Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 20th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. No public domain. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the maximum image resolution for non-free use logos? This one is 50px wider and taller than the original upload, and I added it so that it wouldn't look blurry on the org's page. Jesse Jackson (talk) 04:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use apply only to (the english) Wikipedia; there is the policy about fair use, and the maximum resolutions allowed. But, since this file is too simple (see bellow), no reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cc-by 2.0 Belgium according to the website. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce logo est soumis à un copyright (propriété de France Nature Environnement), je l'ai chargé par erreur en CC 81.255.138.165 07:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, misunderstood the licence terms. See also ticket:2016072010006191. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 08:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. No public domain. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation: movie poster

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Girls_in_school_in_Khyber_Pakhtunkhwa,_Pakistan_(7295675962).jpg 125.209.107.182 13:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 13:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not completed Dcapitampura (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 16:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 15:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This might also be a copyright violation.--100.36.171.168 16:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frank Buchholz Galerie per-seh Kantplatz 3 Hannover Kleefeld vertritt Simona Deflorin, hier ihr Werk Gestern und morgen von 2007.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

There is no freedom of panorama in the UAE, therefore these photos can't be hosted on Commons until/if UAE law changes, or the building falls out of copyright.

russavia (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

Violates COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. es:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed tells that the building was finished in 2007.

Some of the images of people might be de minimis.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

See discussions immediately above. These images weren't included in the previous nomination because they hadn't been added to the relevant category when I nominated the other files for deletion.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Pictures of the Sheikh Zayed Mosque can not publish under a free licence without permission of the creators.

Ras67 (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 16:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

As before, no COM:FOP in the UAE nor eligible for de minimis.

HyperGaruda (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

There is no "Freedom of Panorama" in the United Arab Emirates. The building is modern and still under copyright, as are the sculptures, frescoes, etc. within it. These photos may be transferred to local wikis that allow FOP-encumbered photos, but cannot be hosted on Commons.

Storkk (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The Grand Mosque was constructed between 1996 and 2007. It was designed by Syrian architect Yousef Abdelky.

Ras67 (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. See also previous deletion requests in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque.

HyperGaruda (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The Grand Mosque was constructed between 1996 and 2007.

Ras67 (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free television broadcast, which is not de minimis. LX (talk, contribs) 10:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Screenshot: TV - Using VisualFileChange.

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Files from User:Seemoramee

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded in January 2015 without license review. In present the licensing is Standard YouTube License. Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded in March 2015 without license review. In present the licensing is Standard YouTube License. Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, simple text. Output of an enwiki template, en:Template:Copyedit_progress. Not in scope. Reventtalk 01:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

also not own work, not CC0 (It's CC-BY-SA, obviously) Reventtalk 01:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please. Used at this page. I created it for that page way back in 2013, and I'm pretty sure it was on that page at some point. I have added it. We take screen shots at the end of every drive. Jonesey95 (talk) 03:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to keeping it, now that it's actually in use on a project page... it was not when I nominated it. My second 'comment' was not a deletion rationale, was just pointing out the error. Reventtalk 00:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedily (withdrawn by nom) File is now in use on a project page (and was apparently only not in use due to an error). --Reventtalk 00:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work (2010), but maybe is free. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is free as PD-Italy.--Demiurgo (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, withdrawn. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remove ambiguity : there are two Launcestons Rcbutcher (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, author's req on day of creation. --Achim (talk) 15:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remove ambiguity, there are two Launcestons Rcbutcher (talk) 11:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, author's req on day of creation. --Achim (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это фото нигде не используется,я его лично хочу удалить Danil492112 (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 19:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, previously deleted as ICC Champions Trophy 2017 Logo.jpg Lugnuts (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Christian Ferrer. --JuTa 21:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 00:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused image of a cat. 100.36.171.168 00:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 00:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I cast a vote for the deletion of this file. Probably not out of scope but have a closer look to the source, a website. Is there any OTRS ticket? No? Then we have a clear case of copyvio. I have made my decision. Best regards, GeoTrinity (talk) 01:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo; as it could be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded in April 2015 without license review. In present the video is private and impossible to confirm the licensing Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded in April 2015 without license review. In present the video is private. Impossible confirm the licensing Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo, as it can be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo, as it can be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 01:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded in August 2014 without license review. In present the licensing is Standard YouTube License. Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Current source does not use cc-by as stated. If video originates with a PD weather service, this would be n issue but we would need to change and verify that source czar 07:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, very poor reproduction that doesn't meet criteria Sfs90 (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No es la imagen correcta y no se sube la informacion Dcerongam (talk) 04:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. No public domain. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdevarao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sdevarao. Uploaded in a row on 19./20.07.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 05:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdevarao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, sometime black bordered and/or photoshopped, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sdevarao (serial copyright violator, see also previous mass DR). Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded since 25.07.2016. Considering also File:Power Plant 2.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=760797207270300&set=a.245388458811180.78730.100000200831448&type=3&theater (2013)

Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover would still be in copyright in Nigeria. --ghouston (talk) 05:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osfegoar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images pertain to a few women (or one woman) who plays soccer. There is, however, no indicaiton of own work, many are Facebook sized and only five have camera data. There are also differences in style, white balance and so on which indicate this is highly unlikely to be the work of a single person or the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Osfegoar, my tags above and mostly grabbed (per multiple FBMD...) from Facebook or other copyrighted sources.Gunnex (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website doesn't use a free license. --ghouston (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks more like a screen cap from a really old television show than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image looks like a newsreader on a television show, it is very small and of low resolution, also unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and low quality image claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been taken from the net - no meta data with low resolution and small image size. Editor has a history of copyright violations take page FOX 52 (talk) 06:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a colorized version of http://www.flickriver.com/photos/57271949@N04/6530556881/ which has a Non-commercial license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not at source address (base URL), no sign of Creative Commons policy for website czar 06:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this picture during a soccer game, while I didn't know the most of USM Alger's players.

I thought this guy was a player, but in reality, he's... the bus driver of that team.

So this picture is not useful at all and could be deleted.

Thank you S. Plaine (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo of state official, unlikely to be new user's "own work" (as listed) czar 06:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube source video clearly doesn't belong to the YouTube uploader (see the station ID bug in the lower left corner) and wouldn't be the YouTube uploader's to relicense. Copyvio czar 06:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover art. MKFI (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 06:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still image comes from video montage of fair use clips. Based on the uploader's account, it's unlikely that this fight footage was shot by the YouTube uploader. czar 07:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope and probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gab brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These flags and corporate logos are not own work, they need proper licenses and sources to be retained.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The flags are duplicates of SVG files, delete them all. The Stanford University seal is probably too old. That other image, I have no idea what it is, nuke it. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per shizhao (talk) 01:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gab brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violations. Several of these are copyrighted book covers. File:ICRANet Headquarter.jpg has been published previously: http://www.lopinionista.it/notizie/la-notte-europea-dei-ricercatori-pescara-tra-cielo-e-terra-gli-appuntamenti-odierni-258593.html.

MKFI (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gab brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book covers.

MKFI (talk) 08:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gab brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book covers.

MKFI (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV wohl von https://www.ewe.com/de/presse/pressemitteilungen/2015/04/timo-poppe-weiter-swb-vorstandabbau-von-doppelfunktionen-ewe-ag Jbergner (talk) 07:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrAssenator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AnexoFM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. Also probably copyvio from other site

George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal logo without educational purpose. George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xulturid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Peronal pictures without educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign of CC0 license at source. In fact, as a professional photo, I would think that it was more likely supplied to the website than belonging to the website (to relicense as they please) czar 07:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. SPAM George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, upload from spain, user has a spanish name but the name of the creator in exif is in chinese Berthold Werner (talk) 07:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Promotional George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private artwork holder. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken (by Flickr user) from the net at http://tardisboard.proboards.com/thread/729/1948-metropolitan-police-box (or the original at photobucket). UK photos from 1948 are still under copyright even if unknown author and we have no info on where this came from. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sema hie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Bad Photoshop fake artwork. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmgcrsa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. SPAM, no educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremias19941 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kielloggs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Obvious pages copied from magazines or books, see the off-center white borders and bent pages... and then a series of dramatically colored images of various sizes none of which has any metadata, and was taken in Manila Philippines, Seoul South Korea, some place with a LOT of snow, an image of the Incheon bridge also in South Korea. No indication of user's oown work other than an iPhone 5a appears in all the old image copying and on the bridge photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kielloggs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iddoss26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aerraaiti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Non notable logo. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonylook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose, self promotion. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:EDUSE, no educational use Pippobuono (talk) 08:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by:File:Elswick, 1917 - Messrs Armstrong, Whitworth & Company by John Lavery.jpg A1AA1A (talk) 08:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use. Spamer's contribution. Wiki isn't a photo hosting. Bilderling (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alrayyan.fm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos without EXIF depicting w:ar:خالد دلوان with various persons. The uploader claims to have shot the photos, but no information is provided on the event where the photo was taken. The photos are likely copied from coverage of the person in question, unless the uploader is part of the subject's staff or has some other way to regularly take portraits.

