wappen Roetenberg.png was uncategorized on 17 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Rosenzweig δ 13:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Tuefingen.png // Image:Wappen Tuefingen.svg

Hallo,

• 
• 

ich habe mal ne Version des Tüfinger Wappens erstellt gehabt, jedoch nie eine Vorlage gefunden, diesen Stab genauer abzuzeichnen. Deine Art von Stab habe ich hier noch nie gesehen, jedoch finde ich deine Bildquelle nicht. Auf der Gemeinde-Seite (salem-baden.de ist nur meine Vorlage unter Teilorte zu finden.

Außerdem steht in der heraldischen Beschreibung: "in 9 Plätzen geschacht", ist jedoch in den meisten Abbildungen unten rechts mit 11 Plätzen geschacht, weils wohl besser aussieht.

Welche Version sollen wir verwenden?

Grüße, --David (20:48, 30. Apr. 2009)

Hallo David, ich habe meine Version damals aus zwei vorhandenen Wappen zusammengebastelt. Am Schluss las ich zwar von 9 Feldern unten - aber die Vorgabe zum Vierteln liegt eigentlich etwas oberhalb der Mitte. Deine Version passt besser zur Beschreibung. Ich empfehle aber dünne schwarze Trennlinien zumindest entlang der roten Felder. Die Krummstabausführung ist uneinheitlich - je nach örtlichem Usus. Viele Grüße --Enslin (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Habs mal abgeändert. Ich glaube, wir sind in der Aufteilung der Vierung so frei. Ein Wappen mehr in .svg :)

--David W. (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich einmischen darf: Neumalgeschacht ist festgelegt, da kann und darf kein Feld mehr sein ( siehe Geschacht (Heraldik)). Das Wappen wird als (Vierung (Heraldik)) geviert blasoniert, d.h. 1 und 4 und 2 und 3 Feld sind gleich. Wenn die Wappenbeschreibung nichts Außergewöhliches zum Krummstab sagt, wird er nach gut dünken gemalt.J.R.84.190.247.124 16:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Bambi-karlsruhe.jpg

File:Bambi-karlsruhe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Schiefer Turm St. Moritz - falsches Bild

Hallo, dein Bild "Schiefer Turm St. Moritz" zeigt nicht den schiefen Turm (auf dem Foto ist auch nichts Schiefes zu erkennen *g*), sondern den Turm der evangelischen Dorfkirche. Gruss --81.62.166.162 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Ist korrigiert - --Enslin (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Wappen Seitingen-Oberflacht.png

File:Wappen Seitingen-Oberflacht.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Wappen Seitingen.png

File:Wappen Seitingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oberflacht.png

File:Wappen Oberflacht.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Karte Bürgerausschüsse Esslingen am Neckar, bitte gebe mir einen Rat

Hallo Enslin, kannst du bitte die Karte File:Bürgerausschuss-Bezirke Stadtteile Esslingen am Neckar.svg anschauen. Nach den Beschreibungen habe ich gedacht, dass ich es selbst hinbekomme, dass die einzelnen Bürgerausschuss-Bezirke mit offizieller Bezeichnung angezeigt werden. Aber die Notizen, die ich einfügte werden in Wikipedia (Artikel:Esslingen am Neckar; Bereich: Bürgerausschüsse) nicht angezeigt. Bitte gebe mir einen Tipp. Vielen Dank --Zwiegel (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Wappen-Gaertringen.svg

Hier ist dir der in COM:SVG#External_files bzw. COM:SVG#Frequently_asked_questions beschriebene Fehler unterlaufen, die SVG verweist auf eine Datei file:///C:/Users/K[...]/Pictures/Wappen_Gaertringen.png --Martin H. (talk) 16:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Wappen von Gamerschwang (Teilort der Stadt Ehingen im Alb-Donau-Kreis) - File:Wappen Gamerschwang.png

Hallo Enslin,

wie ich gesehen habe, haben Sie viele Wappen von selbständigen und ehemalig selbständigen Gemeinden im Alb-Donau-Kreis bearbeitet bzw. hochgeladen. Nach langer Suche habe ich jetzt endlich auf einer Angebotsseite von eBay.ch das Wappen von Gamerschwang in alter Form (Rassler Freiherr von Gamerschwang) gefunden. Das reine Wappen (ohne äußerliche Ausschmückungen) mit den 4 einzelnen Wappenschilden und dem mittigen kleinen Wappenschild (L) war bis zur Gemeindereform im Jahr 1973 und auch noch danach in Gebrauch. Ich habe dieses Wappen als Vorlage einfach mal unter dem folgenden Namen bei Wikipedia Commons (inkl. Kategorisierung) hochgeladen:

.

