Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2013

File:Titan poster.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2013 at 14:08:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cutaway diagram of Titan's interior and atmosphere, drawn to scale.

Info Cutaway diagram of Titan's interior and atmosphere, drawn to scale. All by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice diagram, as always from you. The one thing that feels wrong to me is that it looks as if Titan was far above the equator and rings of Saturn, while it actually has an inclination of pretty much zero. An awesome way to make that clear would be a similar composition to this (that could, at the same time, educate about the scale to some extent). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version that has Saturn's rings flatter, though now Saturn's rings and the clice in Titan conflict with each other.😕—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not ideal but definitely better from a factual point of view. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 06:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 15:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Zeche Zollverein abends.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 22:03:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 08:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 09:29, 23 August 2013
Support Very nice. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Almonroth (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, really great shot. I like the atmosphere and the lighting. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC) P.S. Ich war vor Jahren mal da und bin beeindruckt von der Bildqualität.[reply]
Pile-on Support Can't argue with anything about this. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Couldn't suggest to improve anything Poc o² 13:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Tabanus sudeticus MHNT Portrait.jpg

File:Orb Valley, Roquebrun, Hérault 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 07:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice picture, but where is the wow effect ? Pleclown (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination yes, not very wow -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tabanus sudeticus MHNT Portrait.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 15:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Fbnpch --Fbnpch (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Deserving. --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like some goateed aging jazzman wearing sunglasses. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you to Fbnpch, and all of you. I recommend this family to make insect close up. They leave very easily approached. But he does not like the flash, it is easy to approach, but was only allowed one photo. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice job, Poc o² 22:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 07:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Dolmabahçe Mosque Mars 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 10:43:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Dolmabahçe Mosque, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. In the background the Dolmabahçe Palace. c/u/n -- Arild Vågen (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 09:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Moray Eel (Gymnothorax funebris), Cozumel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 21:40:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A free swimming Giant Moray Eel (Gymnothorax javanicus) with diver at Cozumel, Mexico. All by -- P.Lindgren (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P.Lindgren (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice work. But the diver is a bit out of focus IMHO. Nikhil(talk) 12:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Yes, the diver is OOF due to the short DOF. But I think that the Giant moray is the main subject and the diver just adds to the scenery. The picture is taken at 24mm with the Giant moray only around 1 meter in front of me so immediately after I took the shot I had to get away from it's intended swimming path... ;)
Support Wow. This is a very cool and unusual under water shot. Well executed, and for me it is plus that the diver is a little OOF. It helps attract focus on the main subject. --Slaunger (talk) 07:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question I do not know much about giant moray eels, but I have never seen a photo of one, which was green. Is it really so green, or is it the propagation of light in the atwer, which makes it appear so green? --Slaunger (talk) 07:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info Thanks for your kind words! In ~200 dives, it's the first time I've seen a free swimming moray coming towards me so I was very happy to get the shot. I'm no expert but of the 10-15 times I've seen a Giant moray when diving it's color has shifted from brown to dark green. But the photo was taken only 7-8m below the surface so I believe it's the light through the very clear water that makes it appear a bit greener than usual. Or maybe the Mexican Giant morays is greener than the ones I've seen in Asia.
    - Thanks for the information. I have done a little image search and I did find a few green ones, but this is one of the most stunning I think there are available at all. Thanks for uploading it to Commons! --Slaunger (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing fish, nice composition. --Cayambe (talk) 09:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 15:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Grisblänkan August 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 12:35:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Grisblänkan lighthouse outside Öja island, Stockholm archipelago. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the seamless transition from sky to water Poc o² 19:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 15:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Interno della Cattedrale di Alba.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 21:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Valerio Manassero - uploaded by Valerio Manassero - nominated by Valerio Manassero -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Serious perspective problems, please, try again at QIC to get some feedback on that. Poc o² 22:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same opinion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parque Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales II.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 22:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parque Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales en la ciudad de Trujillo

Info created by Rjcastillo - uploaded by Rjcastillo - nominated by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Have you got space left at the top left and right. I do not like the tightly cropped hills on both sides. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No. I realized after make the photos. Sorry.--Rjcastillo (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riesennetzspinne.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 22:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not very sharp and a bit overexposed (head and legs) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sakurajima at Sunset.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 04:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gribeco - uploaded by Gribeco - nominated by Gribeco -- Gribeco (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gribeco (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superbe ! --Wikinade (talk) 05:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 08:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 11:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The image appears very noisy (all throughout color noise) when viewed at 100%. I don't understand the rational of using ISO 1600 when you had the luxury of 1/800 second? At 40mm length, you could have easily taken the photograph hand-held at 1/200 second and thereby using ISO 400. That could have given you the same level of sharpness and much less/well-controlled noise level. Also, at ISO 1600 if you notice, there are color shifts happening --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Kadellar (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schäferpfühle Ladeburg.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 18:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ladeburger Schäferpfühle Nature reserves in Brandenburg, Germany

Info created by kds11 - uploaded by kds11 - nominated by kds11 -- Kds11 (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Kds11 (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject doesn't look interesting to me and the composition doesn't make it so. Also needs ccw rotation and has chromatic aberration on the right (and a little on the left). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpness in the farer areas is imho not sufficient for an FP landscape shot. English description is missing. Probably try QIC first to correct the most obvious errors as pointed out by Julian. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition and bad quality. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aporia crataegi.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 13:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by MichaD - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simisa (talk) 16:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit tight at top, but nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 20:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support In spite of the disturbing branch on the right Poc o² 17:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Puente Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 17:08:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bridge Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho with the island Taipai in the background, Macau

Info Bridge Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho with the island Taipa in the background, Macau. All by me, Poc o² 17:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 17:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rjcastillo (talk) 01:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting point of view. --Maire (talk) 10:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. --ArildV (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 22:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Lyford House, Tiburon.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 02:20:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little soft but very good quality. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow this worked at sunset when it shouldn't have. Nice to see us getting a head start on WLM-USA 2013. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours -- Colin (talk) 12:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 08:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very good! --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some perspective distortion on the buildings (at both sides, easily fixable), and maybe the image could be used somewhere, it's nice and of high EV indeed --A.Savin 19:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but I fixe it, lightnings are cropped. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 07:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a useful image but not a great one. The composition, with the tree and the rooftops, and the light-polluted sky, don't work for me. Colin (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Reservations per Colin, but the difficulty of capturing such a subject is a mitigating factor IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena

File:Budapest bridge 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 05:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the composition but I miss some sharpness. For this kind of shot using a tripod (yes, I know, tricky on bridges due to traffic) is the best options Poc o² 13:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. I used tripod, however, the bridge moves with the shift from cars --The Photographer (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llorenzi (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition! --P.Lindgren (talk) 11:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Significant sharpness issues at 100%. A shaking tripod is worse than no tripod. Also the lower part of the bridge is kind of distracting, cant let focus on the scene beyond --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colors but I don't like the composition either. Are we supposed to be looking at the bridge or the landscape? If the former it's a very odd crop that raises more questions than it answers; if the latter the bridge is in the way. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a technique picture frame --The Photographer (talk) 12:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose With this composition, I expect both foreground and background to be in focus/sharp. Either a smaller aperture and focus stacking would have worked well here. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 09:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Kikos (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The star formation region NGC 3324.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 13:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ESO, u/n by Stas1995 — Stas1995 (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is difficult to argue that this is anything other than an exceptional photograph of a deep-space object. The raw image is huge and sharp. Very nice. Well done. KDS444 (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kasir (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 10:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Pakri pank3.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 17:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Icicles on Pakri cliff, all by Ivar (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Picture temperature too warm IMO. Can you change? -- Simisa (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I could do it, but I don't see a reason, why should I. Shooting time of this photo was at 17:02, sunset at 18:41 (23. march). Less than 2 hours difference means, that sunlight is already warmer than at midday. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 07:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Souq Waqif, Doha, Catar, 2013-08-05, DD 11.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 03:21:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Original umbrellas roof in the Souq Waqif market, Doha, Qatar

