Peng

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Peng!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Lindenbaum Eschersheim

In Angaben über Naturdenkmale im "Amtsblatt der Preussischen Regierung zu Wiesbaden, vom 6. März 1937" ist zu lesen, daß besagte Linde die laufende Nummer "11" hat. Als Lagebezeichnung ist zu lesen: 50m nördl.v. Haus Nr. 4 d. Straße Am Lindenbaum.--Fester-de 13:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:Cities in Germany

Hi Peng, Grüße aus dem schönen Westfalen. Unter der Kategorie [Category:Cities in Germany|Cities in Germany] gibt es die jeweiligen Orte als Unterkategorien. Wenn du Bilder zum Thema "Münster in Westfalen" suchst, dann findest du unter "Cities in Germany" eine Unterkategorie. Und in dieser Unterkategorie findest du dann alle artikel und nur in kategorien einsortierten Bilder. Oder auch andere zu dem passenden Ort gehörenden Bilder. Es gibt auch einen entsprechenden Hinweis am Kopf der Kategorie.

Some hints for German users:

• Bitte sortiert die Bilder direkt in den entsprechenden [:Category:States of Germany|Bundesländern] und nicht hier in die Hauptkategorie ein.
• Ortskategorien (Städte und Gemeinden) heißen "Ort, Germany" und sollten sich neben dem Bundesland auch hier bzw. in [:Category:Villages in Germany] befinden.
• Artikel zu Orten sollten in die Kategorie des Ortes oder zumindest ins Bundesland einsortiert werden und nicht mehr direkt nach hier, damit auch Bilder ohne Artikel gefunden werden können.

Gruß --skINMATE 20:23, 8. September 2005 (UTC)

Betr.: Städtekategorien in den Commons

Hallo. Habe jetzt schon zum 2. Mal bemerkt, dass du eine Stadtseite in den Commons korrigiert hast. Bitte sage mir doch, was ich da falsch mache, damit ich dir Arbeit ersparen kann. Bisher glaubte ich , dass alle Städte in Cities of Germany auftauchen müssten. Wie soll man sie denn sonst finden ? Lieben Gruß --Peng 11:01, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Unter der "Category:Cities of Germany gibt es folgende Erklärung: Bitte sortiert die Bilder direkt in den entsprechenden Bundesländern und nicht hier in die Hauptkategorie ein.

Ortskategorien (Städte und Gemeinden) heißen "Ort, Germany" und sollten sich neben dem Bundesland auch hier bzw. in Category:Villages in Germany befinden. Artikel zu Orten sollten in die Kategorie des Ortes oder zumindest ins Bundesland einsortiert werden und nicht mehr direkt nach hier, damit auch Bilder ohne Artikel gefunden werden können. Wenn du also einen Artikel für einen Ort schreibst, dann wird dieser Artikel unter der Kategorie "Ort, Germany" eingefügt, und diese (neue) Kategorie fügst du dann als Unterkategorie in Cities of Germany ein. Auf diese Weise findet man Bilder UND Artikel. -- skINMATE 22:22, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Velociraptor image

Regarding your image here Raptor.jpg, would it be possible for you to make a close-up on the feet? I am working on the Wikibooks project Wikijunior Dinosaurs and would really appreciate an image of the Velociraptor claw. Let me know if you can do this. Thanks!--Konstable 00:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure if T-Rex images will be of too much use, the T-Rex page is already full with images. But it wouldn't hurt to have more options for images! You can email them to: kostatus001 (at) ihug (dot) co (dot) nz (replace the (at) and the (dot) with @ and . - I have problems with Spam) And thanks!--Konstable 02:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Kategorien

Hallo Peng,

es wäre schade, wenn Deine Fotos in der Commons nicht zu finden sind, nur weil sie keine Kategorien enthalten. Dadurch entstehen auch viele doppelte Bilder, weil eben andere die vermeintlich fehlenden Motive grad nochmal hochladen. Dabei ist das ganz einfach. Schon beim Hochladen eine bekannte Kategorie in der Summary-Feld mit eingeben, z.B. [[Category:Frankfurt am Main]], oder Du kannst sie nachher per Edit nachtragen. Schau halt mal in der category:Frankfurt am Main nach, da findest Du schon einiges. Damit wird letztlich eine vernetzte Datenbank erzeugt, über deren Stichworte - eben die Kategorien - das Bild als Datensatz von mehreren Seiten erreicht werden kann (vgl. Image:Höchst Kohlenkran Mainkraftwerke.jpg mit drei Kategorien). Mehr Infos findest Du hier: Wikipedia:Kategorien.

