Thierry Caro

photo philippe claudel

Bonsoir Thierry, est-ce qu'il serait possible d utiliser ta photo de philippe claudel dans un manuel scolaire? Cordialement, Stefanie (einhalb)

Fleur la fête des mères

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonsoir Thierry, comme j'ai été interrogé par Franz Xaver pour identifier la fleur de Image:Flore-bassin-bleu.jpg, je te fais profiter du résultat de ma recherche. Il s'agit très vraisemblablement de la Fleur la fête des mères ou Petite fleur soleil (Thitonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray.). Amicalement. B.navez 16:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bauhinia-monandra-Réunion.jPG

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This image has been nominated for Commons:Quality Images If know of any other images that meet the guidelines please nominate them at Commons:Quality images candidates ... Gnangarra 12:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

The license doesn't appear correct as source is User:Bouba can you clarify the licensing thank you Gnangarra 15:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re:Magazine cover

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ok Thierry, sorry for the distrust. There are some users who upload images with fake licenses, therefore you should explain that on the description page. Regards. Anna 22:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the day

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for submitting Image:2512-Vergès-Fontenoy-Poivre.jpg for picture of the day. Unfortunately, as this image is not already been a featured image or quality image, I have had to remove it. This is a result of community consensus at Commons_talk:Picture_of_the_day/Poll Please submit this image for Quality image or featured image. Thank you. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 20:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:WikipediaBaudrillard20040611.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 18:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Georges Fourcade.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Georges Fourcade.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |EPO| 10:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:William_Henry_Brewer.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:William_Henry_Brewer.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 22:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyright

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please pay attention to copyright and licencing. Image:Jennifer-Hawkins-Roche-Merveilleuse.jpg, for instance, is not in the public domain, but as CC-by-sa, according to the site. If you have obtained a special licencing scheme, you should mention it explicitely. Thank you. Rama 14:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:WikipediaBaudrillard20040611.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:WikipediaBaudrillard20040611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--rtc 16:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bibliothèque-faculté-droit-Moufia.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hippobroma-longiflora-Grand-Brûlé.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Debatehualpen.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Debatehualpen.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 01:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Statue-soldat-Copenhague.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Statue-soldat-Copenhague.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--AFBorchert 05:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Combat-de-phelsumes-sur-un-bananier.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour M. Caro,

Je pense qu'un autre version de l'image, coupé pour montrer seulement le bananier et les phelsumes, peut être un candidat plus bon à FPC. Avez-vous un image en un format RAW ou TIFF pour le couper ? (Si vous ne pouvez pas comprendre ce message, je suis désolé - français n'est pas ma langue maternelle...) Merci. Doodle-doo Ħ 21:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

D'accord. Je ne sais pas beaucoup des informatiques qui peuvent ce faire sans manquer un peu de l'image, mais je sais ils sont sur l'internet... je pense que le GIMP peut faire ça... mais je ne sais pas. Vous pouvez parler à le Graphics Lab et ils peuvent te donner plus d'information. Merci. Doodle-doo Ħ 17:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Statue-Vigeland.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Statue-Vigeland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fingalo 12:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Église-Monterrey.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Église-Monterrey.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil 12:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bauhinia-monandra-Réunion.jPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would like to use this photograph as a Postcard in a series of botanical postcards I am publishing. I will use the CCSA 2.5 License on the photograph. Contact me personally if you have questions cpa@sympatico.ca WayneRay 12:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)WayneRayReply

Image Tagging Image:Bertin-Lalauze.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bertin-Lalauze.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Plaque-entrée-Villas-Récif.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Plaque-entrée-Villas-Récif.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 21:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Images.nypl.org.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Images.nypl.org.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 12:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Be careful before editing. The licence does appear on the page to which I put a link. Thierry Caro 22:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.

I see no mention of Creative Commons or the CC logo anywhere on that page. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

See the section under Detailid - it says "sharealike-attribution". Patstuart 23:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier peut être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright. Si le fichier est listé ainsi en raison de la mise en ligne d'une meilleure version disponible, considérez que bien que le fichier puisse être supprimé, votre travail (que nous apprécions à sa juste valeur) continue d'exister au travers de la nouvelle version.

Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci ! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Patstuart 22:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Planche-Tabernaemontana-persicariaefolia.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Planche-Tabernaemontana-persicariaefolia.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Uw stem

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Beste, U hebt op bovengenoemde kort commentaar gegeven in het Frans. Kunt u daar wat meer uitleg bij geven? Desnoods ook in het Frans, dan schrijf ik rustig verder in het Nederlands, maar toch liever in het Engels, dan kunnen ook de andere stemmers meegenieten. Met dank. Lycaon 22:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merci pour clarifier. Lycaon 23:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Même le ti créole, you should not translate, I spent several months in Mauritius in the late eighties ;-). And please if you feel you have reasons to critic my pictures, do oppose, never hard feelings. Cheers. Lycaon 23:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:VavilovNI.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:VavilovNI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cecil 00:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Olivier_levasseur.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Olivier_levasseur.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 23:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Joseph_Hubert.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph_Hubert.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 15:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nip/Tuck

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Je préfère ce genre de mots sur wikt, c'est plus impersonnel. ;o)

Tu es le bienvenu sur Vikidia quand tu veux. Amitiés. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 18:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

POTY Competition

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rueda-del-Toro-L'Orphelinat.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 00:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Panorama-sur-Cilaos.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ligne-A-Car-Jaune.svg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Couverture-2-magazine-2512.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I've read the note on the image description page, but it has to be documented better than this. OTRS is the standard way for this kind of documentation.

Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Thank you. Dschwen (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Same goes for the other 4 covers. One email will be enough though. The OTRS ticket number will be posted on all five description pages and the status of these images will be cleared up once and for all. Sorry about the hasseling, but we owe it to the users of commons to make sure the content they get here is really free. --Dschwen (talk) 14:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Léon-Geismar-en-uniforme.JPG

Latest comment: 15 years ago11 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Léon-Geismar-en-uniforme.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Tu ne peux pas prétendre être l'auteur d'un fichier (dans la licence) dont tu indiques l'auteur quatre lignes plus haut. Dans tous les cas, merci d'attendre l'autorisation explicite sur OTRS en apposant {{OTRS pending}}.Bapti ✉ 21:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

On est bien d'accord à propos de cette image et des autres qui vont venir ? Il s'agit d'un membre de la famille qui détient des photos dans ses archives familiales et veut les mettre sur Commons. Il ne sait pas comment faire et je préfère les charger pour lui. Je lui avais rédigé un message OTRS à vous envoyez mais il a fait le sien propre, un peu moins académique. Confirme-moi si tout est bon. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

J'avais mis self par erreur, effectivement. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oui, on est bien d'accord, en tant qu'ayant-droit, le membre de la famille peut placer des documents sous licence libre (quand ils ne sont pas déjà tombés dans le domaine public). Mais la permission envoyé sur OTRS doit être claire et précise (fr:Aide:Republication/Courriel Image est spécialement conçue pour cela).

Mais tu n'es nullement habilité à apposer une confirmation OTRS (surtout si celle-ci n'existe pas encore !). Ce genre de fautes lourdes, pardonnable pour un nouveau, est difficile compréhensible venant d'un contributeur chevronné. Une permission OTRS ne peut être apposé que quand la Wikimedia Foundation a une autorisation claire et précise lui permettant d'utiliser un document.

Quant à ton bricolage, {{GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}, il ne fonctionne pas. La syntaxe correcte étant {{self|author=Dominique Hymans (ayant-droit de certaines archives de Léon Geismar)|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}. Mais, encore une fois, pour le moment, la permission n'est pas claire.

Une fois le premier fichier correctement validé, il te sera possible d'apposer toi-même à l'avenir le bandeau de permission OTRS sur les autres fichiers.