Info Original umbrellas roof in the Souq Waqif market, Doha, Qatar. All by me, Poc o² 03:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 03:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool --A.Savin 19:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice contrast between earth-toned, unexceptional street scene and colorful, slightly surreal umbrellas. Looks like an album cover. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 01:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again it's obvious from the colors that it's one of Frank's works. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support !!! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support one of the best I've seen in the last time. Tomer T (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful setting and colors. But the presence of the big rock in the foreground mars the composition, IMHO. If bridge is the main subject, more importance should have been given to it. Right now the foreground rock/hill occupies a significant portion of the frame and is kind of distracting to me when I try to look whats happening behind it -- Dey.sandip (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment imo the hill is necessary to provide depth and proportion to the motif. Luckily there's also a guy standing on the top of the hill, serving as scale and thus hinting at the sheer monumentality of the scene. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: beautiful scenery, but I totally agree with Dey.sandip. — TintoMeches, 07:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For me it's inverse, the idea and the composition are very good, but with this centring I want to see more of the hills and also more at right, this is why I don't support but anyway a good shot! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tomer T. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like you said about my picture of "the Grand Prismatic Spring", I have seen a lot of pictures of the Golden Gate bridge better than this one and I consider that this is not a criterion.. but anyway I like the composition . --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree about the rock, but nonetheless it's a magical scenery for me, clearly enough for FP --A.Savin 21:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is such a lovely shot, Frank. I've tried to get similar shots from nearby, but nothing this spectacular. As for the hill in the foreground, this is the only option from this vantage point, outside of a big earthquake dramatically changing the landscape ;) Almonroth (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- composition and lighting are fantastic Ian Furst (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

File:Roquebrun, Hérault 03.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 21:53:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Too much empty sky—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:28, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I like this sky, there is something... --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Woldu Stockholm Marathon 2013 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2013 at 11:53:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Daniel Woldu during Stockholm Marathon 2013. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 11:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 11:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--ArildV (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:C elegans male.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 08:47:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Anatomical diagram of the posterior portion of a male C. elegans nematode. Image includes extensive use of 4-tiered layering to create subtle shading of organs to best illustrate their relationships to each other, and accurately depicts the anatomical "switch" between the animal's vas deferens and intenstine near the animal's tail, an arrangement difficult to express using a layered SVG diagram. This nomination is a follow-up to a previously featured picture of a hermaphrodite of the same animal. Accuracy of diagram may be verified at the Wormatlas.

Info created by KDS444 - uploaded by KDS444 - nominated by KDS444 -- KDS444 (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KDS444 (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 02:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a small error when the file is viewed directly in Firefox (see image note), but apart from that it looks great. ~~Please list the sources this drawing is based on in the description, then I'll be happy to support.~~ --El Grafo (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a list of references used in the creation of the overall image, see image page for details. I have also reviewed the image note for the rendering error in Firefox but have not been able to determine the nature of the error-- can you elaborate just a bit for me, El Grafo? Even just a line or two about what you are seeing would be helpful. Thanks! KDS444 (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sources, support now. --El Grafo (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC) The error is really small, so I took a screenshot and uploaded a crop of it: File:C elegans male.svg rendering error.png – a part of the green line is missing. In the pre-rendered png-versions provided by Mediawiki this looks perfectly fine though.[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Very nice!!! But there's a stray bit way off the page boundary, please remove it. Also there are strange squares around the tips of sensory rays—is this intentional? & the label lines are fragmented, why? Can you join them—this improves the milters.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 15:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvin: Have removed the stray bit, fixed the sensory ray openings (gradients were causing the squares-- strokes are working better), and joined the label brackets, as per your suggestions. KDS444 (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Hight EV, Well done my friend. --The Photographer (talk) 20:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Eurojet EJ200 for Eurofighter Typhoon PAS 2013 01 free.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 16:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurojet EJ200 engine for Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft.

Info all by me. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. Very busy trade floor background has been removed. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting object Poc o² 13:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good but I'm not a fan of the cropped pedestal --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Useful picture. I wish we could have some parts opened to see the blades and the combustion chamber, that'd be great. --Kadellar (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support not something I see every day. Very interesting and high quality. --99of9 (talk) 10:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Galeopsis tetrahit - kare kõrvik Keilas.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 08:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Galeopsis tetrahit - common Hemp-nettle at golden hour, all by Ivar (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment some noise on the blossoms? --A.Savin 14:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info New version with minor changes uploaded. --Ivar (talk) 16:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer 16:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support good. Not the sharpest one, but otherwise with a wow effect, that's for sure. --A.Savin 19:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support You've got it, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 04:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Lasius niger y Cinara tujafilina en Thuja occidentalis.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2013 at 15:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ant (Lasius niger) and aphids (Cinara tujafilina) on a Thuja occidentalis. Image depicts approximately 18x12 mm.

Info Ant (Lasius niger) and aphids (Cinara tujafilina) on a Thuja occidentalis. Image depicts approximately 18x12 mm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks good --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice lighting and original subject Poc o² 17:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you all for your support. Lighting was made with a DIY softbox for external flash, it works! --Kadellar (talk) 16:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Lok 99 222 im Bahnhof Wernigerode.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 18:54:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Lok 99 222 also known as "Harzbulle" in the early morning. Keep in mind that the vehicle is covered in steam, when you get the feeling that the picture is lacking contrast. C/U/N by  Richard  [®]  18:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  18:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good -- Christian Ferrer talk; 19:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- It is a bit overdone to me, Richard: oversharpened; oversaturated and overcontrasted. One expects colors during the early morning to be softer. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it?  Richard  [®]  20:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