Nemo 08:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not in Commons:Scope Nemo 08:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational use com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, watermark, and there is file:ROBIN - GRAND PIANO - SONGWRITING - TAPIOLA.jpg Pippobuono (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not educationally useful, and only exists for the subject's continued failed attempts at self-promotion on Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos of a blocked Wikipedia user. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serxas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper articles, which are presumably not free and presumably not the uploader's own work.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source and author are indicated, but there is no indication that free reuse is permitted. — Yerpo Eh? 10:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julian usma vasquez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Wikimedia is not a webhost for personal images.

Takeaway (talk) 10:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Wikimedia is not a webhost for personal images. Takeaway (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of non-notable people Takeaway (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emiliagates (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations and spam

Takeaway (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenmwebaze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation of browser software.

Takeaway (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aiflc global services (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: spam

Takeaway (talk) 11:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я не хочу, чтобы моя фотография находилась в общем пользовании. Senri lu (talk) 11:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • А это не может быть основанием для удаления. Загрузив файл и согласившись с лицензией вы передали права. --ssr (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 17:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to let other people watch my photos. Senri lu (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Свободные лицензии невозвратимые. Вы публиковали эту фотографию под свободной лицензии и теперь не имеете право удалить их от Викисклада. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я не хочу, чтобы моя фотография находилась в общем пользовании. Senri lu (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 23:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to let other people watch my photos. Senri lu (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Свободные лицензии невозвратимые. Вы публиковали эту фотографию под свободной лицензии и теперь не имеете право удалить их от Викисклада. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я не хочу, чтобы моя фотография находилась в общем пользовании. Senri lu (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 23:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to let other people watch my photos. Senri lu (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Свободные лицензии невозвратимые. Вы публиковали эту фотографию под свободной лицензии и теперь не имеете право удалить их от Викисклада. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я не хочу, чтобы моя фотография находилась в общем пользовании. Senri lu (talk) 11:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 23:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to let other people watch my photos. Senri lu (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Свободные лицензии невозвратимые. Вы публиковали эту фотографию под свободной лицензии и теперь не имеете право удалить их от Викисклада. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siaopan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, the other uploads were obvious copyvios speedy deleted about the same subject. Although I did no find previous publication they likely come from https://ufactory.cc/cn/uarm_metal/ and are likely promotional content

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Beschreibung, schlechter Titel,hätte nicht hochgeladen werden sollen Spock1801 (talk) 12:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelte Version Mucki (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abkaranam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I did not propose DR for the photos of this user with a right location (they have a cat OK). But for the present ones : unclear descriptions ; unknown locations ; unknown genus and species : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness

Tangopaso (talk) 12:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Favor lucky abitoye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; Commons is not a private photo album.

Tangopaso (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear subject. unused. Two other files of the uploader deleted as missing permission. -- Geagea (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rithunrt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I did not propose DR for the photos of Siruvani falls. But for the preasant ones, unclear and bla-bla descriptions. Example : Our life depends on the Life of Plants n Trees.. I would prefer to know the exact species of the plants and the location !
Unknown location ; indefinite categories (ex : Life, Plantae, Photography...). Unknown genus and species of plants.
So out of project scope because no educational usefulness.

Tangopaso (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie(except new OgreBot uploads). 100.36.171.168 13:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 13:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. 100.36.171.168 13:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comandersub marc rc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

We need information about the music in these videos.

Yann (talk) 13:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo can't be ow. Spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 13:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably, a copyright violation. There are several previous alike uploads that already were deleted. --ssr (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Cuiabán Revolution (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://tswan7meha.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/epa-building1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ignasi27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saaduddin2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial album cover of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moralesmarcial1982 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://laverdaddiario.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ud_miguel_manjarrez_torres_escritor-640x424.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Low resolution. 100.36.171.168 14:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 14:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 14:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Whoops! Why do I keep forgetting that this was used?--100.36.171.168 14:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. 100.36.171.168 14:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 15:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free ad. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Downscale bitmap duplicate of File:Flag of Syria.svg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version uploaded PageImprover (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo as it can be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'd like it deleted because I accidentally uploaded when playing around with how to update images. Please delete since it's not needed, and very low-quality. Thanks. Simpson MFG (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image Wcam (talk) 18:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No info on FOP in Guyana, assume not ok Elisfkc (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any additional information regarding FOP in Guyana, so I have no defense and no objection to deleting it here. I simply uploaded the photo as a search result from Flickr with the intention of adding it to the National Museum of Guyana article, but if we don't have clear rights to put it there, I won't pursue it. 72.92.133.53 20:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, apparently cropped from another image, authorship questionable (see talk page) Funcrunch (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on an autobiography on the English Wikipedia that was nominated for speedy deletion. 100.36.171.168 18:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal photo. 100.36.171.168 18:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused selfie. 100.36.171.168 18:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sevensun1988 (3 uploads on 20.07.2016 = 2x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by the South African government, compare: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-South-Africa-exempt 178.24.93.167 19:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of South Africa.png 178.24.93.167 19:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prismoa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non free photo taken by Achrad Baznani, see http://www.baznani.com/coin/. When his photos have a free licence, it is clearly shown (cf the CC-BY-SA mentions on [[the one on this page http://www.baznani.com/about-the-artist/)

