Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 97

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hit-and-run annoying comments in CfDs and DRs

I suspect there is nothing we can do about it but someone, presumably someone sockpuppeting, keeps putting obnoxious comments in CfDs and DRs using throwaway IP addresses. Typical example, by no means the worst, just the one that had me think to come here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2024/08/Category:African_Women_Theologians&diff=prev&oldid=922675078. At least this one didn't call anyone an idiot.

I know there is no effective way to sanction a throwaway IP or throwaway account. Would it be permissible to delete remarks like this when I come across them, just so they don't have the gratification of these sticking around? - Jmabel ! talk 16:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, they don't contribute anything to the community. Actually it all seems to be under one range per Special:Contribs/86.172.31.142/18. Maybe we can just block the whole range. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
@Matrix: Do you mean Special:Contribs/186.172.31.142/18? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes, sorry for my haste —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 19:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Edit request for {{Decade years navbox}}

Please copy the latest edition of {{Decade years navbox/sandbox2}} and make it the new edition of {{Decade years navbox}}. The rationale is here. I think it works fine. --トトト (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC) トトト (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

@トトト: Done. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Weird processing result of a DR

Hello,

what happened to File:Landtagswahl 2019.31.jpg that should have been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Saxony state election 2019? There are no JPEG data left, but a file page is still there. I used two different browsers to check, where one is seldom if ever used to access Wikimedia sites (so, it's likely not a caching issue on my side). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

I deleted the file. I remember a similar case to this at w:File talk:Ignatyevo Airfield - NASA World Wind.jpg, w:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_209#File:Ignatyevo.jpg_not_rendering. Usually this means the file's data has been lost for some or another reason. The thumbnail was still there though. This case is weird because the file is so recent. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I think something is wrong, the file File:Άγιος Γεώργιος Φερών.jpeg which was uploaded 7 days ago is missing contents. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
? That file was uploaded in 2014. And deleted yesterday. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Prolific copyvio uploader

It looks like Siveohalloran12 (talk · contribs) has uploaded multiple copyright violating images - they all look like internet publicity material, not their own work. I have tagged a couple for speedy deletion but it might be quicker for an admin to go take a look and do a mass-nuke. --10mmsocket (talk)

There are no previously deleted contributions. New user so I nuked and warned Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello, can an administrator please delete the file redirect File:Nadja Stiller Com C07-089-001.jpg? The file was recently uploaded and has since been renamed to File:Nadja Tiller Com C07-089-001.jpg. I forgot to suppress the redirect while reaming and I'm not sure if {{Db-author}} would be applicable here. Ratekreel (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done In the future you can use COM:G6 —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Noted! Thank you, Matrix. Ratekreel (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
@Matrix & @Ratekreel, I'm sorry but G6 doesn't apply here per Commons:File renaming#Leaving redirects. G2 is a good go in such cases. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Aafi, I think the policy is relevant in case of vandalism or when one's not sure if it's vandalism. Ratekreel (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
All broken redirects are under G2, and otherwise suppression is against policy, if the previous name is not clear vandalism. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
typos, wrong names etc. should be tagged with G2, and yours was a G2 case. G6 doesn't fit in here. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for clearing this up —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern about admin responding to concern with ""Cross-project shit-stirring by a suspicious user" "

A wikipedian referenced my uploading/adding of images as one sign of alleged COI, so i wanted to check if Wikimedia had concern about efforts here being used against editors. But instead I got that comment on a deletion (I'm not saying I have an issue with the deletion of my comment on other noticeboard, i dont know. But they havent indicated where else i could raise my concern. Whenevery (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Why are you bringing WP issues here? This issue seems irrelevant to Commons Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
The purpose of WM Commons for a content contributor ("user"?) is to improve WP content. Whenevery (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Actions of someone using our content anywhere outside Commons is irrelevant. We are only concerned about the behaviour of Commons users on Commons Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Well they're described by WM as a "family" with "shared values", but thx for answering my question from the user noticeboard. But no response about the admin on Commons calling me a "suspicious user" here after I referred to an allegation at WP? Whenevery (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
The place to handle problems they are not properly handled in a local Wiki is Meta and not Commons. GPSLeo (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thx I've always been confused about meta & wm & wf, never really looked into it as was focused on content. I was just looking at the WF Universal Code of Conduct, seems the AgF & civility & possibly psych requirements were not met in the edit comment ive raised here & the colleague justifying it. Whenevery (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
I agree with my fellow admin - I think you are stirring and looking for attention. Commons is not wikipedia - don't bring your drama here Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
That's false, there was no drama I simply retired from WP. Whenevery (talk) 13:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Don't bring EN-wiki drama to commons. Commons isn't en-wiki, and we don't want its drama spilling over here. (Note to admins: A user posted a very friendly notice explaining that their editing patterns are not what they expect of new editors). @Whenevery, I don't know why you came to commons, and it doesn't matter to me why you came to commons, as long as you aren't here to vandalize, advertise, use commons as a personal web host, or bring en-wiki problems to commons. We are part of the Wikimedia family of projects, but just as wikibooks doesn't complain to wikivoyage, Commons doesn't want to hear about en-wiki's drama. We will happily support all of the wikimedia projects by hosting, catagorising, and maintaining their freely licensed images, but we are not another drama board. If you have a problem on en-wiki, solve it on en-wiki. The values of commons (and all Wikimedia projects, is to make the sum of all human knowledge, and make it available for free for everyone. Commons specifically is the largest collection of free to use images on the internet. All images here are under CC-BY-SA or less restrictive license, all of witch are irrevocable, meaning you can use them forever. Commons does see a lot of cross wiki vandalism/abuse without people bringing it here. We don't solve cross Wiki problems, that's metawiki's whole purpose. If you have any more questions, leave them on my talk page. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
That's already been explained, but thx for further. Again I didn't bring any 'drama', that was the rude characterization that i was trying to get addressed here. I was confused at an idea that adding images to an article is an excessive interest. I had noticed a lot of articles, even important ones, had no images, so I wondered how true that was. You yourself now bring in a WP detail, so I now have to note that I wasn't new to editing, I mentioned so, and why would that be assumed after decades of WP anyway, and that fact in itself was then used to allege sockpuppetry. Whenevery (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Can you please explain what you mean by "I have to note I wasn't new to editing"? (I got caught up in a similar situation on en-wiki, and want to make sure you are thoroughly explaining yourself without causing miscommunication.) When most en-wiki admins hear that, they assume you had a prior account (especially as your account is about a month old on en-wiki, and only a week on commons, yet you are writing high quality articles on relativly obscure topics), and will block you for sock puppetry. I can't speak to the adding images part, but what caused concern was high quality, well sourced articles about a particular court case, not something new users normally do unless they have involvement in the actual case or personally know the people involved. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Aside: there are terms that, while they contain a word that might be considered somewhat obscene, are not really all that strong. "Shit-stirring" is one of those. If one editor said another was "shit", or even that all their contributions were "shit", that might call for admin action (although still probably not on a different wiki from the one where the matter came up). Accusing them of "shit-stirring" is quite different from that. - Jmabel ! talk 20:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, please do not delete them

User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, but there are too many to revert them. See Commons:Deletion requests/List of libraries in Paris for an overview. Please do not delete them (yet). See Commons talk:Galleries#How to handle Gallery pages with a wrong format? for the discussion. JopkeB (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

This is a copy of the enwiki article and therefore clearly out of scope and as I do not see this fact mentioned anywhere also a copyright violation. Such copies from Wikipedia are regularly deleted. GPSLeo (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
I don't really see how lists of places without images are galleries or wouldn't qualify for speedy deletion under either G1 or G2 depending. G1 literally says "Mainspace pages (galleries) that are empty or contain no useful content, such as pages that contain text but no images or other media" qualify for speedy deletion. Sure with "galleries" like Commons:List of hospitals in Paris there's the boiler plate image on the top, but so what? It's clearly not a gallery regardless.
Not to mention the whole "list" thing doesn't seem to be widely used outside of galleries for France. Even if someone wanted to convert such a page into a gallery then it should have the same name as the parent category. The word "list" is totally meaningless and just shows that the creator never intended for them to be actual galleries. And I could give a crap if there's a conversation about it. Nothing says the guidelines should just be ignored while or when a couple of people are discussing something on a random talk page. At the end of the day who cares? This isn't an encyclopedia and the person who created the "galleries" isn't even active anymore. So I don't really see a legitimate reason to keep the pages. It's not like someone can't recreate them under the normal names of the categories and with actual images if they wanted to anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find a List of libraries in Paris, not in the enwiki and neither in the frwiki.
The List of libraries in Paris is not just a list, but also shows a gallery. And the links are to Commons categories. That to me makes it a "a guide to the subcategories of a large main category", one of the purposes we mentioned on the discussion about good galleries. I admit, it would have been better if each line in the table would have got an image as well, then it would be a gallery page like List of paintings by Paul Gauguin, of which there are many more. And perhaps there is a better format for it. But are that good enough reasons to just delete it? To delete a work where so much effort has gone into? Without even a warning? (Because a speedy deletion can be deleted even before the creator had a chance to react.) Please have some more respect for the work of others, even when the creator is not active anymore. It might be usefule (see page views). So I prefer that we first have a policy for these kind of gallery pages before they are recklessly deleted. JopkeB (talk) 10:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
The List of libraries in Paris is not just a list, but also shows a gallery. @JopkeB: Your free to revert the speedy deletion template in move the gallery to one that's better named while getting rid of the list in that case. I could really care less. I don't think it should exist in it's current form or explicitly as a "list of libraries in Paris" though. Most galleries are inherently lists. So calling them "lists" is just pointless.
Please have some more respect for the work of others, even when the creator is not active anymore. Your the one saying we should give people warnings before the deleting the galleries. It's not that I don't have respect for users, if the user was active and the galleries weren't created more then 10 years then I'd have zero problem warning them. There's no point doing that in this case. It's just a waste of everyone's time and energy.
I prefer that we first have a policy for these kind of gallery pages before they are recklessly deleted. I think your reading to much into this. I spent plenty of time researching the user's editing history and how long the galleries existed before I nominated the images for deletion and there's at least a couple that I didn't nominate for deletion because I plan to improve them. So there was nothing reckless about it on my end. Your just cherry picking. Again, I have absolutely no issue what-so-ever with giving people time to work on things. These galleries weren't created recently by an active user though. I just don't think we should waste our time or resources giving warnings about 15 year old pages that clearly aren't being improved and to people who aren't even active anymore. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I certainly wouldn't speedy-delete stuff like this—certainly at least give those who have been working on them reasonable time to move them somewhere more appropriate (user space, or off of Commons entirely)—but List of libraries in Paris doesn't look to me like a gallery as intended. On the other hand, if the info there isn't duplicated in one of the Wikipedias, then a list like that is certainly useful for maintenance purposes, if only to keep track of which of these do and do not yet have categories. But I'd sure like to see more of a Commons focus: which of these buildings are out of copyright, for example, is a lot more important to Commons than the surface area. - Jmabel ! talk 19:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

at least give those who have been working on them reasonable time to move them somewhere more appropriate @Jmabel: I checked the edit history of most of these before I nominated them for deletion. Most, or all of them, were created more then ten years by a user who hasn't edited since March of this year. So they aren't working on the galleries or anything else at this point and I really don't think they care about them either way. Although I agree with you generally, but it's clearly just a waste of everyone's time in this case. Plus I don't think it's worth moving pages given the lack of meaningful content to begin with. There are other galleries in the same category that I'm probably going to move myself since I do think that they are worth improving though. But there is no "one size fits all" solution here. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
@Adamant1: It still gives the time to someone who is watching the page, or who is aware the the user has left and is following the notifications they get. For example, I follow User:Fæ's talk page and comment on DRs when I think the image in question should not be deleted. I'm sure many others are doing similar things for other departed users. - Jmabel ! talk 04:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
That's fair, but I still think it depends on the situation and realistically how many people watching a talk page are going to care about something that specific anyway, especially more then six after the person stopped contributing? I'm really not a fan of bureaucracy for it's own sake. It just comes off like derailing and/or makes things needlessly complicated. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Former Cinema in Bečov nad Teplou

please merge the categories

Thank you Gampe (talk) 06:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Renaming well-established categories

Militum professio scriniarii, has been, renaming established categories without consensus, ignoring COM:CFD.? Example: Category:People of the Royal Navy to Category:Royal Navy people Please "cease and desist", till its sorted out.

