Commons:License review/Requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests for license reviewer rights

(Translate) (purge this page's cache)

Before requesting, please read Commons:License review and relevant pages such as Flickr files.

To become a reviewer, you need to be familiar with the general licensing policy of Commons and the common practices of reviewing. A reviewer is required to know which Creative Commons licenses are allowed and disallowed on Wikimedia Commons. You should be dedicated to license reviewing every so often and offer your help in the backlogs. You can demonstrate your knowledge by regularly participating in deletion requests or New Files Patrol.

Post your request below and be prepared to respond to questions. The community may voice their opinions or ask a few questions to verify the applicant's knowledge. After a few days, a reviewer or administrator determines whether there are no severe objections to the applicant. If there are not, the user will close the request and add the applicant to the list of reviewers. If permissions are granted, you can add {{User reviewer}} (or one of its variants) to your user page and begin reviewing images.


Click the button to submit your request. Alternatively, copy the code below to the bottom of this page, and only replace "Reason" with the reason you are requesting this user right. Requests will be open for a minimum of two days (48 hours).

=={{subst:REVISIONUSER}}==
{{subst:LRR|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|Reason ~~~~}}

To close a request, please wrap the entire section excluding the section heading with {{Frh}} and {{Frf}}. If the request is successful, please leave this message {{subst:image-reviewerWelcome}}--~~~~ on the applicant's user talk page.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 5 days.

Turkmen

Comments

 Question(s) By Alachuckthebuck Hello Turkmen, thank you for volunteering to become an LR, how would you respond to the following scenarios:

  • User:BIG GYM ENERGY, uploads a complicated logo with a promotional summary, but before it can be tagged, {{VRT pending}} is added to the file page by a VRT member.
  • A photo is uploaded of a model in front of the Eiffel tower at night, with a Facebook post as the source, and the license: "Given to me by the model via DM".
  • A reaction video marked CC-BY-SA on YouTube, with uncited sources.
  • Image from flicker that was moved to commons using upload wizard and tagged as AI generated (on commons, not on flickr)

All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alachuckthebuck hi! :)
  • It can be waited until the response from VRT is received. Also, if the uploader does not respond to the email, the template is replaced after 30 days from the date of installation, and after some time the file is deleted because it does not have sufficient permissions.
  • This person may have their own claim. The permit must be approved by the VRT.
  • You need to see the video's upload date to YouTube. Because the material used can also be protected by copyright. But if there are unreferenced sources, I think it would be best to avoid uploading it.
  • If the file is taken from an album website such as Flickr, it must be uploaded according to the appropriate license there. If it does not match the license there, it should be deleted.
Regards, Turkmen talk 07:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]