Habertix (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 19:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 17:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If these do not meet with your requirements then do as you see fit and is proper. Some of them are surely in scope of the project and have an educational value, but if you believe otherwise, I leave it up to the community to decide what goes and what can stay. Thank you for your consideration and guidance.Seemoramee (talk)SeemorameeSeemoramee (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Delete, en masse, on COM:PRP grounds. The variety of cameras, and depicted people (as well as the presence of images that were clearly from other sources) makes it highly unlikely that these can be reasonably identified as acceptably licensed works. The uploader has, on their talk page, confirmed that some of these are copies of works they 'physically own'. It would not be plausibly possible, IMO, to clean this of copyrighted files, since such images are unlikely to be searchable. --Reventtalk 23:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The rationales for the proposed/requested deletion of this selection of files among Special:Contributions/Seemoramee are:

  • privacy concerns: shots in obvious private places without any clear evidence by the photograüh alone that the subject was aware of being imaged (like doing purposeful posing)
  • quality issues: overly photoshopped, badly framed or repetitive scenes, this sums up in my opinion of a lack of educational usefulness.

To rebut any possible accusations of censorship: this selection is only a part of the actual contributions of the uploader. Every image which was e.g. a usable body study was left "unharmed".

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very disgusting images of old nude women uploaded by sockpuppet. Out of scope

/St1995 00:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thikthik15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of this user's uploads are likely to be copyright violations. Direct links to the images are given by the user in the description of all the uploads and there's no indication that the images were released under a free license. --- Managerarc talk 20:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 17:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If these do not meet with your requirements then do as you see fit and is proper. Some of them are surely in scope of the project and have an educational value, but if you believe otherwise, I leave it up to the community to decide what goes and what can stay. Thank you for your consideration and guidance.Seemoramee (talk)SeemorameeSeemoramee (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Delete, en masse, on COM:PRP grounds. The variety of cameras, and depicted people (as well as the presence of images that were clearly from other sources) makes it highly unlikely that these can be reasonably identified as acceptably licensed works. The uploader has, on their talk page, confirmed that some of these are copies of works they 'physically own'. It would not be plausibly possible, IMO, to clean this of copyrighted files, since such images are unlikely to be searchable. --Reventtalk 23:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The rationales for the proposed/requested deletion of this selection of files among Special:Contributions/Seemoramee are:

  • privacy concerns: shots in obvious private places without any clear evidence by the photograüh alone that the subject was aware of being imaged (like doing purposeful posing)
  • quality issues: overly photoshopped, badly framed or repetitive scenes, this sums up in my opinion of a lack of educational usefulness.

To rebut any possible accusations of censorship: this selection is only a part of the actual contributions of the uploader. Every image which was e.g. a usable body study was left "unharmed".

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemoramee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very disgusting images of old nude women uploaded by sockpuppet. Out of scope

/St1995 00:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context to give this any meaningful educational value, out of scope. Used on 1 wp.ceb page in a completely wrong context. P 1 9 9   21:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvios. Boxing fight video. Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete YouTube washing; watermarks and technical nature of video clearly suggest this is a capture from a professional broadcast. Youtube user and uploader here do not have rights to license. Эlcobbola talk

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still image comes from cc-by video (12 seconds in), but that photograph is used within fair use in the video and would not be the video uploader's to relicense as cc-by unless he too is the author of the photo. And, well, it's hard to be the author of the photo if you're in it. We would need permission or confirmation of the photograph's authorship and their cc-by release. czar 21:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the text is above TOO and FOP also does not apply as it seems to be in a building. Sanandros (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like the YouTube video is a copyright violation. There is an Arabic(?) TV bug in the upper right corner and some of the YouTube uploader's other videos are ripped from news channels. We have no confirmation that the uploader owns the rights to this footage. czar 21:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". The uploader's other "nueva iglesia" files are full-sized with EXIF data and this is the only one that is web-sized and without EXIF, shot from an aerial angle. The license given is also generic PD, not CC0. Web-sized Flickr upload around the same time. czar 21:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the photo's author has put this photo in the public domain, and that's not even looking into the rights of the subject matter. czar 21:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