Cordialement.--Bapti ✉ 17:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

C'est vrai que la gravité des actes que tu me reproches m'échappe complètement, et que l'expérience que tu me reconnais n'y change rien. Par conséquent, n'hésite pas à me tenir informé de mes erreurs potentielles. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Par contre, il y a comme un problème, de mon point de vue : j'ai reçu un numéro de ticket avant que l'autorisation ne soit obtenue. Or, d'une part, je n'ai pas de compte OTRS, et je ne peux donc pas savoir ce qu'il en est de cette autorisation. D'autre part, la page du fichier réclame un numéro de ticket. Tout est donc réuni pour confondre le novice et l'inciter à ajouter le numéro dans le modèle. C'est dommage. Idéalement, il faudrait que ce soit plus clair. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Je ne vois pas quel est ton problème. Lors de la réponse à un courriel par un volontaire OTRS, l'objet est modifié pour rajouter un numéro de dossier (numéro de ticket). Le modèle Template:PermissionOTRS est apposée lorsqu'une autorisation claire a été reçu sur OTRS. Dans la mesure où tu es incapable de savoir si c'est le cas ou pas, tu n'as pas à apposer ce bandeau.--Bapti ✉ 17:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Je t'assure que ce n'est pas clair malgré tout : on t'envoie un numéro qu'on te demande par ailleurs sur la page du fichier. Tout est fait pour que tu sois tenté de l'y mettre toi-même. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suffirait de lire : "Note to OTRS volunteers: if the email contains sufficient confirmation of the validity of the license, please replace this template with..." :p

Je viens quand même de modifier la mise en forme.--Bapti ✉ 17:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Relèvent du même cas :

Peux-tu confirmer avec le même ticket ? Thierry Caro (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Je ne peux pas valider ces trois images. Le ticket sur OTRS ne fait référence qu'à quatre images déjà validées.

Pour confirmer l'autorisation pour ces trois images, tu peux donc demander à ton contact de renvoyer la même lettre-type (fr:Aide:Republication/Courriel Image) depuis la même adresse (avec l'objet "Re: [Ticket#2008091810017212] Photo Léon Geismar".

Bon courage--Bapti ✉ 10:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Casarea dussumieri

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merci pour tes conseils : je débute sur wikipedia et wikispecies. N'hésite pas à intervenir, j'ignore encore à peu prés tout... Tu as peut-être remarqué que j'ai sur ma galerie des photos avec du texte : j'ai perdu les originaux et celles-ci sont ce qui me reste (base illustrée d'un site internet sur la faune de la Réunion). Je les retouche au fur et à mesure pour effacer les textes... JjArgoud (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suppression d'images

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Thierry : comment supprimer des images une fois qu'elles sont importées sur ma galerie ? En fait, j'ai commencé à retoucher les photos portant des marques numériques (textes) et je voudrais remplacer les anciennes : - Aldabrachelys gigantea.jpg - Asterochelys radiata.jpg - Crocodylus niloticus JJA.jpg - Gehyra mutilata 2.jpg - Hemidactylus frenatus JJA.jpg - Hemiphyllodactylus typus nne.jpg - Leiolopisma telfairi 2.jpg - Phelsuma laticauda JJA.jpg - Phelsuma madag.jpg - Phelsuma lineata.jpg - Phelsuma ornata.jpg Merci ! JjArgoud (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ministère-de-l'Outre-mer.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ile Ronde

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Si j'ai pu aller sur l'Ile Ronde, c'est parce que c'était en 1986 et en voilier, sans demander d'autorisation... J'étais avec 3 amis et nous sommes restés dormir sur l'île, ce qui nous a permis de chasser (photographiquement parlant) de nuit et de trouver une demi-douzaine de Casarea (juvéniles pour la plupart). J'ai des photos du Phelsuma de Guenther, des scinques de Telfair... Nous n'avons pas trouvé trace du Bolyeria (ce que nous espérions secrétement), mais retrouvé un escargot (Tropidophora fimbriata haemostoma) que personne n'avait revu depuis 1960.JjArgoud (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

== Flat Island ==

Bonjour Thierry : merci de ton intérêt pour mes photos. Je ne comprends pas ton ajout de catégorie (+ Category:Flat Island, Rivière du Rempart) pour les scinques de l'Ile Plate : c'est vrai que Flat Island est la traduction d'Ile Plate, mais "Rivière du rempart" ? 80.69.223.112 15:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir Thierry, je suis perplexe : - j'ai importé quelques fichiers (images d'escargots endémiques de la Réunion) qui apparaissent dans mes contributions, sont utilisées (sur le Wikipedia anglais...) mais n'apparaissent pas dans ma galerie ? - je regarde tes modifs de catégorisation, mais ne comprends pas bien la logique : pourquoi ajouter une catégorie "Mare Longue" qui ne renvoie à aucune page existante (projet d'en créer une ?) - quelles contributions puis-je apporter à tes portails Réunion, Maurice, Rodrigues ? - je constate avec regret la divergence des informations sur la page française, anglaise, etc... sur un même sujet... JjArgoud (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merci de tes réponses limpidissimes... Grace à toi, j'avance à grand pas dans ce qui peut paraitre comme un dédale au profane.JjArgoud (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

