Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Asuka Arnold classic 2016.jpg Roperoperope (talk) 05:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Tabercil (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I doubt User:HakanIST is the author of the TV show used for this crop. If so, they should prove their authorship through COM:OTRS, otherwise proper source/authorship information is required. Even if the TV show is PD (what is not obvious here). Ankry (talk) 07:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ankry , photo was cropped from 80s_tv_show_crew.JPG, Thanks.--HakanIST (talk) 07:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 07:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
By her own request. This is a picture when she was using the steroid. Therefore, She looks a little fat. (Source: Asami Imai no niconico SSG 18th, 20th Extra Broadcast) 133.218.12.29 12:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is heavily used. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lanwi1 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation[1], uploaded by w:en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. Source site is bad, I cannot open it. I am not convinced, that the photo is copyright violation. Longer discussion is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Uploader is Nipponese Dog Calvero's false personation account. He is more active on Vietnamese human rights activists articles. --Lanwi1(Talk) 10:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, Do not slander me! I am a friend of Jason Lin is Facebook, this image is really I shoot upload! --Glay Liou (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Do not pretend, Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 10:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Do you dare to open your real name? --Glay Liou (talk) 10:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jason Lin (林浩生) is a Hero! And Lanwi1 is a Coward! --Glay Liou (talk) 10:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Do not pretend, Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 10:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- I blocked Glay Liou due to intimidation/harassment for a month (second block). Taivo (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - appears at http://glayliou.pixnet.net/blog/post/39220635-%E4%BB%8A%E4%BA%95%E9%BA%BB%E7%BE%8E%E6%8F%A1%E6%89%8B%E6%9C%83(tgs%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E9%9B%BB%E7%8E%A9%E5%B1%95) with explicit copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama OTRS ticket does not apply - this image is from Cape Town, South Africa. Reventtalk 00:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Lots of images on internet containing this image, several months before commons upload https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivy-msz3k6COCCIJBHeBEYQdyqE085wv8ndkLQGNtl2xbcLrIg_1rrxsc_1QGTItVbNfLdhj0CZKpDOT1HGfjVByK0p00LVzrLFI1351ctEv0C1m_1uT3JguVMvtUukHMfGqRJp0T52Wuf5nlJAROTKD-4ywwYR7EKcqfCorYSlgJ9t3xwAfhFKPqXrr1zAeiO-TAM_1jbWMorBwcJyxVWCdAgWep2THUZQnQm5xJyRDfNepX7F4k82mZ4A1egH-6P_1AefWKxFF0sh3OMBXAofoDPuVHO07s_1OMBqEByAMWUN1CUQPNpMJ6f6vAi9sX4KnvGe0dk4SE2_17OY-MZGoFaptJHpC7W77B-HWty7EeG-H_1uCE0-Vfm_1CRZBIRq2twbr-J7SrPBrsKT1VlKr611hz2P8koBB5MvVQeq7C0hDKvQv8Z7iu_1Jc-VcNtrSq6DMI2N6Iq3LIKZ5mG8JdPR6rd9xg8PeDLWLDrOPWhrPMEce03XiEXDrLQ32-GxIhmmRi1Po3EBoSSnmrofHpM5PGogZ7ZBbQjwJIby6ucajesj5rnI6LG4TirbSXGnAPEZNhyxUZLO-x1Y_1AYQiPxZxYPAQhx6GlqGJKtqQD8GVa53cbGsnrw4FDk9G8p30lcblcHirjLk0NxO5XDmqktG87-kIgwoEgFxLY8rWZN4HCbWqI-h8u3lcqz_1GItrnzBzkABfzcCX9--K-sr2jEd_1u1KZXj3nq4kWu6pjHL43vAfZzjiaM8j1TSjaGf2UXJ-0D1coE969kcnFkn1TZhUW88aqXkj0Mpq6Vu8qzU1r0pom-RLgmy7brVaysxl7afEPb2EqIkUMmznvFUbAU34wYa-ucm0a38I8lmJuU4CKkQflswZvcMTu0VP3nGHzZRXkenKDF38CIC-VYw-QFwynejqXytI37NcPQ5vHl2htZnoj9Ba3dEwN8NB_179-aEUefWVagcy6PVP4ddjSd2-8dbfF56q1B_1bRDiihqmj-v3KBsg7C0EPEKwbtU-erVDaKFadl8myxo2G62HrNZx0kjQD3NKBCskD6a9vt1r1fP9dVu-mci3zeozoAmmz45vTrl6aTu9N474sYLRbOkcobjs8HBjnA2E_1CF_19lOj33dth778wPRu-xKIyt35a5feI7frDVF_1wWKvkYtC0DoNLRxq4ruCtlv67Szyle87eBxmtgaT4kZ7j-upbye7KrgXnFxrOpoaffIYd1QH2Cf5GYmbNeeltFCDZ7TWo2_11FKv5kj7ETJkCr2pQ-kA6kgNyAjQ2R_1-dIcEphRkH7S2pAIXLloTYG2ftmmeZ6ddKabWSogl6_1YSmh1BlcYyJoiewDsPVVYgZutCYHhw35rNV_118dDdr6cEDJe3Ws9-dpUiAxTaRmiZIdkyt6y8dDafG86l5A0aNnjogBAC_1nFehAUkrFM6Ez6T0CyRfBBfV7VRP5wzaSvL3DmMTGbSuYG1_152eElyc3YP2qAPU1jeKBrNe7LttDsU4FNb11T1sJjBohpbF0LQ42R0iICx0v58Ba5SLrxIFoWU5OlnolE9ZgJrzps9OIXK--9YMLCJyZaOgJwTtaMsQXD8KPU&gws_rd=cr&ei=NPnyV7yNCobgUv3Do4gP Ronhjones (Talk) 00:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Image is not watermarked by Bollywood Hungama, as the licensed images typically are. Wider versions exist elsewhere, such as http://www.santabanta.com/gallery/bollywood-parties/golmaal-music-launch/sharman-joshi-rimi-sen-and-ajay-devgan/27941/ among others. Reventtalk 00:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
User only uploaded for one day. Several files by uploader are copyright violations. Suspect they all are
- File:Yanamalakuduru.jpg
- File:My photo with other.jpg
- File:Vijayawada-krishna-developments.jpg
- File:Vijayawada teppotsavam.jpg
- File:Vijayawada-kanaka-durga-temple-2015.jpg
- File:Vijayawada-banner.jpg
- File:Vijayawada morning.jpg
- File:Vijayawada river.jpg
- File:Vijayawada paritala.jpg
- File:Undavalli caves vijayawada.jpg
- File:Sri-Lakshmi-Narasimha-Swami-Temple-in-Vedadri-in-Krishna-5.jpg
- File:Vijayawada caves.jpg
- File:Prakasam barriage.jpg
- File:Railway junction vijayawada.jpg
- File:Ramalingeswara-Swamy-Temple-in-Yanamalakuduru-3.jpg
- File:Photomica com(1).jpg
- File:Kanak-durga-vijayawada1.jpg
- File:Kanuru.jpg
- File:Dc-Cover-v46segfcfgpr0vhv4v03qdppl4-20160402072555.Medi.jpg
- File:Dev vijayawada1.jpg
- File:Hanuman111.jpg
- File:Bhavani-Island.jpg
- File:Bhavani-island-vijayawada-view-from-boat.jpg
- File:7. Bhavani Island.jpg
- File:4-w-dt1.jpg
- File:07VZVIJREG2BHAVANI 829814f.jpg
- File:05VZ BHAVANI ISLA 1744893f.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 00:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry (talk) 00:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
A formal picture of a known Israeli artist/musician. It had been on the web before uploaded to the Commons, in several places (such as this one - the flickr page of who claims to be the photographer) - one thing for sure - there's no OTRS release approval for this picture and it cannot stay in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 01:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Character that is the IP of the park Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a photo of a TV screen or computer monitor of a copyrighted broadcast, an unacceptable derivative work. — ξxplicit 01:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
two copyrighted logos Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted material, not own work. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Outside of project scope, not realistically useful for education. Liance (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep it is in use = in scope. MGA73 (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Ambiguous redirect. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
copyvio, not CC Ragimiri 07:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Migzacademico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, taken from company's FB account. Logo is not simple under HK law, which uses UK law as standard.