В источнике https://ssl.panoramio.com/photo/22847253 указана лицензия CC-BY-ND Dogad75 (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии, автор неизвестен Dogad75 (talk) 21:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader requests deletion of this file here. epicgenius (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or per this edit. Gunnex (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader requests deletion here. epicgenius (talk) 22:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or per this edit. Gunnex (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Dogad75 (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Oursana (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Oursana (talk) 22:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. В указанный источник-Викимапию, фото скорее всего было загружено с сайта www.parovoz.com (в левом нижнем углу стоит значок сайта), первоначальный источник расположен здесь http://www.parovoz.com/newgallery/pg_view.php?ID=48699&LNG=RU#picture, где автором указан Бекиров И. Dogad75 (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии, автор неизвестен. Dogad75 (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. This might be used only for promotion. 100.36.171.168 23:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I keep forgetting that these images are being used?--100.36.171.168 23:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RollerNews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The person in these images had an article on English Wikipedia that was subject to a deletion discussion; shortly thereafter, I elevated it to a speedy deletion nomination and it was wiped by JohnCD in about an hour. These images are meant to convey the idea that the person depicted is a professional athlete with sponsorship deals from Razor Skate and Monster Energy even though these claims are false. The image of the subject with an oversize check appears, upon inspection, to be Photoshopped. These images are now all orphans except for two that are still located on a userspace article on Spanish Wikipedia that ought to get deleted too.

RunnyAmiga (talk) 23:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariadna Lenham. The photoshopped image is a remarkably bad job. Reventtalk 00:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neat find, but what part does the UNC Greensboro archives actually own and what did their YouTube upload actually license under cc-by? There isn't any indication of the following: (1) Who owns the photograph used as the visualization? Who took it and did it have a copyright notice? (2) Who recorded the audio? What happened to their copyright? How did UNC acquire it? (3) Was the lyrics/instrumentation written down as sheet music? If so, was it copyrighted? The authors of the song have rights to consider here too. In any event, we're missing info on all of the above, so the UNC archives release as cc-by isn't enough to account for the creator rights. czar 23:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No acceptable FOP (Freedom-of-Panorama) in Iceland. The architect was Guðjón Samúelsson (1887-1950). The copyright term is 70 years plus end of the year. Snaevar (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No record of the map or license at the source or under Taylor/Guerette. Only released here for personal use. czar 23:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is obsolete and unusable Mightyquinn84 (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cartoon image that has no educational purpose. 100.36.171.168 23:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Залил по случайности второй раз Danil492112 (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Это фото нигде не используется, и я лично хочу его удалить,оно мне не нужно Danil492112 (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination with note that submission was declined at en:wiki. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jotaema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jotaema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This work it is clearly free of copyright according to Chile's law (more than 50 years after the death of the author)