Are they intending on renaming every category, beginning with "People from..." and "People of ..."?

He has been warned about this behaviour regarding other file types and cats already on multiple occasions. Broichmore (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

@Broichmore: - I respectfully ask you to stop LYING about me. I have NEVER received any warning!
Furthermore, there is not any clear consensus regarding 'People from...' for category naming. I have seen a variety of different naming conventions for people who belong to or somehow connected to an organisation - and as an approximation, from my experience, the primary subject matter comes first. 'People from...' does NOT follow conventions of British English. The National Archives in the United Kingdom categorises people associated to an organisation by organisation first - such as 'Royal Air Force pilots', 'Royal Navy submariners', National Coal Board miners, 'British Army sappers'. Trying to enforce diametrically opposite grammar for subjects which are very clearly against the fundamental spirt of a wiki, and is highly likely to result in editors failing utilise appropriate categories. Commons is NOT Wikipedia, it is a global multilingual, multi-cultural project. All languages are accepted here, including ALL versions of the English language. Kind regards. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps not warned, but certainly made aware of. On your talk page you were diplomatically informed on 19 May about Marine petrol stations => Marine fuel stations, and reminded of COM:CFD.
On 4 September about moving categories like Category:RAF Transport Command, without redirects. You didn't like RAF Transport Command which has been around a long time (in the world, that’s a tacit warning), to impose "Royal Air Force Transport Command".
You should expect criticism when making fundamental far reaching design changes to tree and nesting structures here.
People by name categories have been around since at least 2010, without complaint.
I remind you the default language here is English, for good reason.
There are many instances here the primary subject matter doesn't come first. In fact it's the norm here.
Whats happening here is your extending the admin time of every user to identify cat names. I did not create this system, we have Painters_from_Great_Britain, not British painters, and
18th-century painters from Great Britain, not British painters of the 18th-century, etc. Best regards. Broichmore (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
@Militum professio scriniarii: I don't know whether you are deliberately or accidentally making this more confusing than it inherently is, but I have never seen a category "People from" for an organization. Do you have an actual example? If so, yes, I would agree that is poorly named. If not, then it is a red herring.
"People from" is quite common with the indirect object being a place. I prefer "people of" in this case as well, but "from" in this case is perfectly good English. - Jmabel ! talk 21:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
All languages are accepted here, including ALL versions of the English language. Actually that's technically incorrect because the Universality Principle. Generally if most other categories are "people of X Naxy" then you can't rename a small subset of categories to "Navy X people" just because of local conventions. Otherwise it can break things and make it that much harder for people to browse through related categories. This being a "multi-cultural project" or whatever isn't a valid reason to rename the categories either. You should have a done a CfD and then renamed the categories if or when there was a consensus to. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Militum professio scriniarii I'm at fault here for mentioning "People from", it was glib attempt to reference the thousands of cats such as Photographers from Denmark), "Professional sumo wrestlers from Japan" etc., as well as "People of Aukland" all of which could be altered as a follow on.
I may well have jumped to the wrong conclusion, about your motives here, but I have bad experiences before with heavy hotcat users changing categories for no better reason than inflating their statistics, or just because they don’t like the syntax employed. Hotcat can make immense changes of this type in an extraordinarliy short time. If that not you, then I apologise.
The implications of your strategy are immense, left unchecked. What's to stop your expanding it to renaming such cats to Danish photographers", "Japanese professional sumo wrestlers", "Aukland people" This, whole strategy that I have brought attention to is not just confined to "People of Id organisation". It potentially crosses over into many different areas.
You’ve also put forward a notion that the National Archives in the United Kingdom categorises people associated to an organisation by organisation first - such as 'Royal Air Force pilots', this is just not the case. The NA in particular still uses cat filing structures conceived in the days before computerisation, and there’s no consistency about it, they could and do use RAF more often than "Royal Air Force" The same goes for the British Library, the Imperial War Museum, Greenwich, and even the Library of Congress, all of which are immense collections and all are haphazard. It’s the case with all of the established GLAM’s. Commons is in fact one of the first organisation to take a fresh look at how to structure cat names, from the premise that the vault is paperless.
Furthermore, in fact, its normal in the UK to use "RAF" as opposed to "Royal Air Force". There is never usually any confusion over it, only once have I seen an individual improperly assigned as being as a member of the RA (Royal Academy) when they were in fact an amateur artist serving as an officer in the Royal Artillery. IMO if you were to start a consensus a hypothetical discussion on making afresh cats for the RAF or USAF, you would find the acronyms preferred, as they are instantly identifiable and known, easy to type and give an uncluttered look to the master header index pages. Long cat names are not the best for scanning by eye. “RAF Transport Command”, is infinitely better than "Royal Air Force Transport Command". Even Wikipedia adopted the shortened version as this is the universal way of referring to it. From our point of view there’s hardly anything in the cat, to make it worth defending, so Andy gave way. However, for anyone to overturn a cat created by such an influential editor without warning, consideration or consensus is astounding, and not a good look. Broichmore (talk) 15:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Unusual Deletion of Images of Vietnamese Artists

Hello Commons community, I am Plantaest, an administrator of the Vietnamese Wikipedia community. Recently, our community has noticed something unusual regarding articles related to figures in the Vietnamese entertainment industry, specifically the continuous deletion of images.

Upon reviewing the Commons logs, I found that on September 20, an administrator named Krd deleted many images related to Vietnamese artists, all with the same reason: "No permission since 12 September 2024," according to the deletion log.

The question arises: who added the "No permission" template to these images? Since I cannot access the history of the deleted files, I am unable to determine who added them. However, I have identified a user with suspicious activity.

User "Thich an che"

The user "Thich an che" is a very new account, created on September 20, but has already added the "No permission" template to files related to several Vietnamese artists such as Mỹ Tâm, Lý Hải, Chí Tài... Clearly, a new account wouldn’t easily know how to use these techniques.

Vandalism of Deleted Files

Reviewing the log of File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png, I noticed two unusual points:

  • At 4:22 on September 20 (UTC), administrator Krd deleted this file with the reason "No permission since 12 September 2024." This suggests that someone, possibly another account of "Thich an che," added the "No permission" template to this file a few days earlier. Did Krd delete the files in bulk without thoroughly checking?
  • At 6:13 on September 20 (UTC), the user "Thich an che" uploaded an image of unclear origin, mocking a Vietnamese YouTuber named Nguyễn Phương Hằng.

It is worth noting that this file was being used in the infobox of the Nguyễn Phương Hằng article, and she has been a highly searched figure recently, having been released from prison on September 19 after nearly two years in detention. I have temporarily removed this file from the article about her.

Conclusion

In my view, someone using the account "Thich an che" and possibly several other accounts has been placing the "No permission" template unjustifiably on images related to Vietnamese artists. Moreover, this person deliberately re-uploaded a deleted file to have it displayed on a heavily viewed Wikipedia page. This is clearly an intentional act of vandalism.

Therefore, I kindly request that the Commons administrators, especially Krd, assist the Vietnamese Wikipedia community with the following issues:

On behalf of the Vietnamese Wikipedia community, thank you all. Plantaest (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Bấy bi cute tried to remove undeletion requests (see Special:Contributions/Bấy bi cute). Cherry Cotton Candy (talk) 14:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I tagged File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png as copyright violation with evidence.  Băng Tỏa  14:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I asked MGA73 to restore the old version of the file. It's a screenshot from a YouTube CC video from a legitimate copyright holder, so its license is compatible with Commons. The copyright of the original file was fine before the vandalism.  Băng Tỏa  16:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I blocked Bấy bi cute for a week for vandalism, and Thich an che for abusing multiple accounts, clearly a sock of Funny Man 1999. Yann (talk) 14:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
@Yann: Thank you very much. I hope the admins will continue to support our community in restoring the deleted files, as well as creating a filter to prevent similar actions in the future. Plantaest (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

@Plantaest: Here's a dump of all of what Thich an che edited that has since been deleted. Feel free to use this as the basis for an undeletion request:

Extended content
    06:13, 20 September 2024  +233‎ File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png ‎ ‎Changed label, description [[:File:/or aliases in en
    06:13, 20 September 2024  +313‎ File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
    05:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7276986482).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Minh Tuyet.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Cam Ly 1.png ‎No edit summary
    04:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TrangPhap.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Quyen.png ‎No edit summary
    04:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Quyen 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:KHOI MY 2015.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My (more cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:HOANG MY AN.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:04, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Mai 2018.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHang1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHag3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHag2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Minh hang 3.JPG ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chân dung Minh Hằng.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chân dung Minh Hằng cropped.png ‎No edit summary
    04:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Diệu Nhi GQT6.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Duong Lam 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:LeDuongBaoLam1989.png ‎No edit summary
    03:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khả Như.png ‎No edit summary
    03:46, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngọc Trinh in Chị mẹ học yêu.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NGỌC TRINH VÀ SIÊU MẪU VÕ HOÀNG YẾN KHOE VẺ RẠNG RỠ TẠI HẬU TRƯỜNG VIFW SS18.webm ‎No edit summary
    03:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018-10-08 Gymnastics at 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Girls' Artistic Gymnastics – Vault qualification (Martin Rulsch) 207.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Trinh va Fan.png ‎No edit summary
    03:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Trinh va Fan (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong.png ‎No edit summary
    03:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong (Vietnamese actor).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DSC01858.png ‎No edit summary
    03:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi17.png ‎No edit summary
    03:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi Zalo.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi Zalo (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đông Nhi - Chí Thiện - Khổng Tú Quỳnh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dongnhi2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dongnhi (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong-nhi-2014.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong-nhi-2014 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi 2015.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi 2015 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018 - Dong Nhi at Quan khu 7 Stadium (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018 - Dong Nhi at Quan khu 7 Stadium (1).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:35, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:1410060361-dong-nhi-1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Thy.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy.png ‎No edit summary
    03:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy Idol 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy Idol 2012 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy BBSD.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DoanLPDapcanh.png ‎No edit summary
    03:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ANHTU52024.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ANH TU - SEPTEMBER 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:27, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ya Suy at Vietnam Idol Finale on Feb 1, 2013.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:27, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà An Huy - Quán Quân Vietnam Idol mùa 8 và Bài Hát Hay Nhất ( Sing My Song ) mùa 3.png ‎No edit summary
    03:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Lê Quang.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Minh Son.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2722268119).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2723057080).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2722268119) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2723057080) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Uyên Linh, tháng 8 2013.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Uyen Linh Singer.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ul0.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hongocha.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha in 2009 Asia Song Festival.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha at the 2009 Asia Song Festival 2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676933861).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676929535).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676929535) (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:20, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ha Ho in 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    03:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhật cường (cropped).JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhật cường.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:18, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hong Quang Minh's mug shot (March 2016).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:18, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (1).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (1) cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ĐÀM VĨNH HƯNG 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ĐÀM VĨNH HƯNG & HUY TUẤN.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Damvinhhung3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Damvinhhung.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Anh.png ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Anh (2018).png ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Trung Quân at Bài hát yêu thích tháng 6 live show 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Trung Quân at Bài hát yêu thích tháng 6 live show 2012 cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRUNG QUÂN 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang in 2015 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang Idol, a famous transgender singer in Vietnam, attends the ceremony and shows her support for the new innitiative (20643882158).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang - Miss International Queen Vietnam 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BaoHan2000.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ung Hoang Phuc.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ung Hoang Phuc (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhất Trung.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VŨ NGỌC ĐÃNG.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tran Huu Tan.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:08, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chau Dang Khoa 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Touliver.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Touliver (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Xuân Bắc, Ngô Kiến Huy & Dương Anh Vũ.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngô Kiến Huy hosting Bộ 3 Siêu Đẳng SS2 EP13.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngô Kiến Huy hosting Bộ 3 Siêu Đẳng SS2 EP13 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngo Kien Huy.png ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NGO KIEN HUY 2021 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Den Vau in Song Gallery 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Isaac Pham Luu Tuan Tai.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Isaac2017.png ‎No edit summary
    03:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tóc Tiên at the premiere for "Big Girls Don't Cry" music video (2015).JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tóc Tiên (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TOC TIEN - THE BRAIN VIETNAM (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Toc Tien (2016).png ‎No edit summary
    02:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ca Si Tóc Tiên (Vietnamese singer).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bich Phuong.png ‎No edit summary
    02:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BICH PHUONG 2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BICH PHUONG - VIETTEL++.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - YOUR FACE SOUNDS FAMILIAR VIETNAM 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - YOUR FACE SOUNDS FAMILIAR VIETNAM - 2020.11.28.png ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - MAY 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:55, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - APRIL 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:55, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khuong Hoan My.png ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tangduytan.png ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Suni Ha Linh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:SUNI Ha Linh in 2024.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:53, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:SHYN3192.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:53, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nguyenthuychi.png ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu.png ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu tiết lộ những bí mật về vai Hạ Linh (Min Hari) - Mối Tình Đầu Của Tôi - She Was Pretty.webm ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:CHI PU KÍN CỔNG CAO TƯỜNG ĐỌ SẮC CÙNG DÀN HOA HẬU VÁY ÁO RỰC RỠ TRÊN THẢM ĐỎ VIFW THU ĐÔNG 2016.webm ‎No edit summary
    02:51, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu as Hạ Linh in She Was Pretty (Mối tình đầu của tôi).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:51, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a video 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a fan meeting.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a fan meeting (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee at the fansign.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:49, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee at the fansign (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:49, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ [[:File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ [[:File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MIN - 2020.03.21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:47, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erikthanh13.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:47, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erikthanh13 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:46, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erik tại sự kiện, 2020-03-21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Viethuong.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VIET HUONG.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VH-aodaixanh0615.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hongdao.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Quangminh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Baoliem2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vanson2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MY TAM - LIGHT & SHADOW LIVE - INAX VIETNAM.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Dũng 2021 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Dũng 2021 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2023 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi singer.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ha Nhi in Khau Vi Ngoi Sao.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em quay gameshow.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    02:35, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NAM EM X BẠCH CÔNG KHANH 26.06.2022.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:34, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bach Cong Khanh.png ‎No edit summary
    02:34, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:HOAI LAM 2022.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:33, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:33, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (3).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (2) cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at the MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at the MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7277018516).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at MTV EXIT Concert in Hanoi, May 26, 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at MTV EXIT Concert in Hanoi, May 26, 2012 (7276405972) (Crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam performs at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (727729513).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam MTV EXIT concert Ha Noi 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam MTV EXIT concert Ha Noi 2012 01.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan on stage at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7280165088).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan on stage at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7280165088) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan for song on stage (7285318430).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam and Pierre Bouvier of Simple Plan join hands at MTV EXIT.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam 2.JPG ‎No edit summary
    02:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Hải - Vu vơ - Behind the scenes 1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Hải - Vu vơ - Behind the scenes 1 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh2 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh cropped.png ‎No edit summary
    02:20, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DuongTrieuVu.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ThuyTienTran.png ‎No edit summary
    02:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Lam Vlog.png ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngo Johnny Nguyen 22072007.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Johnny Nguyen 22072007 BKKIFF.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Sơn Tùng M-TP hát Chín bậc tình yêu tại đêm nhạc An Thuyên 27s.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Sơn Tùng M-TP at KUL News, July 2015.png ‎No edit summary
    02:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 5 (2017).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 4 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 3 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 2 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 1 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP (2014).jpg ‎No edit summary

Jmabel ! talk 15:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thats an impressive list, @Krd, Can you provide some insight as to what happened (as of when I'm writing this) 12 hours ago? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
@Jmabel: Thank you. If possible, I hope you can investigate accounts that are similarly disruptive, like: Special:Contributions/Nguyễn Thanh Vân dana, Special:Contributions/Nguyễn Minh Đào 1996, Special:Contributions/Vô Danh 69, Special:Contributions/Funny Man 1999. It seems this situation has been ongoing for months. This is a great loss for the Vietnamese Wikipedia community. Plantaest (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Seems like these are socks of a glocked user. @Jmabel, I think a post on SRG is in order for these accounts? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Funny Man 1999‎. Yann (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I have proposed a filter: Commons talk:Abuse filter#Add a filter to block the addition of the "No permission" template for new accounts. I hope the admins can review it and consider using it to block accounts with similar behavior in the future. Thank you. Plantaest (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Filter looks good, thanks for helping us sort this out, It has been a chaotic 24 hours on commons. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Vô Danh 69
   (change visibility) 11:13, 20 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Nguyễn Trần Trung Quân.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 11:07, 20 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Ceri Thu Hà.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 11:07, 20 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Neko Lê.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 11:06, 20 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:112744 hua kim tuyen 1.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 11:06, 20 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:112744 hua kim tuyen 1 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:39, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Trường Giang tại lễ phát động nhân đạo năm 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:39, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Truong Giang.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:38, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:USAID co-sponors MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:38, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:USAID co-sponors MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7277031772).jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:37, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Trấn Thành 191226.png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:36, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Tran Thanh at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:36, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:TRAN THANH - THE BRAIN VIETNAM (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:35, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:TRAN THANH - 7UP - 2020.05.14 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:35, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Tran Thanh & Hari Won (2017).png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 16:35, 19 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Chương trình Sóng 20 của Vieon - 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Rapper B Ray.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:39, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:SUBOI – BATTLE OF THE BRIDES 2 – HCMC PREMIERE – P4.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:39, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:SUBOI – BATTLE OF THE BRIDES 2 – HCMC PREMIERE – P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:38, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:SUBOI – BATTLE OF THE BRIDES 2 – HCMC PREMIERE – P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:37, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:SUBOI – BATTLE OF THE BRIDES 2 – HCMC PREMIERE – P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:37, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Suboi performing in Ho Chi Minh City in December 2013.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:37, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Suboi performing in Ho Chi Minh City in December 2013 cropped.png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:36, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Suboi Fusebar 2.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:36, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Suboi Fusebar 2 cropped.png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:35, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:Suboi Fusebar 1.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:34, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:JUSTATEE.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:34, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:JustaTee.png ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 15:32, 18 September 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +57‎ File:JustaTee.jpg ‎
Nguyễn Thanh Vân dana
   (change visibility) 03:28, 17 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +214‎ File:Cười Xuyên Việt logo.png ‎ ‎Added [vi] caption: Cười Xuyên Việt logo
   (change visibility) 03:28, 17 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +334‎ N File:Cười Xuyên Việt logo.png ‎ Uploaded a work by Truyền thông Khang from https://logos.fandom.com/vi/wiki/C%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Di_xuy%C3%AAn_Vi%E1%BB%87t with UploadWizard
   (change visibility) 08:46, 9 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −110‎ File:NAM EM.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 08:43, 9 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −50‎ File:VuTruVFCngoaitruyen.jpg ‎No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted
   (change visibility) 11:28, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +22‎ File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎No edit summary
(change visibility) 11:27, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −24‎ m File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎ added Category:Comedy; removed
This project page is uncategorized.
Please help improve this project page by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related project pages (how?), and so that it can be more easily found.
Tag: HotCat 
   (change visibility) 10:43, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −33‎ File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 10:39, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −50‎ File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 10:30, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −50‎ File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 09:25, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +275‎ N File:NGUYEN PHONG HAI.png ‎ Uploaded while editing "Nguyễn Phong Hải" on vi.wikipedia.org Tag: Cross-wiki upload
   (change visibility) 02:40, 8 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +334‎ N File:CHUNG KET THE NEXT COMEDIANS MUA 1.jpg ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
   (change visibility) 13:07, 6 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +321‎ N File:THE NEXT COMEDIANS.jpg ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
   (change visibility) 11:30, 6 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +276‎ N File:HỒ VIỆT TRUNG.png ‎ Uploaded while editing "Hồ Việt Trung" on vi.wikipedia.org Tag: Cross-wiki upload
   (change visibility) 06:41, 6 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +264‎ N File:KARIK.png ‎ Uploaded while editing "Karik" on vi.wikipedia.org Tag: Cross-wiki upload
   (change visibility) 15:06, 5 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −110‎ File:NAM EM.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
(change visibility) 05:21, 5 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −24‎ m File:NAM EM.jpg ‎ added Category:Nam Em; removed
This project page is uncategorized.
Please help improve this project page by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related project pages (how?), and so that it can be more easily found.
Tag: HotCat 
   (change visibility) 05:16, 5 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +265‎ N File:NAM EM.jpg ‎ Uploaded while editing "Nam Em" on vi.wikipedia.org Tag: Cross-wiki upload
   (change visibility) 12:48, 4 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +268‎ N File:DATMANIAC.png ‎ Uploaded while editing "Datmaniac" on vi.wikipedia.org Tag: Cross-wiki upload
   (change visibility) 12:20, 1 May 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −37‎ File:VuTruVFCngoaitruyen.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 14:57, 30 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +316‎ N File:VuTruVFCngoaitruyen.jpg ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
   (change visibility) 06:45, 30 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −53‎ File:Anh trai Say Hi.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 14:31, 29 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) −53‎ File:HOANG HAI.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
   (change visibility) 09:28, 28 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Soobin Eleverse.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:17, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Châu Đăng Khoa trong một bộ ảnh thời trang cùng siêu mẫu Thuỳ Dương.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:16, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:CHÂU ĐĂNG KHOA trên trang bìa Thể Thao Văn Hoá Đàn Ông.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:16, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Châu Đăng Khoa chụp ảnh fashion features cho ĐẸP MAGAZINE.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:10, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Bích Phương.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:07, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:JustaTee - THE BRAIN VIETNAM.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:07, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Justatee RapViet.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:06, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Justatee RapViet (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:USAID co-sponors MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7277031772).jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:USAID co-sponors MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 11:17, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Soobin Eleverse 2.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 10:55, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Trường Giang tại lễ phát động nhân đạo năm 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 10:54, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Truong Giang.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:53, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Hoài Linh.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 10:52, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Tran Thanh at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:52, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Mc Trấn Thành tại Siêu trí tuệ Việt Nam mùa 2.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 10:51, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Tran Thanh.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 10:50, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:TRAN THANH - THE BRAIN VIETNAM (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:50, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Tran Thanh & Hari Won (2017).png ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:49, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:TRAN THANH - 7UP - 2020.05.14 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:49, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Trấn Thành 191226.png ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
   (change visibility) 10:40, 27 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +53‎ File:Sontungmtp.jpg ‎No edit summary
   (change visibility) 11:39, 26 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +196‎ File:HOANG HAI.jpg ‎ ‎Added [vi] caption: HOANG HAI
   (change visibility) 11:39, 26 April 2024 (diff | deletion log | view) +300‎ N File:HOANG HAI.jpg ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard


Jmabel ! talk 21:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Again User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, please do not delete them

Again User:Adamant1 put a deletion request in a lot of gallery pages which are fine (two or more images). Now he even emptied them and put a speedy deletion request in them. For me that is vandalism. Please do not delete these gallery pages. They should all be reverted to the versions before the vandalism.

It is at least about:

JopkeB (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

It turns out that hundreds of them have already been deleted, but they are no longer in his list with contributions, only in my inbox of my mailbox. And I cannot tell whether he also made deletion requests for gallery pages that I did not have on my watchlist. Very sad. JopkeB (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
@JopkeB: 99% of them only had one image. Otherwise they only had a couple with zero chance of expansion or anything that made them worth keeping. Again though, most of them only had a single image. Although it's not like that's the only criteria for speedy deletion. There's several others that you seem to be ignoring for whatever reason and I really don't appreciate your spurious accusation that anything here is vandalism or that you are trying to get admins to revert things based on your clearly false personal opinion that I wasn't basing the speedy deletions on the guidelines. Just because you aren't privy to why the galleries where deleted or what my motivations where at the time doesn't mean it's vandalism. So I'd appreciate it if you dropped the stick instead of trying to use admins to get your way about something that clearly isn't an issue.
Just to give one example of what I'm talking about, the gallery for "Rosa 'Editor Stewart'" only contained two images and essentially recreates the category without adding anything or there being a way to expand it. It's totally valid to nominate a gallery for deletion that purely recreates the category and has not chance of being expanded. Again, your free to disagree with that, but calling it vandalism is just hyperbolic nonsense. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
The vandalism is that you emptied the gallery pages, so that the administrator cannot see anymore whether it is jusitified to use the speedy deletion. And GA1 is only for gallery pages with zero or one image, not for two. And I doubt that only 1% of the deleted pages had more than 1 image, you can see on the removed kb's that in the row above there were at least two pages had more (four and five). And I do not know any other reason to use GA1 than having no or one image. For other reasons you still need to make a proper deletion request. JopkeB (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
@JopkeB: An admin can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's just how it works with speedy deletion requests. I've been doing it that way for years with out issue, seen plenty of other people do it that way, and Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion doesn't say either way. So I don't see how its vandalism. I think admins use a special tool to speedy delete pages anyway. Meaning they don't check them for content to begin with.
As to the rest of your comment, the guideline says "Mainspace pages (galleries) that are empty or contain no useful content" qualify for speedy deletion. I'll meet you half way and say that the phrase "contains no useful content" is a little ambiguous, but nowhere does it say it's "only for gallery pages with zero or one image" like your claiming. Regardless, it's at least my belief that a gallery isn't useful if it purely duplicates the category because it only contains a couple of images and can't be expanded. Your free to disagree with that, but I reject the idea that me nominated said galleries for deletion is or was vandalism. The one extra image doesn't actually change the equation that much when it comes to if a gallery is useful or not. Really, this whole just comes off like bad faithed Wikilaywer. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
@JopkeB: --Adamant1 (talk) 05:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Please place the speedy deletion template above the page content and do not remove the page content. If the content is removed we have to look at the versions from the history. This step would not be necessary in many cases if the template is just placed on top of the content. GPSLeo (talk) 05:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
@GPSLeo: I'm fine with doing it that way if blanking the page is an issue. It's just how I've seen other people do it.
@Adamant1: {{Speedydelete}} says Placement: At the top of the page which to me implies going above the existing content, not replacing it. Maybe this ought to be clarified to "At the top of the page, above the existing content." Consigned (talk) 10:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
@Consigned: Fair enough. It probably should be clarified if it's obligatory since I've been doing it that way for years now, seen other people do it the same way, and this is the first time I've seen anyone say anything about it. So it really doesn't seem to be a requirement or anything that anyone cares about. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
@JopkeB anytime the word "again" pops up on AN, its not good. IDONTLIKEIT Definitely applies here, and considering the current mood on commons, not exactly the best time or place to be making another post about a user when the first one hasn't even been archived yet. requests for undeletion is the appropriate venue for JopkeB.
At this point, I'm thinking 1 (or 2) way I-Ban.
All the Best -- Chuck Talk 05:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
I don't think that's necessary at this point since me and JopkeB get alone fine outside of this. I would like to see her drop the stick about it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

File_talk:Coat_of_arms_of_Nigeria.svg

Someone posted their email address several times on this page; is this something that can be overwritten via history (oversight perhaps) so this email address is not in the history? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. I simply deleted the talkpage, so it is not viewable for others. And I blocked the IP for 3 days. Currently nothing more should be done. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

undeletion request

please undelete Category:Sima Sabet. Hanooz 18:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done although you can recreate categories yourself. Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Admin actions needed for POTY

A few admin actions are needed for the contest, which is starting soon: 

page_namespace == 4 &
page_title irlike "Picture of the Year\/\d{4}\/R[12]\/votes\/.+" &
global_user_editcount < 75 &
!("autopatrolled" in user_rights)

cc @AntiCompositeNumber:

Thanks, Ingenuity (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done for the AbuseFilter. Yann (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
@Ingenuity, created the tag as well. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
what for MediaWiki:Tag-poty-script-description? Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
@Aafi: could you create that with Edits made using the [[MediaWiki:POTY-gallery.js|Picture of the Year helper script]] ? Thanks! Ingenuity (talk) 17:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done. Regards, Aafi (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Nonsense depict statements

Hello, I stumbled on this one that added nonsense depict statements on random images. The few older edits seem nonsense too. Syrio posso aiutare? 00:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/286 may be adapted to test for those.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Datasets about potential logos released

Hi all! As part of our current work with the logo detection tool, we have conducted an analysis over 22 days of recent file uploads (August-September 2024) and identified 1,594 images as potential logos using the developed logo detection model.

We have released two datasets: one with all identified logos - fields are image title, confidence score, URL, uploader, whether the uploader is a bot - and another one with an additional field that tells if the image is tagged as “own work” or “not own work”. Note that the latter contains 180 less files than the former, because in the meantime those files were deleted. We consider this as a positive signal, in line with the main goal of facilitating content moderation.

We thought these datasets would be of interest to you, especially in terms of patrolling recent uploads. We also wanted to point out that, according to our statistics, our experimental tool can detect ~47% more files that are not correctly categorized as logos or are not correctly pointed out as such.

We can also expand this dataset to include one more full month of data (i.e. July 2024), as well as exporting those datasets regularly on a monthly basis.

Hope this could be of help for your moderation work and more specifically identification of problematic/copyrighted logos. If you need more info, feel free to ping me. Thanks in advance! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

@Sannita (WMF), can you add their deletion status and relevant info? (who tagged, who deleted, DR or CSD, etc) All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck I'll ask the dev who did the dataset, and will let you know if we can integrate the dataset. Now it's already weekend, so if it will be possible, it will happen early next week. Sannita (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Is there a way to detect how likely a logo is to be above the threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
@Sannita (WMF) any updates? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I was looking through the csv file earlier and it's interesting, but kind of unintuitive. @Enhancing999: Do you think it would be possible to turn the CVS file into an autogenerated page with a table or something like you did with the list of uncategorized categories? --Adamant1 (talk) 07:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Trade, I agree that the threshold of originality would be useful to distinguish potential copyright violations. The current logo detection doesn't take into account that dimension, as it's a slightly different task. Are you aware of any relevant Commons category/template/metadata that would enable the encoding of such distinction? That would be important to let a classifier learn it. Thanks! MFossati (WMF) (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
No, not really. I would be surprised if there were no AI that could determine the complexity of an image Trade (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hey Alachuckthebuck, I think that's doable, it'll take some work to generate that. Please stay tuned! MFossati (WMF) (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi everyone, we've just published two additional datasets:
Additional fields extracted from a file page's wikitext:
  • category - a category with at least one logo occurrence, or Template:PD-textlogo, if any
  • deletion_request - a template indicating regular/speedy deletion requests, if any. For instance, a delete value maps to Template:Delete. Values for speedy deletions are as in [1]
MFossati (WMF) (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
@MFossati (WMF) Thanks so much for doing this, But according to the csv, not a single image on there was tagged with a speedy template. and about 25 were in a DR. Is that correct? For the images that did get deleted, would it be possible to get the tagging user and the deleting admin? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: sure! Here are all counts:
Re: deletion requests - yes, looks like all of them contain Template:Delete, so no speedy ones apparently.
Re: deleted images - sure thing, I'll post here when done. MFossati (WMF) (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: here you are: https://analytics.wikimedia.org/published/datasets/one-off/gogologo/22_days_of_gogologo_deleted.csv.
Fields are:
  • url - the deleted page URL
  • deleters - users who deleted the page
  • reasons - reasons why the page was deleted
  • links - wikilinks found in the deleted page
  • taggers - users who tagged the page for deletion. Note that they're only available for regular deletion requests, i.e., those with a dedicated page
Deleted pages of [2] are just 4, so let me post them below:
Hope this helps! MFossati (WMF) (talk) 15:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! One final request, Can you add the confidence score of gogologo to that CSV? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: I've merged [7] into [8], which has now the following fields:
url, confidence_score, uploader, is_bot, deleters, taggers, reasons, links
Please note that the distribution of confidence scores might change in the future, as we refine the underlying model (e.g., by adding threshold of originality features). MFossati (WMF) (talk) 13:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

14.236.170.225

14.236.170.225 (talk · contribs) is adding {{No permission since}} to pages for files that are obviously under a free license. Given that 14.236.170.225 seems to be specifically targeting certain users and reverting their edits, I believe 14.236.170.225 may be acting in bad faith. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. 2 weeks block, all reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Old account, please put the old account template

I had an old account (User:Copperwidth) that I owned, and I was trying to put the Old account template, (Template:Alternative user) but the Abuse filter suggested that I would log in to my old account. I had forgotten the password for that account since 2 years. I was trying to prove that the account wasn't used for sockpuppetry. Your help would be grateful.