J'ai créé une page Omphalotropus rubens, mais l'orthographe exacte est Omphalotropis rubens : je n'arrive plus à me retrouver dans les modifications de la photo dans Wikicommons et de la page Wikipedia, et de leurs liens. Peux tu m'aider ? 80.69.223.112 16:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Saint-Jacques-Réunion.JPG

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Saint-Jacques-Réunion.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MusicalM (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Factories_in_Réunion

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous avez annulé un changement de catégorie que j'avais effectué sur cette page, sans donner d'explication. J'avais enlevé Category:Economy of Réunion parce que Category:Factories in Réunion contient des images de bâtiments (et fait d'ailleurs partie de Category:Buildings in Réunion), qui ne sont donc pas représentatives d'une activité économique. De mon point de vue, Category:Economy of Réunion devrait plutôt faire référence à une catégorie comme Category:Industrial activities in Réunion, qui pourrait contenir des images montrant des graphiques ou des illustrations montrant l'aspect économique d'une industrie.

De plus, en comparant avec les catégories similaires pour d'autres département, on voit que c'est plutôt cet aspect qui est retenu (en général, il y a une catégorie consacrée au tourisme). Merci de bien vouloir m'expliquer votre point de vue, afin d'améliorer le classement des catégories de façon constructive.

-Tryphon (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

L'usine est, dans le système capitaliste, le symbole par excellence de l'activité économique. Dans ce contexte, je ne vois pas pourquoi la catégorie regroupant les usines n'irait pas dans celle qui traite de l'économie. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dans ce cas, la catégorie Category:Factories devrait se trouver dans Category:Economy, ce qui n'est pas le cas. Encore une fois, je trouve étrange de placer des bâtiments dans une catégorie aussi abstraite que l'économie.

Ce qui me paraît le plus logique, et qui pourrait constituer un bon compromis, c'est de placer Category:Factories in Réunion dans Category:Industry in Réunion, qui se trouverait elle-même dans Category:Economy of Réunion (comme pour Category:Industry in France). Qu'en pensez-vous? (vous pouvez répondre directement sur cette page) --Tryphon (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

C'est c'est que j'ai fait. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merci beaucoup. --Tryphon (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

OTRS

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

We have received an OTRS ticket (OTRS:2954132) from Air France concerning some images from its museum. It says you are uploading the images, but it is unclear which images are in question. Can you please advise? Stifle (talk) 11:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I had not yet uploaded the pictures when you received the message. Here they are: File:Inauguration-aérogare-Invalides.JPG, File:Yvonne-de-Gaulle-Max-Hymans.JPG and File:Max-Hymans-escale-Vienne.JPG. Can you confirm that everything is OK with them? We've been through a quite complicated scheme to have them on Commons. Thierry Caro (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I believe User:Zureks is dealing with this now.

BTW the tag {{OTRS|pending}} is incorrect, you need {{OTRS pending}}. Stifle (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo-L'Ours-et-la-Prose.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Logo-L'Ours-et-la-Prose.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Albert-Rigoulet-monument-Villamblard.JPG may be deleted

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

The File:Albert-Rigoulet-monument-Villamblard.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 19:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Princesse-Rahaly-Randriantsimandray.JPG may be deleted

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

The File:Princesse-Rahaly-Randriantsimandray.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 19:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Léopold-Mouneyres.JPG may be deleted

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

The File:Léopold-Mouneyres.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 20:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Max Maurey.JPG may be deleted

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Max Maurey.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Max Maurey.JPG") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 00:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Crissy Field beach and Golden Gate Bridge.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi I corrected some errors but I am not sure we are seeing the same ones. Could you please take one more look ?Thanks.--Two+two=4 (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Carte-visite-Max-Maurey.PNG may be deleted

