Jorunn

Hello, I'm just curious. I observe you do some recategorization which moves images out of some categories and into other. I'm wondering if there are any concensus on how to do the categorization as you are going to get some huge categories with that scheme and some nearly empty. I moved things around a bit myself but tried to maintain a balanced topic tree.

A single church in a category will make a nearly empty ctegory while moving images out of a municipality and into the county will create a huge category. Mediawiki has a limits on number of items in a category of 1000 items, moving the municipalities into the county sets a limit on the number of images in a municipality of about 50 images. That is very low.

Agtfjott 02:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Opphavsrett

Du skriver på siden din: "Liste over norske målarar/grafikarar/teiknarar som døydde før 31. desember 1934. Bileta deira er i det fri/Public Domain".

Det er nå så. Men jeg ser at du for bildene av Nikolai Astrup skriver at kilden for bildene en bok fra 1994. Disse er da antagelig underlagt egen opphavsrett for selve avfotograferingen og å publisere dem uten samtykke krenker fotografens enerett. (For norsk rett se åndsverkloven § 43a.) Kommentarer? Tskoge 01:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Jeg forholder meg til diverse diskusjoner på no:, f.eks denne:

http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brukerdiskusjon:Mortendreier#Bruk_av_gamle_bilder

Og http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Norway (som ikke er særlig nyttig). Jeg kjenner ingen rettsavgjørelser på at kopiering av todimensjonale kunstverk kan regnes som åndsverk, og dermed komme inn under åndsverkloven i Norge. Jimbo Wales har vært ganske tydelig på at bilder av kunstverk er velkomne på Wikipedia og søsterprosjektene. --Jorunn 01:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Veldig godt arbeid du gjer med å lasta opp kunst på commons! Eg la til Lars Hertervig (1830-1902) i lista di over kunstnarar. Med helsing frå --Gunnernett 11:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Egedius

Mellom dei sagaopplastingane som du har tilskrive Egedius, er det fleire som er av Erik Werenskiold, død 1938. Au-au... --Orland 12:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Eg var overtydd om at den avrunda E'en var en Erik-E. Kan hende eg tar feil... Kva med dei bilete der Olav T. er teikna som Nansen? Som med dette med Jarnskjegge. . Eg trudde det var eit sikkert kjennemerke på Werenskiold!? Hadde vore frigjerande å vere sikker, f.eks. via en verkkatalog av Egedius. --Orland 18:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I alt leverte han 37 tegninger til Snorre; 10 til Olav Tryggvasson, 22 til Olav den Helliges saga og 5 til Magnus den godes saga: Mellom anna Ormen lange, Bondehææren samler seg, Slaget på Lyrskog Hede og Seidmennene. Sier Knut Berg i Norsk biografisk leksikon. Og jeg trekker meg diskrét tilbake, - opp som ei løve og ned som en skinnfell. --Orland 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Du skulle vore forgylla! --Orland 00:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

It is my understanding that we can still upload Werenskiold's images since they are in the public domain in the US, having been published before 1909. I've uploaded Image:Sigrid_and_olaf.jpg. Haukurth 10:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

See here: [1] This falls under "Works published outside the U.S. before July 1, 1909". Of course some of Werenskiold's other works may still be under copyright in the US if they were published after that date but I'm confident we can use his Heimskringla illustrations. I've put two of them to use here: [2] Haukurth 17:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

I award Jorunn the history barnstar for her work on Heimskringla. Haukurth 10:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Stephan Sinding-Kjærlighetspar.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephan Sinding-Kjærlighetspar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — H92 (t · c · no) 14:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

subst:ncd

Husk subst:ncd når du laster opp bilder fra en:wiki, jeg lastet nettopp opp samme Nesnabilde som du lastet opp i går ;-) Finn Rindahl 17:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Albert Edelfelt-Augusti.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert Edelfelt-Augusti.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Harald_Sohlberg_Fra_Akershusvollen,_aften_1926.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Harald_Sohlberg_Fra_Akershusvollen,_aften_1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jorunn 08:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Images put up for deletion