oversaturated and overcontrasted looks like this IMO
or this

Oppose Halos around almost all details. The problem is the bad contrast because of the lens flares and opposite light position. Correcting that left an unnatural look that isn't totally bad, but I don't think it's really good either. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 06:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 02:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Significant over-sharpening and unrealistic contrast characteristics. The Light has not been used well here --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can see what you were thinking, but the effect of the light on the haze to the right just makes it look like it was poorly exposed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nostalgic and very atmospheric. For me POTY 2013 winner :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Rubha nan Gall lighthouse and MV Clansman ferry.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2013 at 11:34:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition of the lighthouse, ferry and mountains across the water. -- Colin (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Rjcastillo (talk) 12:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and setting. Excellent, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sehr schöner Bildaufbau! --Simonizer (talk) 13:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 17:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and beautiful colours. Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 18:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 17:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --mathias K 15:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. Could have wished for a bluer sky, but then again this is Scotland we're talking about. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Schloss Neuschwanstein 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2013 at 20:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 20:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 20:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Every year we get a new FP of this :-) Who could resist shooting this fairy-tale scene. Very detailed and crisp and well lit from both facing sides. Even the clouds are cooperating with the composition. Hard midday light brings out the brickwork texture. Colin (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's wonderful without a doubt. I just wonder why it has to be sharpened so much... — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The castle is kitsch (I'm Bavarian and thus allowed to say so... ;-) ) - but the picture is awesome! Superb quality. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a good picture of an amazing castle but I do think it's oversharpened. You can see halos around some parts of the castle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.Lindgren (talk • contribs) 09:10, 30 August 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Info I removed the halos. -- Wolf im Wald (de) 10:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support--P.Lindgren (talk) 17:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I have to agree about the oversharpening. I would support if redone with less sharpening. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is razor sharp image, but I see very little evidence of oversharping unless under extreme and worthless pixel peeping. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good like that --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:55, 01 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a nice & highly valuable image, without doubt. But: Do we really need four (!) nearly identical views of Neuschwanstein as FP? Even though the one from 2005 can (and should, imo) be delisted, the remaining three are a bit too much I think. --A.Savin 22:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per A.Savin. No more wow factor...--Jebulon (talk) 09:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say that is more a comment on our FP collection and processes than on this image. We don't moan when there are lots of similar poor-quality non-FP pictures in our collection. We are happy to congratulate one that is the best (and this is). So it is a bit unfair to be critical in this nom just because some others got to FP in the past. I imagine there is one best viewpoint for this castle, which limits the variation. Should we discourage people from taking and uploading improved pictures of subjects we already have? Of course not! Suppose this nom failed if everyone said "Not this again, boring" -- then we'd have a perverse situation where the best image of this castle wasn't actually featured. -- Colin (talk) 10:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, actually a dilemma. Feature this one but delist all others = a disrespect for the work by Taxi and Ximonic, possibly unnecessary conflicts. Feature this one and keep the others featured = somewhat contradictory to the idea of COM:FP (the "very best of Commons", several almost identical pictures concurrently featured). Not feature this one = nonsense, the picture isn't worse than the others (although the "wow factor" falls with every new nomination of this motif, that's for sure). --A.Savin 11:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well you and Jebulon can go "Wow, not this again!" :-). Having too many similar FPs is "a nice problem to have", is fairly uncommon, and not worth the pain it causes whenever the subject of delisting is raised. Let's just be happy we have an abundance of excellent photos and worry about something else. Colin (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - I think that this picture is the best or second best of them all, so I don't regard this as a reason to oppose. I also think that the photo from 2005 doesn't meet today's standards for FP any more with many blown areas and questionable wb/sharpening. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Please notice that I did not oppose, and I even didn't vote...--Jebulon (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Yes, but the comment is, imo, a little hurtful. And if everyone didn't vote because of "same again" then it wouldn't be featured... Colin (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm sorry, I did not want to hurt anybody, sorry for that. And yes, I did not support because of "same again", so I've no problem if this picture is not promoted. But it will be promoted ! Good image, anyway...--Jebulon (talk) 19:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, very good!! Although I`d like to see the unsampled 11500 px version. ;-) --mathias K 15:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a cropped version. The other version will be uploaded soon! :-) -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Congratulations! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.  Richard  [®]  08:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Sunflower near Raichur, India.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 05:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflower in a field near Mittikellur village, Lingasugur taluk, Raichur district, Karnataka, India

Info created, uploaded and nominated by MikeLynch (talk)
Support -- MikeLynch (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Strong loss of detail through compression. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sure you mean "Oppose"? :) MikeLynch (talk) 07:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that, and thanks for pointing it out. I meant

Oppose. Is there no way of getting a file with less compression? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't really know much about photography or image processing. I have an original image and I applied an "autocorrect" feature available on a photo editor in order to get this. That might have changed stuff a bit. The original image is available as an earlier version of this image; if it can't be accessed, let me know, and I'll upload it again. Thanks. MikeLynch (talk) 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to say it, but I think but I think it's difficult to achieve sufficiently high quality (for FP) with an old compact camera. I looked at the original file, and I do not think it can turn into a FP imo. Regards --ArildV (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, thank you for your time :) . MikeLynch (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thromidia catalai Heavy Starfish PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 19:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 10:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 20:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alphabet tower batumi georgia.JPG

File:Neuer Sendeturm Brocken.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 20:22:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info C/U/N by  Richard  [®]  20:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  20:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 22:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Light and compsosition are not really appealing to me. Sharpness and level of detail in the center are excellent. But the main problem is the oversharpening of unsharp areas at the top (slight border unsharpness is inevitable with wide-angle lenses). I would suggest to apply a gradient filter to reduce the extrem sharpening at the top of tower and leave unsharper areas slightly unsharp instead of massively sharpen them. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination  Richard  [®]  20:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghost town Frisco in Utah.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 22:29:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too noisy and insufficient contrast. Besides that there is a pixel error in the sky (see original size). Can you rework the pic? -- Simisa (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Simisa. I reworked a version without noise and with more contrast. The pixel error is away. Please check it. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's better now; I have changed my rating! -- Simisa (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb 1997 picture ! --Jebulon (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 04:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Igreja no Pontalete.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 16:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Imagem de uma igreja no povoado de Pontalete, em Três Pontas, no sul de Minas Gerais

Info created by WOtP - uploaded by WOtP - nominated by WOtP -- WOtP (talk) 16:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WOtP (talk) 16:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disturbing composition, distracting foreground. Would have been impressive if taken from a point 10 metres ahead – at least without the street lamp in the frame. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maître-autel et retable, église Notre-Dame, Montfarville, France.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 22:09:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High altar, reredos and chancel in Our Lady church of Montfarville (France).

Info created, uploaded and nominated by EdouardHue (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EdouardHue (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Müga Wasserspiele sw 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 22:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water game in MüGa-Park in Mülheim an der Ruhr in b/w with long exposure (1000x ND filter)

Info The vignette / dark corners at the left and right bottom are of natural origin from surronding trees. IMHO black/white is better here because it attracts the attention on the water and its flow
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good idea to convert this image into bw. Colors wouldn't help here at all! We should do that more often anyway... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose B/W does work here in terms of drawing attention to the fountain. But the subject itself is pretty ordinary and I don't see much of "wow". --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please define "pretty ordinary". Is it really a reason for opposing? On FP the question is how any motive is photographed and if the composition is somehow eye-catching. Viewing my nomination on 1920x1024 fullscreen it is eye-catching enough for me that I decided to nominate it. Look at this FP detail shot of a fountain - it is much more ordinary than my motive but nonetheless very good. If ordinary means to you "can be seen everywhere" you are wrong with your assesment, because this special water game curling through the whole park only exists at the MüGa-Park, see also [1] (only in German) --Tuxyso (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tuxyso, I understand your concern. Unfortunately, it does not make sense for me, to compare this image with an old FP. It I was there at the time of voting, I would have not supported that either. The definition of "wow" is a very subjective thing that you already know. I can't really quantify that. --Dey.sandip (talk) 14:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Probably I've misunderstood you. The term "the subject itself is pretty ordinary" as justification for your opposing vote bothered me. I have no problem if my photo (composition + motive + quality + light + ...) does not attract you (in short: no Wow) as it was now clarified in your last statement. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - ~~Neutral~~ I agree with Tuxyso, here this is not Featured Subjects Candidate, it's the page for Featured Images Candidate. ~~Me, I don't support because I prefear the colored images~~ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Support I change my vote --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Photographing "ordinary subjects" to FP standard is hard. I like the symmetry. Colin (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderfully balanced composition and the lighting is exquisite. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 04:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Restos de la Catedral de San Pablo, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 34.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 19:34:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Remains of the Cathedral of St. Paul to the light of the street lamps, Macau

Info Remains of the Cathedral of St. Paul to the light of the street lamps, Macau. All by me, Poc o² 19:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 19:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I don't find the composition very appealing. I would prefer a centered composition personally, but if you are going for an off-center composition, I would include more of the railing rather than cropping it that closely. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 20:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washingtonia.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 16:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wachingtonia filifera in Batumi Botanical Garden