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Carte-visite-Max-Maurey.PNG which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Carte-visite-Max-Maurey.PNG") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 23:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Thierry Caro!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Natasha-Saint-Pier-5-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Natasha-Saint-Pier-2-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Natasha-Saint-Pier-4-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:2512-Gravats-démolition.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Natasha-Saint-Pier-3-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Gilbert-Hoair-1-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:2512-Objets-chantier.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Valérie-Filain-1-2512.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Copyright status: File:Jean-Claude-Legros.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Claude-Legros.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Bapti ✉ 10:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

mérimée

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

En rentrant de ballade je comptais finir de mettre le modèle mérimée aux catégories que j'avais ouvertes avant de partir et je vois que tu es passé entre temps, merci :) Symac (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

dans les classements qui posent problème, tu penses à ce diff ? Sur la base mérimée il est bien indiqué "Classé", non ? Symac (talk) 17:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Patrouilles automatiques

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Salut, je t’ai donné les droits d’Autopatrolled : désormais, tes modifications ne seront plus marquées du disgracieux point d’exclamation rouge (et les patrouilleurs de Special:RecentChanges et Special:NewPages sauront qu’il n’y a pas besoin de vérifier tes contributions en quête de vandalisme ou d’erreur de débutant). Concrètement, cela ne changera rien dans ta manière de contribuer à Commons. Cordialement, Jean-Fred (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Poster-karaté-Tampere-2006.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Poster-karaté-Tampere-2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lymantria (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:129.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Lakatos_2.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lakatos_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Euralille

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Euralille has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

84.62.204.7 19:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ouvrages-Centre-Edgar-Morin.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ouvrages-Centre-Edgar-Morin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

194.57.171.11 14:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merci

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merci pour les petites modification que tu apportes à mes imports. Mirgolth (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Identification église

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Eglise de Bras Panon

Bonjour, Saurais tu identifier cette église de Bras Panon ? Mirgolth (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Elle est apparemment appelée chapelle du Pont de l'Escalier et est située sur le territoire de Salazie, et non de Bras-Panon. Le Pont de l'Escalier est assez fameux dans son genre. Des légendes lui sont associées. Il pourrait sans doute avoir un article sur Wikipédia. Thierry Caro (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

J'en profite pour te demander : toutes les photos de plantes que tu as chargées, as-tu vérifié si elles pouvaient illustrer des articles sans image ? Sinon il faudra que je le fasse pour m'assurer que les pages sur la flore réunionnaise sont illustrées au mieux. En tout cas, tu as fourni du matériau ! Thierry Caro (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Je ne l'ai pas fait de manière méthodique. Je pense d'ailleurs que plusieurs article sont même à créer. Mirgolth (talk) 06:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tonton Bernardo en Avril 2012 (UTC) Bonjour Thierry; Beaucoup de catégories sur Creative_Commons concernant la Réunion ont été nommées 'version française', c.a.d. AVEC accents. je trouve ceci plutôt contreproductive, car la plupart des claviers du monde n'ont pas les accents français, y compris mon ordinateur, achété en France, qui n'a pas le: 'É' (é majuscule), c'est la galère pour attribuer des catégories (ex: [Category:Grand Étang] ), et j'imagine même pas pour ceux, qui n'ont pas de tout des habitudes avec les accents, ex. non-francophones qui n'ont même pas les accents en minuscule sur leur clavier !

Pareil pour en.wikipedia ou d'autres langues ! Mon salut du Tonton

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-2.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.61.238.168 21:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Ouvrages-Centre-Edgar-Morin.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ouvrages-Centre-Edgar-Morin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 13:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Olivier levasseur.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Olivier levasseur.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Olivier levasseur.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dodo-beer.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 14:10, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Laurence-Fischer-et-journaliste.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Laurence-Fischer-et-journaliste.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

P.danseur6.2 (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Carte Réunion libre de droit.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Réunion libre de droit.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Carte Réunion libre de droit.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Liamdavies (talk) 13:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

P.danseur6.2 (talk) 07:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Misuse of images

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! See what Richard Bartz sent me: http://www.zazzle.de/zwei_goldstaub_tagesgeckos_phelsuma_laticauda_karte-137323502835785735 I have started a topic here to see what we can do. Cheers, --Kadellar (talk) 11:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Western

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Western has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jonund (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Featured pictures of Barcelona