Gijón16 (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
HK law follows UK law. Under UK law, this is not COM:TOO. Gijón16 (talk) 08:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
HK law follows UK law. Under UK law, this is presumably above COM:TOO. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and reuploaded. --Ezarateesteban 21:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without camera data, per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. (Depicted person is probably notable bishop from the Philippines). Taivo (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Looks like derivative work, photo of photo. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
This photo seems taken from TV and also in extremly low reso of no use Indrajit Das 09:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover, published 2016. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
A book cover. This is probably copyrighted, no evidence of permission or licensing. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Wikipediabiopage
[edit]- File:FatinaSalaheddineFutureTVLebanon3.jpg
- File:FatinaSalaheddineFutureTVLebanon2.jpg
- File:FatinaSalaheddineFutureTVLebanon.jpg
Screenshots of television. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted with text-may be locally hosted but not at Commons Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- also file:SPI-Rückseite.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation (wrong author, wrong source, wrong license) axel (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation (wrong author, wrong source => wrong license) axel (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Can you please remove this? Inacatarina (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Image posted to Twitter by "Kerri Frost" six months before it was uploaded here. No suggestion that the uploader is the same person. Uploader's other files were lifted from different websites and local newspapers and have all been deleted as copyvios. --McGeddon (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
No free license, should not be on Commons Ariadacapo (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photograph was taken from Bishop John Noonan's biography on the diocesan website. Farragutful (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete obviously not the work of the uploader as claimed, just copied from the internet without pemission. Ww2censor (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Also File:Val in 2014.png
Very small image, no EXIF, uploader claimed ownership with no proof. Other image uploaded for same person by same uploader also claimed as owned by uploader was a crop of a commercial image. This image is likely same. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Very small image, no EXIF, uploader claimed ownership with no proof. Other image uploaded for same person by same uploader also claimed as owned by uploader was a crop of a commercial image. This image is likely same. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Small (296 × 394 pixels) photo without camera data, per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that this is uploader's own work; past contribs suggests that this problem is not new. Chenzw Talk 13:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ulmoccasion.com/media/01/00/2954162662.JPG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HipHopLover44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/469932265225850880/G_e4L0L9.jpeg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardoafonso123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.mariaritanet.com.br/wp-content/uploads/23567078075_ad12e53715_k.jpg.
- File:MRSAMBAEMMIM.jpg
- File:Mariaritavozepiano.jpg
- File:Mariaritasambadamaria.jpg
- File:Mariaritapianoevoz.jpg
- File:Mariaritamrtour.jpg
- File:Mariaritasegundotour.jpg
- File:Mariaritacabtour.jpg
- File:Mariaritaredescobrirtour.jpg
- File:Mariaritaelotour.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
The website where this came from is linked; this image is not there anymore but any material from the website is copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Apparently made with non-free material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Probably not free TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, "John Sarbach" given as author in watermark and EXIF Ariadacapo (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
out of scope and likely copyvio (phone screenshot) Ariadacapo (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of non-free electronic game (and console design) Chenzw Talk 17:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of the cover of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of the cover of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused image of the cover of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of the cover of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of the cover of a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Poster, not own work as claimed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
PDF file of an event poster, not own work (see all the little logos, etc), not in use and not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
PDF file of an event poster, not own work (see all the little logos, etc), and not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Event poster, not own work, not in use and not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Obviously copied from another source because if it were own work, it wouldn't have JPG artifacts all over it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
deleted on de.wp as possible copyvio, same here. Original uploader was blocked. 2607:FB90:21BF:194D:4579:E3:2547:A578 22:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of not notable chiled from Israel. The only file uploaded by uploader. Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Dateibezeichnung entspricht nicht realen Gegebenheiten Pmuehlich (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I have to apologize. Instead of setting up a deletion request on Produktion Balaenenweg Aarau.JPG, I caught this site. --Pmuehlich (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Ich möchte das selbe Bild in SVG-Format hochladen Sonneninfo (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. (Translation: "I want to upload the file in svg") --Indeedous (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
ORDAT FOSS Teilsysteme.jpg Doktor Wegel (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously an error with deletion request. Raymond 08:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Ersatz durch eine korrekte Datei desselben Autors Klaumich49 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
ich will es so haben danke Remisxanto (talk) 21:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Die Interessensgemeinschaft, die dort abgebildet ist, möchte dieses von mir erstellte Bild nicht mehr sehen. Dory171 (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: obvious error. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
the supposed source is the uploader, yet the description mentions that s/he found it on the web Bulgu (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Flickr image from bad author 47.150.68.26 19:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward: Category:Flickr images from bad authors -- these are all likely license laundered. - Using VisualFileChange.
Fails COM:EDUSE Utcursch (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Not in scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
A large gallery of images with the common thread of Architecture designed by the Dirsmith company, see their website http://www.dirsmithgroup.com/f_0dirset.htm, and find all these images in use on that website. This gallery includes Architectural Renderings, Composites, and obvious copyright violations. There is no metadata on any of these images.
- File:Rome v veneto cherub fn W.jpg
- File:Rome via nazionale nite W.jpg
- File:Rome v fratt wall ftn W.jpg
- File:Rome spanish steps - la barcaccia 4W.jpg
- File:Rome pal quirinale ftn nit W.jpg
- File:Rome p navona3 W.jpg
- File:Rome p navona2 W.jpg
- File:Rome p navona1 W.jpg
- File:Rome p navona window W.jpg
- File:Rome p del pop ftn top f W.jpg
- File:Rome borghese little fount W.jpg
- File:Rome p barberini triton W.jpg
- File:Rome capitoline ftn W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn villa giulia p W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn villa giulia c W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn tempio vesta W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn trastevere W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p s pietro suz W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p s pietro 2 W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p pantheon W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p navona nite W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn little wall 3 W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn little shop 1 W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p del popolo c W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn p d esedra nite W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn campidoglio W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn center 2 W.jpg
- File:Z rome ftn center 3 W.jpg
- File:Sponge-Man-Athens W2.jpg
- File:TIVOLI VILLA D'ESTE ORGAN FOUNTAIN AND BASIN.jpg
- File:ROME FONTANA DI TREVI.jpg
- File:ROME BORGHESE GARDENS W.jpg
- File:ROMA, PIAZZA DEL POPOLO 2.jpg
- File:RHODES ... TIM AND OLD WOMAN AT WELL.jpg
- File:HORSE AND VW AT SEA W.jpg
- File:Z rhodes tim scholar W.jpg
- File:Piraeus vw loading W.jpg
- File:Paris vx bois d bol W.jpg
- File:Palermo vw campsite W.jpg
- File:Palermo vw wildflowers W.jpg
- File:Cefalu vw sissy in gabbia W.jpg
- File:Bassae vw uprighted W.jpg
- File:Athens vw diapers W.jpg
- File:Bassae vw tipped W.jpg
- File:10236 Grotto Section Elevation Drawing W2.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC PRIVATEDESK ALCOVE.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC DESK ALCOVE Lt W Lev10.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC DESK ALCOVE Lt W.jpg
- File:10236 Aerial Rear Garden - 7.75w.jpg
- File:10236 Pool-Grotto Section-Elevation Drawing and imagesWLev8.jpg