Info created by პაატა შ - uploaded by პაატა შ - nominated by პაატა შ -- Paata Shetekauri (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paata Shetekauri (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop at the top. Pleclown (talk) 20:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Červený Kameň (Bibersburg, Vöröskő) - gardens.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 14:05:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 12:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chinon from above.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 09:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective. Kleuske (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llorenzi (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice idea and composition (it's hard to decide what to include) but I think compression artifacts spoil the quality of the picture, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the idea and the unusual perspective. Impressive shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Freezing Water and Vectorial Elevation.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2013 at 11:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jun Ren's Freezing Water sculpture facing Vectorial Elevation interactive light art

Info created by Jon Rawlinson - uploaded by Canoe1967 - nominated by Canoe1967 -- Canoe1967 (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Canoe1967 (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:K 563 i remise.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 07:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen - Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kovalev v Szilagyi 2013 Fencing WCH SMS-IN t194135.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2013 at 09:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sabre fight at 2013 World Fencing Championships

Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Smial (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Good technical quality combined with a great composition showing this dynamic sports perfectly.[reply]
Support Excellent framing and technically, regarding the circumstances, also very good. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 12:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:56, 01 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very nice picture of a defensive footwork to get out of range --PierreSelim (talk) 19:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jebulon (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support // Martin Kraft (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Paracirrhites forsteri Freckled Hawkfish by Nick Hobgood.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2013 at 12:50:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont de Ceps, Roquebrun, Hérault 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 12:09:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Reworked version! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Before it was a little overexposed imo so I didn't know how to vote, but now the sky is far too blue to me (the blue channel is even clipped). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done You're right for both and I've tried to improve the both, thanks -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, that looks a lot more natural to me. Support. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:53, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:President Barack Obama with full cabinet 09-10-09.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 07:34:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

First Cabinet of President Barack Obama in the White House East Room

Info created by Chuck Kennedy - uploaded by Gage - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 08:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sure it's an official gov photograph but I'm impressed by the even lightning. Sting (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ for now, needs perspective correction (the vertical lines on the sides aren't vertical). darkweasel94 14:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, even it didn't bother me for this kind of subject. Sting (talk) 16:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've striked my vote. darkweasel94 18:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

There is no 1 oppose, it seems that the bot didn't notice my striking. How does one fix that? darkweasel94 13:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can be fixed in review or now (done). In the future, using <s>{{o}}</s> instead of <del> should help. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rathaus Hannover 2013 horizontal.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 16:19:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The New City Hall of Hanover, created by Mimihitam - uploaded by Mimihitam - nominated by Mimihitam -- Mimihitam (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mimihitam (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The right of the city hall is leaning in. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it needs a tilt and perspective correction. One additional question, showing so much water leans me to believe that it is an important part of the picture for you, in that case, why did you cut the tip of the tower? Poc o² 22:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not an outstanding composition/quality; this motif has an existing FP which I clearly prefer. Sorry --A.Savin 13:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as A.Savin -- Arcalino (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don’t agree with A.Savin here because this is an entirely different view on the motif, which I find much more interesting than the frontal shot. However, the good idea has not been perfectly carried out (poor crop on the reflection, square framing would have done better IMHO). --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 04:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruddy Darter dragonfly (Sympetrum sanguineum).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 14:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Florent Chouffot - uploaded by Florent Chouffot - nominated by Florent Chouffot -- Masterichoo (talk) 14:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Masterichoo (talk) 14:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 15:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info At first this is no Ruddy Darter as they don't have these yellow stripes on the legs. Most probably this is a Vagrant darter (Sympetrum vulgatum), but as those Sympetrum species are very similar in appearance it's hard to identify them having only the head and the breast in focus. --LC-de (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too many blurred areas f6.3 is not a good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Archaeo. --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valerie Aurora headshot.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 07:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info uploaded by SarahStierch - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for a studio headshot, the DOF isn't very convincing. Portrait quality isn't at FP-level. If my hair were that color, I'd dye it. Kleuske (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info uploaded an edited version to clean that awful banded background in the original file. Sting (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The edited version with a much less banded background. I like this portrait with a nice technical quality. I disagree with you Kleuske as for me the DOF is well set to concentrate on what's important, catching the viewer's sight on the face. As a counter-example, the following portrait doesn't work for me because of the out-of-focus lips and eyebrow. Sting (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support DOF is enough for me for a portrait; we can hide a lot of ugliness in our face by shallow DOF. J Kadavoor J e e 05:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Messier 94.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 16:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:Benison P Baby - uploaded by User:Benison P Baby - nominated by User:Benison P Baby -- Benison (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Benison (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: below 2 megapixels. Tomer T (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 13.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 07:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by and nominated by Bourgeois.A (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bourgeois.A (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective distortion, and distracting leaves at top. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose And the oversaturated, overpolarized sky, and the wall taking up so much space in the bottom ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is JPEG effect, this pictures is not "oversaturated" or "overpolarized". Bourgeois.A (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but that doesn't mean you can't fix it. And I suppose the file format is also responsible for the composition issues? Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The native format is JPEG, alterations agracenet the situation and personellment, I love this very héstétique framing, everyone's tastes. Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brachylophus fasciatus Fidschileguan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 19:29:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Wow, what a fantastic photo. Would be even better without green-channel-clipping though, is there a chance the uploader can fix that? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose until fixed. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent shoot!!, need wb --The Photographer (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice find! Nikhil (talk) 13:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just wondering what is the red spot below its mouth Poc o² 17:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 08:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 05:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander Vasenin (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Tian Tan Buddha by Beria.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 00:35:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tian Tan Buddha, also known as the Big Buddha located at Ngong Ping, Lantau Island, in Hong Kong.

Info all by Beria Lima. Béria Lima ^msg 00:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Béria Lima ^msg 00:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like it! Very nice light and a great composition with the the clouds being stoped by the hand. ;-) --mathias K 14:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this not so Big Buddha version :p --PierreSelim (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and beautiful. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great picture to come out of Wikimania this year. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, great work. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job! But do remember to temporarily disable the copyright info when you're using Wilfredo's camera. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was expecting someone to pick up on that. But we exchange cameras in Wikimania and I totally forgot to remove his copyright note, so now I have about 1000 pictures with "By Wilfredo" on it :D ;) Béria Lima ^msg 16:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very nicely done. --Myrabella (talk) 06:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 08:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pslawinski (talk) 03:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--The Photographer (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:13-07-13 Hermann Lammers Meyer 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2013 at 05:56:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

German country singer Hermann Lammers-Meyer (Herman, the German) at ADAC truck grand prix festival 2013, Nürburgring, Germany

Info created by Achim Raschka - uploaded by Achim Raschka - nominated by Achim Raschka -- Achim Raschka (talk) 05:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 05:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clipped whites. Acceptable on the edge of his hat, but his shirt is too much. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baradari Pavillion.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 16:19:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baradari Pavilion of Amur palace, Jaipur