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Why did you want to delete the category "Featured pictures of Barcelona" ? --Jordiferrer (talk) 08:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This category is useless if there is only one or two pictures inside. There are thousands of featured pictures out there and we should not create a new category for each place where at least one was taken. Seven featured pictures is a good threshold. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please give me a hint for the rule of seven pictures. I can't find it. You're right if there is only one or two images for a long time. --XRay ^talk 19:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wrong categories

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! You moved two of my pictures File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Lüdinghausen -- 2014 -- 5502.jpg and File:Senden, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal -- 2014 -- 2991.jpg to "Featured pictures of North Rhine-Westphalia". The old categories were Category:Featured pictures of Lüdinghausen and Category:Featured pictures of Senden (Westfalen). I just started these two categories. To protect them from deletion I put an image to these categories. (It was a hint from another admin.) Other images are waiting for a nomination. I created these kind of categories for every city or muncipality in the district of Coesfeld if there is at least one image. (BTW: A better category than "FP of NRW" would be Category:Featured pictures of Kreis Coesfeld.) I just undo your changes and ask for restoring the categories. (At the moment there are broken links in the corresponding categories QI and VI.) I hope that's in your way.--XRay ^talk 13:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

See the previous section. Such categories are useless if almost empty. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Every category is starting with just one image. I'm working for other images in these categories. So hopefully there will be more images in these categories in the future. IMO it's not useful to delete categories. Please give new or small categories a chance. Sometimes it is necessary to start with one image. Hundreds of my images are waiting for upload. It a lot of work to (re-) create all the categories used by these images. --XRay ^talk 19:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just another aspect. Moving images from the small categories to North Rhine-Westphalia cause the lost of images in categories of the "Münsterland" and the "Kreis Coesfeld". IMO this isn't useful. A category with one image is more than a small category. There are other depedencies. --XRay ^talk 19:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

You won't find someone who has created more categories on the French Wikipedia. I know categories. I know how useful they are. And how some are useless. Here we have a typical case. All featured pictures were once in the same category. I created the category tree for cities. But now everyone comes there and finds their small town missing and create the page. It is not bearable. Fill it first, create it after. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

An easy way is to remove the categorization of this small categories in Category:Featured pictures of Germany by city. So the categories can be filled and they can be used in a local environment as I do it. The category to delete directly but is a little hard. Without the categorization in Category:Featured pictures of Germany by city both requirements are fulfilled yet. Do you agree? --XRay ^talk 04:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Uncategorized FPs

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Thierry Caro! How are you? I found two problems: Looking at the FP pages, I noticed that the pictures of plants (Commons:Featured pictures/Plants) and fungi (Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi) are without FP categories. What happened? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

RE: I think maybe you categorize the pictures from Commons:Featured pictures, list. If yes, one suggestion: it's better if you categorize from Commons:Featured pictures/chronological/current month. Here's all recently promoted pictures. ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to categorize some. If you want, categorize them too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Remove redirect

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

How to remove the empty Category:Featured pictures of São Paulo at the Category:Featured pictures of São Paulo (state)? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Featured pictures of Pará

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Featured pictures of Pará has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Featured pictures of Rio Grande do Sul

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Featured pictures of Rio Grande do Sul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-1.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

86.217.73.47 20:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Jennifer-Hawkins-Roche-Merveilleuse.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 22:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:2512

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:2512 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 06:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Moving pix back to Category:Warner Theater (West Chester, Pennsylvania)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that you moved all the photos in the above category to Category:Hotel Warner. The theater is on the National Register of Historic Places. All but one of the photos were taken before the hotel was built and do not show the hotel. The one that was taken after the hotel was built does show the hotel in the background, but focuses on the theater part. Smallbones (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Impression V (Parc).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi , nice upload. i would encourage you to use commons:pattypan, or old uploader Commons:Upload with template:artwork. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:David-Moreau-The-Eye.JPG

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:David-Moreau-The-Eye.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hotels in national parks of the United States

Latest comment: 4 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Why was Category:Lodges in national parks of the United States moved without discussion to Category:Hotels in national parks of the United States and the redirect even removed? There is (to the best of my knowledge) no such thing as a "National Park Hotel" (though of course some sites may refer to them as that for search engine optimization purposes, and there might be a few that have "hotel" in their name because they are historic buildings that predate the park in question). They are "National Park Lodges". - Jmabel ! talk 05:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: This may be created again – as a child category – a bit later, but for the moment I wanted to widen the scope and match the category with the French one. Thierry Caro (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Is there even one hotel in a U.S. National Park that is not part of the lodge system? Admittedly, I've only been to 8 or 10 of the parks, but I've never heard of any.