for its government signed the Berna agreement of 5-jun-1975
--Mcapdevila (talk) 05:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jotaema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MKFaC4ycL2s/VA7fSjbYhVI/AAAAAAAACHQ/3P7OPEJTjyE/s1600/456715_3593618972279_160669584_o.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - Flickr acct claims to be Coleman while this is a pic of Coleman - Flickr acct looks like a collection of images from various sources INeverCry 18:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value. 100.36.171.168 18:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just got this message and I want to tell you why It should stay in short.
The reason why it should stay is because it is my own work, done by me, plus it is my image on my wikipedia user page User:MajesticEli on wikipedia and it would be unfair to delete my personal picture when many other people ('wikipedians') have their own images e.g. User:Salvidrim!.
I can also see it put to good use on various Wikipedia articles, based around graphic design or Microsoft Paint.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MajesticEli (talk • contribs) 20:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use on user page. P 1 9 9   13:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:SELFPROMO, bad license. Self-promotional item uploaded by user with his name boxed off and placed on his userpage, not used in any articles, and the author is falsely claiming copyright to work, which he cannot do - he not made enough changes to consider this a derivative work. MSJapan (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture, so believe the copyright of the picture is mine-- along with the edit. That may reflect a misunderstanding of the copyright rules, however.... My only purpose in posting it was to provide some substantiation to me being an inductee to their Hall of Fame. NNicholaou (talk) 19:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least the self-promotional nature of this isn't at issue. Secondly, you are indeed misunderstanding copyright. You are "substantially reproducing" a copyrighted work and are not using it in a manner consistent with fair use (which Commons doesn't accept as a rationale for uploads here anyway). Commons:Licensing has a picture-based tutorial, and it very clearly states that you may not upload the work of others without permission. MSJapan (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is that fole within the scope? Sanandros (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keep. image url: https://github.com/uf-team/uarmdocs/blob/dev-xitong/docs/img/getting_started/01-cover.jpg --Siaopan (talk) 06:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright infringement. No public domain. Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete The diagram shows a removal of sodium ions and replacement by calcium, which is opposite to what it's supposed to show. 97.90.34.186 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I am the creator of the picture. Please let me kow if if there is something wrong with it or if a better image exists. But the above comment is incorrect. Typical ion exchange resins function by removing calcium, replacing Ca2+ with 2 Na+. But I am glad to discuss. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Chemistry is not my special field ... The file is used in a number of articles. The author states that it is content-wise correct. Let me ask one of the friendly German chemistry nerds what kind of vote I should cast here. We should WAIT before we take action a bit longer in this case. Cheers, GeoTrinity (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As far as I understand, the Ca2+-Ions should have a higher affinity towards the resin than Na+, given by the higher net charge, so the image is correct. Literature would be Quantitative Chemical Analysis by Daniel C. Harris (ISBN 978-1464135385). Maybe it was not clear that the resin in the image is the stationary phase, so it actually shows the removal of Ca2+ from the solution. To be removed from the solution, they are being added to the resin. --Nothingserious (talk) 05:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep All correct. The diagram shows the ion exchange reaction as it is in reality. The ion exchanger accepts calcium ions and releases sodium ions instead. --Rôtkæppchen68 09:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep All correct. That what the starter of the discussion means would be the regeneration of the resin. --Elrond (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Smokefoot: Some remarks: the structure ist not correct. There should be no Sulfogroup at the Divinylbenzene. This should be corrected. --Elrond (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Here are the answers of the chemistry specialists (German only). If I have understood it right, the principle itself is right but showing sulfonated polystyrene is wrong and should be corrected, dear Smokefoot. I hope that helps. I better don't cast a vote though. Best regards, GeoTrinity (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I want to thank everyone for suggestions and comments. The one actionable improvement is from Elrond, but, with all due respect, that comments are incorrect: the sulfonation is conducted on the crosslinked PS, and is expected to occur at both types of monomer sites (in fact might favor the dialkylbenzene sites owing to substituent effects). To quote from Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry "Chemically inert polystyrene beads are treated with concentrated sulfuric or chlorosulfonic acid to give cross-linked polystyrene 3-sulfonic acid. This material is the most widely used cationexchange resin and is strongly acidic." Feel free to let me know if any of you have questions about this or other chemistry entries in Commons.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You are rhight with this, that the sulfonification ist a postpolymeric reaction, but the linking group (the divinylbenzene-group) ist stericly hindered, so that there is hardly a substitution possible. Not impossible, but improbably --Elrond (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • one more  Comment: additionaly to that, what I sayed; Divinylbenzene is only in 1 - 4 % in the polymer. And make a consideration. The benzenerings of the Styrole are directed out of the chain like in a barb wire and the rings of the crosslinker are covered very well by the chains and! the outer rings. What is the chance for a substitution?! Xylene is monomeric and not to compair with this situation. --Elrond (talk) 10:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment We can agree to disagree. Xylenes are typically not considered hindered and are rather activated.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aldrich says their Amberlite resins are minimum 4.3 meq/g. You can calculate the fraction of aromatic rings that are sulfonated for any given amount crosslinking if you really want to see the likelihood that the crosslinker is sulfonated. DMacks (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Good point, Aldrich indicates 8% cross-linked polystyrene for "Amberlite® strongly acidic cation exchanger sodium form". So immediately we know that my drawing is unrealistic in terms of crosslinker content (but we are trying to make a point). I simplified and assumed that the polymer is 92% C8H6SO3Na (sulfonated styrene, MW = 206.2) and 8% divinylbenzene (unsulfonated, MW = 130) to give an avg MW of 200/monomer. With these assumptions, one expects 5 mequiv exchange capacity per gram, slightly more than they quote, so maybe the crosslinkers are indeed untouched. Assuming that my arithmetic is ok.