Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/03/Category:Black people

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Until fairly recently, this was a disambiguation page, but it was changed without discussion. I think it worked better the way it was. See Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/09/Category:People with black skin. The same goes for some of the newer subcategories like Category:Black males, Category:Black men, Category:Black females, Category:Black women, Category:Black people in art, Category:Black people with braids, and Category:Group photographs of Black families. Themightyquill (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the same (I had presumed obvious) reasons we don't have Category:People by race. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/09/Category:People by colour. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • My 2 cents: This kind of categorization (black basketball players etc) is not a homage to colour but reminds segregation(ism) to me. (Next step would be muslim sportswomen!) I advocate male-female "discrimination" (separation), especially in sports, because generally they contest in separate gender categories, in real life. But separation based on colour, creed etc is not a correct categorization, IMHO. Is there any Black Basketball Leagues anywhere? If not (I hope so) then there is no need for cats like Category:Black basketball players, something that I see we have here and they do in certain WPs. (When we have that kind of cats it may become unavoidable what we have at hand now.) I hope I don't drag the discussion somewhere else. If my comments are "silly" just ignore me and continue your discussion please. --E4024 (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we do categorize people by creed, nationality, culture, and sometimes ancestry, but generally not by pseudoscientific racial categories. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. People by descent seems to be ok. I suggest to back it to disambiguation page. -- Geagea (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, it is also confusing as black and white people have different meanings in different cultures/contexts. Disambiguation would create the same situation as for Category:White people --Hannolans (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to disambiguation. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]