- File:DEDICATION DAY2 W.jpg
- File:NORTH BLUE TOWER W.jpg
- File:3 TOWERS FROM PARK W.jpg
- File:CLASSROOM SKETCH W.jpg
- File:DESIGN CONCEPT RENDERING xtxt.jpg
- File:CABRINI GREEN SITE W2.jpg
- File:AAR Drawing 3 4x6 72dpiW.jpg
- File:AAR Drawing 1 4x6W.jpg
- File:AAR Drawing 2 4x6 W.jpg
- File:Watercourse images as sculpture 72dpi.jpg
- File:RUSTIC TERRAZO SHAPES 3 72dpi.jpg
- File:REST WOMB 72dpi.jpg
- File:POOL FORMS TO STUDIO 72dpi.jpg
- File:POOL FORMS 2 72dpi.jpg
- File:POOL FORMS 1 72dpi.jpg
- File:POND PIPE FALLS 72dpi.jpg
- File:POND AND DUCKS 72dpi.jpg
- File:GLASS CULLET WALL 72dpi.jpg
- File:GARDENS TO STUDIO 72dpi.jpg
- File:GARDENS TO STUDIO 2 IMAGES 72dpi.jpg
- File:GALLERY SPACE2images 72dpi.jpg
- File:GALLERY SPACE 2 72dpi.jpg
- File:GALLERY SPACE 1 72dpi.jpg
- File:FROM LA SALLE STREET 72dpi.jpg
- File:ELDON AND SUZANNE IN PIT 72dpi.jpg
- File:ELDON & RON 72dpi.jpg
- File:WALKWAY TEXTURES 72dpi.jpg
- File:SECT ELEV Lcomposite 72dpi.jpg
- File:SCULPTURAL PLANTER FORMS 72dpi.jpg
- File:OVERVIEW OF THE GARDEN 72dpi.jpg
- File:GARDEN TO WALK 72dpi.jpg
- File:GARDEN WIDE 2 72dpi.jpg
- File:ENTRY @ SPIRAL STAIR 72dpi.jpg
- File:ENTRY WALK @ BUBBLE 72dpi.jpg
- File:GARDEN TO STUDIO 72dpi.jpg
- File:SECT 123 COMPOSITE 72dpi - Bubble House.jpg
- File:PLAN L5composite 72dpi - Bubble House.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC DESK ALCOVE Lt NEW 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite Private Attic Study Alcove.jpg
- File:10236 animal habitats NEW - Playboy Mansion - Finished Animal Habitats Detail of Sculptured Stonework.jpg
- File:10236 Pool to HMH Wing 3NEW 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - View from East Waterfall from Grotto to Mansion across Garden.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC DESK ALCOVE Lt NEW - Playboy Mansion - Private Study and Desk Alcove in Attic as built.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY STONE ENTRY DRIVE 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - The Exterior Entry Drive Stonework.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY STONEWORK WINTER 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - The Exterior Fireplace Wall in Winter.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY Stone Fplce in Constr 72di - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Building the Exterior Fireplace Wall.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY 16 TON STONE ON CRANE 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - 16 Ton Boulders being transported.jpg
- File:SAN V The Birds 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Birds arriving at Sunset.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY FIREPLACE DWGS 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Original Design Concept Fireplace Sketches.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY SKYGEESE CLOSE 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Birds arriving the Mississippi Flyway.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY Elevation Original sk 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Original Design Concept Sketch Elevation.jpg
- File:SAN U Original Site Plan 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center - Original Design Concept Plan.jpg
- File:SAN N fireplace close 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Fireplace Stonework.jpg
- File:SAN Q Great Room@Gst Ent modf'd 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Great Room View to Lake.jpg
- File:SAN L Great Room from Conf-Din 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Great Room.jpg
- File:SAN G guest arrival terrace 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- From Entry Deck to Lake.jpg
- File:SAN F guest approach close 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Approach and Entry Stair.jpg
- File:SAN E guest approach middle 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Approach through the Garden.jpg
- File:SAN C chimney mass Suz 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Finished Chimney Stonework.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY Closeup aerial of bay 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Closeup Aerial View of Bay.jpg
- File:SANCTUARY APPROACH VERT 72dpi - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Approach View1 across lake.jpg
- File:SAN A lake view long 72dpi - - Sanctuary - Wildlife Refuge - Conference Center- Approach View2 across lake.jpg
- File:10236 GAME HOUSE ALCOVE ROOM Lt - Playboy Mansion - Game House Alcove Room Environment.jpg
- File:10236 Entry Court nite w text 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Entry Court Fountain and Lighting Environment.jpg
- File:HMH SHOWER -SINK HANDLES Faucets 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite, Sculptured Faucets.jpg
- File:10236 hmh stair mbr to attic 1 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite, Carved Spiral Stairway up to Attic Study.jpg
- File:WOODWORK composite 3-fireplace w-text 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite Woodwork PanelingDetails, Original Design Concept Drawings.jpg
- File:10236 Stair gnomes 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite1, Woodwork Details, Little carved gnomes.jpg
- File:10236 Stair in Construction1 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite1, Woodwork Details, Carved Stairway in Construction.jpg
- File:10236 Stair in Construction2 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Master Bedroom Suite, Woodwork Details, Carved Stairway in Construction.jpg
- File:10236 HMH BED CONTROLS - Playboy Mansion - Finished Woodwork Details, Electronic Bed Control Station.jpg
- File:HMH MBR Bed Enclosure - Playboy Mansion - Finished Woodwork, Master Bedroom Suite, Bed Enclosure.jpg
- File:10236 HMH WOODWORKING DETAILS - Playboy Mansion - Finished Woodwork, One-of-a-Kind Carving Details.jpg
- File:WOODWORK MBR electronics wall2 72dpi- Playboy Mansion - Woodwork Details, Master Bedroom Suite, Electronics Wall2, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:WOODWORK MBR Electronics Wall Elev 1 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Woodwork Details, Master Bedroom Suite, Electronics Wall, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:WOODWORK MBR cassone headboard det1 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Woodwork Details, Master Bedroom Suite Cassone and Headboard, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:WOODWORK MBR cassone headboard det4 - Playboy Mansion - Woodwork Details, Master Bedroom Suite Casework and Headboard, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:WOODWORK MBR floor plan bed72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Woodwork Details, Master Bedroom Suite Floor Plan, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 HMH ATTIC DESK ALCOVE 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Private Study Desk Alcove in Attic as built.jpg
- File:WOODWORK DWGS HMH South Wall El - Playboy Mansion - Sculptured Casework Woodwork Details, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 sculptured pulls 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Sculptured Woodwork, Work Trays, Private Study as built.jpg
- File:WOODWORK DWGS ATTIC alcove2 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Attic Study Woodwork Details, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 AQUARIAM Detail Fish Halogram - Playboy Mansion - Animal Habitats, Aquarium, as built.jpg
- File:10236 Attic Desk2 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Attic Addition, Private Study as built.jpg
- File:10236 NO SLOPE before and after 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Attic Additions, North Slope, as built.jpg
- File:10236 tennis court bar detail 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Tennis Court Bar, as built.jpg
- File:10236 tennis court + antenna - Playboy Mansion - Tennis Court Observation Deck, as built.jpg
- File:10236 AQUARIAM IN GREENHOUSE - Playboy Mansion - Greenhouse Aquarium, as built.jpg
- File:10236 Tennis Court 2 Images 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Tennis Court Development, as built.jpg
- File:10236 Pond Little Falls 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Finished Pond Edge, Little Falls and Planting, as built.jpg
- File:10236 animal habitats - Playboy Mansion - Animal Habitats, as built.jpg
- File:10236 walkway in forest 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Stairway down into Redwood Forest, as built.jpg
- File:10236 yogi's penthouse apt 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Animal Habitats, Yogi Bear's Apartment, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 flamingo aldos sculpture 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Walkway into Redwood Forest, as built.jpg
- File:10236 ANIMAL HABS DWGS 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Animal Habitats, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 koi pond falls 72dpi - c.jpg
- File:10236 POOL POND AQUATIC PLANTS 2 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Detail of Pond Edge and Planting, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 Pool to HMH Wing Attic 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - from Pool back to Mansion, as built.jpg
- File:10236 RON IN CONSTR AT POOL 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Boulders and pool edge under construction.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO WALK THRU ARCH 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Stone arch entry into Grotto, as built.jpg
- File:10236 door wall to garden 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Secret Door into Garden as built.jpg
- File:10236 llama yard 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Finished Rear Yard Gardens, Special Guest and Landscape as built.jpg
- File:10236 Secret Archway To Pool Gardens 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Entry into Rear Yard Complex through Secret Door as built.jpg
- File:10236 Pool-Grotto Section-Elevation Drawing3B fotos - Playboy Mansion - Detail of Pool edge and Berms, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 Pool Bridge Planting - Playboy Mansion - Finished Pool, Bridge and Landscape as built.jpg