StillOrange

(talk) 01:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

@StillOrange: Please fix your signature. It shouldn't be on several lines. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done. @StillOrange: I made the edit. But, as Yann said, your signature should not be on several lines. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Ok, fixed it 🙂 StillOrange (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

File overwriting by User:Alanruiz45

Alanruiz45 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) User is overwriting own uploads with Copyvios from the internet. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Alachuckthebuck I don't see the issue. The user made 2 contributions after a long absence - neither of which appear to be copyvio. What am I missing? Gbawden (talk) 05:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Please look at deleted cont ribs, and what they were overwriting. they were overwriting images with Copyvios from the internet. I don't know why. Give me a ping if you still have questions. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
It looks like they are making some rather bad rename requests to. Like requesting File:Alan Ruiz Jimenez & mi bebe hermoso Alejandro.jpg be renamed to File:Regional mexico.jpg. The first one isn't great, but the second is way to ambagious. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I wonder if the user is trying to exercise their right to vanish, based on how these appear to be personal photos. @Bedivere, Can you talk to the user? My Spanish isn't good enough to handle this All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Considering some of these seem like personal pictures, and are unused, they may well be deleted, but not without a nomination. Bedivere (talk) 23:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Audio file update

I have made updates to the digital renderings (meaning I corrected transcription mistakes) for the following two files:

- File:Božidar Kantušer 1st string quartet - 1st mvt.wav

- File:Božidar Kantušer 1st string quartet - 2nd mvt.wav

and I cannot overwrite these files.

@admins, would you please tell me how to proceed.

Do you delete the files, and I next upload the new ones? Or should I upload the new files and then you delete the old ones?

Turboton (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

In order to overwrite files, you need the "autopatrolled" user right. Upload the new files, and either keep the old ones, or delete them as dupes, depending on the amount of change between the files. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The "issue" is now solved. My connexion was way too slow, hmm... I also realized that I have the "autopatrolled" user right, which permitted me to overwrite the files. Thanks for pointing things out. All the best. --Turboton (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Another old account

Still, I recently discovered another old account of mine (User:TwentytwoAug). Please put the alt account template on the account. The reason why I made other accounts is that either that I just forgot the password, or that forgot the other accounts existence. Just also here to prove that I am not using these accounts for sockpuppetry, I was just young when I made the account. Sorry if I'm bothering you. :P StillOrange (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Is there a reason you can't put the template on the account? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done. If the user has no advanced rights, then some projects prohibit writing on other user's pages – I'm not sure, does it apply in Commons or not. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
There is a filter that prevents non-autopatroled users from editing other peoples userspace, but I can't find the exact filter. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: Special:AbuseFilter/245, already tripped by the OP.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks @Jeff G.. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 23:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: You're welcome.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Uploads by Salh Alheib Klel

Hi all,

I'm not sure what to think about the uploads of Salh Alheib Klel. All are unused and most of them seems to be around a unknown micro-nation in Antarctica (no result on Google except on Wikimedia project) and two seems auto-promotion. The first have been used for vandalism and reverted. I'm guessing we should delete them and maybe block the account (maybe also a CU?), what do you think?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Pretty clear CSD F10 territory. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Since this involves admins, please do come around and comment on: Commons talk:License review/Requests#Suggestion: Remove assigning of LR rights by LR. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Translations of Vote Templates into Prussian (prg)

Because they're mostly protected, I can't edit them. Please put them in their respective templates:

Vote Templates
Template lang=en lang=prg Prussian text
{{Support}}  Support  Enlāika Enlāika
{{Strong support}}  Strong support  Spārts enlāika Spārts enlāika
{{Weak support}}  Weak support  Kussals enlāika Kussals enlāika
{{Agree}}  Agree  Senwaitjai Senwaitjai (both versions are correct.)
{{Withdraw}}  I withdraw my nomination  As eliminijja etrīnksnan As eliminijja etrīnksnan
{{Oppose}}  Oppose  Emprīkistatina Emprīkistatina
{{Strong oppose}}  Strong oppose  Spārts emprīkistatina Spārts emprīkistatina
{{Weak oppose}}  Weak oppose  Kussals emprīkistatina Kussals emprīkistatina
{{Neutral}}  Neutral  Neutrāls Neutrāls
{{Abstain}}  Abstain  Etlāika si Etlāika si
{{Info}}  Info  Infōrmācija Infōrmācija
{{On hold}}  On hold  Preistalinna Preistalinna
{{Question}}  Question  Prasīsenis Prasīsenis
{{Vote keep}}  Keep  Palāikais Palāikais
{{Vote speedykeep}}  Speedy keep  Dīws palāikais Dīws palāikais
{{Weak keep}}  Weak keep  Kussals palāikais Kussals palāikais
{{Strong keep}}  Strong keep  Spārts palāikais Spārts palāikais
{{Vote speedy}}  Speedy delete  Dīws āupausinais Dīws āupausinais
{{Weak delete}}  Weak delete  Kussals palāikais Kussals palāikais
{{Resolved}}
Resolved
Papretta
 Papretta
{{Done}} ✓ Done ✓ Segīsenis gāncas Segīsenis gāncas
{{Already done}} Already done Segīsenis jāu gāncas Segīsenis jāu gāncas
{{Not done}}  Not done  Ni tikinna Ni tikinna

Now, am I sure that all the casings are right? No. But will these help the Prussian Language on Wikicommons? Seems so. Kxeo (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done, you may want to translate the Main Page as well. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

113.165.210.130

A sock of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Funny Man 1999. IP has the exact same behavior as those socks (adding no permission template inaccurately everywhere). Nguyentrongphu (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Krd. Yann (talk) 11:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Do we want to add a LTA filter? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

POTY 2023 Round 1 - mass message

As it is now October 1st and POTY has started, could an admin please send this message to these targets? The person who was asked if he could do it just said he never used massmessage so help is needed. Thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Giles Laurent: ✓ Done. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@Giles Laurent: however I'm really sorry. I don't know what caused the heading to appear twice? Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Copying the header into the "subject" of Special:MassMessage when it's also embedded on the "page to be sent". Now that classic question of whether to load up AWB to remove it or let it be. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  17:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
jeez. I see, and the messaging tool asks for the subject line (error: the subject line is empty). I have no good experience with AWB and would leave it to others. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I made a request here. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Renaming a category

Hello. The category Category:Demonstration for Palestine in Barcelona (27 September 2024) was wrongfully/unnecessarily renamed Category:Vaga general per Palestina 2024 (Barcelona), even after Category:Strike for Palestine (27 September 2024) had been renamed Category:Vaga general per Palestina 2024 and then renamed back. Anyways, the problem is now I can't rename the category because the English name is already in use as a redirection. I would kindly ask you to do that for me, if possible and plausible, as per Commons:Categories#Category names and also for homogeneity with other categories under Category:Demonstrations and protests in Barcelona in 2024. -- Brunnaiz (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion request

Could someone delete the first version of the image please?--Trade (talk) 01:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done.. Regards, Aafi (talk) 02:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Fair use file needs speedy deletion

Hi, can someone do the honours on this one, please. ASAP. Apologies for not noticing originally. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 15:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, Matrix, and I apologise for the lazy error again. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
@Serial Number 54129: In the future, please do not report such things here. Instead, add {{speedydelete|reason for speedy deletion}} in beginning of file page. The file had been in Commons for more than year, so couple of hours more or less actually do not make big difference. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Taivo  :) I was joking about not pleasing people! I wouldn't normally have posted it here, but HJM wanted it ready for his TFA, and of course, we weren't sure how long the deletion would take. Anyway, thanks for the message. Made me chuckle! cheers, Serial Number 54129 (talk) 10:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

requuest to overwrite File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-bjn.svg

Hello. I want to overwrite it. Because the logo didn't follow the logo guidelines. I also want to change the tagline and font. 미솔파 (talk) 10:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

You can always upload a new version of the logo with your changes. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
I can't. It's protected. 미솔파 (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion, you can upload the edited version as a new file. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Edit request MediaWiki:Gadget-libAPI.js

Hi, would somebody with interface-admin rights to add function below to MediaWiki:Gadget-libAPI.js (example diff). Function is for adding a method for removing already queued edits from queue. It would be used in Cat-a-lot.js. 

abortPendingRequests: function() {
   apiRequestQueue = [];
},

--Zache (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

@Lucas Werkmeister and Mdaniels5757: this is just pushing edit request up. After the edit is complete, I will update User:Zache/cat-a-lot-edit-libAPI.js to use abortPendingRequests() instead of capturing $.ajax for aborting the edit queue. Another humble request: could the statement, Since the JS edit API module by MW is a joke..., be removed from the header of MediaWiki:Gadget-libAPI.js as deprecated? (Example: diff) It may have been true in 2012, but now it feels like just unnecessary confrontation. --Zache (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Judging from MediaWiki talk:Gadget-libAPI.js this has been ✓ Done. Multichill (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Campaign:wlpac-rs

Hi, I left a message on the Village pump/Technical page but I think only admin can create Campaign and MediaWiki pages. Please take a look at Village_pump/Technical#Campaign:wlpac-rs. Thanks for your help! MikyM (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hurricane Milton

Hi there, I protected File:Milton 2024 path.png earlier today as it's in use on the homepage of the English Wikipedia. There is now a newer version available at File:Milton 2024 track.png. Could some of you please watchlist that new file, and when that version gets updated, copy it across to the protected file so that the Wiki homepage is being kept up to date? Much appreciated. Schwede66 02:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