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The nature of the crosslinking looks correct. The central benzene, which was a divinylbenzene monomer, had a vinyl pointing "down", which became polymerized as a normal styrene in the chain that includes the left and right benzene units. That divinylbenzene also had a vinyl pointing "up", which became polymerized with other styrenes in another chain that includes the top benzene unit. This other chain would be clearer if the fourth styrene monomer were included, but that might overly clutter the image for purposes of discussing the sulfonation/cation-exchange. If you hover over the image, I added annotations for these two polystyrene chains, that just happen to share a single benzene as one of their monomers. See File:Poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene).png for a clearer illustration of the crosslinking layout. DMacks (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Yup, I should improve it and am all ears going forward. But arent you bothered by weird the angles on the divinylbenzene-derived rings?--Smokefoot (talk) 21:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, those angles are ridiculous for the DVB attachments to the alkyls--that diagram is just to illustrate the connectivity and make the chains look as similar to each other and to simple polystyrene as possible. The idea of angles is really significant, but that discussion is probably best left as part of a full geometric discussion--the en:Tacticity is not even illustrated at all--apart from the bonding itself. Hope you don't mind my re-positioning some of your comments to keep separate topics threaded. DMacks (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Could someone explain the positional numbering of the sulfonate? This substituent is para to the vinyl in the monomer (or the alkane backbone in the polymer). Why is it 3-sulfonate not 4-sulfonate? DMacks (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment the 3-sulfonates are only on the rings that come from divinylbenzene (DVB). Sulfonation normally would occur at 2- and 4 positions but in the DVB-derived polymer, the 4 position is blocked. I think (dont know) that the use of 3- vs 2-sulfonate is an arbitrary label. All four CH's in the DVB-derived material are equivalent to first approximation. In the styrene-derived rings, the sulfonation I guess (should look this up) occur at the 4-position (favored sterically and electronically) but maybe at the 2-positions (favored statistically and electronically). No doubt there is a detailed study of the regiochemistry of sulfonation of mono vs dialkylbenzenes but probably too specialized for Wikipedia.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that sense of "3" substitution makes sense. DMacks (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, photographer's permission needed. Sealle (talk) 00:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 03:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we already have enough pictures of exhibitionists, this image has no encyclopaedic value 87.123.77.178 18:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Part of a series, perfectly within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: After berated with an admin, I give it a second try after almost four years. This picture was kept just 3 hours after the first deletion request was made and without receiving at least a second vote. The statement that this picture is part of a series isn't true since the series was deleted thereafter. Plus, it is NOT in scope but only an ordinary exhibitionist picture. Academic pictures would not be in such a black surrounding, would not ask the model to get in such a pose, would certainly not show the face of the person ... I cannot see any educational or academic use of this picture which is not used by any article page of any Wiki project. Moreover, we have simply enough penis pictures in stock on Commons, including any kind of erect penisses. There is no reason for keeping this one, I'm sorry. I therevore cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: It's just categorized as a file (and therefore listed under the cats) but not in use as being bound in in wikipedia articles! And even if, this wouldn't be necessarily an argument to keep it. Therefore, Amitie 10g's argument is first just a technical one (doesn't count much) and secondly, it turns out to be wrong if you look closer to it. Best, GeoTrinity (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - indeed out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since), but the image has a link source and a license. Changing the "no source" to a deletion nomination for assistance on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Random (and not working, at least for me) webpage is not a source (additionally it's not an official webpage of any type; as "republika.pl" is known host for free webpages that anyone can set). For this type of license (PD in Poland pre-1992) important is the fact of publishing before 1992. And with the current source it is not proved. Actually nothing is proved, including what the picture depicts. Masur (talk) 17:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It links to the scanned newspaper page. And it should be PD if it is published before 1994. But on the link there is just the year 1948 written so we need someone polish who can confirm that this pic was published before 1994.--Sanandros (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - copyright situation unknown, Słowo Ludu Magazyn" has existed until 2006. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After a cursory search on Google and Yahoo, I think that "Ciatou" doesn't seem like a correct pinyin transliteration of "橋頭".--Liji (talk) 16:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, categories can be renamed. --Pitke (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC) --- Sorry, was too hasty. Deleted, unneeded (incorrect and unused) alias for category. --Pitke (talk) 02:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: there is the same image dated back to 5 July 2013 which is copyrighted. Jarash (talk) 06:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Я лично знаком с А.Моргуновым и лично делал это фото. Кроме этого лично А.Моргунов дал разрешение на использование этого фото в статье. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.87.136.164 (talk) 21 July 2016‎ (UTC17:22)
English: In order to keep the file in Commons you have to sent a declaration of consent to Open-source Ticket Request System team either using this form or by e-mail using this template. Also I ask you to write the actual date when this photo was taken.
Русский: Чтобы оставить этот файл на викискладе, нужно отправить разрешение команде OTRS либо используя эту форму либо по электронной почте используя этот шаблон. И еще я прошу Вас уточнить фактическое время создания фото.
--Jarash (talk) 08:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Published elsewhere earlier, no OTRS permission. --Sealle (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The really poor quality of this image suggests that it's not own work of the uploader, but copied from another source, perhaps a youtube. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Reply to user Ellin Beltz: Your accusations are not supported by any concrete evidence that would thereby indicate this image has been copied from another source.

