User talk:Martin Falbisoner/Archive 4 2016

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Christian, also a happy and successful year 2016 to you! Thanks, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Dein Bild von der Münchner U-Bahn

hat im Schnelldurchlauf doch tatsächlich 21 Pro-Stimmen bekommen. Da kann ich dir nur gratulieren! Passiert wirklich selten, meistens eh bei den üblichen Verdächtigen. Zu denen du somit gehörst! ;-) Es ist immer wieder ein Vergnügen, sich das Bild anzuschauen, auch sehr lehrreich, wenn man die kleinen Unzulänglichkeiten betrachtet und sich die Frage stellt, wie man die auch noch beseitigen/bewältigen kann (zB die fast unvermeidbare Überbelichtung der Neonröhren an den Pfeilern vorne). --Hubertl 22:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank Hubert! Ja, die angesprochenen Unzulänglichkeiten sind tatsächlich nicht leicht zu beseitigen. HDR scheidet durch die Natur dieser Aufnahmen aus, ansonsten fielen mir nur Spielereien mit Ebenen und Masken ein, letztlich also Montagen. Ob diese dem enzyklopädischen Anspruch auf Wiki allerdings dann noch entsprechen, sei dahingestellt. Ansonsten bemühe ich mich natürlich in der RAW-Bearbeitung, das maximal Mögliche rauszuholen, klar. Vielleicht hast Du ja mal Zeit, Lust und Gelegenheit, ähnliche Bilder in Wien zu schießen? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich subway station Hasenbergl 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Hasenbergl 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

FoP in den VAE

Hallo Diego, mich würde Deine Einschätzung interessieren: Du hast ja selbst schon in Dubai fotografiert und fleißig auf Commons eingestellt (Gratulation auch zum schönen FP). Grundsätzlich wird hier ja offenbar die Mehrheitshaltung vertreten, eine Panoramafreiheit existiere in den Emiraten nicht (bei gleichzeitig lautstarker Minderheitenmeinung, dass dies doch nicht so ganz stimme). Auf der anderen Seite tummeln sich auf Commons etliche Bilder, die demzufolge eigentlich gelöscht werden müssten, aber noch online sind. Nun war ich letztes Jahr selbst in Dubai, hab aber noch nichts auf Commons hochgeladen, obgleich da vielleicht sogar potentielle FP-Kandidaten dabei wären. Was meinst Du denn hierzu? Besten Dank und viele Grüße --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Martin, wenn du dir das Archiv meiner Diskussionsseite anschaust, wirst du sehen, dass es voller Löschanträge wegen FoP ist (Bilder die eher älter sind). Ich weiß, es ist sehr verlockend tolle Bilder von Wolkenkratzern und Skylines hochzuladen, und sie hier zu präsentieren. Eher oder später werden sie aber gelöscht. Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit. Ich habe tolle Bilder von Ländern wie Island, Qatar, Abu Dhabi oder Montenegro, die ich bei mir aufbewahre, bis sich die Rechtslage ändert. Der einzige Vorteil, den ich darin sehe, diese Bilder hochzuladen, ist dass sie gelöscht werden aber halt in Commons vorhanden sind, und zwar in der Regel mit einem Datum an dem sie wieder hergestellt werden können (das ist dennoch bei einem Skyline schwieriger als bei einzelnen Objekten). Viele Grüsse, Poco² 09:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Alles klar, hab ich mir fast schon gedacht. Danke Dir! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Munich subway station Dülferstraße.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich subway station Dülferstraße.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Dülferstraße.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icelandic Landscape near Neskaupstaður July 2014 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Icelandic_Landscape_near_Neskaupstaður_July_2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Icelandic Landscape near Neskaupstaður July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hverarönd July 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hverarönd July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henry Mayer, The Awakening, 1915 Cornell CUL PJM 1176 01.jpg

I thought you'd like to know that I've put up a restoration as an alternative. Sorry for the delay, but as you can imagine, an approximately 54 megapixel image does take some time to do right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIDAluna in Cozumel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Alcazar de Colon 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamanai - Jaguar Temple.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - Castillo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - Temple of the Descending God.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamanai - High Temple.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montego Bay - Sam Sharpe Memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Calle El Conde.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Catedral Santa Maria La Menor 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Catedral Santa Maria La Menor 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts at Dawn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Catedral Santa Maria La Menor and Statue of Christopher Columbus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Faro a Colon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Domingo - Alcazar de Colon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIDluna - Caribbean Sunset.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 17:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamanai: High Temple as seen from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I agree. Charles (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coastal panorama with the Templo del Dios Viento, beach, and the sea, as seen from the south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theatrium of AIDAluna, March 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 15:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamanai - High Temple 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bad that the bottom is so dark. But good quality.--Famberhorst 18:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisbach Surfer2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 21:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC) FP?--Lmbuga 21:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, Martin Falbisoner! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

