Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/22

21 November 2024

23 November 2024

Deletion requests on 22 November 2024

November 22

File:Families Who Kill The Donut Shop Murders Billboard in Times Square.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deepanshi Yadav Singer.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jeraxmoira as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMMA D´ARCY MARCH.jpg

another transfer by the same user was already deemed a case of Flickr washing. This photo says it was posted on Facebook in the Exif Vera ^(talk) 07:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photos at File:EMMA DARCY at JW ANDERSON SHOW 3.jpg and File:EMMA DARCY at JW ANDERSON SHOW.jpg were uploaded by this account on the 22nd and 30th of January of this year with clear reference to the Instagram accounts they were taken from. Now the Flickr account uploaded the same photos on the 31st. This account should be blocked from further contributions. Vera ^(talk) 10:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swisstopo Deutsche Heereskarte Schweiz Rigi LT K 80 S25 75 1944.tif

I would like to upload the same file in better quality Swisstopo historic (talk) 08:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kodalychor Laeiszhalle 2024-04-27.jpg

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Yann (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has a license, but is User:Abubiju the L. Schlott that appears in the "Author" field of the EXIF? If so, Keep. If not, Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right. The uploader seems to be someone who knows (3,563 edits. Account created on 30 June 2006). Yann (talk) 12:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Agree with Ikan Kekek. If the uploader is the author mentioned in metadata, then keep. If not, delete the file. --Ratekreel (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balla Camara.webp

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) Yann (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical photo, unlikely to be own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A pair of walnut (Juglans hopeiensis).jpg

Image is a copyrighted computer screen image Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 09:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of the image. The photo shows my own computer, and the image on the screen follows the CC 4.0 standard and has been sufficiently blurred. I believe there are no copyright issues. You can also keep the cropped image showing only the walnut; please make the final decision. 蝠翔似黑潮 (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content on the screen is a photo of the type specimen of this walnut (Juglans hopeiensis), sourced from the Chinese Virtual Herbarium. The link is as follows: https://www.cvh.ac.cn/spms/detail.php?id=075d503e You can see the CC 4.0 logo at the bottom of the webpage. 蝠翔似黑潮 (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I agree to keep this image, but I need to indicate the authorization license of the screen web page (Screenshot CC-BY-4.0). Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodolfo Ranni - Foto set de filmación "La Búsqueda".jpg

Photo published in Argentina in 1985. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin (20 years ppa), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Notice that {{PD-US-URAA}} cannot be used for images uploaded after March 1, 2012. Günther Frager (talk) 09:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Barbados (construction sheet).png

I don't see any evidence at the source that the creator released this under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Needs VRT permission release to be kept. Ratekreel (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Flags of Perpignan

Complex design, and nothing at COM:FRANCE indicates government works are inherently public domain. We'd need the date of creation to know if the copyright expired. Otherwise, this is a copyvio.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope Gregory XVII (Clemente Domínguez y Gómez) at 1978 formal Papal coronation.png

Photo by Spanish news agency EFE and published in 1978. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Notice that {{PD-US-URAA}} can only be used in files uploaded before March 1, 2012. Günther Frager (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Motion video.webm

Bogus copyright license, since this YouTube video is private for unknown reasons. Absolutiva (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustave Van de Woestyne - Portrait of David van Buuren.jpg

Artwork by Belgian painter Gustave Van de Woestijne (1881–1947) created in 1935. It is currently in the Belgian public domain, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time (notice that at the time protection was 50 years pma). Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Notice that {{PD-US-URAA}} can only be used for images uploaded before March 1, 2012. Günther Frager (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrich Erdmannsdorffer sen (cropped).jpg

Wenn Erdmannsdorfer 1962 gestorben ist, kann er nicht 2021 fotografiert worden sein. Also, wo kommt das Bild her? Established 1620 (talk) 11:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das angegebene Datum ist höchstwahrscheinlich jenes, an dem der Uploader der Originaldatei das Foto abfotografierte/einscannte. Dieser ist ein Neuling, weshalb eine Frage auf seiner Disk. der bessere, weil weniger eskalative Weg gewesen wäre. Dort ([1]) gibt er an, dass es sich um ein Bild seines Großvaters aus Familienbesitz handele. Kompetenter (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: The date given is the date the uploader of the original file photographed or scanned the photo, according to the metadata. He is a newcomer, so a question on his (Wikipedia) user discussion page would have been the better, less escalating way. There ([2]) he states that it is a picture of his grandfather from family property.