No. Those two files aren't and should not be confused as duplicates. In fact, the first file uses the 2023 WPTC color scale, while the second one is merely an alternative by @Supportstorm. Please update the path using the new color scale. Tavantius (talk) 12:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
As Tavantius stated they are two separate files. The track uses the legacy scale that was used on the English Wikipedia until 2023 when the majority of members voted to switched to an new scheme. Since there were thousands of tracks with the previous scheme and not all the language Wikipedia have elected to use the newer colors, the legacy scheme track files are still maintained by me. Supportstorm (talk) 13:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
I see. Thanks for the clarification. Schwede66 13:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
As I said on the file talk page, the track should not have been used for the homepage, instead using a satellite. As stated above we use the new colors and still have to update it and needing to go through a tedious process just sounds unnecessary and actually damaging to the WikiProject Weather effort since now no one can update it very quickly without going through a tedious process which could take hours just for a response to be made. Sorry if this sounds a bit harsh, but I would’ve preferred if the WikiProject was alerted before the decision was made. MarioProtIV (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
@Schwede66: I request you undo your action in light of you evident misunderstanding of how these images are used and what they represent.--Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 17:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Undo what action? Schwede66 18:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Undo your use of the track there.--Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 18:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Done. Schwede66 18:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Ajout de 11 photos en licence libre

Demande de déblocage temporaire du tableau " sites mégalithiques des Pyrénées orientales" pour ajout de 11 photos différentes sur 11 cases "image non renseignée" .Milca56 Milca56 (talk) 07:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

It is possible that I don't understand, but I'm guessing this is about fr:Sites mégalithiques des Pyrénées-Orientales, which does not seem an any way to be blocked. I have no idea what help is requested, particularly from a Commons administrator. - Jmabel ! talk 12:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Oui . Dans le tableau de cet article est indiqué que la page est protégée .Dans la colonne illustration "image manquante" on ne peux pas insérer une photo pour compléter comme cela est possible sur les autres "sites mégalithiques "par exemple du Morbihan . Milca56 (talk) 04:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

JoelMLN

Please reconsider the uploads made by JoelMLN (talk · contribs). The user has been uploading lots of files without evidence of permission. As can be observed in the talk page, the user has had lots of problems. One notable feature is that they stated the source to be from a website while the actual photo was taken from a TripAdvisor review, indicating a misleading source. ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a month. Lets see if they get the message Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Add information on protected image

Hi, I have created an illustration Diagram of the Grand Hotel Brighton and the effects of the bomb, showing the position of key individuals at the time of the explosion. and now I would like to cross-add "Other versions" links between that and The Grand Hotel in Brighton 12 October 1984, following an IRA bomb attack. My problem is that the jpg image is protected so I can't add the information my self. The information I want added is: |other versions =<gallery>File:The Brighton bomb explosion.svg|Diagram of the Grand Hotel Brighton and the effects of the bomb, showing the position of key individuals at the time of the explosion.</gallery>.

Hope someone here can help, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

TThey are not versions of the same image. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
@Pigsonthewing That is depending on the definition of "Other versions". To me that means other images depicting the relativ same stuff and that is exactly what this illustration does Diagram of the Grand Hotel Brighton and the effects of the bomb, showing the position of key individuals at the time of the explosion. to the protected jpg. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm inclined to agree with Andy here. The illustration is at a different angle from the photo. Other versions usually means "other versions of the same photograph or the same artwork." Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
@Pigsonthewing @Abzeronow I don't know where you found this definition "other versions of the same photograph or the same artwork" because I can't find any definition which is commonly accepted here at commons, please link to it if it exist.
The only type of definition (but not really) is at Category:Other_versions_templates, "This category is for all "other versions" templates, that is, templates used to show alternate versions of a file (usually they go in the other_versions field in {{Information}})."
What the different angel has to do with it is nothing I understand.
The main subject with both these images is to show the The Brighton bomb and it affects.
  • So if we have different views on this, what do we do, who else can look at this, who has more knowledge about "Other versions"?
--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
I agree with Andy and Abzeronow here. "Other versions" means "other versions of the same work", not "other images of the same thing." The mechanism for the latter, if needed, is a category. - Jmabel ! talk 16:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
@Abzeronow @Jmabel @Pigsonthewing So I will just drop this now, we just have different understandings, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Mass-message request for WLM-US 2024

Hello! I'm one of the organizers for Wiki Loves Monuments in the US. Could the following message be sent out to last year's participants inviting them to this year's event?

The body template already includes my signature, and the five tildes adds the timestamp. Thank you! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done GPSLeo (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

POTY 2023 Round 2 - Mass Message Request

Could an admin please send message to vote in POTY round 2?

Please keep the "Subject" blank as it’s already included in the message. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

In progress GPSLeo (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done GPSLeo (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Request for closure of Commons:Requests for comment/Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

The RfC has been open for a bit over a month, and the discussion's subject affects a large number of images on Commons. Uninvolved closure that can summarize the result of the discussion is requested. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Template:Sisterprojects

Please correct the links in Template:Sisterprojects, some of them are incorrect. Chrumps (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you be bit more specific? Which wiki/language should point where?
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
For example: https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Main_Page/de or https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/pl:. Chrumps (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Any suggestions where they should point? Links need to be fixed by an admin at Template:Sisterprojects layout.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
There is a discussion about Wikifunctions at Template_talk:Sisterprojects_layout#Broken_Wikifunctions_link
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 21:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Ok, but links https://www.wikifunctions.org and https://www.wikiversity.org should work fine for all languages without an additional subpage or parameter. Chrumps (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately only for logged in users to their own language, of course, but it's still better than a broken link. Chrumps (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Does this qualify as "Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus"?

File:GID Landspout.jpg was deleted on October 17 as an image sourced from a US government website where even the agency that published it did not know who took the photo.

Two days later, a user uploaded a screenshot of the web page that hosts the photo as File:NWS_Hastings_Tornadoes_Picture_1_Webpage.jpg. I've opened a deletion request. Given the minimalist and unremarkable nature of the rest of the page, I don't see what purpose a screenshot of the page design serves or why that purpose couldn't be served by blacking out the photo of unknown provenance (or simply choosing another page with only unambiguously free elements).

I'm quite happy to wait for the deletion process to run its course, but for future reference, my question here is whether images like this could/should have just been G4'ed instead? (But note the uploader's rationale in the current DR)

Courtesy ping to uploader @WeatherWriter:

--Rlandmann (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes, deleted. Yann (talk) 22:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Special:ChangeContentModel for template

Hello, I have found a template from Wikipedia (nl/en) that I would like to import to Commons (w:en:Template:Stacked bar). I have created the corresponding CSS file under Template:Stacked bar/style.css, but unfortunately I get an error message: «must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "CSS")». According to my research (mw:Extension:TemplateStyles), the problem is probably due to the fact that the content model of the page has not yet been changed to "Sanitized CSS". As I cannot make this change myself, I would like to ask you to set the content model of the page Template:Stacked bar/style.css to Sanitized CSS using Special:ChangeContentModel, so that the transfer of the template can continue. Аныл Эзташ (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

@A. Öztas: I changed it to Sanitised CSS. It appears you also misspelt "styles.css" as "style.css", which I have corrected. I have also imported the template from enwiki for you. If you need any more help, please let me know. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 15:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, that helps! --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Upload of KI-generated fake images by User:Freja Nygaard

Hi, Freja Nygaard has uploaded three obviously KI-generrated images here, which he falsley declared to be oil-canvass paintings from "the scandinavian royal collection". We have removed the pictures from the german articles and I've blocked him there. The question now is, what to do with the files on commons. As a de.wp-admin I don't know enough about your rules on commons regarding fake and false described images, but I kindly ask You, to have a look at this problem. Thanks in advance. Emergency doc (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion by me. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories to add and/or remove on multiple files

See the discussion here.

The work to do is put in that table :

Table of changes to be made to Wikimedia logos
File Category to add Category(ies) to remove Done
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-tcy.svg Category:Tulu Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-tcy-new.svg Category:Tulu Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ta.svg Category:Tamil Wikipedia logos Category:Tamil Wikipedia logo ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-dag.svg Category:Dagbani Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-blk.svg Category:Pa'O Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wiktionary-logo-blk.svg Category:Pa'O Wikimedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ext-new.svg Category:Extremaduran Wikipedia logos Category:Extremaduran Wikipedia ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-anp.svg Category:Angika Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-tly.svg Category:Talysh Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-zgh.svg Category:Standard Moroccan Amazigh logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-fon.svg Category:Fon Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wiktionary-logo-mnw.svg Category:Mon Wiktionary logos Category:Mon language
Category:Wiktionary logos 		✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-bew.svg Category:Betawi Wikipedia logos Category:Wikipedia Betawi
Category:Commons-bew 		✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg Category:English Wikipedia logos Category:English Wikipedia logo ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-tum.svg Category:Tumbuka Wikipedia logos Category:English Wikipedia logo
Category:Tumbuka Wikipedia 		✓
File:Wikiquote-logo-as.svg Category:Assamese Wikimedia logos Category:Assamese language ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v3-ar.svg Category:Arabic Wikipedia logos Category:Arabic Wikipedia logo ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-tay.svg Category:Atayal Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-dga.svg Category:Dagaare Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-gungbe.svg Category:Gun Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-pcm.svg Category:Nigerian pidgin Wikipedia logos Category:Lagos Wikimedians photos
Category:Nigerian pidgin Wikimedians 		✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-trv.svg Category:Seediq Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-alt.svg Category:Southern Altai Wikipedia logos none ✓
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ami.svg Category:Amis Wikipedia logos none ✓

Berdea (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

@Berdea: All done, I believe, but please check. - Jmabel ! talk 01:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I have detected only one error (see below) :

Wikimedia logos : one file to correct
File Category to add Category(ies) to remove Done
File:Wiktionary-logo-blk.svg Category:Pa'O Wikimedia logos Category:Pa'O Wikipedia logos ✓

@Jmabel: Thank you for your help and for your speed. I would allow myself to come back to this page if I had other modifications to make. This work of categorization is quite tedious, but I think this work of storage is useful. --Berdea (talk) 10:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Done. - Jmabel ! talk 10:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Jmabel ! talk 10:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

No thumbnail

I don't understand what's going on. If you look at this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Congo_location_map.svg, you will see, in the history file section, a lot of thumbnail issues. If you click on the lines with no thumbnail (in the date/time or thumbnail column), the file is ok but not the thumbnails. Why my uploads don't work ? Is it an issue with my account ? my network ? Could you help me please ? Yunan973 (talk) 13:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

The SVG files you uploaded have invalid namespace declarations. For example, when I try to display one of those thumbnails in my browser, my browser complains 
This page contains the following errors:
error on line 3 at column 677: xmlns:ns: '&#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;ns_sfw;' is not a valid URI
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
The relevant SVG is 
<svg
   version="1.1"
   viewBox="0 0 851.256 914.719"
   xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
   xmlns:ns="&amp;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;ns_sfw;"
   xmlns:i="&amp;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;#38;ns_ai;">
This is a common problem with tools failing to properly expand XML entities. Adobe illustrator will use an entity to define namespaces; for example, xmlns:i="&ns_ai;". Instead of expanding the ns_ai entity, the tool just quotes the ampersand and does some other nonsense (#38; is also an ampersand).
The working files have a DTD that declares the entities: 
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd" [
	<!ENTITY ns_extend "http://ns.adobe.com/Extensibility/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_ai "http://ns.adobe.com/AdobeIllustrator/10.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_graphs "http://ns.adobe.com/Graphs/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_vars "http://ns.adobe.com/Variables/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_imrep "http://ns.adobe.com/ImageReplacement/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_sfw "http://ns.adobe.com/SaveForWeb/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_custom "http://ns.adobe.com/GenericCustomNamespace/1.0/">
	<!ENTITY ns_adobe_xpath "http://ns.adobe.com/XPath/1.0/">
]>
Glrx (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Great ! Thanks a lot ! It works now. Thanks again. Yunan973 (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

DR close

Could an admin take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Notorious B.I.G. stencil.jpg and assess whether it can be closed or whether it should be re-listed? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Revdel request

Revdel of this diff, blatant copyvio from https://desire53place.blogspot.com/2024/10/taj-mahal-tourist-attractions-things-to.html. ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done copyvio of text hidden Abzeronow (talk) 16:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Datasets about potential logos - September 2024 uploads

Hi all, we have released a new dataset of potential logos uploaded in September 2024, together with another one of those which have already been deleted as of 2024-10-24. We are sharing them with you for your consideration.