Info created by User:Benison P Baby - uploaded by User:Benison P Baby - nominated by User:Benison P Baby -- Benison P Baby (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Benison P Baby (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, bad crop at the top. --Kadellar (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Kadellar. --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kadellar. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above -- Arcalino (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château de Beynac Chapelle Dordogne 10.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 17:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Above the river Dordogne, the chapel of the medieval Château de Beynac in the Dordogne department, France. 13th-century, with additions of the 17th-century (annotation). Please enjoy the typical stone roof.-- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support darkweasel94 23:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 11:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin (talk • contribs)
Support Very nice view! --mathias K 14:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like colors and composition. --Mile (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. Great composition and lighting. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition, the point of view from above favors the monument in its landscape. (Is the hour in the EXIF data correct? I was suprised to see that this picture was taken at 1 pm, the light seems more from the end of afternoon on my screen). --Myrabella (talk) 06:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC). Yes, the hour is correct. Et je n'ai pas trop tripoté les curseurs de niveaux...--Jebulon (talk) 08:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting piece of (old) art. J Kadavoor J e e 15:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -  Richard  [®]  07:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful site -- Arcalino (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Helsinki July 2013-27a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 17:22:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Lutheran Cathedral in Helsinki, Finland. A stitch of five photos. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality and resolution!--ArildV (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why so high resolution? Imo, no significant gain of detail comparing to 50-60 MP or so (rather soft when viewed at 100 %). The facade is a bit blown at the right. --A.Savin 23:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it is particularly soft. Sometimes I find that stitched images, when they are stretched and rotated and perspective adjusted, can become a little soft at 100% and worth downsizing a little -- it isn't worth subjecting people to 100MP downloads to see a soft image. But sometimes they are just fine and downsizing just loses detail. This one is in-between imo. As for blown highlights, I'm not seeing such, though the white is very bright. Would you expect to see any detail on sunlight white stone anyway? Colin (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good work Alves! For me the resolution can`t be too high and is a big plus for this picture. There are always significant details to show, for example the Eye of Providence just over the central gate. ;-) --mathias K 15:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work; but prefer Poco's AOV a bit more. J Kadavoor J e e 07:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Krumlov20(js)panoramic.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 14:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

English: Český Krumlov - panoramic view from the Castle Gardens Čeština: Český Krumlov - panoramatický výhled z Zámecké Zahrady Polski: Český Krumlov - widok z Ogrodów Zamkowych

Info created by Jerzy Strzelecki - uploaded by Jerzystrzelecki - nominated by Jerzystrzelecki -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you do something about the clipping in the sky? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Molen De Adriaan (Haarlem) 2.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 14:07:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The windmill Molen De Adriaan in Haarlem

Info created by Yiyi - uploaded by Yiyi - nominated by Yiyi -- Yiyi (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yiyi (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image could benefit from some perspective corrections. Kleuske (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neuer Zollhof Düsseldorf at Blue Hour.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2013 at 20:27:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 03:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Thomsen Barny cross country London 2012.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2013 at 13:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peter Thomsen and Barny, competing for GER, at fence 26, during the cross-country phase of the Eventing during the 2012 Olympic Games in Greenwich Park, London.

Info created by Sffubs - uploaded by Sffubs - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paata Shetekauri (talk) 17:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice action shot of a big event. --99of9 (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tramo en Brno, returniĝa buklo Technologický park 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 23:24:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by darkweasel94 - uploaded by darkweasel94 - nominated by darkweasel94 -- darkweasel94 23:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- darkweasel94 23:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clipped whites, color noise in the dark areas, and I don't think the background is very nice. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 17.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2013 at 19:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 19:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 19:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 09:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santuario di Vicoforte - Particolare.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2013 at 21:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Valerio Manassero - uploaded by Valerio Manassero - nominated by Valerio Manassero -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 09:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sôber - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2013 at 16:51:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spanish metal band Sôber at Asaco Metal Fest 2013, Parla, Spain.

Info Spanish metal band Sôber at Asaco Metal Fest 2013, Parla, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 09:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-08-11 12-24-28 Switzerland Cantone Ticino Frasco Sonogno.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 15:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stones and pebbles in the Verzasca river

Info created by simisa - uploaded by simisa - nominated by simisa -- Simisa (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Simisa (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love the rippled water over the stones but the stone in the middle, out of the water, distracts me and isn't attractive enough to warrant the attention it gets. Would have preferred if all was under water. Colin (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 22:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cloud-to-cloud ramified lightning discharges.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2013 at 15:34:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Florent Chouffot - uploaded by Florent Chouffot - nominated by Florent Chouffot -- Masterichoo (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Masterichoo (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 22:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:KENSETT MAP CANADA 1812.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 19:10:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ian Furst - uploaded by Ian Furst - nominated by Ian Furst -- Ian Furst (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ian Furst (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose: Great map of historical value, but the digital reproduction isn't as good (i.e. sharp) as it could be (compare it e.g. with this one). --El Grafo (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with El Grafo.--Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 09:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merops leschenaulti by N.A. Nazeer.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2013 at 20:00:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

en:Chestnut-headed Bee-eater (Merops leschenaulti) on a bough

Info created by NilgiriMarten - uploaded by NilgiriMarten - nominated by Fbnpch --FbnPch • (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some noise, but still FP. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much noise. --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The preview at 800px is superb but at full resolution, it's very noisy --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much noise --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Too noisy—Love, Kelvinsong talk 19:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too noisy, it's a pity --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 20:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin - Berliner Fernsehturm - Fensterreinigung.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 05:52:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Window cleaning at main pod of Berlin Television Tower

Info all by Wladyslaw. High EV, nice view. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work! Nikhil (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and seven... High technical quality + great wow factor = FP.--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 09:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Sala Thai - Hagenbeck.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 04:43:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sala Thai at Tierpark Hagenbeck, Hamburg, Germany

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 04:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 04:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a noticeable brightness transition in the sky, some stitching errors (I added annotations) and the right lower photo seems shaken to me. Also, maybe a rectilinear projection instead of what looks like a cylindrical projection would be possible for a less curved building. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks for review (and congratulations for your sharp eye!). It was a hard work for me, but the corrections are done. I leave the annotations until sunday for control. As the sala is handmade by Thai workmen, not everything is rectangular and also the main pillars are not exactly perpendicular (compare them with the poles of the balustrade, which are perpendicular). --Llez (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 18:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 05:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pslawinski (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 09:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Wallfahrtskirche St. Marien Zöbingen-1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 10:35:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Mary pilgrimage church, Zöbingen, Germany

Info St Mary pilgrimage church, Zöbingen, Germany. Created, uploaded and nominated by Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as above --A.Savin 22:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed and exposed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 09:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Théatre de la Mer, Sète, Hérault 04.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 20:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Little bit unsharp, litte bit too less "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:13-08-31-wien-redaktionstreffen-EuT-by-Bi-frie-086.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 11:53:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Bi-frie - uploaded by Bi-frie - nominated by Plani -- Plani (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Plani (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated (clipped) orange and yellow, and I think it looks oversaturated, too. Title could be more descriptive, but that's a minor problem. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated I ducked when I saw it because I thought that pepper was going to jump off the screen and hit me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info it isn't saturated. --Ralf Roleček 14:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I brought out my pack of tricolored peppers from the refrigerator to compare with this image. What's oversaturated about it? Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it looks bright orange in real life doesn't make it a good idea to jack it up to "psychedelic" online. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Befreiungshalle Kelheim BS.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 20:34:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Befreiungshalle Kelheim c|u|n by --  Richard  [®]  20:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  20:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 08:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pslawinski (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 12:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jebulon (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 17:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Budapest bridge 4.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 04:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by --The Photographer (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Might have worked if just the woman looking into distance and nobody else. But even then, it looks a bit too much like a tourist snap. The lighting isn't bright enough to be vivid or dark enough to be interesting. -- Colin (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cryptocephalus sericeus LC0295.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 11:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The imagos of Cryptocephalus sericeus are very colorful and variable. They are feeding in pollen, mostly on bright yellow flowers. Created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 11:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Need some WB, but its ok for me --The Photographer (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female Ruby-throated Hummingbird.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 17:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Ruby-throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) Date