Hi Jorunn, I noticed you put up a whole range of images you uploaded because you say they are not in the PD as you thought - can you add why you think so? (I think the reason is on your talkpage, but my language skills are a bit rusty) Also, your images are all sitting in "Incomplete deletion requests" and will not be processed until the requests are completed, please read Help:Mass deletion request for more info. Kind regards, Deadstar 09:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I am going to add them to a mass deletion request, but it is taking time because my internet connection is slow or lost at times. I've uploade the images, but I have not made them myself. At the time of the uploads they were thought to come under the PD-art licence, but now the infopage about this licence says that this is not the case for images made in Norway, Sweden and Finland where this images where made. --Jorunn 09:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

OK - No big rush, thanks for your help. Deadstar 10:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Jorunn, I notified Kjetil and Chris that this mass deletion request is being prepared, I believe this needs some qualified assesment - it's would be quite dramatic if all these images have to be removed. But I guess the use of this license will be clarified when the deletion request is in place.

If you have a bad connection right now you may not need to tag every image right now before posting the request. The result of the deletion discussion will set precedence for all images with this lisence, and if the result should be keep it's not really necessesary to have tagged all images.Finn Rindahl 10:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

According to Help:Mass deletion request I am to first mark all the images for deletion. These images are not mine, and according to Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Nordic_countries they are copy violations. --Jorunn 10:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I was just told about this, and I'm not sure about the interpretation. It is true that photographic images are protected, faithful reproductions of earlier works can also be seen as production of copies of those works. Throughout the Act, production of copies is defined as being independent of the method used, so a photo of a painting would be a derivative work and thus covered by the original copyright. PD-art covers only faithful reproductions, and such reproductions are always covered by the original copyright. Furthermore, what is protected by §43a is not the photo as a physical object, but the subject of the photo – it can't even be copied as a drawing. This means that as soon as someone takes a photo of a work of art, that work is protected for 50 years (and 15 years pma in Norway). This would be an absurd situation; it would mean that if I made a drawing based on an old painting, a photographer could sue me since he owns the rights to the subject. Cnyborg 17:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Harald_Sohlberg_Fra_Akershusvollen,_aften_1926.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Harald_Sohlberg_Fra_Akershusvollen,_aften_1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jorunn 10:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vincent Stoltenberg Lerche-Oldsaksgranskeren.jpg

Hi, you marked Image:Vincent Stoltenberg Lerche-Oldsaksgranskeren.jpg for deletion but did not give a reason? Is this part of the mass deletion request? At the moment it's not considered for deletion - Kind regards, Deadstar (msg) 09:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Never mind - I answered my own question! As it was listed in the mass request, I've added the template. Kind regards, Deadstar (msg) 09:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi

When dealing with categories here you may find my preferences -> gadgets -> Hotcat useful. Thanks & regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 173f61202e33a3afb24009877de5a986

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#undeletion request

Hi Jorunn, could you please have a look at this page and join the discussion? TIA - EdvardIsle (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

License

Hi, I would like to ask you if you can release this image also under CC-by-sa 3.0 license or similar: File:Knoppar på Raud Torstein, bløming seint i mai 2005 i Oslo..jpg. I would like to use it in PEXESO, but with GFDL only it is not possible. Thx.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I added CC-SA, is that ok? No attribution is required by me. --Jorunn (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I added CC-by-sa 3.0 too, but I requier no attribution. --Jorunn (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Well if you dont want attribution, probably cc-by-sa 3.0 should be removed, as by means attribution. I will have a look on the licenses to tell you the truth later. Now I have so much work. Sorry.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_Jorunn_(uploaders_request)

I later found the posting on Administrators Noticboard, if you agree and someone gives me the info that it is indeed legaly correct we should undelete them. --Martin H. (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm very done with this. I don't know why you would need my consent. If it is correct then it is correct, and if it isn't it isn't, and you should act accordingly. But I think you will find that many of the images has no source information, and I can't give it now, because I do not remember from which publications the images were taken.