- File:10236 UNDERWATER SEAT LEDGE 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Detail of Underwater Seat Ledge and Plantings, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 pool bridge over pond detail - Playboy Mansion - Finished Underwater Seat Ledge as built.jpg
- File:10236 Pool @ West Falls 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Finished West Waterfall as built.jpg
- File:10236 Pool to HMH Wing 2 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Finished East Waterfall profile with view back to Mansion as built.jpg
- File:10236 east waterfall profile 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Finished East Waterfall over Grotto as built.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO first concept sk 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - First Concept Sketch of Grotto, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO hydraulics 72dpi - Playboy Mansion - Hydro Spa Lie Down and Stand Up Hydraulics Detail, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO PLAN 72pdi - Playboy Mansion - Pool Grotto Plan Detail, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO Fusion in SKYLIGHT FLUME.jpg
- File:10236 Pool-Grotto Section-Elevation Drawing and images full size.jpg
- File:10236 GROTTO-Spa w-FGW - Playboy Mansion - Finished Grotto Environment as built.jpg
- File:10236 Pool Grotto Section-Elevation and images through Grotto, Original Design Concept Drawing.jpg
- File:10236 pool stair detail.jpg
- File:10236 Pool-Grotto Section-Elevation Drawing1B fotos.jpg
- File:10236 Aerial Rear Garden Before any work was started.jpg
- File:10236 Aerial Rear Garden 72dpi - Finished Rear Yard Pool, Ponds and Grotto Development.jpg
- File:DC9-1 72dpi - Boarding Hefner's Big Bunny DC-950 on way to LA.jpg
- File:10236 Site Plan - Overall Site Plan of Rear Yard Pool, Ponds and Grotto Development.jpg
- File:NSUC ext FGW detail 72dpi.jpg
- File:NSUC+Lascaux+Chauvet.jpg
- File:NSUC Sanctuary Sketch of Rock Pulpit and skylight concept..jpg
- File:NSUC FLOOR PLAN 72dpi IMG0003LT.jpg
- File:NSUC FGW Sculptural Forms.jpg
- File:NSUC FGW wide early.jpg
- File:NSUC - Aerial 2 from SW.jpg
- File:NSUC Sculptured Fused Glass Wall Exterior.jpg
- File:LASCAUX-SKETCH from visit to the Original Caves 72dpi.jpg
- File:NSUC Sanctuary-Wide Lt.jpg
- File:NSUC Sculptured Fused Glass Wall-Close.jpg
- File:NSUC skylight over rock from entry 72dpi.jpg
- File:North Shore Unitarian Church Sculptured Fused Glass Wall.jpg
- File:Hefner Carved Woodwork.jpg
- File:Hefner Master Bedrom Suite.jpg
- File:Hefner's Private Attic Study.jpg
- File:Hugh Hefner ... Sculptured Letter Trays.jpg
- File:Playboy Mansion ... Hefner's World Renowned Grotto.jpg
- File:Plan of Pool and Grotto 2.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Promotional PDF upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The uploader did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo, this might be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
File was uploaded as "own work", but it appears to have been unlikely created by the uploader as explained in COM:VP/C#File:Demokratikuskoalicio logo.svg . It's not clear whether this would be considered below TOO for Hungary based upon COM:TOO#Hungary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Enchanted Kingdom
[edit]No FOP in the Philippines
- File:Anchors Away EK.jpg
- File:Disk O' Magic.jpg
- File:Enchanted Kingdom (01-03-2015).jpg
- File:Enchanted kingdom.jpg
- File:Enchanted Kingdom.JPG
- File:Space Shuttle Enchanted Kingdom Coke Zero.jpg
- File:Space Shuttle Enchanted Kingdom.jpg
- File:Wheel of Fate gondolas.jpg
- File:Wheel of Fate.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 01:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE Utcursch (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Promotional content, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joshdanie16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
the free sources for the maps should be provided
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Obviously an asteracea flowers. But the flower being out of focus, the flower will never be identified nor the images useful. We already have a lot of good image of asteracea.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
This is listed as PD by 外山恒一 (en:Koichi Toyama) but there is no linked evidence that he has given this permission. ja:ファイル:KToyama.jpg links to his generic Twitter feed (and should also be taken down if the claim is invalid). I don't know whether the image would belong to Koichi Toyama or to the broadcaster (though the speech is almost certainly copyrighted by the speaker). The video is quite infamous on its own and I'm surprised it has stayed up for so long without copyright scrutiny. czar 06:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Josep Torres Tribó isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. The file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Canada for text. It seems to me, that author of the text is Canadian government. That case the text is copyrighted 50 years from publishing. Publishing year is unknown. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Moodle-icon.png Ragimiri 07:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
very low quality Mhohner (talk) 08:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:José Ernesto Galloni
[edit]
Scans of newspapers. It is not clear how old they are, where they are from, or whether they are still under copyright. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- I was thinking you found something copyright protected about these; These came in from NASA's photostream, I can only think that some people may wish to use a .jpg version that do not have Photoshop or Illustrator to convert the .svg to a .jpg. Just my thoughts on how the files might be worthwhile to keep. It doesn't make a difference to me, these files came in as just extra files from the flickr stream. Cheers! Jasonanaggie (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- You doesn't need Photoshop or Illustrator. Every modern browser can render SVGs directly. BTW, MediaWiki converts every SVG to a PNG automatically. Also we have an explicit PNG version without background for every patch extra. --Ras67 (talk) 13:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- I was thinking you found something copyright protected about these; These came in from NASA's photostream, I can only think that some people may wish to use a .jpg version that do not have Photoshop or Illustrator to convert the .svg to a .jpg. Just my thoughts on how the files might be worthwhile to keep. It doesn't make a difference to me, these files came in as just extra files from the flickr stream. Cheers! Jasonanaggie (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
These files too:
- Expedition 3 (15310395856).jpg
- Expedition 5 (15333144562).jpg
- Expedition 8 (15333164752).jpg
- Expedition 10 (15333180122).jpg
- Expedition 12 (15333506475).jpg
- Expedition 16 (15330380181).jpg
- Expedition 18 (15147026677).jpg
- Expedition 19 (15146806039).jpg
- Expedition 20 (15310544246).jpg
- Expedition 22 (15147133637).jpg
- Expedition 24 (15147100308).jpg
- Expedition 26 (15147173867).jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this unused image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dirsmith1
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 08:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 09:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of multiple photos. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better vector version! Ras67 (talk) 09:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need for this inappropriate JPEG, we have a better PNG version! Ras67 (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution, has no potential educational uses. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, better alternatives in Category:Isopropyl group. Leyo 09:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
This image is for promotional purpose of the Triptrek (India) Ltd | Indrajit Das 09:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Querying as this seems to be a third party logo ( TOO concern) claimed as own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kattyteezearza (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
- also the redirect File:P 20150823 081922 BF 1.jpg.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but this given the tone/ quality of the photo is a considerably older, What's the real source? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gianlucaste17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. In my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. In my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of a book cover, no evidence of permission to use a likely copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Low clarity Naveenpf (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused fan art, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution, no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
- Imho below TOO but is this low quality version of the logo in scope? Natuur12 (talk) 11:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
- 1929 Us file. Could be PD but this needs to be proven. Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Selected files in Category:Tux toys
[edit]Based upon the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linux-pingvin.jpg, I am nominating the majority of photographs in Category:Tux toys, avoiding images where a de minimis case may apply or where the toy appears home-made. Though the Linux penguin icon may be copyright free, it cannot be presumed that 3D soft toys based upon it must be copyright free. The requirement that must be satisfied to be hosted on Commons is at COM:TOYS which states:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
Checking the manufacturer's label, or a verifiable assertion that one of the toys is home made, would be sufficient evidence but this must be added to the image page text to avoid future challenges. Unfortunately a number of these images have been hosted on Commons for several years. It would be courteous to alert potentially interested parties or re-users on other Wikimedia projects for additional viewpoints as not all will be active on Commons or watching these files. Similarly if someone requests an extension to the default 7 days to discuss this DR, I would support this being granted as a sensible conservative step.