@Bearcat8183, did you take this photo? And do you have a higher resolution image? czar 17:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not own work, copied from [1]. --Sealle (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der angegebene Verwendungszweck ("zur öffentlichen Verwendung in Wikipedia") passt nicht zur Lizenz. W. Edlmeier 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Was müsste ich den dann angeben? Tina Filifera

@Tina Filifera: Du müsstest eine Mail an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org senden wo die Band das einverständniss gibt das Bild unter CC-BY-SA 4.0 zu veröffentlichen.--Sanandros (talk) 07:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WegC1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing permission from the copyright holder, no evidence that WegC1 is the Wegener Center.

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, problem acknowledged - currently in contact with Steinsplitter on how to proceed and proof that we are actually the WegenerCenter.
WegC1 (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just sent a verification request as stated in COM:UPOLICY --WegC1 (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OTRS pending requests sent. --WEGC1 (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files to delete

[edit]

File:Metop Satellit ESA.jpg can be deleted because we do not own the copyright --WegC1 (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the files with valid OTRS, deleted the rest. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong licence (copyrighted, maybe textlogo); out of scope. Yes, is PD-textlogo but unused (and maybe prommotional), not eligible for Speedy. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was a suggestion draft (template) for the SVG version. ↔ User: Perhelion 21:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Edit: template = draft = Skizze [2] Diese ist von keinem Gebrauch mehr auch die direkt resultierende File:Loerrach wappen.svg nicht mehr. "Die Datei kannst Du freilich überschreiben." (Uploader to me!) User: Perhelion 09:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Die svg-Datei ist voll daneben (Lerche zu hoch angesetzt) - hier schmückt sich der Hochlader sogar als Künstler, deshalb die korrekte png-Datei mit Angabe zur Heraldikerin behalten, auch falls der sinnfreie svg-hype bei den Wappen mal vorbei ist. Rauenstein (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is a valid reason, maybe I should ask the uploader before to omit your unnecessary attention.User: Perhelion 08:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Falls der Uploader Repgow auch nur irgend etwas dagegen hat (was ich natürlich nicht angenommen habe und auch nicht annehme) möchte ich nicht widersprechen.
@Rauenstein: Im allgemeinen kann ich deinen Unmut nur zu gut verstehen, jedoch würde ich SVG auf keinen Fall generell verteufeln. Ich habe deshalb den Antrag noch einmal ausführlicher dargelegt.
@voll daneben: auf dem ersten Blick heraldisch gesehen schon (daher haben Repgow und viele andere sich geirrt) allerdings wird die vermeintlich "unheraldische" Position und Größe in der Blasonierung so festgehalten. Diese kurze Diss sollte zur Erklärung ausreichen (Jürgen Krause) User: Perhelion 09:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Das ehrt dich @Rauenstein: - in diesem Sinne auf eine gute Zusammenarbeit hier; und die klare Mehrheit möchte diese Datei auch wohl behalten. Gruß --Jürgen Krause (talk) 12:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Die SVG-Version wurde nun von MaxxL auf den Stand von vor über 4 Jahren zurückgesetzt. Dies hebelt (durch die Hintertür) jegliche Behalten- und Lösch-Argumentation faktisch vollends aus. Die zurückgesetzte Version ja die durch die nun offizielle Version von Jürgen Krause "ersetzte". Diese "ersetzte" Version ist zwar von dem Webmaster in offizieller Vertretung, allerdings gab er zu einen Fehler in der Darstellung gemacht zu haben (Mühen beim SVG-Format, siehe der Diss bei Rauenstein, welcher zwar ein Diskussions-Archiv pflegt, allerdings - aus welchem Grund auch immer - leider nicht für besagtes Jahr 2012!?). Daher fällt es mir etwas schwer hier bei MaxxL einen guten bzw. lösungsorientierten Willen zu sehen (vor allem in Anbetracht des ihm zugespielten Hintergrundwissens). Daher würde ich bitten die (nichtsdestotrotz uneingebundene) Version wieder zurückzusetzen.User: Perhelion 09:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]