• I'm sure I will! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eisbach Surfer2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eisbach Surfer2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 05.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 05.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Kitts - Brimstone Hill Fortress 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulum - God of the Winds Temple 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilparting Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilparting Church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schoenau am Koenigssee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - passenger boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsau - Sankt Fabian und Sebastian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - Malerwinkel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mt. Watzmann: East Face with St. Bartholomew's Church as seen from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wilparting Church 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wilparting Church 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 08:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caribbean Sea - Long Exposure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Caribbean Sea - Long Exposure.jpg

Ich habe mir erlaubt, Dein wunderbares Foto bei FPC zu nominieren. Ich hoffe, das war ok. Grüße. --Code (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Danke Dir Ansgar - freut mich, dass Dir das Bild gefällt. Ich hatte die Befürchtung, es wäre eine Spur zu experimentell für FPC, aber es scheint ja erfreulicherweise auch schon bei anderen auf positive Resonanz zu stoßen. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeche Zollverein trees and grass ICM impression.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oktoberfest 2015 - Impression 5.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oktoberfest 2015 - Impression 5.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Palace, Brussels as seen from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brimstone Hill: Orillon Bastion as seen from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Caribbean Sea - Long Exposure.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caribbean Sea - Long Exposure.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Martin Falbisoner,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reynisfjara and Reynisdrangar, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reynisfjara and Reynisdrangar, Iceland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reynisfjara and Reynisdrangar, Iceland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich subway station Candidplatz - exit.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Candidplatz - exit.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Candidplatz: exit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

FPC/VIC/QIC

I'm sorry, but until March 2017 I can not vote for a six-month blockade that has been imposed on me in this discussion, so do not be offended is not out of malice. For the rest if I am a servant here. Greetings --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Color Profiles

Well, Colin, I've found the culprit! I often use FixFoto after converting my raws to jpgs. FixFoto is a totally unknown (even in Germany...) little program, but very powerful and handy. I like it more than Photoshop Elements (or Gimp for that matter) which I also use. The problem is: FixFoto always removes embedded profiles when saving files. Don't know why. So I'll make sure to embed a color profile using PSE or DPP before uploading images from now on. Btw., I do have a wide gamut screen - and didn't face any problems so far. Another btw: Color profiles don't help very much if people don't learn to properly calibrate their monitors. There's a couple of guys I know who invest way too much money to buy equipment without really taking care of it afterwards... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlskirche Vienna, September 2016 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very good image considering the difficult light conditions. --Peulle 19:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlskirche Vienna, September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some ghosts and IMO at the top a bit to bright, but overall very good quality and composition. --Milseburg 18:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

WLM 2016

Hallo Reinhold, danke für den Hinweis! Täusch ich mich, oder macht Österreich dieses Jahr gar nicht mit? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ach ja die haben ja schon alles :-) Da wäre dann nur noch der Tag des Denkmals interessant: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2016/%C3%96sterreich

aber das weißt du sicher schon.--Ermell (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlskirche Vienna, September 2016 -3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality and very good.--ArildV 17:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvedere, Vienna September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --Christian Ferrer 17:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterskirche Vienna, September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmenhaus at Schoenbrunn Palace, September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schoenbrunn Palace as seen from Neptune Fountain, September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting point of view. Why don´t you hand it in for WLM? --Ermell 18:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment No more WLM-Austria. All is done )) --A.Savin 11:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Empress Elisabeth, Volksgarten Vienna, September 2016 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Empress Elisabeth, Volksgarten Vienna, September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schoenbrunn Palace as seen from Neptune Fountain, September 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schoenbrunn Palace as seen from Neptune Fountain, September 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crown Kings Bavaria Munich.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crown Kings Bavaria Munich.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Martin Falbisoner, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 09:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park, November 2016.jpg