Info created by Pslawinski - uploaded by Pslawinski - nominated by Pslawinski -- Pslawinski (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pslawinski (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 19:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good!  Richard  [®]  20:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! You "freeze" it! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. Very good. --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 06:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support unbelievable. -- -donald- (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 12:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --Alexander Vasenin (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible! --Arcalino (talk) 07:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now, tell the truth ! It is a stuffed specimen photographied over an artificial background ?! :)--Jebulon (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Ha! No trickery involved here, just a good setup and lots of patience.
  - I hope you understand it was a joke.--Jebulon (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 12:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Neues Rathaus Hannover 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 12:41:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 12:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 12:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Assuming this is stitched, how many photos did you use? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I shot 20 single images, but this is a crop. :-) -- Wolf im Wald (de) 13:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that explains the resolution. Thanks for the info, great work stitching them together. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Wolf im Wald (de) 15:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 03:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hallo again, Neues Rathaus. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good! --Arcalino (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Oban Bay from McCaig's Tower.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2013 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detailed panorama of Oban, its bay and islands.-- Colin (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podocnemis expansa from Venezolana.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 19:51:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pslawinski (talk) 03:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support good portrait. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunflower Field near Raichur, India.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 05:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflower field near Mittikellur village, Lingasugur taluk, Raichur district, Karnataka, India

Info created, uploaded and nominated by MikeLynch (talk) -- MikeLynch (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MikeLynch (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 06:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed sky, heavy compression artifacts. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian H. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per this. J Kadavoor J e e 14:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise over Catanzaro Lido.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 21:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Nicholas Gemini - uploaded by Nicholas Gemini - nominated by Nicholas Gemini -- Nicholas Gemini (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nicholas Gemini (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Pslawinski (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a sunrise above the sea, there is nothing special about the sunrise in this particular place, of which you can't see much anyway. The technical quality isn't extremely great either, it's pretty noisy. darkweasel94 12:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not interesting, low quality, tilted. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very ho-hum sunset that looks like it escaped from hundreds of similar pictures in a Flickr photostream. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mammilloydia candida - Snowball Cactus.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2013 at 14:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Florent Chouffot (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Masterichoo (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The quality is really wonderful, but the crop on both the top and the bottom is a little too close to the subject imo. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, here you go ! Masterichoo (talk) 9:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Still a few hard edges left on the bottom where you extended the image, and a few floating spikes. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually don't like the overhead angle of view; but the details here are wonderful. J Kadavoor J e e 05:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe not the best composition but the quality is great! --The Photographer (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I miss the "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holzhausen-Kreisel.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 19:09:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roundabout decoration, Eschach-Holzhausen, Germany. The painted flowers and clouds have been created by local children.

Info Roundabout decoration, Eschach-Holzhausen, Germany. The painted flowers and clouds have been created by local children. Created, uploaded and nominated by Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose fourth leg not visible, bad crop. -- -donald- (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose centered and cut composition, car is distracting, overprocesed (bora bora sky). --The Photographer (talk) 18:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I didn’t do anything to the sky, it’s exactly as it was --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please upload the RAW file to http://commonsarchive.org/ ?. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to but don’t have it anymore, I usually delete RAW files as soon as I am satisfied with the result. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corse Ota Porto tour genoise.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 21:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice lighting. Sharpness could be better but acceptable IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for this nomination! --Myrabella (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gladly, Tomer T (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support Very nice light, colors and composition, just the sharpness could be better. --mathias K 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed your support vote. -- Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition and colours ! Once again, a great picture by Myrabella. Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish the right crop was a little further to the right, but it's still very good. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry but I really don't like the brightening of the image...--Llorenzi (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 13.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 08:25:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Array of iron warriors in the courtyard of the Malbork Castle, Malbork, Poland

Info Array of iron warriors in the courtyard of the Malbork Castle, Malbork, Poland. All by me, Poc o² 08:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Poco but the composition doesn`t work for me here. The soldiers facing back, the saturation (green) is a bit overdone for my taste and the overall sharpness could be better. Sorry, mathias K 14:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 06:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Something is very wrong with the colors. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please extend your hard argument a bit?. I can work a bit the green of grass but you are talking in general and actually I didn't touch the colors of the original RAW file. Poc o² 16:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded with the attempt to address the excesive green saturation and the sharpness, please, Mathias or Yikrazuul, give me some feedback Poc o² 21:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Corse Ota Porto genoese tower sunset.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 15:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The genoese tower of Porto in sunset, Ota, Corsica, France

Info Created by Myrabella - uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myrabella (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! --Ivar (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support of co(u)rse ! Ivar made a good suggestion.--Jebulon (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice post card from Corsica, thank you. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry to spoil the party, but all sunsets in the world have as much "wow factor" as this one; I don't really see what makes this one special. The tower itself doesn't really catch my attention and not much detail is visible of it. darkweasel94 05:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May I explain that to me, this sunset is special because the scene evokes the specific purpose of this tower, built in the 16th century to watch over the Gulf of Porto, Corsica, that is highlighted here. --Myrabella (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 15:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a wonderful sunset and a beautiful picture! Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the tower and the area around it is a bit fuzzy, noisy and dark but it's nowhere near enough to ruin that sunset and the cove. Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Kikos (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please give your reasons to oppose? --Myrabella (talk) 06:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Stryn (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the better sunset pictures. Thanks for uploading! --Simonizer (talk) 13:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:David Dixon Porter - Mathew Brady's National Photographic Art Gallery.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 15:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Matthew Brady's National Photographic Art Gallery - restored, uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even the vignetting is nice ! You are a master, no doubt ! I encourage reviewers to have a look at the original, in order to enjoy the improvements. Great job (again) --Jebulon (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ! --JLPC (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 23:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gildir (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Egyptian sea star.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 22:05:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Alexander Vasenin (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander Vasenin (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent lighting --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 12:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kreuzschnabel. --Kadellar (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I guess that some rotation could help, but anyhow, great shot Poc o² 20:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bulwersator (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pslawinski (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, excellent quality and hight EV, a perfect FP representation --The Photographer (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 17:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Mount Sefton LC0291.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 10:38:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info View into the Hooker valley on South Island, New Zealand. Created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 10:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Nice view, but snow is overexposed and not the highest "wow" factor. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- wow --Neptuul (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice landscape and very sharp but I also think the snow is overexposed and I feel the rest is oversaturated, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 18:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clipped snow. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Irreparably oversaturated, too-polarized and uneven sky. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 11:39:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Reworked version of a previously nomination, withdraw just before its promotion because I did not like the changes done. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice photo and good use of wide-angle lens.--ArildV (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arild is right. --Kadellar (talk) 18:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support could be brighter as for me, but it's ok. --sfu (talk) 19:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:RybnoeDistrict 06-13 Konstantinovo village 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 09:22:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden house (the former Priest's house) in the open-air museum of Konstantinovo, Ryazan Oblast, Russia

Info all by A.Savin.
Support --A.Savin 09:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer 10:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice compo and subject, but colors are artificial. --Mile (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough contrast, looks like bad HDR, can the shadows be toned down? Pslawinski (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Colors and contrast are very naturals IMO, it will be hard to do more natural, very good picture --Christian Ferrer 05:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting; and seems stable in :en. J Kadavoor J e e 03:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other opposers, looks a bit overprocessed (to me, only my taste).--Jebulon (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Schottenkirche St. Jakob Innenraum.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 20:15:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Scots Monastery, the former Benedictine Abbey of St James (Jakobskirche) in Regensburg, Germany. c|u|n by  Richard  [®]  20:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  20:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support the photo taken by Richard with Leaf Credo 80 :) --Laitche (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 12:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow ! ~~(problem with the link in the file description page)~~ --Jebulon (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. Nimmst du nicht an WLM mit diesem Bild teil? Ich habe gefunden, dass Schottenkirche Nr. D-3-62-000-596 ist. --Kadellar (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe das leider falsch hochgeladen. Kann ich nachträglich ein Bild dort teilnehmen lassen?  Richard  [®]  16:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich glaube, man muss nur das schreiben:

{{Kulturdenkmal|Typ=|Ort=Regensburg|Nummer=D-3-62-000-596|Kategorie=|Kategorie2=}} in der Beschreibung und {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2013|de}} unten.