Why is uniformity with France important here? How does this differ from say, Category:Paradores de Turismo, which I hope we are not also planning to change? - Jmabel ! talk 06:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: Well, you seem to suggest that there is such an institution called 'National Park Lodges' or a 'lodge system' but I have not heard about such things. I do not think a coherent group exists and is recognized as such, but if I'm wrong, a category for that grouping should be independent from the renamed one, just like Category:Historic Hotels of America, which is a label, differs from a potential Category:Historic hotels in the United States, which would be, if one may, a purely Wikimedia-maintained listing category. The deleted category was never about a label, a group or anything that exists outside of here and the existence of such a group, if confirmed, thus does not has anything to say about the renaming of the category, I believe. I think I was the one who established the deleted category. Thierry Caro (talk) 06:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

So maybe what we need is a category that corresponds more closely to en:National Park Service rustic in addition to the more generic Category:Rustic architecture in the United States to which it is currently (and to my thinking dubiously) linked. - Jmabel ! talk 16:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: Yeah. This seems like a good solution, in my opinion. A real Category:National Park Service rustic. It would focus entirely on architecture. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

OK. I got started on that, but I can see that there is way more there than I'm willing to take on in an area that is not basically what I'm currently working on. - Jmabel ! talk 07:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: I can't promise anything but I'll make sure I fill the category whenever I am in a position to. Thierry Caro (talk) 07:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Glad we got to a mutually acceptable approach here. - Jmabel ! talk 16:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: I have started to create state subcategories. Thierry Caro (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Gorge_Powerhouse,_Newhalem,_Washington

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Gorge Powerhouse, Newhalem, Washington has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 04:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Navajo Bridge

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Was there a good reason you renamed the category to divert it away from the name of the Wikipedia article? Famartin (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

To make it closer to both the French article and the NRHP designation. Thierry Caro (talk) 09:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Also, there's actually no English article. The article that exists in English is en:Navajo Bridge and that one is not even linked to a Commons category with the same name, as Category:Navajo Bridges uses the plural form. Thierry Caro (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shops in Mount Rainier National Park

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I see you've made Category:Shops in Mount Rainier National Park a subcat of Category:Buildings in Mount Rainier National Park and put Category:Longmire General Store in Category:Shops in Mount Rainier National Park. I believe there are a couple of other shops in Mount Rainier National Park, but none of the others is a building in its own right. There's a pretty big one at Paradise Inn -- I'm amazed to see we don't have any pictures of it, when Covid-time ends and I can go there, I will take one. (The park is open, but the Inn is not.) There's also one at the Sunrise Day Lodge. Could be another I don't know about.

My point: Category:Shops in Mount Rainier National Park should probably be at the same level as Category:Buildings in Mount Rainier National Park. The Longmire General Store is the only thing that would belong in both, and there are liable at some point to be photos of two other shops in the Park that are not buildings in their own right. - Jmabel ! talk 03:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel: Hello. I have visited the one in the Sunrise Lodge years ago. I wish I could go back! But then when it comes to categories, I have just blindly followed the example of Shops in Washington, a category that eventually finds itself under Buildings in Washington. I agree that this is not optimal and I wouldn't mind someone moving Shops in Mount Rainier National Park to Structures in Mount Rainier National Park. But we also have to understand that this is a breach from most of what is done elsewhere.

My work on Mount Rainier National Park was mostly about creating Mount Rainier National Historic Landmark District on the French Wikipedia. We now have more articles initiated than the English version. If you eventually do go to the park to take pictures, there are places listed on the new French page that still don't have one. They are the Huckleberry Creek Patrol Cabin, the St. Andrews Patrol Cabin and the Sunrise Comfort Station, which is the easiest to reach but should not be confused with the other Sunrise Comfort Station. Thierry Caro (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tell you what: I'll leave it as it is for now, but once we have a photo of either the Paradise or Sunrise shop, I'll change it, because the current hierarchy clearly won't make sense with those.

