Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of statues in Central Park

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Pictures of statues in Central Park

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama for artworks such as statues in the USA, and each of these images appears to be a photo of a statue in Central Park, without sufficient attribution and without proof of permission. Per Commons:Freedom of panorama#USA, "For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, ... any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork." --  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does bear a plaque (see [8]), but I can't find any image on the internet that shows a copyright notice. Assuming, therefore, that it's ok under US law. --MichaelMaggs 17:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image:Three Dancing Maidens, Central Park.JPG
    • Sculptor: Walter Schott (d. 1938). Created 1910, presented to the city in 1947. Lupo 09:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • The artwork itself is public domain per the death of the creator being more than 50 years ago. This seemed fairly clear from the 1910 creation date, which I had added to the description precisely to address a potential deletion request. [9] - BanyanTree 12:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Eh, what's got 50 years to do with it? We generally apply 70 years p.m.a. The U.S. has never had a 50-year copyright term.(Rubbish. Of course they did, from 1978 - 1998 for works published 1978 or later. But that's of no use to us, as no such 50-year p.m.a. copyright expired in that time, before the extension to 70 years. Lupo 21:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)) It may be though that the sculpture is indeed PD-US, or PD-US-not renewed. But it's still copyrighted in Germany until the end of 2008 (Schott was a German...) Lupo 14:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • Untangling my thoughts: I uploaded the picture thinking of w:Template:PD-old-50, which states that works created in the U.S. prior to 1923 etc etc. Schott created the work in Germany and and it was then sold to a U.S. family, so that's clearly flawed reasoning. Delete, and apologies for the mess. - BanyanTree 22:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Next stop: the other images of statues and sculptures in Category:New York City statues and sculptures, Category:Statues of the United States, and Category:Sculptures of the United States. (gotta run!)   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all that are copyrighted or that do not specify the sculptor. However, some photos in these categories are ok, such as Image:John Ericsson Battery Park.jpg. Kjetil r 02:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, but the nominator should weed out those that are obviously in the public domain first and then list the rest here for individual consideration. Lupo 09:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I didn't mean to nominate "the other images of statues and sculptures in Category:New York City statues and sculptures, Category:Statues of the United States, and Category:Sculptures of the United States" as a part of this nomination, just to put them "out there" (so to speak) as the categories I intended to look at next (and others could do the same if they wish). I'm sorry if I gave any impression to the contrary.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no big problem. Just try not to nominate the obviously PD ones. (The nomination of the obelisk for FOP violation above was hilarious.) Preemptive notice: the Statue of Liberty is PD. (Erected 1886, designer Frédéric Bartholdi (1834 - 1904).) :-) Lupo 07:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closing. All images specifically listed have been dealt with. If there are others they should be listed explicitly in a new Deletion Request. --MichaelMaggs 17:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]