. Vielleicht die richtige Kategorie auch, aber normalerweise werden sie mit der Vorlage automatisch geschrieben. --Kadellar (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alles klar, vielen Dank für die Infos!  Richard  [®]  18:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Top! (bitte, nicht an WLM teilnehmen, ich will auch :P) Poc o² 20:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bulwersator (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
SupportVery good --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought Credo 80 was just a poor man's IQ180 but the result is actually not too bad:) --ArildV (talk) 21:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Stockholms slott December 2012.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2013 at 18:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Royal Palace, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good! --Ivar (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the lighting seems a bit strange to me, perhaps even a bit HDR-like. IMO there is too much shadow recovery due to the backlighting. Maybe sunrise and/or a different season would allow for a sidelit picture? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- hey ,
- It is a exposure fusion but I think the light is correct, sunset in Stockholm was 14:47 (taken 14:22) and the winter sun is very low so its only indirect sun light in the sky in the image. Exposure fusion (only 3 ev) was used for dark shadows under the bridge and to keep the correct exposure of the sky.-best regards -ArildV (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- and its not backlighting (sunset and north west west facade )--ArildV (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I stand corrected regarding the lighting direction, but what I mean is basically, lack of any direct sunlight on the building. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see the point that KoH mentioned but for me it isn`t overdone, very close to but overall still good enough for me. --mathias K 14:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it very much, inspite of too much water in foreground maybe (crop out ?)--Jebulon (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much brightening of the lower part of the photo imo. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Lighting does the scene no favours.Fotoriety (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As others have said, poor lighting Pslawinski (talk) 11:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe lighting not is the better, but atmosphere and view is nice imho --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Understen.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 12:50:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The lighthouse station at Understen in South Kvarken, Baltic Sea. View from northeast.

Info created by ℇsquilo - uploaded by ℇsquilo - nominated by ℇsquilo -- ℇsquilo 12:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ℇsquilo 12:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really nice one and I would like to support it but it lacks sharpness imo. Maybe you can try some post processing with the raw-file? --mathias K 14:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't shoot raw, but I could try some more processing of the jpeg-file. --ℇsquilo 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A slightly sharpened version is now uploaded. --ℇsquilo 07:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the radar antenna to the left. I once had the product responsibility for these particular antenna systems. So I probably should not vote, as I am biased. --Slaunger (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it a Decca Radar? I used one of those in a similar, but smaller, survey-tower at Furillen when I did my national service. --ℇsquilo 07:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is an X band magnetron-based radar system from Terma. The fan-beam antenna has a length of 21 ft and emits circularly polarized microwaves. The circular polarization makes the radar resilient to rain clutter. It is a darn good radar antenna and there are about 40 such radar systems installed along the Swedish coastline (I just fact-checked with our sales dept today). --Slaunger (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Utö kyrka January 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 08:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Utö church in the Stockholm Archipelago a beautiful winter day. I like the unavoidable shadows, because they draw attention to the church. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light through the trees is unusual, but I like the result, it's not too distracting. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good but right is leaning in (wall and all the windows) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Done, thanks!--ArildV (talk) 22:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Colors of Sweden in January-- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 11:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadows give it a magical feel. J Kadavoor J e e 17:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Červený Kameň (Bibersburg, Vöröskő) - courtyard.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2013 at 05:54:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 05:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 05:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ennerdalewater1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 14:25:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ennerdale Water, Cumbria – created, uploaded and nominated by Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose, unsharp and smeared NR artifacts. Also, would benefit from some brightening. Nice composition though. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thanks for your comment – I love that pic for its composition (and the clouds’ co-operation) in the first place. Its lack of the last bit of technical quality is due to the fact the best camera in the world is always the one you’ve got with you ;-) If there’s no chance to survive here for it, I’ll withdraw. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info New version uploaded: carefully brightened & colors improved. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's still sharpness that's my main reason for opposing. It's basically at a threshold such that if it were already an FP, I wouldn't want to delist it, but as a new nom, I cannot support unfortunately. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I withdraw my nomination I’m having that strange feeling again FPC being just not my kind of world. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Actually, going through your QIs, I see a few that I'd consider good candidates for FPC, such as File:Basaltsee-Rhön.jpg (might want to fix the CA first) or File:Allmersbach-Kirche.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 08.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 08:52:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by & nominated by Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK, this is much better. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 22:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Festung Ehrenbreitschein in Koblenz. Hi-res (36 mpix). All by Heuschrecke (talk) 22:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Heuschrecke (talk) 22:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good quality but one bulding is tilted (see note) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, thank you. I restitched the panorama in a different mode, hope it got better. (But the walls of that building aren't perfectly parallel to each other even on source images.) Heuschrecke (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inded not perfect but acceptable IMO, very nice -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop. Where's the Rhine? Kleuske (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the picture of a fortress, not Rhine. There are houses below the fortress but above the Rhine, see an example. They would spoil the composition if included.
Oppose --Teme (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 17:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Deep Purple's vocalist Ian Gillan performing at Músicos en la naturaleza 2013 in Hoyos del Espino, Ávila, Spain.

Info Deep Purple's vocalist Ian Gillan performing at the music festival Músicos en la naturaleza 2013 in Hoyos del Espino, Ávila, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great facial expression. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  07:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think I'd wear that jacket but nice moment and lighting effect with the limelight in the background Poc o² 20:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pslawinski (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you all for your support. --Kadellar (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Fonçage Robert-2013 09.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 08:52:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by & nominated by Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaple sv. Cyrila a Metoděje (Dolní Bečva)001.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2013 at 18:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Bjalek Michal - uploaded by Bjalek Michal - nominated by Jirib -- Jirib (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jirib (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture (though could be sharper), hope we see more of WLM here. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wait... this isn't blue hour? It's really convincing then. I only found out after Daniel's vote prompted me to look at the EXIF time and see that it's 10:11. In this case I will have to Oppose due to unnatural colors. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support Nice composition, lack of sharpness --Arcalino (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the colors.  Richard  [®]  07:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~Try to add it to Radhošť and Dolní Bečva; but the thumb view is not showing.~~ J Kadavoor J e e 13:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC) OK; now.[reply]
Oppose Clipped blue channel in the sky (oversaturated). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated Agree with Julian. This might work if it were dusk, but it's not. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kölner Dom nachts 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2013 at 15:46:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, very detailed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. --Kadellar (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. I could imagine myself sitting on the ladder on the spire, whooohaaaa!  Richard  [®]  08:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Kadellar...--Jebulon (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:15, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! amazing details --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Strobridge & Co. Lith.- Ben-Hur - Klaw & Erlanger's Stupendous Production.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 15:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Strobridge & Co. Lith. - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work! -- Arcalino (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 09:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Matthew's Church - Paisley - Stained Glass Window.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 07:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Memorial stained glass window by Robert Anning Bell