Grüße --EvaK 00:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Hallo EvaK ! Glaube mir, ich bemühe mich seit Beginn meiner Hochladerei, geeignete Kategorien zu finden. Ich de4nke, die Frankfurtfotos hätte ich alle einsortiert, wenn auch zu Anfang nur durch Listen in den Artikeln. Da erschien dann unten der Vermerk Folgende Artikel verwenden das Bild etc.. Zum Beispiel tauchte das Museumslädchen in Kultur in Frankfurt am Main auf. Ich schau demnächst noch mal alle durch. Falls du eines zufällig findest, wäre es nett, die Kategorisierung für mich zu erledigen. Ach ich sehe gerade, du tatest es bereits. Mille gracie und Danke und bis bald. Gruß --Peng 10:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Peng, zuerst mal habe ich die Bitte an Dich, daß Du begonnene Diskussion auf der Ursprungsseite fortzuführst, damit sie nicht auseinandergerissen werden. Wer sich an einer Diskusssion beteiligt, schaut üblicherweise dort auch regelmäßig vorbei. Deshalb habe ich Deine Anwort an mich hier her verschoben.
Es gibt ganz nette Tools auf dem Wikimedia-Toolserver, z.B. eine Übersicht über alle Deine Biilder auf der jeweiligen WP incl. der Commons und deren Status: Peng Bilder auf Commons. „Orphan!“ bedeutet, daß das Bild ohne Kategorie ist. Eine weitere Hilfe ist das Tool CatTree, das den ausgwählten Kategoriebaum anzeigt. Da findest Du schon einiges. mit. Versuche es mal. Grüße --EvaK 11:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Ich habe inzwischen gesehen, wo Dein Problem lag und hoffentlich nicht mehr liegt. Du hattest bei einigen Kategorien die Bilder in Form von Galerien direkt eingetragen, vergleichbar einem Artikel. Das ist zwar möglich, wird aber nur in Ausnahmefällen gemacht, z.B. das Stadtwappen in der Kategorie Frankfurt am Main. Üblicherweise ist es soo, daß dem Bild selbst die Kategorien als Verweis mitgegeben werden. Die Wiki-Software sorgt dann für eine automatische Einbindung des Bildes in der jeweiligen Kategorie. --EvaK 14:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Jepp, genau das war es , was ich meinte. Übrigens:Habe gerade den link mit der Bilderübersicht getestet. Fantastisch !! Vielen Dank für diesen Hinweis und deine weitere Arbeit, die du dir gemacht hast. Ich gehe jetzt mal alle MEINE eigenen Fotos durch. Einige , die ich hochlud, stammten ja auch von anderen Wikipedias. Oder aus der deutschen, die ich dann etwas korrigiert hatte. Nochmal lieben Gruß. Und wenn ich mal ne Frage habe....? Dann bist du mein Ansprechpartner. Merci vielmals. Gruß --Peng 09:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Römer

Mir ist klar, dass der Römer ein hessisches Rathaus ist und auch in die Kategorie gehört. Ich habe die neue Kategorie Römer, Frankfurt natürlich auch genau dort eingeordnet. Deswegen ist die Kategorisierung jedes einzelnen Bildes, wo der Römer zu sehen ist nicht mehr nötig und redundant. --T.h. 11:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, die neue Kat. hatte ich übersehen. Danke für die mühsame Arbeit. Gruß. --Peng 12:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

File:Dampfross1.jpg

File:Dampfross1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Parkafoto

Hello! The main charackter in this film wore this jacket while he was working as milician. I've gathered files, that concern this film, so as well this jacket. I hope, you don't have any opposition. --Lowdown (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Lukaskirche leider 2.jpg

Hallo Peng, du hast bei diesem Foto als Urheber "eigenes Werk" angegeben. Ich weiß zwar was du damit meinst, der Eintrag ist trotzdem falsch und kann bei der Nutzung zu einer ungültigen Attribution führen. Ersetze den Eintrag bitte mit deinem User- oder Realnamen. Falls das Problem bei weiteren deiner Uploads besteht, solltest du das auch dort korrigieren. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Hm, ich hoffe es ist so nun richtig. Danke für den Hinweis. --Peng (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Peng!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Dicke luft in der gruft p.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 25dcfd4ba9d97a214700ca534fbf1ca7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:1.FFC_24.5._015.jpg