- File:Digigalos.PNG
- File:Education Freedom Day, Tunisia 2015DSC 9115.jpg
- File:Santa-Tweezers.JPG
- File:Stofftux.jpg
- File:Tux the penguin.jpg
- File:Tux-peluche.jpg
- File:Tux-Weihnachtsmütze1.jpg
- File:Tux-Weihnachtsmütze2.jpg
- File:Tux04102006.jpg
Fæ (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Neutral — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value, added to further an inside joke from the podcast Hello Internet. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 11:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
This photo needs copyright Chrismahonevine (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Not a meaningful image Naveenpf (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
personal photo Naveenpf (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Indistinct image; out of scope. Psychonaut (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The image alt text on the source page is "Cyber Crime (Stock Image)", which leads me to suspect that this is not a public domain government-produced image, but rather a stock photo that the FBI has licensed for use on its own page. The uploader has a history of falsifying licences Psychonaut (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Author is Jan Lenica, who died in 2001. Work from 1986. Stamps are NOT in the public domain in Germany, because Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. 37.7.241.1 14:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ConstanzaBuchet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Halcones Parana Santa Teresita 4.jpg
- File:Halcones Parana Santa Teresita 1.jpg
- File:Halcones Parana Santa Teresita 2.jpg
- File:Halcones Parana Santa Teresita 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sean Drader (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in New Zealand for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Non free use image. Youngest architect of that church died en 1983 Arcyon (discuter) 14:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Non free use image. Youngest architect of that church died en 1983 Arcyon (discuter) 14:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Non free use image. Youngest architect of that church died en 1983 Arcyon (discuter) 14:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Non free use image. Youngest architect of that church died en 1983 Arcyon (discuter) 14:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- ne peut-on appliquer pour les articles de wiki en français le droit français ? Ou faut-il accueillir de tels cas sur wikipédia avec les logos etc ...--Claude PIARD (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BoquiraBahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Prefeitos Boquira.jpg
- File:Boquira vereador 2001 a 2004.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 07 de Abril de 1963.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 1967 a 1970.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 1971 a 1972.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 1983 1988.jpg
- File:Vereadores 1973 a 1976.jpg
- File:Vereadores Boquira 1977 a 1982.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 1989 a 1992.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 1993 a 1996.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 2001 a 2004.jpg
- File:Vereadores 2005 a 2008.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 2009 a 2012.jpg
- File:Vereadores de Boquira 2013 a 2016.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BoquiraBahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://correiomacaubense.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/prac3a7a-da-bandeira-boquira.jpg.
- File:Boquira vista do alto.jpg
- File:Desfile civico em Boquira Polica mirim.jpg
- File:Policia Mirim de Boquira.jpg
- File:Prefeitura de Boquira.png
- File:Prefeitura de Boquira.jpg
- File:Boquira Bahia.jpg
- File:ECLIPSE EM BOQUIRA.jpg
- File:DESFILE CIVICO POLICIA MIRIM DE BOQUIRA.jpg
- File:Praça da matriz Boquira.jpg
- File:PRAÇA DA BANDEIRA.jpg
- File:CAVALGADA EM BOQUIRA BA.jpg
- File:LUCIANO CANDIDATO A PREFEITURA DE BOQUIRA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused small-size vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
the author is Government of Pakistan and government of Pakistan has not provided the permission to license the photos under CC. thought I am not sure if the copyright expired or not.
- File:Pakistani Passport 1984.jpg
- File:Pakistani Passport 1967.jpg
- File:Pakistani Passport 1974.jpg
- File:Pakistani Passport 1960.jpg
- File:Pakistani Passport 1947.jpg
Saqib (talk) 15:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Restored two per INC's request. Pakastani law is "Copyright in a Government work shall, where Government is the first owner of the copyright therein, subsist until fifty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work is first published." . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wordmanner (talk · contribs)
[edit]All works by Gilbert Pélissier uploaded as "own work" and with no evidence of permisison
- File:Gilbert Pélissier à Venise en Mars 1976.jpg
- File:Sans titre, dit Enquête .1998. (39,4x51,2cm)-A29B.jpg
- File:Incises If.2002.jpg
- File:L'Inconnue.1981.(146x114 cm).jpg
- File:La.Place.Saint-Marco, à Venise.jpg
- File:78.déjà.1978.(195x130 cm).jpg
- File:Sans titre. Dite "Urbanisme".1973.(150x150 cm).jpg
- File:L'à venir. Circa 1960.jpg
- File:Les.Rênes.du.pouvoir.Circa1955.jpg
- File:Portrait.par.Luc.Bonnard.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 17:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - two people not in public. From the title it could be an attack image WereSpielChequers (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Author and uploader are two different people as attested in the file description. There is no evidence the uploader has permission to distribute this image or what its license terms really are. Brianhe (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
NO need anymore Pyrusca (talk) 17:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No need anymore Pyrusca (talk) 17:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Sebastian d d
[edit]
Low-quality snapshots of self and family, not in use, no potential educational value, out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The user uploaded an illegible biography of himself. It is not in use by him and has no potential uses for anyone else. Out of scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gemfields PLC (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on any of these promotional files, notice user's name and name of company... also notice that the COM:TOO logo file is enormous, with no real need to be so large. Please see the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MB-one/Gemfields file to which these/some of these are appended, and the category created to hold these images, again with company name: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Gemfields.
- File:Gemfields logo.svg
- File:Montepuez Ruby Mine, Mozambique.jpg
- File:Kagem Emerald Mine, Zambia.jpg
- File:40 carat ruby from Montepuez.jpg
- File:Amethyst pocket, Kariba.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these images (including product shot, and etc.) was created by uploader despite "own work" claims. No metadata, subject matter, etc. all conspire to indicate this is an advertising page for SouthMall and some shampoo companies.
- File:Julie Vega.jpg
- File:Head&ShouldersNewlogo.png
- File:Rejoice Rich.jpg
- File:Rejoice Logo.png
- File:H&MSMSouthmall.jpg
- File:South-Residences.jpg
- File:South-Residences-at-SM-Southmall.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal file, overprocessed to make head black and white (and or that's a cutout superimposed). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of image on projection screen. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on this black Islamic flag. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, wrong file format & no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, obviously copied from unsourced book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal image, Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal & uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategoried file with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Arunatiwary
[edit]
A biography and a curriculum vitae for someone's physics professor. Raw text images are out of scope for Commons, and as this person apparently has no Wikipedia articles, they don't belong on any of the other projects, either. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of some kind of art pressed into the sidewalk. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized PDF file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized photo, would appear to be non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized photo, would appear to be non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe that photo of that water treatment plant would not appear to be educational in a country like yours or mine, but we're not able to evaluate its value for Ecuadorian people.--Dura-Ace (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It's a water treatment plant in Piñas Gijón16 (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for the categories, that makes it a lot more likely to be used. Also do you feel up to writing an English description? It's the descriptions which are searched when people are looking for images. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Possible hoax image, Unused, uncategorized photo, apparently non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized photo, apparently non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Composite image without source/author for each contained image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized groupshot, apparently not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio logo from http://www.thyrocare.com/ Jcc (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
File:10353546 920834031276139 5865701100360567027 nAmour paix et liberté peinture a l'huile sur 393 peinture en pointillée.jpg
[edit]
Unused uncategorized image of some kind of art. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Great photo of road, but unused, uncategorized and no real indication where it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It is in Pinas so categories are now added. Being unused is not a reason for deletion. Gijón16 (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --lNeverCry 22:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of some kind of stage performance, license questionable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
PDF file, unused, uncategorized and out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal snap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: hiten patel, Copyright holder: HITEN'S PHOTOGRAPHY". Copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
At Commons:Undeletion requests today, the uploader claims to be El Monte Rey, one of the subjects of this image. If that is correct, then this cannot be "own work" as claimed and cannot be kept here without a free license from the photographer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not a complete image of the subject, even if rotated perfectly. -βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 20:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
imho rather poor-quality 2007 image, and lots of alternative photographs at Wikimedia Commons - your oppinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
mini-size upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
out of scope personal image that the uploader has removed all necessary details; information template and licence. Ww2censor (talk) 21:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- JuTa has now reverted the removal of the information template, its details and copyright tag that the original uploader removed but I stand by the nomination. Ww2censor (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hor Mert Kemwar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collages including images of disparate origin, not referenced: Possible copyvios, faulty source and authorship indications.
- File:Amongst the Myrtle trees.png
- File:Representation of God's Cherubim.png
- File:Self Portrait of King Hor Merti Kemwar.png
- File:Hor Merti Kemwar's Shower.png
- File:Hor Merti Kemwar's Apep.png
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
low quality: blurry image without any description. There are better images for nights, Christmas decos and hotels in Vienna Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Whatever the outcome of this, I have added some categories that describe the image. darkweasel94 16:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account in wikimedia commons.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo appears to be in COM:SCOPE and was correctly licensed. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep You have asked, and we have refused... which is in our rights, since you used a license which you cannot revoke. You may also use them for your personal project, of course, and they may be licensed there in whatever way you wish. Please stop nominating your files for deletion, or you risk being blocked. Storkk (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
{{subst:delete2|image=File:Parque Caracol Canela.jpg|reason=The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}.}} Christina flyer (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to cancel my account in Wikimedia Commons.