Legende zur Farbeinteilung:

schwarz gepunktet = gelb

senkrecht gestrichelt = rot

diagonal gestrichelt (Feld rechts oben und Feld links unten) = grün

schwarz gerastert (Feld links oben und Feld rechts unten) = schwarz

ohne Schraffierung = weiß

Leider bin ich der professionellen Bearbeitung dieses Wappen nicht mächtig und gebe die Bearbeitung falls Zeit und Lust vorhanden an Sie ab.

Viele Grüße.

--Heini Woldschläger (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Neresheimer Deckenfresko

Hallo Klaus, ich hoffe, du bist hier erreichbar. Du hast schon vor einiger Zeit die Datei File:Neresheim-fresko2.jpg des Neresheimer Deckenfreskos hochgeladen. Ich habe (schon vor einiger Zeit) am Artikel über die Gründergestalt dieses Klosters geschrieben, den heiligen de:Ernst von Neresheim. Ein passendes Bild fehlt allerdings noch. Auf dem Artikel fand ich die Information vor: In der Klosterkirche Neresheim stellt Martin Knoller ihn auf dem Deckenfresko mit Haspel und Winde dar. Leider ist dein Upload nicht hochauflösend, so dass ich das nicht verifizieren konnte. Könntest du eventuell die Datei - falls vorhanden - in größerer Auflösung hochladen oder einen entsprechenden Ausschnitt hochladen? Vielen Dank! --Saint-Louis (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Saint-Louis, habe das Bild in maximaler Auflösung getauscht. Wo soll da Ernst von Neresheim sein?--Enslin (talk) 07:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Ich konnte den Abt auch nicht entdecken. Vermutlich ist er auf einem anderen Fresko zu finden. Die Kirche scheint ja mehrere davon zu haben. --Saint-Louis (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg

File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 12:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Enslin, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen_villingen.png

File:Wappen_villingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Der Buckesfelder (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maxtrab (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.27.28.250 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Schmaehingen.png

File:Wappen Schmaehingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Riespower (talk) 09:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Wappen Ruit

Hallo Enslin, das Wappen ist nicht ganz richtig: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_Ruit_auf_den_Fildern.png

eine bessere Datei liegt unter http://www.nabu-ostfildern.de/NABU-Ostfildern-Dateien/Wappen~Ruit.jpg Kannst du das ändern? --91.44.226.150 11:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke, wurde erledigt -neue Version ist online. --Enslin (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

danke dir --91.44.226.150 13:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wappen Roetenberg.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wappen Roetenberg.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Seelen

Die von Grün sollen ja die besten sein.--Symposiarch (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen Mettenheim.png

File:Wappen Mettenheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fränsmer (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Enslin,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File:Karl-lautenschlager-1932.jpg

File:Karl-lautenschlager-1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Welterod.png

File:Wappen Welterod.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juergenk59 (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Niederstotzingen-1900.jpg

File:Niederstotzingen-1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Niederstotzinger (talk) 12:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Wappen

Moin! Anstatt eine Datei zweimal hochzuladen und dann eine zum Loeschen vorzuschlagen bitte Commons:Dateien verschieben benutzen! Alle Dateiverwendungen werden automatisch mit dem neuen Dateinamen versehen. Dann muss man nix zu Fuss machen! Gruss nach Stuttgart. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Enslin,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Wollmerath.gif

File:Wollmerath.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oberschwoerstadt.png

File:Wappen Oberschwoerstadt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion 01:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Wappen Russheim.png