Dear Ikan, Thanks for your hint. I've tried to sharpen the image a bit, and it should be better now (within physical limits of course). What do you think? Thanks! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice, peaceful autumn colors of Japanese maples. --Zcebeci 15:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Great Buddha Hall of Tōdai-ji, Nara, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would crop it a bit tighter, see note. --Basotxerri 13:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)  Done good idea, thanks --Martin Falbisoner 14:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyoto Station November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Funny how the movement of people in 5 seconds creates those trails of color. -- Ikan Kekek 08:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyoto Station November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Martin Falbisoner, I think this would be a good FP candidate if you upped the sharpness a bit on the trees to the right of the castle-related building. -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)  Done --Martin Falbisoner 13:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC) It's better. Whether it's sharp enough, I don't know. Quite a striking picture, though, in any case. -- Ikan Kekek 22:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dotonbori, Osaka, at night, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okayama Castle, November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okayama Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okayama Castle, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himeji Castle, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobe Port Tower and Maritime Museum, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horyu-ji, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenix Hall, Byodo-in, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenix Hall, Byodo-in, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himeji Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkaku-ji, Togudo Hall, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs. --XRay 07:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ishiyama-dera, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kinkaku-ji, as seen from the south, during Koyo (autumn leaves season).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ishiyama-dera, November 2016 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments So where did you vacation? Pandora??? :) Good quality. --W.carter 21:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himeji Castle, November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 19:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osaka Castle at Night, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hikone Castle November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hikone Castle November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Hall, Kiyomizu-dera: as seen in autumn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is a tricky one, there are so many to choose from. Obviously the best with autumn colours if others think that's OK for a scope. Charles (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I've been looking for all autumnal versions and my personal conclusion is that there are three possible candidates: this one, File:Kiyomizu-dera,_Kyoto,_November_2016_-02.jpg and File:Kiyomizu-dera_(24294752243).jpg. As they all are quite comparable, I'm willing to consider this one as the best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kyoto Station building (1997) as seen from the estern side of the main hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sika deer in Nara Park, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikan-do Zenrin-ji, November 2016 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikan-do Zenrin-ji, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikan-do Zenrin-ji, November 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo. Only two branches in the front are disturbing the composition --Michielverbeek 07:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikan-do Zenrin-ji, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty and relaxing to look at. Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osaka City Hall, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osaka Central Public Hall, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ninomaru Palace, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

added message myself --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okayama Castle, November 2016 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 12:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dotonbori, Osaka, at night, November 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dotonbori, Osaka, at night, November 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neon signs in Dotonbori: view of Ebisu Bridge on the Dōtonbori Canal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Okayama Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Okayama Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, November 2016 -07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Some holiday joy

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 15:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks, Cart, and all the best to you and yours as well! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you, George Chernilevsky ^talk - Merry Christmas to you! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

... Ikan Kekek and Arild Vågen for your very encouraging evaluation of my subway pics! I would have had a pretty hard time choosing between them, so I'm actually glad that Arild went ahead and picked one. I'm really flattered - it was just 10 hours ago that I uploaded the files... ;-) Best wishes and Merry Christmas! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

P.S.: And now Basotxerri created an independent nom for my second pic. Also thanks so much - and Frohe Weinachten.

Let's see how that turns out! :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Same to you. You're a great photographer, and I will be shocked if these pictures are not featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Three-storied Pagoda, Kiyomizu-dera: illumination in autumn..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly the best in its scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Terrific. -- Ikan Kekek 01:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Himeji Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Himeji Castle, November 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both of these photos are terrific and potential FP noms. You could nominate them as a set, too. -- Ikan Kekek 01:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)  Comment Both are terrific but I prefer this one, better balance and composition, and I like the people waiting for the train.--ArildV 09:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Himeji Castle Keep Tower: with moat as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 07:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kobe Port Tower at night with Maritime Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 10:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kobe Port Tower and Maritime Museum, November 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kobe Port Tower and Maritime Museum, November 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Großhadern: outbound platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I think you should narrow the scope, as the two platforms in that station are clearly different in appearance. This photo is best in scope for one platform and File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg is best in scope for the other. In both cases, it's the platform where there is no train that is best shown in the picture. So specify that direction for this nomination and nominate the other one as best in scope for the other direction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Ikan Kekek:  Done

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 02.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Großhadern: inbound platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment: @Ikan Kekek: fyi
•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)