I want to eliminate my Wikimedia commons account
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking again to delete my photos from wikimedia commons: Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by
I want to eliminate my wikimedia commons account.
Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Just use it where ever you want. Thats no reason to delete it here. --JuTa 16:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio Miniapolis 23:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- This is the source (which has a copyright notice), but I don't if its author holds copyrights to the individual photos. Is anyone familiar with the site? Miniapolis 14:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Cosmin Stefan should confirm the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
TL;DR: Incompatible license, no permission (copyright violation) for CC BY-SA 4.0 from author of the original work.
Possible copyright violation, if both of the following conditions are met:
- The copyright holder of the original work (Chris Ward) never dual-licensed the original work under GPLv2+ and CC BY-SA 4.0 license with "you may choose the license of your choice"; and
- This work exceeds the threshold of originality for the vectorization (SVG source code/paths).
The icon (256px PNG, with PSD hyperlinks) was originally published in August 2013 in mpv software since commit 303096bcb2b5f52ea51d5d7ddb738689b08a0a2f The license that Chris agreed to is ambiguous, but assumed to be GPLv2+ (the license that mpv is released under). This icon is still distributed with mpv, so the case of GPLv2+ permission is clear (for now).
CC BY-SA 4.0 and GPLv2+ licenses are incompatible with each other one way: CC BY-SA 4.0-licensed works can be included in GPLv3-only works, but as of today GPL-licensed works cannot be derived/included in any CC BY-SA as a derivative works at all. See Template:Incompatible license.
OTRS permission is most likely required from Chris Ward for uploader's choice of CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
Info I've already sent an email to Chris asking for OTRS permission, though normally the burden of proof is on the uploader. May just be a case of changing the license information on the file to {{GPLv2+}} if there is no originality/creativity involved in this derivative work. 80.221.159.67 07:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Info The original revision of the file page claimed own work
and didn't include the GPLv2+ license template. Those were later added to the page. 80.221.159.67 08:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Info: A replacement is available. An SVG known to be under GPLv2+ (LGPLv2.1+?) and without license incompatibilities has been available in mpv's source code repository for quite some time: mpv-gradient.svg. It has some differences from both this SVG and the authorative source at File:Mpv icon.png, so neither are perfect. Author of the SVG is a pseudonym "evgenyz" according to one of the mpv developers on #mpv IRC channel at freenode. Comment Replacing the file would avoid legal ambiguities per Commons' precautionary principle. 80.221.159.67 11:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC) (edited: 11:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC))
Kept: There is an explicit copyright notice at https://mpv.io/ and no other licensing information that I can find. It's not clear what country the MPV project is based in, but I think this is safely below the ToO,. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
This is a second deletion nomination for this SVG vectorization of the mpv logo to address unanswered questions remaining from the previous deletion request.
I believe this file to be a copyright violation because of the following reasons:
- The copyright holder (Chris Ward) did not agree to CC BY-SA 4.0 for the logo. The original work in question is File:Mpv icon.png and has been OTRS-verified today. [1]
- The GPLv2+ license is incompatible with CC BY-SA 4.0.[2]
- The copyright holder is from United Kingdom [3]. United Kingdom has a very low threshold of originality.[4]
The logo used on mpv's official website at mpv.io is not the same as this SVG file on Commons, as thought by User:Jameslwoodward closing the previous deletion request. It is apparently a downscaled 128px version of the original PNG file.
There are ~65 free software contributors in the project in past 6 months (checked on 2016-10-03 against source code repository), where different people hold copyright to parts of the software. Thus, the question about where the "mpv project" is based in is irrelevant; It is only relevant where the copyright holder of the logo in question is based in. That question has now been answered.
As mentioned in the previous deletion request, a free replacement free of known copyright issues is available from the project: mpv-gradient.svg
I have no doubt the original logo in PNG format is copyrighted in United Kingdom, and I believe the derivative SVG version uploaded and/or vectorized by User:Tlebeau as is also in violation of the GPLv2+ license for exceeding the threshold of originality this way.
The problem with this version on Commons is we don't know if User:Tlebeau will agree to GPLv2+ for their version of the SVG file, so changing the license tag to {{GPLv2+}} is not appropriate for their work until such permission is received. SVGs are a completely different subject anyway, because the vectorization process (SVG source code) may involve some amount of creativity to be eligible for copyright. I'd side with Commons' precautionary principle .
References
- ↑ OTRS ticket #2016101110008753:
I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: GNU General Public License, version 2 (GPLv2+).
- ↑ See Template:Incompatible license.
- ↑ TEN ZERO THREE - Web design, development and graphic design. Archived from the original on 2016-10-11. "... My name ... is Chris Ward. I grew up in Worcester in the West Midland of England and ... lived for a few years in Nottingham before being drawn south to the bright lights of London. I've recently moved to St Albans and work in London ..."
- ↑ Commons:Threshold of originality § United Kingdom
For clarification: I do not represent the copyright holder in law. I am a neutral observer. 80.221.159.67 18:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I can't close this, because I closed it last time, so here are my comments:
- First, I think this is below the ToO everywhere. It looks a great deal like many software "play buttons" we have all seen in various applications. Changing color and minor shading does not give a copyright, so I doubt that any version of this has a copyright. But, even if the predecessors to the Chris Ward version do have a copyright, they are freely licensed, and it is not clear that making an SVG from another SVG gies rise to a new copyright.
- Second, while the creator of this SVG acknowledges that he worked from the Chris Ward version as an original, as we are told above, there are freely licensed versions of this icon available, so the SVG could just as easily have been created from a free original. If the consensus rejects my first comment, then this could be made free by the creator simply reopening the file, making a minor change with the free PNG version in front of him and reposting the file with the PNG as the source. Requiring that is just silly.
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted per no permission. --lNeverCry 07:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This is circa 1918 photo and the author is unknown. Why do you think, that author is 70 years dead? Taivo (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Adjusted. {{PD-hu-unknown}} Tambo (talk) 09:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In order to use {{PD-hu-unknown}}, the uploader must prove that the image was published more than 70 years ago. This may have been created in 1918, but it is only the publication date that matters. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
have the same content with this file which translated by the arabic graphic lab --Alaa Najjar :)..! 09:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Previously uploaded here--Alaa Najjar :)..! 16:33, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Please upload only interesting stuff to the Wikimedia community Chrismahonevine (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is interesting to anyone wanting to know about Sailfish OS, I did check before if there were other screenshots of the operating system suitable for the article, but I found none Towel401 (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
маленький размер Wildcatjane (talk) 13:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - It is not actually very small, has full EXIF, and is a beautiful photo. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
маленький размер Wildcatjane (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - It is not actually very small, and has full EXIF. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The "no visible copyright notice" rationale gets applied to photographs and documents, but as far as I'm aware does not apply to statues or other 3D modern artworks. Happy to be corrected by the part of U.S. law that clarifies this, however as a rationale for a public domain work, I would like to see this tested.
Addendum, refer to http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.pdf. The intent is to define how publications require copyright notices. As statues are not publications, this seems irrelevant to determine their copyright. --Fæ (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep Note that Circular 3 covers the 1975 law, which is not applicable to this 1968 work. The Copyright Act of 1909 calls for notice on all copyrighted works. For sculpture
- "... the notice may consist of the letter C inclosed within a circle, thus:(C), accompanied by the initials, monogram, mark, or symbol of the copyright proprietor: Provided, That on some accessible accessible portion of such copies or of the margin, back,permanent base, or pedestal, or of the substance on which such copies shall be mounted, his name shall appear." see Section 18 at http://www.copyright.gov/history/1909act.pdf
I see Calder's initials here, and the date, but not the (C) or the word "Copyright", so I think {{PD-US-no notice}} applies. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Also, Circular 3 discusses "works" in general, not "publications". On page two under "Visually Perceptible Copies", it specifically mentions the requirements for "sculptural works". . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- (ec) I'll strictly refer to the 1909 act as you correctly suggest, therefore ignoring the rationale you raised with regard to Circular 3 as irrelevant, as the 1909 act makes no statement about sculptural works apart from statues in connection to copies. The 1909 act section 18, depends on section 9 ("That the notice of copyright required by section nine of this Act shall [...]") and section 9 says "That any person entitled thereto by this Act may secure copyright for his work by publication thereof with the notice of copyright required by this Act". Again a single original work of art that is a statue is not a publication. Though the 1909 act mentions "pedestal" (sec.18), this is in relation to "copies", such as one might have for mass produced models. This reading is backed up by the penalties section of the 1909 act, sec.25, where the word "statue" is used twice, but only in relation to "infringing copy".