File:Wappen Russheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wappen Leopoldshafen.png

File:Wappen Leopoldshafen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fúlvio^diz!-fiz! 21:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Wappen Frohnhausen (Dillenburg).png

File:Wappen Frohnhausen (Dillenburg).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    21:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Attenweiler Wappen.png

File:Attenweiler Wappen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.47 20:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Wappen Sankt Ingbert.gif

File:Wappen Sankt Ingbert.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ZellmerLP (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Koenig-Wilhelm-Viadukt-1896.jpg

File:Koenig-Wilhelm-Viadukt-1896.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 18:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Wappen Eichelsdorf.png

File:Wappen Eichelsdorf.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oliver73L (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Eszet-Schnitte.png

File:Eszet-Schnitte.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Stuttgart-stiftskirche-bernhard von neher-fenster.jpg

File:Stuttgart-stiftskirche-bernhard von neher-fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Martinskirche-Plieningen-Chor.jpg

File:Martinskirche-Plieningen-Chor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Karte s muehlhausen.png

File:Karte s muehlhausen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/Leonel Sohns 11:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Stuttgart-Untertürkheim

Stuttgart-Untertürkheim has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CptViraj (talk) 05:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Wappen Schnelsen.png

File:Wappen Schnelsen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JoeHard (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Chianti (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Werkhausen.png

File:Wappen Werkhausen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Soerth.png

File:Wappen Soerth.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Kraam.png

File:Wappen Kraam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oberbaldingen.png

File:Wappen Oberbaldingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oberachern.png

File:Wappen Oberachern.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

File:DE-ST 15-0-83-565 Wolmirstedt COA.png

File:DE-ST 15-0-83-565 Wolmirstedt COA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Teutschenthalwappen.jpg

File:Teutschenthalwappen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ollemarkeagle (talk) 12:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Datei:Wappen Sooden.png

Danke für das Hochladen einer Abbildung des alten Wappen von Sooden (Bad Sooden-Allendorf). Bitte gib doch an, woher diese Abbildung stammt. Ich habe das Gefühl, dass sie vielleicht dem falschen Ort zugeordnet ist. Das mir bekannte Original sieht etwas anders aus. Vingerhuth (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Quelle war: https://www.heraldry-wiki.com/heraldrywiki/wiki/Allendorf_%28Bad_Sooden-Allendorf%29 --Enslin (talk) 20:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Unter der Quelle liegt das alte Wappen von Allendorf. Ich suche die Quelle für das alte Wappen von Sooden: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_Sooden.png . Grüße --Vingerhuth (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quelle ist in der Datei angegenben: http://images.vector-images.com/133/badsooden_city_coa_n8227.gif

weitere Quelle: https://www.heraldry-wiki.com/heraldrywiki/wiki/Bad_Sooden Enslin (talk) 18:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Beides sind Sekundärquellen und lassen keinen Schluss auf eine Primärquelle zu. Die zweite Quelle ist lediglich ein Bildersammel-Album von Kaffee Hag, also kaum wissenschaftlich verlässlich. Die erste Quelle sagt nichts darüber, von wem die Grafik oder die Vorlage stammt und ist damit auch kein Beleg. Es ist nicht auszuschließen, dass sich ein fehlerhaftes Kaffee-Hag-Sammelbildchen von 1925 in die enzyklopädische Wiki-Welt eingeschlichen hat. Jedenfalls kenne ich die dargestellte Form des Wappens aus den vielen Lokalgeschichtlichen und öffentlichen Darstellungen auf Fahnen und Emblemen aus meinem Leben vor Ort nicht. Ich werde mal versuchen, eine Abbildung des "richtigen" Söder Wappens zu bekommen. Das ist vermutlich nicht ganz easy, weil dieses Wappen nicht mehr "lebt". Die Körperschaft "Sooden an der Werra" existiert ja nicht mehr. Vingerhuth (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Five_rays

Five rays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lobsterthermidor (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mercedes-benz-museum-stuttgart-streben-2006.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Wappen Bergerhausen.png

File:Wappen Bergerhausen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 15:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)