File:1.FFC_24.5._015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 16:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:NormanChurchAyotStLawrenceMay04.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NormanChurchAyotStLawrenceMay04.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NormanChurchAyotStLawrenceMay04.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Schwimmflügel 079.jpg

File:Schwimmflügel 079.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Schwimmflügel 063.jpg

File:Schwimmflügel 063.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Peng, ich möchte dich ersuchen, von ideologischen Stereotypen in der Kommunikation mit anderen Benutzern abzusehen, zumal du in beiden Fällen - vermutlich aufgrund sprachlichen Mißverständnisses - völlig daneben lagst. WP:KPA gilt auch hier.
Zur Rechtslage: die in File:Schwimmflügel 063.jpg abgebildeten Personen könnten dich, sofern sie es denn wollten, vor einem deutschen Gericht mit eher guter Erfolgsaussicht wegen Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzung verklagen. Dazu genügt in der deutschen Rechtsprechung nämlich dass die abgebildeten Person(en) für Leute, die diese kennen, auf dem Bild erkennbar sind.[1] Hinzu kommt, dass es nicht dasselbe ist, ob dieses Bild, sogar ohne Augenbalken, in einer Tageszeitung einen Artikel z.B. über Babyschwimmen im örtlichen Schwimmbad, wo es auch aufgenommen wurde, illustriert oder hier quasi als Stockphoto losgelöst vom aktuellen Ereignis bereitgehalten wird. Ob das Bild deshalb nicht doch besser gelöscht werden sollte, musst du letztlich selbst wissen, denn du bzw. die Nachnutzer wären die Beklagten. Ich halte das Bild zwar für "harmlos", aufgrund der Augenbalken aber für kaum verwendbar, da dieser auf den ersten Blick scheinbar irgend etwas "kriminelles" suggeriert. Nächstes mal vielleicht einfach vor- oder nachher um Erlaubnis bitten. --Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 8 Novemb

1. habe ich niemanden persönlich angegriffen.

2. kenne ich sowohl die kids als auch die Betreuer

3. wer Augenbalken bei Kindern mit kriminell verbindet, tut mir leid.

Liebe Grüße. --Peng (talk) 14:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

RE 2. Warum bittest du dann nicht die eine Mutter (sofern sie es ist) um Zustimmung (ohne Balken)? Das starke Recht am eigenen Bild (vor dem wir mit dem personality-Baustein warnen) würde die Abgebildeten ja auch ohne Balken vor mißbräuchlicher Verwendung des Fotos schützen - zumindest im Prinzip. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Im Prinzip würden damit aber auch die Möglichkeiten der Identifizierung steigen. Deswegen besser nicht. ICH weiß es, das genügt mir. Danke. --Peng (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Wolgaauto1.jpg

Hi!

Why do so small resolution of this image? Have you another bigger version of this file? --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry no, I don't. At the time I took the picture, I haven't yet known my camera. Sorry. --Peng (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I've been thinking that is scan... --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Peng passed away

The German community has been informed today that user Peng passed away. A condolence page has been created. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

File:OakeshottXIX-XXII.gif

File:OakeshottXIX-XXII.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chlodwigpoth12.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chlodwigpoth12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pastis1.jpg

And also:

• File:Pernod p 006.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Hawaihemd2.JPG

File:Hawaihemd2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Eye of a Needle.jpg

File:Eye of a Needle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Educational_game

Educational game has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 10:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Diekirch 047.jpg

File:Diekirch 047.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vera ^(talk) 12:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Diekirch 047.jpg

File:Diekirch 047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Fritzboehle11.jpg

File:Fritzboehle11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Artmax (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:BoardGamePatentMagie.png

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bookofmelusine.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bookofmelusine.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

I’m sorry, but Jcb doesn’t want to accept that leaving the source field blank is still better than putting the author name there, which is nonsense. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 22:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Bookofmelusine.jpg

File:Bookofmelusine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 02:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Klickerpeng1.jpg

File:Klickerpeng1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.1.67.194 10:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Scotlandyard2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Prometheus uni-bibliothek FFM.jpg

File:Prometheus uni-bibliothek FFM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Müllerundsohn.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Fuchsen peng1.jpg

File:Fuchsen peng1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)