Keep Kompetenter (talk) 11:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" The image is circa 1930 when he would have been 50 years old. --RAN (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sumaiya Shimu.jpg

Low quality image with no metadata. Unlikely own work. Syrus257 (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the user's talk page, the same image was flagged as a copyright violation and subsequently deleted in 2023.Syrus257 (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Syrus257: Can we claim copyright violation as per the assumption only? And same name does not mean the same image.--Rocky Masum (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image lacks metadata, unlike all your other uploads, and has a lower resolution compared to them. Even if it’s not the same image, the fact that a previous image of the same person uploaded by you was removed for copyright violation makes this one more suspicious. Syrus257 (talk) 09:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eva Amurri at Heart Truth 2011 (cropped).jpg

According to the EXIF data copyright of the image belongs to ©DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 11:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:שיחה ישיבת וולפסון.png

מפר זכויות יוצרים - https://www.bhol.co.il/news/1675837 אייל (talk) 11:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eva Amurri at Heart Truth 2011.jpg

According to the EXIF data on Flickr, the copyright of the image belongs to ©DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eve 2011.jpg

According to the EXIF data copyright of the image belongs to ©DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eve in David Meister 1.jpg

According to the EXIF data on Flickr, copyright of the image belongs to ©DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eve in David Meister 2.jpg

According to the EXIF data on Flickr, the copyright of the image belongs to ©DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cola-Band.jpg

No indication that author has licensed this picture under free license. Tekstman (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrea tenuta.png

Photo published in Argentina in 1985. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Notice that {{PD-US-URAA}} cannot be used for files uploaded after March 1, 2012. Günther Frager (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NBV21 different versions.png

Probably not de minimis on book covers. Absolutiva (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Potassium aluminate.svg

Compound does not contain loose K+ and AlO2– ions, neither in solution nor in solid state. See for example doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01239-1 DMacks (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is correct that the compound is not ionised. However, it is not the intention of this file to reproduce the exact crystal structure. Rather, it is used to provide pictorial information on the structure in the infobox of the German Wikipedia article. The deletion request should therefore be rejected. NadirSH (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But that's my point. This isn't its structure. There is no such thing as an "AlO2" mono anion unit in it and if there were it would probably not be bent like a water molecule .DMacks (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greek euro coin.jpg

File:Tetradrachm, 449-413 BC, and 1 Euro, 2002, Greece - National Museum of American History - DSC00287.jpg

Greek euro coin national design is still copyrighted per COM:EURO. Absolutiva (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I uploaded this cropped version at File:Tetradrachm, 449-413 BC, Greece - National Museum of American History - DSC00287.jpg Absolutiva (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heizbaender-frenz-gmbh.jpg

no author no permission no metadata and copyvio from https://www.frenztechnik.de/ Hoyanova (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Modrow 1958.jpg

Even if we assume the type of license tag used here to be essentially correct, 1959 (the year in which the book this was taken from was published) was less than 70 years ago, so the 70 year term is not over yet. There's URAA restoration as well, so we can undelete the file in 2055. Rosenzweig τ 12:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah my bad. Misread a couple things when uploading. Whoops! PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William H. Johnson.JPG

Also:

File:William H Johnson (edited).png

Not public domain in the US per COM:URAA. Absolutiva (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Chalk 01.jpg

Previously published as the subject's profile photo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidchalkmentoring/overlay/photo/; if you have the rights to the photo, please submit the evidence and a copyright statement by following the directions at COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mach-Feynman sprinkler experiment.gif