I was never too thrilled with shops being under "buildings" in our hierarchies globally, anyway, because so many shops aren't whole buildings, and a few are multiple buildings, but I don't see taking on anything that large in the near future. - Jmabel ! talk 16:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sinclair Service Station

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I'm glad you created a commons category for the Sinclair Service Station in Spring Hill, Florida even though only two images are available. I also noticed that you're working on an article for that station on French Wikipedia. However, you should know that other Sinclair Service Stations in other parts of the US are on NRHP, one of which is in Ridgeland, South Carolina. You should move that to a location-specific name. ----DanTD (talk) 15:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@DanTD: Thank you for the suggestion. I am aware of the other stations. The thing is the long-standing policy there is to not disambiguate a title when homonymous articles do not exist yet. So I'm just following that. Thierry Caro (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wilkeson Arch

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

What does the Wilkeson Arch have to do with the National Park Service? I wasn't aware of any connection. Or is this an error? - Jmabel ! talk 14:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello. All my NPS rustic-associated statements are sourced on Wikidata. This one has been documented through this edit. The target document states that the arch's design also embodies the rustic ideals of national park service architecture between the 1910s and 1930s, and mimics other entrance markers at nearby Mount Rainier National Park. Thierry Caro (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seems to me that's quite a stretch. So if someone is influenced by the National Parks' idea of "rustic" their privately built rustic structure just became National Park Service rustic? Wouldn't that make Ellsworth Storey's projects for the State of Washington at Mt. Constitution "National Park Service rustic" as well? I thought much of the point of introducing this category was to separate "National Park Service rustic" from rustic in general. - Jmabel ! talk 23:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mount Constitution Lookout Tower is in Category:National Park Service rustic in Washington (state) because there is a source that says it is NPS Rustic. I'm just following the sources. NPS rustic clearly does not stop at stuff built directly under the supervision of the National Park Service, otherwise I would not have managed to list hundreds of statements under architectural style (P149). If one follows the external documentation, one finds out, among other things, that a lot of buildings that were made following Albert Good's Park and Recreation Structures are nowadays labeled as National Park Service rustic, even if erected in state parks far away from anything operated by the NPS. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

But then if NPS rustic gets a lot of hits, there are still way more — tons and tons — of buildings that I find to be rustic only, as opposed to NPS rustic, in the same sources. So the distinction still exists between the two. And then there are things like Forest Service rustic (Q98964999) that show up from time to time and further cement the idea that not all rustic is NPS rustic. Honestly, so far we're doing very good when it comes to precision. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:FPS00917.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:FPS00917.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FPS00917.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Firehole-ranch-today.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Firehole-ranch-today.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Firehole-ranch-today.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Watkins-creek-ranch-cabin.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Watkins-creek-ranch-cabin.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Watkins-creek-ranch-cabin.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Watkins-creek-ranch-fireplace.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Watkins-creek-ranch-fireplace.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Watkins-creek-ranch-fireplace.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Watkins-creek-ranch.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Watkins-creek-ranch.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Watkins-creek-ranch.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Mosquée-de-Saint-Pierre.JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mosquée-de-Saint-Pierre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

37.164.228.229 14:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pont-du-Bras-de-la-Plaine-1.JPG

And also:

File:Pont-du-Bras-de-la-Plaine-2.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

correct cat naming with artist's name e.g. Portrait of a Knight of Malta

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Thierry Caro, I noticed, that many categories you created do not fulfill the standards on commons for correct cat naming. The name of a category for an artwork should contain the artist's name, to find the files back. You certainly noticed that the majority of categories contain this information, e.g. see the supercat 16th-century oil portraits of men at half length. Another thing with other cases, please consider if it is necessary to create categories for single files or two, because this is hiding the files. It would be very nice if you could repair your categories and consider this by creating new ones Oursana (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-1.JPG

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue-Victoire-Hell-Bourg-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Adamant1 (talk) 08:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

English · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Site olympique de la Place de la Concorde (Paris). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 17:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bateaux_sur_la_plage_à_Étretat

Latest comment: 17 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bateaux sur la plage à Étretat has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Oursana (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic