User talk:Gidip

Bad named images Image:Bupleurum subovatum2.JPG and Image:Bupleurum subovatum1.JPG

Hello, if you've uploaded an image and it have to be renamed please upload it again with different name, and put {{Bad name|new image name}} to the description page of the old one. Thanks --GeorgHH • talk   15:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Orchids

Hi. Just to tell you that I enjoy your orchid postings. Makes me want to visit Israel someday. Lycaon (talk) 07:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Gidip (talk) 07:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

oops

Sorry, was too fast fixing tour user redirect. :-). Lycaon (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, thanks anyway! :-) Gidip (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Strange edit

Hi Gidip, do you have an explanation for this edit at COM:QIC which caused an entry to be corrupted? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I just came across this report. Apparently a Skype-supporting Firefox extension is causing this strange effect. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Very strange indeed... I have no idea how this happened. I apologise for the corruption. Gidip (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

QI review

I have replied to your query about the QI decision review process Commons_talk:Quality_images#Second_review_for_QIC --Tony Wills (talk) 10:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Gidip (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Gideon,

first of all thank you for this! I`ve allready thought that my identification was not correct and so I have started an ID request just yesterday. There it was suggested that it could be a Melecta luctuosa. I've searched a bit and after looking for it in the www I also would say that it either could be that than my identification. Can you maybe confirm this? Because I would like to rename it with the best name if it is possible. So thanks again and best regards mathias K 04:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mathias. I am not skilled enough to determine it to species level (even to genus). I suggest you contact en:user:JelleD, he's a real expert. And mention the location - it helps for the ID. Gidip (talk) 05:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Gideon, thank's for your fast answer! I will ask en:user:JelleD for further helping. For the location i always add the geo coordinates template. So thank's again, regards mathias K 06:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I've searched but I can't find any en:user:JelleD. Did I've done something wrong or are there any other mistakes? Regards mathias K 06:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, ignore my last post. ;-) I´ve found him. The User & Talk page were just empty... Thanks again and regards mathias K 06:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Meise 060629 (24).JPG

Gideon,

Thank you for the promotion of the above mentioned file.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Avec plaisir! Gidip (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

chêne glands, QIC page, consensual review

Hi Gidip.

I've tried to improve the picture according to your wishes. Do you think it is better now and enough for QI? Thanks in advance for another review! Cheers from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Hipparchia pisidice 1.jpg

Bonjour Gidip In "Hipparchia pisidice 1.jpg"

• If you write Hipparchia pisidice between [[]] you refer to a gallery that does not exist in commons. You can create it is a good idea.
• If you write with the syntax that I change then you refer to the category
• If you want to refer to Wikipedia (en) so you have written Hipparchia pisidice

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

D'accord, merci bien. Gidip (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Reviews in QIC

Hi Gidip,

Thanks for reviews for "my" plants from the Jardin des Plantes in Paris. I'm not sure I understand very well what you mean, I've tried to show the more specific of the specimens I've seen, I'm not a specialist as you can see. I hope my picture could be useful or interesting, whith a reasonably good quality, that's why I submit them in the QIC page. Do you think that the plants you reviewed are not "individualized" enough, or something ? Anyway, thanks for the time you spend.--Jebulon (talk) 17:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Looking at your user page, I don't think I have to explain to you anything about photography (-:

Anyway, the photos I reviewed don't really have a centre of attention, the photo with the leaves is totally flat, and the second one also doesn't have a clear "subject". Try to select parts of the plants that are nicely framed in a rectangle, not a random crop of some part of the plant. You can also read here. Gidip (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Question

Hello Gidip, would you please help me. I do'nt know what is the correct formulation in the commons-gallery Platanthera holmboei. There is a change of deleting and undeleting of the link to Israel in the moment. My question: Where did you photographed your pictures? Is "Ya'ar Odem" a location? Should the link only go to Golan Heights? Thanks for your interest and greetings. Orchi (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

This is all political bullshit. The Golan Heights have been conquered and illegally annexed by Israel. Before the conquest they were in Syria. So Arabs get angry when we write that it is in Israel. So there are edit war between Israelis and Arabs. This is what you see. Don't get too upset about it. Many Israel-related articles and media here suffer the same problem. All the best, Gidip (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC).

I think simply writing "Golan Heights" without mentioning any country can be a good resolution to these problems, like the way the page is now. Gidip (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello Gidip, I thank you for your answer and wise proposal. Hope we, that the world will become something more peacefull by Wikipedia. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:Image guidelines - downsampling

Sorry, my english is too bad. I can read, but I need translators to write. I need 10-20 minutes to understand what you've written in Commons:Village pump and I am not always able to understand.

I am interested in the discussion, but I'm not able to participate. On the other hand, I think that this discussion has already been made in Commons, I only found Commons talk:Image guidelines#Downsampling and colour spaces and Commons talk:Image guidelines#Downsampling, again, but I can't understand all.

Thanks. I have the same problem that you: I propose habitually 15-21 megapixel images and they are reviewed as images with 3 or 4 megapixel. Sorry, to say more I need speak Galician language, spanish or portuguesh. Greetins--Miguel Bugallo 18:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I forgot to say that normaly I love your images.--Miguel Bugallo 18:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the message Miguel! Gidip (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

• Hi Gidip,

I think the discussion you started should have find a better place here, but no problem, I've answered and given my opinion which is the same as yours. Please notice (follow the link provided by me, it is very interesting) that we had the same (almost) discussion regarding the FPC candidates.

Cheers from Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Gidip (talk) 06:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the crop suggestions

Hi Gidip:

Thank you for the crop suggestions. Now I started to re crop and update the images. Please check them and give your valued suggestions. My previous uploads are from flickr and there images are tightly cropped to show maximum subject details even in small sizes.

Thanks, Jee. Jkadavoor (talk) 09:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

With pleasure. Gidip (talk) 09:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

QI, if nominator is not uploader

I see that you commented that if I am not the uploader/creator of the image, I should mention that in each nomination. Can I know why because I do not see that requirement in the guidelines? --Sreejith K (talk) 12:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not a formal rule, but it's good for transparency. If someone other than the creator nominates an image, then the creator himself can promote the image. Formally that's OK, but it's better to be transparent as much as possible. This is my advice, and this is what is usually adhered to in QIC. Gidip (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense. Do you think its a good idea to fake the uploaders signature there? Mentioning a description and the uploaders name + my signature will make the text quite long. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

No. Just add "by Jkavadoor" after the description and before your signature. That's not too long. Gidip (talk) 14:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done - That was a good suggestion. I appreciate your help. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Gidip (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Colletes

Greetings Gidip You could try here [1] for Hymenoptera ids All the best from Ireland Notafly (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Ps Suberb pic

Thanks! I actually collected a few specimens at the site and I will send them to a Colletes specialist (M. Kuhlmann) later this year, so hopefully I'll have the correct ID. Identifying from pictures is problematic... Gidip (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

bombyliidae ID

Greetings Gidip,

Unfortunately I am unable to ID this photo. I'm sure it is a bombyliidae, but I don't have knowledge of the group to identify the genus. Have you tried bugguide?

Regards,Leonardo (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks anyway. I will try bugguide. Do you know of any other Dipteran experts in Commons? Gidip (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not aware of any other experts. Leonardo (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Bombyliidae id

Greetings Gideon Post it and other Diptera here for expert id http://www.diptera.info/news.php Notafly (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I tried to, but I can't register to the site )-: Thanks anyway. Gidip (talk) 20:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Try again.Here- http://www.diptera.info/register.php . The site sometimes has difficulties due to it's size and volume of traffic. It is, however, by far the best Diptera site with many experts. If you fail I can, I hope, post the image on your behalf. Robert aka Notafly (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC) The fly is almost certainly Bombylius sp. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombylius Do you have other images showing the wing pattern?

Unfortunately I don't. I will try again and notify you. Thanks a lot! Gidip (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

מזל טוב!

מזל טוב על התמונה המומלצת הראשונה (?) שלך - תמונה זו. יש לך הרבה תמונות עם פוטנציאל להיות מומלצות - תתחיל להציע אותן :) אם אתה רוצה עצות לגבי אילו - אני יכול לתת לך שמות... Tomer T (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

תודה רבה! אשמח מאד אם תמליץ לי על תמונות ספציפיות. גידי Gidip (talk) 09:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

אוקיי, יש כמה. למשל 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ו- 13. אישית, החביבות עליי הן 1, 2, 8, 11 ו-12. שים לב, שניתן בכל זמן נתון שיהיו 2 מועמדויות פתוחות שאותו משתמש הציע. בברכה, Tomer T (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

תודה רבה Gidip (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anthophora on Asphodelus edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthophora on Asphodelus edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Birthday

.... 32 -> 33; than Happy birthday! :). Greetings. Orchi (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Gidip (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anthophora on Salvia 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthophora on Salvia 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plebejus pylaon nichollae copulation 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plebejus pylaon nichollae copulation 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haetosmia male 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haetosmia male 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For all the beautiful images you've contributed. This bee is one of my favorites here on Commons. INeverCry 20:46, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

• PS. I've added the Autopatroller right to your acct. INeverCry 20:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! Gidip (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

GFDL

There is a discussion at Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Proposal:_Change_to_FP_criteria_for_new_nominations:_disallow_.22GFDL_1.2_only.22_and_.22GFDL_1.2_and_an_NC-only_license.22; please participate. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Picture of the Day interview?

Hi Gidip,

My name is Alice Roberts and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We're starting a new feature on the Foundation blog [2] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/

Given that your "Haetosmia male" photo is scheduled for 24 October 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested! You can reach me on my talkpage or by email at arobertswikimedia.org Thanks, Aroberts (WMF) (talk) 22:26, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Haetosmia male 1.jpg

Absolutely breathtaking picture. The detail is gorgeous. I just wanted to drop by and thank you so much not only for taking it, but for sharing it. :) Bravo! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Gidip (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kirinia roxelana male 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirinia roxelana male 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cigaritis cilissa 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cigaritis cilissa 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sternbergia clusiana 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sternbergia clusiana 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Featured set on POTY

Only for your set? Béria Lima ^msg 00:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

1. I'm a girl, so you should refer to me as "she" :D

2. I'm not ignoring you, I'm waiting you to choose which image to maintain so I can make the changes. Béria Lima ^msg 22:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Apis florea worker 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apis florea worker 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Too much info

[3] Because this is a page for describing a picture briefly, putting too much information in here will cause seriously unbalanced Main page in some Wikipedia. For example, if there's no describe for Potd in Korean, Korean Wikipedia shows English description. (Please check the same picture at ko:위키백과:오늘의 그림.) You can put a detailed information in the File's page, so can you just move that description? Thanks :D --관인생략 (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I don't think that's a problem, and anyway I am not the first one to put a detailed description in POTD. You can raise this issue in the discussion of the guidelines for POTD, so there will be a uniform policy for all pictures. Best wishes, Gidip (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

סוגי צלפים

אהלן,

שיניתי את הקטגוריה ושם של הצלף שצילמתי מצלף קוצני לצלף מצוי. אשמח מאוד אם תאיר את עיניי לגבי ההבדלים ביניהם.

בברכה, --SuperJew (talk) 19:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

שלום. צלף קוצני גדל בחבל הים תיכוני של ישראל, ואילו צלף מצרי גדל בנגב ובמדבר יהודה

ראה גם כאן

וכאן

Gidip (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

תודות. --SuperJew (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Biberratte - Nutria - coypu - Myocastor coypus - ragondin - castor des marais - Mönchbruch - March 23th 2013 - 05.jpg

Hi Gidip, I changed the image according to your recommendations. Maybe you can review again on QI.-- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Biberratte - Nutria - coypu - Myocastor coypus - ragondin - castor des marais - Mönchbruch - March 23th 2013 - 05.jpg

Hi Norbert. You have uploaded beautiful photos here. Unfortunately I'm not too pleased from this specific photo, despite the good composition and detail. It is still noisy even after the manipulations, especially in the tree trunk on the right. I would shrink it a bit further. Gidip (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

זיהוי חרדל

היי,

שינית את הזיהוי של החרדל שצילמתי מחרדל שדה לחרדל לבן. מדוע?

--SuperJew (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

שיניתי עוד הרבה זיהויים. מן הראוי שתבדוק היטב את ההגדרות של התמונות שאתה מעלה. אני לא יכול להסביר לך איך מגדירים כל צמח וחרק. תשתמש במגדיר הצמחים של פיינברון ודנין, אתר צמחיית ישראל ברשת, מגדיר הפרפרים של בנימיני, וכדומה. או שתבקש עזרה ממשתמשים אחרים לפני שאתה מגדיר תמונות. אין טעם שתנסה להגדיר לפי השוואה לתמונות אחרות או לפי ספרות פופולרית. המצב כרגע הוא שאתה מגדיר תמונות לא נכון וכך סתם מטעה אנשים שרוצים להשתמש בתמונות, וחבל.

דבר נוסף - כדאי לבדוק לאיזה אורגניזמים חסרות תמונות ולא להעלות סתם תמונות לא נחוצות עבור אורגניזמים שכבר יש עבורם די והותר תמונות.

Gidip (talk) 13:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

נשמה,

כל מה שיש לי כדי לבדוק הגדרות זה לפי אינטרנט, חברים שהיו איתי בטיול, ותמונות להשוואה. ואני לא הולך להטריח משתמשים על כל תמונה ותמונה שאני מעלה.

אם אתה רוצה לתקן הגדרה, תעשה זאת בצורה מנומסת ונאותה, כשאתה מסביר מדוע אתה חושב שההגדרה שלך נכונה ושלי שגויה בדף השיחה של הערך או שלי ואז אם נסכים נשנה את זה.

איני מטעה אנשים שרוצים להשתמש בתמונות בכוונה, אלא בטעות. שנאמר, שיט הפנס

דבר נוסף, אני צילמתי את התמונות שהייתי בטיולים, ואלה האורגניזמים שראיתי. מאוד מצטער שהם לא תמונות של אורגניזמים שחסרות תמונות, למרות שברוב האלה שהעלתי לא ראיתי הרבה תמונות בקטגוריה. לא נראה כי בישראל יש הרבה אנשים שמעלים תמונות...

--SuperJew (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

אז אם תבדוק באתר "צמחיית ישראל ברשת" תראה שהזיהויים שלך לא נכונים. לאגס סורי יש עלים צרים וארוכים. כלנית לא פורחת בסוף מרץ באזור יהודה. לגבי הפרפרים כבר הסברתי, נימפיות קשה מאד לזהות לרמת המין ואין טעם להתיימר שזה מין מסוים אם זה לא ידוע. אתה מוזמן להסתכל על התמונות שהעליתי כאן ובאתרים אחרים בתקווה שתשתכנע שיש לי קצת ניסיון והזיהויים שלי הם הנכונים.

אני כן ממליץ שתבדוק מראש עם משתמשים אחרים את נכונות הזיהויים שלך, פרחים וחרקים אתה מוזמן לבדוק איתי אם אתה רוצה. אפשר גם ב"הכה את המומחה" בויקיפדיה.

אפשרות נוספת - תעלה את התמונות לקטגוריות כלליות, למשל

Flora of Israel, Insects of Israel

ואחרים כבר ימיינו את זה משם.

בברכה, Gidip (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

אכן הסתכלתי באתר וכמו שזכרתי מהפעם שהסתכלתי כשניגשתי לבדוק את הגדרת הפרח, כלנית אכן פורחת עד אפריל, וכפי שטיילנו במרץ זה סביר שזאת הייתה כלנית.

מה גם הייתי במקום וראיתי את עלי הגביע (שלא נראים בתמונה) והם היו למטה, כמו במשל הידוע של הנסיכות עם התחתונים המופשלים שכל מדריך טיולים יודע לספר.

לגבי האגס, אני רואה את הפואנטה שלך לגבי העלים.

זה גדל בגינה פרטית, אז אין צורך אני מניח להגביל למינים הגדלים בר בישראל.

אולי זהו אגס אירופאי (Pyrus communis)?

לגבי הנימפית, הסתכל נא באתר זה ותראה שרק שני סוגים תפוצתם באיזור יהודה: נימפית ירושלים ונימפית המדבר. תשווה בין התמונות שלהם לבין התמונות שלי ותראה בבירור שהפרפר שצילמתי הוא נימפית ירושלים, שכן נימפית המדבר עם גוף הרבה פחות שעיר, סימנים שונים על הכנפיים וזווית החזקת הכנפיים שונה.

ולא חזרת אליי בקשר לחרדל. אודה לך אם תוכל

בברכה, SuperJew (talk) 18:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

אין לי שמץ של ספק לגבי הנורית/כלנית. גם לפי צורת העלים וגם צורת מרכז הפרח מראים שזו נורית. כלנית לעולם לא פורחת בסוף מרץ בהרי יהודה אלא רק במקומות מאד מעטים כמו הר מירון, החרמון והר הנגב. אם אתה לא סומך עליי כתוב בבקשה בקשת זיהוי באתר "צמחיית ישראל ברשת" או ב"הכה את המומחה" בויקיפדיה ונראה איזה תשובה תקבל.

האגס יכול להיות גם שזיף וכדומה, מעבר למשפחת הורדיים לא ניתן לומר הרבה אם לא ראית פרי. אם ראית שזה אכן אגס אז אגס אירופאי זה הכי סביר. גם העלים יכולים להתאים למין זה.

לגבי הנימפית - שכנעת אותי. דרך אגב גם נימפית הבוצין מעופפת באזור זה.

מיני החרדל נבדלים בצורת הפרי, לחרדל לבן פרי שטוח בצורת פגיון ולחרדל השדה פרי בצורת גליל.

אם תחום העניין העיקרי שלך הוא ביולוגיה כפי שנרמז מהדף שלך ואתה מתעניין בטבע - ממליץ לך לקנות מגדיר צמחים טוב. יש רק אחד - המגדיר של פיינברון ודנין. Gidip (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

הסתכלתי שוב על תמונות של נוריות וכלניות והחלטתי שהצדק איתך ושיניתי בהתאם.

לגבי החרדל, קשה לראות מהתמונה שלי, אבל אני בטוח שהפרי היה בצורת גליל.

תודות, --SuperJew (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

בתמונה שלך רואים בבירור את השערות הלבנות על הפירות (מכאן השם חרדל לבן) וגם את צורת הפגיון. תשווה לתמונות בצמחיית ישראל ברשת. אין כאן ספק. Gidip (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

אתה מתכוון לפירות לאורך הגבעול, ולא בין עלי הכותרת? SuperJew (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

נכון, מה שבין עלי הכותרת עוד לא הספיק להתפתח Gidip (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

הבנתי. תיקנתי. תודה --SuperJew (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anchusa undulata 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anchusa undulata 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

עזרה בזיהוי פרחים בנטף ובבית זית

אשמח לעזרתך

• 
  Flower 1, Nataf
• 
  Flower 2, Nataf
• 
  Flower 3, Nataf
• 
  Plant, Nataf
• 
  Flower 4, Beit Zayit reservoir
• 
  Flower 5, Beit Zayit reservoir
• 
  Flower 6, Beit Zayit area

תודה --SuperJew (talk) 16:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

1 זקן-סב מצוי או זקן-תיש ארוך

2,3,5 ורד ממין לא ידוע, צמח תרבות

ללא מספר - אשחר ארץ-ישראלי ויחידות הפצה של זלזלת הקנוקנות

6 חלמית מצויה או מעוג כרתי - לא ניתן לקבוע מהתמונה. המשפחה היא חלמיתיים

4 תלתן ארגמן וקחוון - לא ניתן לקבוע את המין

אולי בפורום של "צמחיית ישראל ברשת" יצליחו יותר טוב עם 1 ו-6

Gidip (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

1 נראה לי יותר זקן-סב מצוי מבחינת הצבע וסידור העלים

2,3,5 יכול להיות ורד הכלב?

6 נראה לי יותר כמו מעוג, בעיקר בגלל הגבעול. תשווה לדוג' לתמונה זאת:

חלמית מצויה

4 לעיניי נראה כמו קחוון מצוי או חברוני. כיצד מבדילים ביניהם?

--SuperJew (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

קחוונים מזהים לפי צורת הזרעונים שאי אפשר לראות אצלך. כנ"ל ההבדל בין זקן סב לזקן תיש. חלמיתיים מזהים לפי הגביעון של הפרח. עדיף שתציב את השאלות למומחים בצמחיית ישראל ברשת ולא תנסה להגדיר לבד לפי דמיון לתמונות אחרות. הגדרה על פי דמיון בין תמונות היא לא שיטה טובה ומובילה לעתים קרובות לזיהויים שגויים. Gidip (talk) 03:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

הורד בבית זית הוא כנראה ורד הכלב, כי שם צולם גם באתר של דנין. לגבי נטף פחות בטוח. האם הורדים גדלו בשטח טבעי ונראים צמחי בר, או שנשתלו בצידי הדרך וכדומה? ורד הכלב גדל בר באזור הזה אבל לא נפוץ. אם זה צמח שתול זה בוודאי מין אחר שלא מוזכר באתרי אינטרנט המוקדשים לצמחי בר. Gidip (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

הורדים גדלו בשטח בר... זה היה ממש טיול בדרך פראית :) --SuperJew (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

אז ורד הכלב ככל הנראה Gidip (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

האם הבנת מהדיון בפורום מהם הזיהויים הנכונים ל1 ו6? --SuperJew (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

6 הוא מעוג כרתי בגלל השעירות. לגבי 1 כדאי לחכות עוד כמה ימים, אולי עוד יענו. Gidip (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Halictus tetrazonianellus male 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Halictus tetrazonianellus male 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

QI Review

Hi Gidip. I startet shooting insects some weeks ago. Two of my pictures of insects, a bee and a beetle are actually nominated for QI (Jul, 26). As you have a good experience in that field, I would strongly appreciate your review and comments. Could you please have a look at these nominations? Thank you in advance, --Sputniktilt (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You have some nice pictures! Catching bees in flight is no easy thing, usually you need many trials and eventually select only a few. I strongly recommend using a flash, preferably with a disperser. Good luck! Gidip (talk) 23:41, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your review - I see the problem with the flying bee. btw: I made some shots with flash, but first, it creates an unnatural light ambiance (ok, that's a question of taste and experience), and second---and that's the bigger issue--- a flashlight disturb bees. Flashing around in the middle of a dozen hard working bees drives them crazy. Instead of working and flying easy around, they start to fly bizarre paths, what makes it very difficult to get a good picture. But I'll go on ;-) But first, I did some shots more during the last two days, focusing on better (natural) light and composition. Two of them 12 are actually QI candidates (Aug. 1st). It would be cool if you could have a look on them, too. Take care, --Sputniktilt (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your photos are beautifull, why you not add geo coordinates can be interisting --Rippitippi (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliment! Most of my photos have coordinates, at least the newer ones. Gidip (talk) 03:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Onam greetings!