Not educationally useful. Camera is jittery, and not centered in such a way to actually show the intended effect. Also, 3 promotional watermarks. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Then edit it? JPxG (talk) 02:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any image editing software? JPxG (talk) 22:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tokyo University Of Agriculture.jpg

同じ画像があるためかなえゆうじん (talk) 14:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cindy Sherman Untitled Film Still 23.jpg

Probable flickrwashing. Original file is now a 404 JayCubby (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa de La Unión Norte con sus Distritos.png

Ya No Me Sirve OrlandoWKD503 (talk) 15:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reiterharnisch Maximilians I..jpg

possible copyvio © Andreas Uldrich - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Needs VRT permission. --Ratekreel (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JORGE ALVAREZ MAYNEZ.jpg

copyvio from https://www.nmas.com.mx/perfiles/jorge-alvarez-maynez/ Hoyanova (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio i think is better subjet to deletion because is a fake image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jorge_%C3%81lvarez_M%C3%A1ynez.jpg 2806:261:4AD:5CF:6966:EB7:C1DB:8CD3 03:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krista Marie Yu - Michael Becker.jpg

possible copyvio © Michael Becker - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harringay Stadium 1950s.png

The name of photographer and country origin of this photo were not mentioned. The copyright status is still questionable. Astrinko (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto María José Domínguez Vázquez.jpg

possible copyvio Copyrigjht Enfócate Fotografía y Branding (Meta-Data) Lutheraner (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onduleur.jpg

uploaded by accident Wafikrochdi (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:AI-upscaled paintings

AI-upscaled paintings, where software has been given a low resolution painting and provided its best guess about how the artist might have painted someone's hair or mouth, whether the paper held by Pope Pius should show legible words or just scribbles when zoomed in, whether Bussy d'Amboise would look better if his portrait had photographically realistic eyes, etc. Out of COM:SCOPE as misleading, these paintings do not look like this.

Belbury (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has now reverted File:Portrait de Bussy d'Amboise, collection du château de Beauregard.jpg to its un-upscaled version. --Belbury (talk) 08:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Looking at File:Clemente Alberi – Ritratto di papa Pio VIII (c. 1830).jpg, for example, the original image that depicts the artist's original work has been universally replaced across >100 Wikimedia project by this AI-generated version. I'm extremely concerned about this practice which replaces original works of art with depictions that contain details not present in the original. This is deceptive and contrary to the goals of Wikimedia. There may be some use cases (where these images can be used in discussions of AI upscaling, for example), so maybe outright deletion of all of them isn't appropriate. But the use of these images where they are presented as if they were the artists' original works should be globally reversed. Marbletan (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-LikhachevaES.jpg

Hello. The person here is E.Likhacheva, director of Pushkin museum in Moscow. She asked me to write this request to delete this photo of her according to our Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. She didn't give the permission to be photographed this way, and this photo being Public Domain is spreading in the news, which is not good for her. See COM:PHOTOCONSENT and COM:DIGNITY. Shakko (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{NO} There are no other portraits in Wiki yet. Photo made over 3 years ago (before "director of Pushkin museum in Moscow"). Upload her other portraits and replace the photo on the card in the wiki. Why delete a unique high-quality image taken at a public open event that someone doesn't really like. Looks like no COM:PHOTOCONSENT and COM:DIGNITY reasons --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luka Dax.jpg

Die personen auf dem bild sind mit der veroffentlichung nicht einverstanden. Es werden rechtliche schritte gegen die veröffentlichende person vorbereitet LukaHorn69 (talk) 18:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google translation: "The people in the picture do not agree with the publication. Legal action is being taken against the person who published the picture". Ban this user for real-world legal threats? And do people performing publicly have any right to demand the takedown of photos of them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vinod Vaniya.jpg

Mistaken upload Aman Vaniya (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Stormm001 (talk · contribs)

Five other uploads from this user were found to be copyrighted images from the web, so these two likely are also. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Asa Coon guns.jpg made no claim of own work at the DR, just that the uploader was able to identify the gun; their talk page response to all other copyright-flagged images was "delete it".