This is part of our current work with the logo detection tool. We hope it will be useful for your moderation activities.

If you encounter issues with the datasets or have comments/requests, please reach out to me or to Sannita (WMF).

Thanks for your attention! --MFossati (WMF) (talk) 09:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Interface admin request

Per a discussion at en.wp and discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Technical#Category:Pages_using_the_JsonConfig_extension, please create MediaWiki:Jsonconfig-use-category with the text "-". I'm posting here rather than MediaWiki talk:Jsonconfig-use-category for increased visibility. There are a few too many to ping. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. @Koavf: is there anything else that I can help with? Regards, Aafi (talk) 04:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
You can have yourself a quite lovely day, comrade. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
There are over 73'000 subcats and over 63'000 pages in the cat just now. Let's see whether they start to vanish now. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't know about when this would be done but per Special:Diff/949188149, Enhancing999 added a template stating the progress. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Timed Text file question

Can an admin take a look at TimedText:LL-Q1860_(eng)-Vealhurl-heraldry.wav.en.srt? I think it might somehow be related to this Help Desk post but not sure. The file might be a case of COM:PERSONAL since it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic value unless it's intended to be used together with File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-heraldry.wav. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done deleted by Achim55. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Gone Postal's template editor

Please remove template editor from Gone Postal per COM:TE § Revocation; they have not edited or made a logged action in over two and a half years. Hope they are well. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. Regards, Aafi (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Merge category's history

Please, merge the history of the two following categories:

Thanks. Minerva97 (talk) 22:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Appears to be done. - Jmabel ! talk 01:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Can please also move Category:Quick response codes to Category:QR codes for history? thx. RoyZuo (talk) 01:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your input...

FYI: Commons talk:Administrators#Userpages: red or blue?. Regards, Aafi (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Bug in the bot User:WLKBot operated by me. Rollback of changes requested

There is a bug in the bot User:WLKBot, operated by me User:Kim Bach, when bulk moving images between categories.

The bot has made a substantial number of edits that should be rolled back.

So I'm requesting a rollback of all changes that were made by User:WLKBot since October 1st 2024.

Tool: User:WLKBot

Languages: English Kim Bach (talk) 11:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Is there a tool that can perform such mass reverting easily with one click? I can't find any oldid=941295377 bad edits at first glance. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
There's w:User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/massRollback on enwiki, don't see anything that would stop this from working on Commons (although I'm not a rollbacker here so can't confirm that) Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
@Queen of Hearts: The tool doesn't seem functioning here: "You didn't select any edits that could be rolled back". If fixed, this could be a good help. Regards, Aafi (talk) 19:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
I've moved it to commons for testing and tweaks. Documentation at User:Alachuckthebuck/massrollback and script at User:Alachuckthebuck/massrollback.js All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
If someone knows the fix before I do, please leave me a post on my talk page, and I'll implement it. @Aafi, I don't currently have rollback, Filing request at com:RFR All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck, all the best and I hope this comes as helpful. I've granted you rollback rights as requested and required. Regards, Aafi (talk) 04:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
@Alachuckthebuck: I have had that script in m:User:Jeff G./global.js for seven years with mw.loader.load('//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Writ_Keeper/Scripts/massRollback.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); and used it (including here on Commons) without problem. @Aafi: Of course, at least one box will need to be checked in order to "rollback some" successfully. Please note that there are thousands of edits requested to be rolled back, and that the bot's user talk page had activity yesterday.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
"at least one box will need to be checked in order to "rollback some" successfully" - do you think I went on selecting no box? Of course, I know what "rollback selected" means and how it is to be used. I once again tried selecting my latest test edit as guided and it brings "You didn't select any edits that could be rolled back!" Regards, Aafi (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
@Aafi: Sorry, it worked for me, although my summary was admittedly short on details. Of course, the edit has to qualify for rollback in the sense that it is the current edit.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
To clarify, All edits that are the current revision of a page that have been made by WLK bot other than the 5 edits made on the 17th to its talk page should be rolled back? I'm about to run the script, and want to make sure I won't break anything. Thanks @Jeff G. for helping with the script. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
In progress, I've done the first 100 as a test, will scale to running them in 1k batches in a few hrs. @Krd, Do you see anything amiss? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
✓ done by alachuckthebuck about 15k reverts, 2 userrights granted, and a script migration, its done. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 23:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
@Kim Bach, It's done, your good to go, the only things not undone were category creations, redirect creations, and the edits made on the 17th to the talk page. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 23:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Saluting face emoji Queen of Hearts (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
@Queen of Hearts, can you take a look at my userights and see if you can fix the expiration on LR? Krd meant to put the expiration on account creator, but overshot the mark. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 00:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Queen of Hearts (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
@Aafi,@Kim Bach, I have been asked by @Hjart, and @Rsteen to undo the rollback. For Context, this whole ordeal has been over the word "the" in the (3 thousand) category titles created by the bot for 35 thousand plus images. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
I suspect there is some miscommunication. Given the bot operator's request about undoing the edits made by their bot, I am in favor of respecting the request. If this requires more help, I suggest seeking help at Commons:Bots/Work requests. However, that needs a clear instruction from the bot operator - why is there even is confusion/miscommunication? I'd like to understand that. Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Apparently, @Kim Bach requested the rollback per discussion on the talk page, but further debate happened regarding the topic on User_talk:Ham_II#"in_the_Statens_Museum_for_Kunst", and I only found out after the run. I was requested to rollback my edits, but I have declined the request on the grounds of more discussion being needed, and Cat-a-lot being a more suitable tool to just move the files to the new cats and remove the old ones (the categories were not deleted). Another option is just fixing the bug in the code, and having WLKBot do the move. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

FYI

I have just blocked Dhwani221 for uploading blatant copyright vios. Earlier today, I deleted six of their uploads which were wrongly licensed as "own work" but elsewhere published by others, and issued them a warning. They returned again with some more copyright violations. In the second batch, I have deleted four of their new uploads as blatant copyright violations and then issued a block. I might have been very strict with the indef block and ask other admins to re-review it. I have DRed the remaining files: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dhwani221.

It appears that they upload the images here only for the sake of having these images added to en-wiki pages. Regards, Aafi (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Rev del request

✓ Done - Jmabel ! talk 21:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt response Jmabel. Best regards, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Broken request and dead delinker

Two problems detected:

Taylor 49 (talk) 17:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Mass-message request for WLM-Suriname 2024

Hello! I'm one of the organizers for Wiki Loves Monuments in Suriname. Could the follow message be sent out to all of last year's contributors?

Thank you so much and please let me know if I need to add anything! MichellevL (WMNL) (talk) 09:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Doing this now. Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Removal of redundant rights

Please remove patroller rights of user Omphalographer since they are image-reviewer now. Thanks, Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Revision deletion request

Could an admin possibly delete all earlier revisions of File:'Fighting and taking policy decisions', from a painted scroll documenting the joint Dogra-Sikh invasions of Ladakh, Baltistan, and Western Tibet, ca.1840's.jpg? They contain extensive copyrighted material in the description field (the file itself is in the public domain). Felix QW (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done @Felix QW: although, not very good per en:WP:REVDEL##Large-scale use, as these were several edits. I believe this wasn't too huge here, given there were not much contributors and the all the edits came on a single day. I have revdelled these revisions. Regards, Aafi (talk) 14:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I would have entirely trusted your discretion either way. Felix QW (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Rwandan flag change

Hi! A new user has uploaded a supposedly new flag for Rwanda (Flag of Rwanda.png) and has gone on to change existing articles and templates cross-wiki. I cannot find any information that this flag is valid, so I'm turning to you for help. Their edits on enwiki have been reverted and I will shortly be doing so on smnwiki. - Yupik (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Deleted, and I'd protect this title. Regards, Aafi (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! - Yupik (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Nuisance vandal in 2603:7080:8C00:B396 range

Anon accounts starting with 2603:7080:8C00:B396 have been persistently doing minor vandalism to File:Brown Derby Restaurant, Los Angeles, Kodachrome by Chalmers Butterfield.jpg (history). I've considered just protecting that file, but thought that might just get them to change their vandalism target to something not on my watch list. Is there a way we can block 2603:7080:8C00:B396 range? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done I soft-blocked Special:Contributions/2603:7080:8C00:B396:0:0:0:0/64 for 3 months. Yann (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Bus categories and images in Oxfordshire & Buckinghamshire

An unregistered user, 217.46.140.107, has made hundreds of unconstructive edits to images and categories of buses in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire. S/he has incorrectly made "Category:Carousel Buses (bus company)", "Category:Thames Travel (bus company)", and "Category:City Sightseeing Oxford" sub-categories of "Category:Oxford Bus Company". GoAhead Group has confirmed to me that the three companies are separate; and Carousel and TT are not subsidiaries of OBC; they just happen to share the same directors. City Sightseeing Oxford shares the same depot as TT, but is also separate from OBC.

The same user has also incorrectly removed hundreds of images from "Category:Stagecoach in Oxfordshire" and "Category:Stagecoach Gold (Stagecoach in Oxfordshire)", and moved them to and "Category:Stagecoach Gold (Stagecoach West)". All of them are photographs that were taken before February 2021, when Stagecoach West absorbed Stagecoach in Oxfordshire. It is therefore anachronistic to move them to the Stagecoach West categories.

I took and uploaded many of those photographs. I am also prone to panic attacks and acute anxiety. I am shaking as I type this, and am finding it very hard to deal with the unregistered contributor who has made these unconstructive edits. (I suspect it may be a registered contributor, or former contributor, who is using their IP address to avoid being identified. But that is guesswork on my part.)

Please will an administrator stop whoever it is from messing up the categorisation of bus images from Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire? And what is the quickest way to move hundreds of images back to their rightful places in "Category:Stagecoach in Oxfordshire" and "Category:Stagecoach Gold (Stagecoach in Oxfordshire)"? Moving each image individually would take a lot of time and effort.