Have a nice Onam tomorrow! JKadavoor Jee 17:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

OnaSadya

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hylaeus rubicola female 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF is shallow, but still OK here. --Tuxyso 21:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hylaeus rubicola female 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF is shallow, but still OK here. --Tuxyso 21:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

FPC closings

Hi Gidip, thanks a lot for your help, but unfortunately you forgot to include recently promoted pictures in FP galleries by topic. It is always helpful to use this manual: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Pictures should be in that galleries, and also in Commons:Featured pictures/chronological/current month (which basically will be needed for POTY). Thanks --A.Savin 06:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I did not forget, there is a limit to how much of the bot's work a person can do on his own voluntarily. What I did took me almost two hours. So each nominator can complete this on his own. The FPC page got seriously overloaded and this couldn't go on much longer. With best wishes, Gidip (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Thymbra spicata

Hi Gidi, I was reading up on za'atar where they mention Thymbra spicata for which there seems to be little information out there, for example even finding out its common name in languages is difficult, turns out in Greek it's called θρούμπι — a name it shares with Satureja thymbra, and in Turkish it shares names with 'normal' thyme, on an Israeli site it's called 'צתרנית משובלת' but I couldn't get a meaningful translation of it through google, 'צתרה' is apparently savory. How common is this spiked thyme in Israel? I found your image of it on the German wiki and I was wondering if you have other images as well, but not close-ups?! Thanks! Fnugh (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I don't think it's very common. As a spice it's considered a poor substitute for Majorana syriaca. I might have other images but these are old photos and I don't know when I'll have time to look for them. Cheers, Gidip (talk) 18:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Gidi, well, if you ever find them or take new ones feel free to share :) Fnugh (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey Gidi, can I ask you a favour to identify some plants I've seen on Street View in Israel? The first is the high grass that's on both sides of the tree here http://goo.gl/maps/NOfnm and the blossoming trees here http://goo.gl/maps/vYKmR. Many thanks! Fnugh (talk)

hi. I think the grass is Pennisetum and the tree is Bougainvillea. Gidip (talk) 11:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Gidi, is the white flowering tree also a Bougainvillea?! Wish you also a Happy New Year and all the best!

It seems so... Happy new year! Gidip (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

"Happy Diwali!"

While Diwali is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Satcitananda (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Diwali and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!" – JKadavoor Jee 06:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I also wish you a very very happy and prosperous diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:05, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Merry Christmas with lots of beautiful photos! Gidip (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agapanthia pustulifera copulation 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agapanthia pustulifera copulation 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Gidip⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Yagur – Nesher, the Green Path – Mount Carmel 125.JPG

הי גדעון, האם אתה יכול לעזור בזיהוי הפרג בתמונה ולשייך את הקובץ לקטגוריה הנכונה? תודה Hanay (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

היי. אני חלש בפרגים. נסי את משתמש אוריה אורן בויקיפדיה העברית. Gidip (talk) 08:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

תודה. Hanay (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gidip,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eucera cinnamomea male 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eucera cinnamomea male 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Allium rothii 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Allium rothii 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Apocynum venetum 1.jpg

Hi Gidip, it seems you're using a new 150mm now instead of your old 85mm. Could you share your experience with the new one? Does it enhanced the quality of works, especially on plant profiles? Jee 03:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I am satisfied with the new lens. The main advantage is in the photography of very small insects like the smaller bee species. It is probably better with butterflies too due to increased DOF, although I haven't photographed many of them lately.

On the other hand, I see little improvement in the bokeh and in the DOF of plant images. I consulted with a plant photographer which I very much respect and he said he uses a 60 mm macro lens, and chooses very high F values (much above 20, you never see that in commons) combined with a ringflash to darken the background. High F values are expected to reduce the sharpness but he said he doesn't have such a problem. I wish I can achieve his quality of plant images.

I'm going to try raising the F values with the 150 mm lens, and see how it affects the sharpness vs. DOF. Gidip (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank for sharing your experience. I too see various styles, including the use of f/16-f/32. But in sites like Treknature and Flickr, we only see a downsampled version; so can't say much about the qualities.

I checked [4] and it seems he is not in the closest subject distance (1-7/8" (48mm) at the closest focus distance (1:1)). We will get better DOF if subject distance is increased even though it affect grabbing fine details.

My observation is that not any macro lens "on its closest working distance" can capture the subject whole sharp. So either we need to increase the subject distance, or we use a normal tele lens. Otherwise we need focus stacking which is not practical for live subjects. That's why I prefer the style of Eric Isley. He uses a 500mm (with a tripod) in most of his works. I prefer the whole in focus views than great details only of the head.

These are some of my concerns as I think to upgrade to a DSLR in future. Thanks again and eager to hear more of your thoughts. Jee 05:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvia rubifolia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 15:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iolaus glaucus 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iolaus glaucus 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iris mariae 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iris mariae 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thrincohalictus prognathus male 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thrincohalictus prognathus male 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Megachile incerta male 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Megachile incerta male 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

הסרת קטגוריה

היי גידי,

לא הבנתי למה הסרת את הקטגוריה "Removing from Category:Flora of Israel" מתמונות שצולמו בישראל. כמו זו או כמו זו או זו. -- Geagea (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

שלום. הפלורה של ארץ מסוימת הם אותם צמחים שגדלים ומתרבים בה באופן טבעי ולא מה ששותלים בגינה. בגינה אפשר לשתול כל דבר מכל מקום בעולם. אתה יכול במקום זאת להשתמש בקטגוריות

Gardens in Israel

Agriculture in Israel

וכו' וכו'

Gidip (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Melitta maura female 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melitta maura female 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Pollen baskets

Bonjour Gidip, après une recherche internet (je ne suis pas une scientifique, juste une bonne observatrice ), la corbicule (curbicula), qui sert à transporter le pollen, peut être située sur le tibia (Apidae à corbicules) ou sur le fémur (Andrenidae, Colletidae et Halictidae), d'après Charles D. Michener, The corbiculae of bees, 1999 ; Laurence Packer and Claudia Ratti, Key to the Bee Families of the World: Corbicula (cela concerne le retrait des belles photos : File:Protandrena mexicanorum female.jpg, File:Colletes on Retama 1.jpg, File:Melitturga female 1.jpg File:Melitta maura female 1.jpg, File:Melitta maura female 2.jpg, File:Andrena rufomaculata female 1.jpg). Cordialement, Minerv (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC).

Salut Minerv. Mon francais n'est si bon et alors je vais vous repondre en anglais (peut etre utilisez Google pour traduire): it is true that corbiculae may appear on the femur, tibia, propodeum, etc. But not every mass of pollen that you see on the leg of a bee is necessarily a corbicula! Besides, I see little point in this category anyway. We might just as well categorize every structure and organ that can be seen on a bee's body - it will have no end. Sincerement, Gidip (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC).

Hi Gidip, thanks for your answer, and I give up the idea. Best regards, Minerv (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Megachile montenegrensis female 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Megachile montenegrensis female 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Cucullia

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cucullia_scrophulariae_2.JPG rether Cucullia Blattariae --> http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Cucullia_Blattariae — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubikolRamios (talk • contribs) 19:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilan Rozenfeld 1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ilan Rozenfeld 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ilan Rozenfeld 1.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris mariae 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iolaus glaucus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthia pustulifera copulation 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onagers Negev Mountains 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea damascena 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allium dictyoprasum 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumex pictus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheum palaestinum 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheum palaestinum 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allium rothii 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adonis dentata 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground focus is good. Clean background. --99of9 06:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melitta maura female 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (already a FP too). --C messier 18:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halictus tetrazonianellus male 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)