A file I remember thoug is (I can give you the image nage because the files were copied to en.wikipedia, and I found it again there). That was taken from the website of a Norwegian auction house. The painting was photographed with a three dementional frame on it (if a coin is three dementional then a frame is too, I guess?). I did a bad crop of the photo, so most of the frame isn't visible in the uploaded image, but the source image was of a 3D object the way I see it now. --Jorunn (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Youre right. My intention was to recreate the images after the policy changed, also the images are now on Wikipedia and they will come back sooner or later, so it might be the better idea to recreate them instead of transfering them with all the mess of transwiki trivia, bad categories, wrong licenses, some user only copy&pasting the 800px thumbnails, etc. I withdraw my request because noone responded and im neither able to validate the PD-Art policy on this nor to provide sources for the images without sources. I asked you, because it was a request on your own uploads. Maybe sometime in future you will ask for undeletion of all or some particular files. --Martin H. (talk) 21:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lars_Sponheim_1.jpg

File:Lars_Sponheim_1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

shizhao (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Uploaded from legit flickaccount (the account belongs to the Norwegian political party "Venstre", please disregard this message. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Roskilde kathedraal 22.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Tufted ducks.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jorunn!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

• Image:MS Falksund i Karmsundet.jpg is uncategorized since 17 July 2009.
• Image:Stoltenberg-Ludvig Ludvigsen Daae.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:M Stoltenberg-Jacob Lerche.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:M Stoltenberg K.M. Stoltenberg 1820-årene.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Vinternatt i fjellene III.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Ukjent mann.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Rode.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Torshaug i Vang, utsikt fra annen etasje mot låven.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Sohlberg-vinternatt 1901.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-A H Torshaug.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kielland-Vaskeplass i Bretagne.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:C Krogh-Er det land.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Wilhelm Peters-Fiskerens kone.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Sohlberg-Høstlandskap.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-CP Stoltenberg.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Kopi etter Van Dyck.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Sohlberg-Solgløtt.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:M Stoltenberg-Hans Michelsen.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-N, L & C Forseth.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-PP Flor.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Ukjent kvinne.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Tynset.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Ukjent prest.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Sohlberg-selvportrett.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Sohlberg-Fiskerens stue.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Gerhard Gunerus Bergh.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Stoltenberg-Strømsø med den gamle kirke på Tangen.jpg was uncategorized on 2 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Lisens- og opphavsperson-mal

Hei Jorunn :-) Fint at du finn bilde Wikipedia kan ha nytte av blant bilda eg lastar opp til Lokalhistoriewiki.no. Ein liten detalj: Om du beheld malen {{Olve Utne}} i lisensfeltet, så vil bilda automatisk bli kategoriserte etter opphavspersonen òg. Da blir det mindre arbeid på deg og lettare å finne fram for meg og andre... :-) Olve Utne (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

File:A_view_of_Lillehammer.jpg

File:A_view_of_Lillehammer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tokle (talk) 08:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Jakobsbakken 3.jpg

Hello Jorunn, please tell me the names of the three mountains from left on that picture. Thanks -- Haubi (talk)

File:Hertig Karl skymfande Klaus Flemings lik, målning av Albert Edelfelt från 1878.jpg

File:Hertig Karl skymfande Klaus Flemings lik, målning av Albert Edelfelt från 1878.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jacob Mathias Calmeyer-Fra Sunhordland.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jacob Mathias Calmeyer-Fra Sunhordland.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jacob Mathias Calmeyer-Fra Sunhordland.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:20, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nynorsksalmebok.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nynorsksalmebok.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:N Bergslien-Byttet vises frem.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:N Bergslien-Byttet vises frem.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:N Bergslien-Byttet vises frem.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:N Bergslien-Etter slaget på Stiklestad.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:N Bergslien-Etter slaget på Stiklestad.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:N Bergslien-Etter slaget på Stiklestad.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:N Bergslien-I skogen skjer det ting.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:N Bergslien-I skogen skjer det ting.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:N Bergslien-I skogen skjer det ting.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Olav den helliges saga - Svein jarl og mennene hans - G. Munthe.jpg

Hei, vet du om det bildet er tegnet av Munthe eller Krohg? hilsen --Sjokolade (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Roskilde kathedraal 3.jpg

File:Roskilde kathedraal 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Oppdal Wikipedia image.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Oppdal Wikipedia image.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Atommodell.GIF

File:Atommodell.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFX^talk 23:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lohengrin.jpg

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)