Thankyou, Motacilla (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

FYI: Special:Contributions/217.46.140.107. Regards, Aafi (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Also FYI: usually when company A absorbs company B, the category for company B should become a subcat of the category for company A. However, no images should be recategorized. - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
In that case, I suggest that "Stagecoach in Oxfordshire" should be a subcat of "Stagecoach West"; "Stagecoach Gold (Stagecoach in Oxfordshire)" should be a subcat of both "Stagecoach in Oxfordshire" and "Stagecoach Gold (Stagecoach West)"; and "Oxford Tube (bus route)" should be a subcat of both "Stagecoach in Oxfordshire" and "Stagecoach West". However, each GoAhead Group company should be a separate subcat under "Category:Go-Ahead Group buses in the United Kingdom". Have I got that right? Motacilla (talk) 22:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
@Motacilla: sounds entirely reasonable. I have no subject matter expertise. - Jmabel ! talk 01:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi all! We are releasing the first version of our external links detection tool, that will help moderators in identifying potentially problematic media uploaded from potentially problematic domains (such as social media networks and/or stock image suppliers).

If the source corresponds to one of such domains, UploadWizard would create automatically a Structured Data on Commons statement source of file (P7482) file available on the internet (Q74228490), with qualifiers “operator (P137) = <the operator of the website where the image originated>” and “described at URL (P973) = <link to source>”. This would make the potentially problematic uploads easily accessible by administrators and moderators.

For the moment, we will be parsing only for a few selected domains and, if needed, the list can be amended by the community to include other domains that are problematic or have a strong probability of being deleted. We could also make it available for the community to maintain the list of domains directly.

If you have questions or suggestions, please write to us in our project’s talk page. (Since I will be travelling in the next days, I might be slow to respond, so please have patience)

Thanks for your cooperation! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

User unilaterally changing and emptying categories, not responding to others' concerns

Rathfelder (talk · contribs) has taken it upon himself to rearrange and empty a number of categories in ways that other users think are problems (myself included) and is not engaging with those concerns at all. See (e.g.) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Koavf&oldid=952064437#Category:Caricatures_of_men and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rathfelder&oldid=953599427#Punch_cartoons. I don't think this is constructive and would like feedback on if this is the correct approach to editing. @Pigsonthewing: who was in one conversation. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

I havent responded to the comment about men yet because I have only just seen it. I will respond now. Rathfelder (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
There are around 1000 entries in caricatures of men. that is usually taken aa overpopulation. There are at least 10,000 more caricatures of men. Do you think they should be there too? I am trying to set up a consistent categorisation pattern for caricatures. Advice would be welcome. Rathfelder (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Do we need a category for Caricatures of male American politicians? That is what most of the existing subcategories are. Do we want to categorise politicians by gender? Rathfelder (talk) 09:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Bot edit war

Two bots are edit-warring at File:Passengers on a Washington State Ferry, circa 1980s (54040757828).jpg. As the uploader, I'm the only admin who is not allowed to hand-review the license and clear this up. - Jmabel ! talk 04:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel, ✓ Done but this edit-war made me laugh. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
@MGA73 some files do need manual review. please tweak your bot design to avoid repeating the review request too many times. RoyZuo (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
I stopped my bot. --MGA73 (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

export a file from Commons

I would like to export this file File:ŌgaiYatarō-An Airman.png, which was originally uploaded on the Japanese Wikipedia by me, to jawiki but do not know how to do it. The file is PD in Japan but may be non-PD in US. At least we cannot rule its possibility out nevertheless User:真夢城（まゆき） carelessly imported it to Commons. In my knowledge only administrators can revert it to jawiki so that would someone please do it instead of me? HinokisOfRoma (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Presumably you can just get ja:ファイル:ŌgaiYatarō-An Airman.png undeleted on ja-wiki. I'm not an admin there, so I cannot examine the history of deleted files there. - Jmabel ! talk 19:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for reply. Unfortunately your suggestion does not work because file history was already erased on jawiki. We can trace it just on Commons.--HinokisOfRoma (talk) 20:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
@HinokisOfRoma: I think you are misinformed about the history erasure on jawiki, please ask there on jawiki anyway.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
I think you may have to re-upload it to JaWiki and then have an importer import the Commons history. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I have created User:Red link example for use in documentation and testing.

Can someone kindly permanently protect the user and talk pages, with an edit summary noting that purpose?

I have also requested that the account be globally locked. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

User and talk pages have indefinite protection of template editors and administrators. Abzeronow (talk) 22:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Flag of Italy.svg

Italiano: si può (semi)proteggere questo file su commons permettendo solo gli autoverificati?
English: can you please (semi)protect this file, allowing edits only for autoverified user? ty

(last) reason: ip removing depict GioviPen GP msg 22:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done for 1 year. Abzeronow (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
 Thank you. GioviPen GP msg 22:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Move request for File:Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư, University of Tokyo 20140308.jpg

Please move the file to File:Complete Annals of Great Viet, University of Tokyo 2014-03-08.jpg (edit protected): To clarify the name of the book and some date formatting. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 16:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! —— Eric Liu（Talk） 21:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I fail to see the justification. RoyZuo (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

DR close request

Could an admin take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fuengirola - Monumento Juan Gómez González, 'Juanito' 2.jpg and determine whether it can be closed? No additional comments have been made more than a month, and I don't think that there's going to be a sudden increase in comments if the DR continues to remain open. I'm not advocating in favor of a particular close; just asking that it be assessed and then closed as the administrator sees fit. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

DR has been closed. Abzeronow (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Abzeronow. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete subtitles file

Can someone delete these subtitles? It's for the wrong file. Thanks! // Kakan spelar (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done by Yann All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Edit war

Some anonymous contributor thinks that "Militsiya" (Russian police before the 2011 reforms) cars are not police cars despite 2 other saying him they are.

I'm not sure what to do here while it's not a vandalism, but these contributions are unconsensual and kinda, silly. idk. Красный wanna talk? 06:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. I reverted that and semi-protected them for a year. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Protected page edit request

File:Samantha Harvey.jpg is protected as it's currently appearing on Enwiki's Main Page (and possibly elsewhere; its subject just won the Booker Prize). Its source is File:R7A9667-2.jpg which has a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license but File:Samantha Harvey.jpg is offered under CC-0 which cannot be the case since the uploader there is not the copyright holder on the source image. Request to update the license of the protected File:Samantha Harvey.jpg to {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} to correctly reflect the source license. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done License fixed. Abzeronow (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

crosswiki problem

User:Torcida Organizada C18 Chelsea Headhunters copyviol file and crosswiki automatic translation GioviPen GP msg 03:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Only one upload. I nominated it for regular deletion as likely copyvio. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

User appears to be running a bot, not responding to talk page

Est. 2021 (talk · contribs), see User_talk:Est._2021#Meat-bot_null_edits and edits like this, which will cause no change at all to how pages function or render 99%+ of the time, but will occasionally break pages (e.g. if a description has an equal sign in it). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. A longer block should be applied if the user doesn't respond. Yann (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Should consider removing from Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON. RoyZuo (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

problematic user

Rivermoll (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

User:Rivermoll delete all the files he uploaded (copyviol/no source and wrong licensing, out of scope)
promo only edits for not relevant sicilian male man
ty GioviPen GP msg 04:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@GiovanniPen: I would suggest making your case about these being out of scope through the normal deletion process. Similarly for copyvios.
This is a new user, and administrative action is not normally how we deal with a few reasonable, if possibly bad, uploads from a new user.
Also: normally if you have a complaint about a user for anything other than vandalism, you should bring it to COM:AN/U, not COM:AN, and you should certainly inform them on their talk page that you have started such a discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 21:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the information, sorry: I wasnt sure that this was the right place GioviPen GP msg 11:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Shall I reopen the topic in COM:AN/U or since I already made it here it’s ok for this time? GioviPen GP msg 11:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
As I said, you should go through the normal deletion process and possibly put a note on the user's talk page explaining what is going on. We don't normally use administrative tools to deal with new users who do not seem to be deliberately malicious. - Jmabel ! talk 17:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Please take care of this DR

Can some admin please take care of this DR. I am exhausted by explaining my POV. If the user would care to understand then I would have wanted to resume. But that's not the case here. There might be some shortcoming on my oart regarding the licence but I can't any better explain them the difference between a personal and a govt account on X (Twitter). Some leftover can also be found on my TP. Plz check the archive if the bot does so in the mean time. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 12:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Shaan Sengupta: You do not have to convince the person whose uploads you want deleted that you are correct. You can just state your case and wait for an admin to evaluate the arguments and close the DR. This DR has not been open even a week, so it would certainly be premature to close it. Unless there is clear consensus, 7 days is a minimum. 3-6 weeks is more common. - Jmabel ! talk 17:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
@Jmabel I think I couldn't explain myself. I didn't ask for a close. I just was fed up of that discussion. I got too much into it that I forgot that I don't need to convince them. Thank you. Also, another DR started in August is now inactive. If you could see that maybe. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Probably not allowed photo

See: File:Markham, Virginia - panoramio.jpg Then click on the source link, which lists an NC license; which I think is not wiki compatible. I'm not sure what to do with this nor where to report it, so I'm reporting here. MisawaSakura (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

No, this is fine. The license was reviewed in 2016, and it is irrevocable. Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
@MisawaSakura: Panoramio changed their licensing policy, but that does not invalidate licenses offered under the old regime. - Jmabel ! talk 17:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

transfer of verification

Dear team, as pointed out by Achim55, please transfer the verification of de:User:CCC-LMU to the Commons project here as well. Many thanks and have a good start to the week! Alex CCC-LMU (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Moved to COM:VRTN. --Achim55 (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp

Commons:Deletion requests File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp seems related to COM:HD#How to change the name of a portrait which most likely is about en:File:Gil Hillin Beverly Hills Cop (1984).webp. @Jmabel: Since you're an admin on Commons and Wikipedia, perhaps you can help this person out? The file probably is OK as non-free content, unless en:WP:FREER is an issue or it's a Getty image, but it needs a non-free use rationale and needs to be added to an article to avoid speedy deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done. The file in question is now deleted. The DR – it depends, but currently it was convenient to delete the DR as well, because it was not properly filed. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring

See File:European Russia location map (2014–2022, Crimea disputed).svg. User:Ecrusized is edit warring against multiple editors despite the file name stating that this includes Crimea marked as disputed (this is also derived from the image without Crimea). Also edit warring on other files. Mellk (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm not edit warring with anyone, except you, who is restoring Crimea (internationally recognized Ukrainian territory) on Russian maps. You also do not appear to be providing an edit summary for your reverts. Ecrusized (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
You were reverted by NordNordWest, then proceeded to revert two more times despite being told that your reverts were problematic. There is no rule that all maps cannot include disputed territories. Even if there was such a rule, the better approach would be to request deletion, not mass reverting. I will also note that you restored an old version with outdated boundaries (e.g. Moscow). Mellk (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done. I kept the file speedily, because it is widely used. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive_97&oldid=961936227"