- Though section 5 lists a typology for registering works and includes "(g) Works of art; models or designs for works of art" and cross references this list in section 18, there is nothing in the text that requires that this apply to original works (i.e. non-copies) that are not "publications" in any conventional or legal definition of that word.
- Consequently I believe that the 1909 act in a straight-forward reading never intended to apply to original unique statues, but may apply to derivative publications, models and copies of original 3D works of art. --Fæ (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep As the photographer and uploader, I'll note that I looked very closely at the sculpture for any and all writing on it and found nothing other than the "CA 68" noted above (you can see this on the photo on the leg nearest to the viewer) "CA" is the working signature for the artist Alexander Calder III ("Sandy" Calder) and 68 is the year it was completed and then purchased for the City of Philadelphia by Edmund Bacon (father of Kevin!) with the city's money + money from the National Endowment of the Arts. Since the sculpture is made of flat pieces of steel and a bit over 8 feet tall, it is very easy to see all the surfaces and there is definitely no other writing on the sculpture or the base. The Smithsonian maintains a record of many prominent pieces of public art in the US (though they didn't do the surveys themselves to the best of my knowledge) Their record is here. It's a bit odd, but I think the record has a small mistake, the date is given as 1964, with the installation date as 1969. Otherwise everything is exactly as in my photo, excluding that the sculpture was moved about 4 blocks (but that's a well known fact). SIRIS gives a reference to the book "Fairmount Park Art Assoc., "Sculpture of a City: Philadelphia's Treasures in Bronze & Stone," NY: Walker Publ., 1974," which was published before the move. I've studied that book in the local library for info on many public sculptures in Philadelphia and can assure you that the photo in the book shows the same artwork as is shown in my photo.
So the basic relevant facts from SIRIS - Calder died in 1976. The work was displayed in public (published) in 1969. It is owned by the City of Philadelphia. The work is signed and dated, but no other writing is noted (they usually include all writing on the sculptures and related plaques).
Hope this helps. Smallbones (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment This ground has been covered before in Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US, in particular in the paragraph:
- "Applying these elements to statues means that if the statue was placed in a public location without restrictions on copying prior to 1978, the work was probably published. If the published work did not comply with the copyright formalities (notice requirements), the copyright ended, placing the statue in the public domain. However, it is important to remember that statues and public art that complied with formalities requirements at the time of publication could still fall under copyright protections."
This was put into Commons on Jan.6, 2012 by the WMF legal team in response to a user question. It is not the law itself, or even legal advice, but an opinion of the WMF legal team on where the law stands as a starting point for community discussion. Given this opinion and the length of time our editors have relied on it, that we at least temporarily respect it, carry on any further discussion at Commons talk:Public art and copyrights in the US, and if we feel like "reversing it" we go back to WMF legal for further input first. Smallbones (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Fæ, I don't understand. It looks to me that you are saying that under the 1909 Act, that one-off sculptures are not covered by copyright? Or do I misread you? There's a great deal of precedent here and elsewhere to contradict you.
For one thing, I don't think you will find the word "publication" in the 1909 Act applied to a created work. The word is used only in the technical copyright sense of the event of disclosing the work to the public. For another, as you note, the Act includes "works of art" in its section 5 enumeration of works covered and sculptures are certainly works of art. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Could you provide a link to a legal case that makes the definition of publication used in the 1909 act extend to any public display, and confirms that the typology in section 5 does cover original sculptures rather than copies or models of original 3D works? The precedent would be something to rely on as you say. I acknowledge the WMF statement, but parts of it lack context for me. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Source is needed for PD-AR-photo 83.58.191.60 13:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no evidence that the image was published before 20 years ago. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Old "self-vandalism" by User:Niabot. Commons is not censored, out of scope with no realistic educational value over the original file at File:Dojikko.png. 80.221.159.67 13:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Fits into Category:Wikimedia image filter. --Leyo 15:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: ，it will be use in zh-wiki 反粒子(Antiparticle)，please don’t delete.Richard923888 (talk) 22:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
the author is Government of Pakistan and government of Pakistan has not provided the permission to license the photos under CC. thought I am not sure if the copyright expired or not. Saqib (talk) 15:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- The file was not uploaded with a CC license tag. If licensing is an issue, please add the correct license tag. The image can be kept for historic significance to the article on Pakistani passport. Venudxb (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- I am not sure which license would be appropriate here. Maybe User:Yann knows better. --Saqib (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Jameslwoodward: Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Venudxb. I wonder if File:Pakistani Passport 1947.jpg should also be kept? --Saqib (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- I am not sure which license would be appropriate here. Maybe User:Yann knows better. --Saqib (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: "Copyright in a Government work shall, where Government is the first owner of the copyright therein, subsist until fifty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work is first published." This has been out of copyright for 11 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. Christina flyer (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christina flyer (talk • contribs) 19:40, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Superseded by File:Praia_do_Flamengo_RJ_sol.jpg. Storkk (talk) 10:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep kein valider Löschgrund. --Ralf Roleček 18:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Please reconcile "Author Gabriel Urrutia Galaz" from metadata with uploader? The image is unused, uncategorized, mostly black and doesn't seem to be educational plus there is an issue with who actually created it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- (sorry, my english is very bad... ) It is a typical example for using a "star-filter" Now it is used. Pics here at Commons not must have educational background. Commons is a source for free media files. And this demonstrate a photographic effect, it is useful. --Ralf Roleček 19:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion anymore. Scope issue resolved. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:1952 Poznan 1 maja Swiety Marcin Armii Czerwonej 4.jpg
- File:1952 Poznan 1 maja Swiety Marcin Armii Czerwonej 3.jpg
- File:1952 Poznan 1 maja Towarowa Swiety Marcin Armii Czerwonej 2.jpg
- File:1952 Poznan 1 maja ul Swiety Marcin wtedy Armii Czerwonej 1.jpg
- File:1945 Poznan gimnazjum Jana Kantego zniszczona sala gimnastyczna 1.jpg
- File:1945 Poznan gimnazjum Jana Kantego zniszczona sala gimnastyczna 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
All uploaded photos were taken by my father Włodzimierz Doliński.
My father is dead and all copyrights to these pictures are mine.
These are scans of photos from my family album. I gave correct source (family album) and author (Włodzimierz Doliński). Place and date of the images are described in the file name and categories.
Photos are unique and after their removal will be lost for the whole community.
I am new to the Wikimedia Commons. What more can I do to prove that I have the copyright to these pictures?