Belbury (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banery wyborcze Golden Tower.jpg

temporary election banners aren't fop in Poland 87.205.173.60 19:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Why you think its should be deleted? Mafo (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fop=Freedom of Panorama. Read COM:FOP Poland. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lita Cabellut.jpg

wrong date. who is the author? Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the date is wrong? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrea Meza, Miss Universe 2020.jpg

dubious license EdrianJustine (talk) 20:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep the file because you think that was the dubious license, but likely to be insufficient per COM:DR. Apipattana (talk) 03:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xenofon Markopoulos.jpg

1940s Greek photo, possibly from 1947. 1940s is too recent for a PD-old license without knowing who the photographer was, and we don't have enough information from the source to say it's anonymous. Additionally, this was not public domain in 1996 so U.S. copyright would have been restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 20:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The public domain applies since it's over 70 years since the photo was taken. The website does not provide evidence of the photgrapher so the name of the photgrapher cannot be found. So it is of a fair use. BEN917 (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no COM:Fairuse on Commons. It's either public domain or it can't be hosted here without permission of the photographer or their heir. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in my first sentence, it is public domain. Photo taken 77 years ago with the website not providing any information about the photographer. Unless any other evidence is provided it cannot be proved that the photo does not belong in public domain. BEN917 (talk) 18:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is public domain in Greece, it is not public domain in the U.S. unfortunately. (Also unknown doesn't equal anonymous, but we could take the website not providing information as evidence that the photographer cannot be found if we find we can trust they've done the research). Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the official website of the club. It is possible that they own the photo. The weight of the evidence it's on your claim. Furthermore, why it's not enough for a photo to be public domain in the coutry that it was taken? BEN917 (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WMF and its servers are in the United States so the photo has to be PD in the US too. Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how is a photo public domain in the United States? BEN917 (talk) 12:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States, especially the "General rules" section. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AEK Athens 1947.jpg

1947 Greek photograph, too recent to use PD-old without knowing who the photographer was, and not enough evidence that this was an anonymous photograph. Was not public domain in 1996 so URAA applies. Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The public domain applies since it's over 70 years since the photo was taken. The website does not provide evidence of the photgrapher so the name of the photgrapher cannot be found. So it is of a fair use. BEN917 (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maiale italiano, restaurado y en exhibicion, Gosport.jpg

Totally superfluous photographing of the screen from a Wikipedia image. The quality is so bad (cropping, image quality) that it should better disappear. Msb (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARA Santa Fe (S-11) en navegacion en superficie..jpg

Bogus authorship claims; obviously this file is a COM:DW of another photo. The uploader is not the creator of this image. Msb (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original underlying photo is potentially public domain given its age, but leaning

Delete due to lack of provenance and that the quality is low enough (blurry / cut off / glare) that it is not very educationally useful - we do have other quality photos available (see Category:ARA Santa Fe (S-11)). ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the "potentially public domain" argument but as long as there is no certain evidence, well. But basically the image quality is extremely bad. --Msb (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ReHacQロゴ.jpg

A file uploaded by a user globally blocked as ja:LTA:KAMEDY. Copyright violations (Commons:Licensing). A unauthorized reproduction from copyrighted press release material [3]. There is no permission from "tonari" (Company managing and operating "ReHacQ") --Motodai (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pt Lakshman Prasad Jaipurwale.jpg

copied from https://www.parrikar.org/essays/jaipurwales/ Ske (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mannathara.jpg

This aerial photo was obviously taken when the uploader took his “iPhone SE (2nd generation)” and photographed his monitor. “Own work” and the license stated are therefore not really correct. Msb (talk) 21:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed, it's obvious. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Countries where the UnionPay payment system operates.svg

map with non-existing countries/borders of countries 46.150.69.196 22:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; in use. Which "non-existing countries" are you referring to? I don't immediately see anything wrong. Omphalographer (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shikh.png

I don't want to be visible to the public anymore. I want to return to anonymity. 186.175.215.208 22:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La capilla de Nuestra Señora de las Nieves.jpg

This photo is sourced to a news article. It does not seem the uploader created the image or that it is in the public domain. Image from this site [4] Found5dollar (talk) 22:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Weinbergen.png

Zu klein (unbrauchbar), außerdem vermutlich inoffizielles PR-Wappen GerritR (talk) 22:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy keep~~ You say unusable, I say used on a couple of dozen Wikipedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also say that this is no real coat of arms but a pseudoheraldic invention for the purpose of public relations, and the source of ths combination of text and several other coats of arms is unclear. So we have a problem with the copyright, too. GerritR (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.weinbergen.de/ is for sale, by the way... GerritR (talk) 09:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a copyright problem, you should give that and not a disagreement with the decisions of dozens of Wikipedias as the deletion reason. Don't you think COM:INUSE means anything? Yet you propose again and again for Commons deletion request decisions to ride roughshod over the editorial decisions of sister sites. It's a fundamental violation of our role. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
außerdem vermutlich inoffizielles PR-Wappen means what i replied to you, just in german and in fewer words. It contains the the whole problem of non-official pseudoheraldism for PR. And please stay at the discussion about this file and don't switch to COM:NPA. GerritR (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreeing with you on COM:INUSE is not a personal attack. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yet you propose again and again for Commons deletion request decisions to ride roughshod over the editorial decisions of sister sites. It's a fundamental violation of our role. This is about me in general and not about this file. GerritR (talk) 16:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's about your DRs, including this one. A personal attack would be to say something like that this line of objection by you shows you to be thin-skinned, but I didn't say anything like that. If it's not valid to point out in a deletion request that you ride roughshod over COM:inuse over and over in deletion requests, including this one, where is it valid to point that out? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And to put it more clearly, you are calling a disagreement about interpretations of Commons policy and the role of Commons vis-a-vis sister sites a personal attack and therefore seemingly impossible to consider, whereas deletion requests that impinge on these things are fine and have to be addressed one at a time instead of allowing policy-based pushback to them in general, with reference to a specific example. Thereby, argument on this basis would be denied, and I think that would not be valid. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kommen wir mal zur Sache zurück. Mein LA besteht aus zwei Argumenten. Das Argument Nr. 1 hat das Problem, dass die Datei mehrfach verwendet wird. Das Argument Nr. 2 ist aber hier entscheidend; es meint nämlich in vier Worten zusammengefasst, dass die Datei von einer (unbekannten) Person für PR-Zwecke erfunden wurde. Ihre Verwendung ist OR, aber das haben die Schwesterprojekte zu verantworten, siehe oben. Irgendjemand (wer?) müsste sich die Arbeit machen, und sie aus allen Projekten entfernen. Sie ist aber zudem eine Verletzung des Copyrights, und das ist das Hauptproblem. Es wurden vier Wappen unbekannter Quelle mit Text kombiniert und zu einem Pseudowappen zusammengeschustert. Dieses wurde wohl ursprünglich für eine Webseite erfunden, die nicht mehr existiert. Die Übernahme in die verschiedenen Projekte ist ein Ergebnis gedankenloser Copy&Paste-Arbeit, ohne sich über den Sinn und Charakter der Datei Gedanken zu machen. Solche Massenübernahmen sind übrigens ein Argument gegen Com:Inuse, aber das wäre anderswo zu diskutieren.--GerritR (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if it's a copyright violation, it does definitely have to be deleted on that basis. As for the rest, no reason to repeat myself, but yes, the point is that Wikipedians have to make decisions on what images to use on Wikipedias. What's the point of COM:INUSE, otherwise? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flying (32464998313).jpg

Very low quality - subject blurred and burnt out by overexposure; hundreds of similar but much better quality images on commons. No realistic use, so out of Commons scope. MPF (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Boro5385 (talk · contribs)

Artworks by Slovak artist Jozef Baláž (1923-2006). They are still copyrighted in its country of origin. Notice Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Slovakia has no information regarding stamps.

Günther Frager (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]