--TomekD pl (talk) 17:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Non free use image. Youngest architect of that church died en 1983 Arcyon (discuter) 15:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well, it depends on whether this architect was relevant for the outer shape of the church. de:Basilika_Notre-Dame_de_la_Trinité_(Blois) states that the leading architect Paul Rouvière died with the beginning of WW II, which would mean that his works are of out of copyright already. --Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Túrelio. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
This image is claimed to be from 2011 and also to be PD-Anonymous, source is "Collection personnelle". Obviously almost nothing is really known about this image, and it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep C’est une erreur, 2011 est la date de versement. La photo a été prise en 1938. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 11:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Now the photo is said to be from 1938 and still claimed to be in the PD with the Anonymous-EU tag. But that tag isn't applicable to German works, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author (here: the photographer) was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp). 1938 is also not old enough to assume that the photograph must be in the PD anyway, since the photographer easily could have lived beyond 1945. Rosenzweig τ 16:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- I think, that the photographer is never disclosed, even not in a lecture, so without significant doubt the photo is really anonymous. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Got any proof for that? How much research did you do and where? --Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- No research, I simply feel that. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is not enough to simply feel that the copyright status of some file is ok, we routinely want proof. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- No research, I simply feel that. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Got any proof for that? How much research did you do and where? --Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It also has to be proven that it was published more than 70 years ago -- no such proof here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Car il n'y a rien sur cette article 176.151.109.190 18:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
PDF file. Unused, uncategorized & apparently non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Ellin, this file is part of a 12 pieces music cycle. Why this one is requested for deletion? It is CC-BY-SA licenced, I have written permission from legal successor of Babits to use his literature. Of course, if it is not usable or suitable for Wikimedia, please delete the whole cycle. --Hoze (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal snap, out of COM:SCOPE, also File:131204김훈 명예소방관 관련 만남19.JPG and File:131204김훈 명예소방관 관련 만남20.JPG Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- the person here is ko:김훈 (소설가) his is one of most notable novelists in South Korea. 최광모 (talk) 12:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- There are two people in photo... it looks like the younger person wanted a selfie with the older person. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Not valid reason. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocables Alan (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized apparently personal image of a man sitting down. Also please consider removing File:140919상도동 추석 가족 모임78.JPG, File:140919상도동 추석 가족 모임79.JPG, File:140919상도동 추석 가족 모임80.JPG, File:140919상도동 추석 가족 모임81.JPG, File:140919상도동 추석 가족 모임84.JPG as well. They are apparently other shots in same photo shoot, or minor duplicates of each other. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
'Louie's puke', is Louis Theroux. He is a film-maker and writer, so I thought a portrait of him would be used by people, even if he is puking. Well, it was just a tin of soup in reality, but I do own copyright on the image. Would it be better if it was deleted and uploaded again as a new entry of just 'louis theroux, film-maker'? many thanks,paul 6th October 2016ce
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, as thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, and file also not in use at Wikimedia Commons projects, see also [[:]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadepalli_Subbarao]] - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Liegt das Einverständnis des abgebildeten Orgelspielers vor? Rollroboter (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nein. Vielleicht ist meine folgende Frage naiv; ich hab mich seit vielen Jahren nicht mit dem Thema "Recht am eigenen Bild" auseinandergesetzt, da ich sonst keine Photos von Personen veröffentliche: Ist ein Einverständnis denn nötig, wenn jemand vor zahlreichem Publikum öffentlich auftritt? Ich hab hier ja nicht einen Besucher herausgezoomt, sondern den Künstler selber während eines öffentlichen Auftritts. (Vergleiche die Ankündigungen zB im ORF, wo es hieß: "Nur wenige Musiker, wie Ingomar Mattitsch, verstehen es, die vier Register mit den zwei Bälgen zum Klingen zu bringen. Sein Orgelkonzert im Klösterle wird der akustische Höhepunkt am Denkmaltag sein.") --Niki.L (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: My reading of Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Germany says that unless the person is a "public figure" (government official, movie star, etc.), then permission is required even in a public place. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Liegt das Einverständnis der erkennbaren Personen vor? Rollroboter (talk) 20:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nein. Vielleicht ist meine folgende Frage naiv; ich hab mich seit vielen Jahren nicht mit dem Thema "Recht am eigenen Bild" auseinandergesetzt, da ich sonst keine Photos von Personen veröffentliche: Ist ein Einverständnis denn nötig, wenn jemand vor zahlreichem Publikum öffentlich auftritt? Ich hab hier ja nicht einen Besucher herausgezoomt, sondern eine Aufnahme gewählt, bei der die beiden Personen im Mittelpunkt stehen, die öffentlich aufgetreten sind. --Niki.L (talk) 05:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: My reading of Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Germany says that unless the person is a "public figure" (government official, movie star, etc.), then permission is required even in a public place. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Erro meu Arthur Ângelo (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Erro meu Arthur Ângelo (talk) 18:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Erro meu Arthur Ângelo (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Erro meu Arthur Ângelo (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
bilddatei von svg in png geändert, kann aber leider nicht die png zu svg-bild hochladen, daher lade ich png neu hoch und möchte svg löschen Yanikor (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
as per File:Madurai - panoramio - yamarhythm (2).jpg (quality), Roland zh (talk) 20:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
as per File:10 Panor - panoramio.jpg (quality/educational use), Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- This is educational, I had no idea what a "streets in Madurai" looks like Oxyman (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
small-sized upload missing description, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your oppinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as duplicate (Dupe) and the most recent rationale was: Dunkin Donuts world map.svg INeverCry (talk) 21:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Event in Madrid, Bollywood Hungama license does not apply. Reventtalk 22:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete: Earlier at the time of uploading, I wasn't clear about the Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. Now I'm familiar with it. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 06:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)- Keep: I've uploaded an another image of the same persons. Event held in Mumbai. Previous versions of the file may be deleted by an administrator, instead of deleting the whole file. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 06:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I had requested to move the file to File:Karan Singh Grover & Bipasha Basu pose post their wedding in Mumbai.jpg for the correct title for the file. But INeverCry declined the request saying that the file is currently nominated for deletion. Check the file history. The file was nominated for deletion because previous file's event was held outside India and such images are not allowed to upload. But I have now uploaded a new version file of the same person. Event is held in India. So now the file meets the criteria of Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 09:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- You should, really, just upload a new file, instead of overwriting the one that isn't okay... read COM:OVERWRITE. Doing so makes things confusing. I've split the 'new' upload off to the target of the requested move... the file that is under consideration is still at this name. Reventtalk 15:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I had requested to move the file to File:Karan Singh Grover & Bipasha Basu pose post their wedding in Mumbai.jpg for the correct title for the file. But INeverCry declined the request saying that the file is currently nominated for deletion. Check the file history. The file was nominated for deletion because previous file's event was held outside India and such images are not allowed to upload. But I have now uploaded a new version file of the same person. Event is held in India. So now the file meets the criteria of Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 09:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Szeretném, ha a Wikimedia Commons figyelembe venné és betartaná a magyarországi törvényeket, amelyek szerint magán személyekről nemcsak, hogy nem tölthető fel az engedélyük nélkül, de még csak készíteni sem szabad róluk anélkül. Ezzel a feltöltéssel mindkét törvényi pont meg van szegve:
- Nincs nyoma annak, hogy a képen felismerhető személyektől engedély lett kérve a róluk készített felvételhez.
- Nincs nyoma annak, hogy a képen felismerhető személyek engedélyezték a róluk készült felvétel közzétételét.
Magyarországon a törvény (PTK) ezt a képmás védelme néven említi.
Ezen a képen nem közszereplők láthatóak közszereplésen, hanem magán személyek nem közszereplésen. A kép megtartása a magyar jogszabályokba ütközik, ezért törlendő. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
A magyar törvények szerint nyilvános eseményeken szabad közemberekről a kiemelésük nélkül fényképeket készíteni. Egy étteremben való evés nem nyilvános esemény, ráadásul itt eléggé ki vannak emelve a tömegből a képen látható személyek. Ennek a képnek a használathoz engedély kell. Másodvéleményt és másik adminisztrátori eljárást kérek. Az nem elfogadható, hogy ugyanarról a képről szóló két törlési megbeszélést is ugyanaz az adminisztrátor zár le. Ez jogproblémás és kétségessé teszi az eljárást. Mintha más véleménye nem létezne vagy nem létezhetne csak Jcb adminisztrátoré. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Szeretném, ha a Wikimedia Commons figyelembe venné és betartaná a magyarországi törvényeket, amelyek szerint magán személyekről nemcsak, hogy nem tölthető fel az engedélyük nélkül, de még csak készíteni sem szabad róluk anélkül. Ezzel a feltöltéssel mindkét törvényi pont meg van szegve:
- Nincs nyoma annak, hogy a képen felismerhető személyektől engedély lett kérve a róluk készített felvételhez.
- Nincs nyoma annak, hogy a képen felismerhető személyek engedélyezték a róluk készült felvétel közzétételét.
Magyarországon a törvény (PTK) ezt a képmás védelme néven említi.
Ezen a képen nem közszereplők láthatóak közszereplésen, hanem magán személyek nem közszereplésen. A kép megtartása a magyar jogszabályokba ütközik, ezért törlendő. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
A magyar törvények szerint nyilvános eseményeken szabad közemberekről a kiemelésük nélkül fényképeket készíteni. Egy kocsmában való ivászat nem nyilvános esemény, ráadásul itt eléggé ki vannak emelve a tömegből a képen látható személyek. Ennek a képnek a használathoz engedély kell. Másodvéleményt és másik adminisztrátori eljárást kérek. Az nem elfogadható, hogy ugyanarról a képről szóló két törlési megbeszélést is ugyanaz az adminisztrátor zár le. Ez jogproblémás és kétségessé teszi az eljárást. Mintha más véleménye nem létezne vagy nem létezhetne csak Jcb adminisztrátoré. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