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 07:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Memorial stained glass window by Robert Anning Bell, located in St Matthew's Church in Paisley. Detailed, high resolution, perpendicular viewpoint and well exposed. -- Colin (talk) 07:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose chromatic aberration See notes --The Photographer (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have another look at my photos but I'm not convinced this is CA but rather just a visual effect from the glass and/or colours used. If this were a lens defect, it would affect other similar areas. The lens was at f/8. Also, as courtesy, most people leave a comment for pixel-peeping "defects" that are straightforward to fix rather than opposing. -- Colin (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have given a reason, that I think is my vote. If you fix this, I will change my vote. If my reason is not enough, choose a stupid reason that you want like "no wow". :) --The Photographer (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- I've now had a look at the originals and there is CA in some areas. I will fix this tomorrow night. I have no clue about your other comment. I'm not here to play games, The Photographer. -- Colin (talk) 21:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination The Photographer has spotted some distortion issues and I think I've made a mistaken when stitching this. I'm going to redo the whole thing. Which will take a while. Colin (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burrow Mump.JPG delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2013 at 10:26:12

Info Interesting subject but the picture lacks good lighting conditions. The framing is poor with less more than 2/3 of image showing grass and the sky. The picture is tillted and perspective is not corrected. The color balance is incorrect resulting with dark subject and innatural sky color. The author was trying to delist this picture in 2010 but her whish did not met acceptance. (original nomination, original demonination proposal)
Delist -- sfu (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Kadellar (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Fotoriety (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist As I said when I nominated this for delisting back in 2010, it's not good enough to be an FP. Julia\^talk 08:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Julia. J Kadavoor J e e 14:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If there is no suitable replacement I can offer this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/saffron_blaze/8443736989/ Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? That is a true piece of art even if not become an FP (I wish it become). J Kadavoor J e e 03:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delist -- Arcalino (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 13 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Delisted Poc o² 22:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:360° Gottvaterspitze Walgau Rätikon.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 09:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info 360° Panorama von der Gottvaterspitze mit Blick auf Bludenz und dem Rätikon c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ein wunderbares Bild. Ich würde das Weiß der Wolken noch etwas abdunkeln. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impessive. Very detailed. --Llez (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LC-de (talk) 21:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing panorama. --Kadellar (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P e z i (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:A Vicugna pacos at Village Québécois d'Antan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 14:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Emmanuel Huybrechts - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, Abraham Lincoln look --The Photographer (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Awkward pose, distracting background. -- Colin (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, mainly for the background. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMW-Welt at night.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 21:16:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Car and people is disturbing, centered composition, cut in top, little breathing space down --The Photographer (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well, it's supposed to be a close up - I still had to use ultra wide angle. The car is necessarily part of the deal here - as the image covers BMW World. As for the people - there are none. Look closely. ;-) Nevertheless valid arguments, I have to admit. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In case the car is part of the composition, is not sufficiently illuminated. Thank you for taking my comments objectively. --The Photographer (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battus polydamas neodamas MHNT.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 17:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus, nominated by Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pslawinski (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you to Joydeep _Talk --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)--Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Bessac 16 Le Menot 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 17:54:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Created and uploaded by JLPC, nominated by Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This view has potential, but IMO falls short on "wow" factor due to two factors: 1) lighting, you're not going to get great results around noon; and 2) frame of view, I think a wider lens should have been used to allow you to get closer to the sunflowers and accentuate the contrast between the foreground and background. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lightning or colors, respectively. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks a lot, Joydeep. --JLPC (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Saint-Pontien, Roquebrun, Hérault 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 17:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chapelle Saint-Pontien, Roquebrun, Hérault, France.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Perfect. --Paata Shetekauri (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some noise on the sky, but nevertheless... --Ivar (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 21:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent colors. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 15:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Cleistocactus strausii (Heese) Backeb.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 00:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very interesting subject. However, I feel it could be a bit brighter. Could you make a version that is as close to the first upload as possible without blowing out? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support now. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with colin, otherwise funny shot!  Richard  [®]  08:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, King of Hearts and Richard, I made a brighter update without blowing out. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support really amusing... --Ivar (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 16:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Isn't it strange that we tend to see faces everywhere? I wonder how the general reaction would have been, had those three brown thingies (inflorescence, I guess?) been arranged in a different manner.[reply]
Support Agree with KoH, it looks a bit underexposed Poc o² 07:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Danubparka fervojo kun Danuba Turo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 22:04:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by darkweasel94 - uploaded by darkweasel94 - nominated by darkweasel94; renominating because the first nomination got no supports, opposes or comments at all -- darkweasel94 22:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- darkweasel94 22:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Tilted on right-- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - You're right but I think it's more a question of perspective correction than of tilt, because the sign on the ground is not tilted. Question - should I upload it to a new filename and transclude it here? I can't COM:OVERWRITE it because it's already a QI. darkweasel94 11:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Hmm. That "revised" guideline (October 2012) introduced the idea of not touching images that are QI/VI/FP. Reading the talk page shows that the issue wasn't fully explored and I disagree with it especially for the uploader fixing issues. I think you should apply IAR and overwrite your file for such a minor thing as rotation. The tower is likely to be vertical whereas road signs are often not. Colin (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Agreed, I remember discovering that some of my pictures that were already QI had dust spots on them, so I removed the spots and uploaded directly over. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        OK, Done, uploaded a new version. darkweasel94 11:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golden Spiral by Brad Hammonds.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 15:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Stairs by Czech architect Jan Blažej Santini-Aichel (1677-1723), Church of the Assumption of Our Lady and Saint John the Baptist, Kutná Hora, Czech Republic. Created by Brad Hammonds - uploaded by Jirib - nominated by Jirib -- Jirib (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jirib (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Request Perfect composition but the central bright part seems blown to me while there is still much room on the dark side, so it could be processed at lower exposure IMHO giving a much better contrast. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 16:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The blown highlights in this case are not distracting to me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 09:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remembers me a snail shell --Llez (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One of the problems on this list is that a good idea gets copied (more or less) at least three times. The spiral staircase is a good example. Kleuske (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that I don't understand what do you mean. This is a very quality photo of the part of monument on the UNESCO list, so why it couldn't be among the featured pictures? --Jirib (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I highly doubt the Flickr user was going "Hey, these spiral staircases just got FP at Wikimedia Commons, maybe if I upload mine to Flickr I'll also get FP!" --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think Kleuske is seeing a "problem" where there is none. Spirals and other geometric repeating patterns are pleasing to the eye. That's why the architect used them and why people like to photograph them. We have plenty domed ceilings and nobody tires of them. Or birds in flight. Or portraits... Colin (talk) 07:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:JOB, cigarette paper advertisement by Alfons Mucha, 1898.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 14:05:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Alfons Mucha - uploaded by Ragesoss - nominated by Jirib -- Jirib (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jirib (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good details and resolution. very good quality.--Jebulon (talk) 15:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Turn685 (talk) 05:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jünglingsbrunnen von Friedrich Adolf Sötebier 1972.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 16:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Youth-sculpture on the fountain made 1972 by Friedrich Adolf Sötebier

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting reflection --Llez (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition! --A.Savin 15:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition.--ArildV (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support creative --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice motif. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done Poc o² 07:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benreis (talk) 12:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Kadalekalu Ganesha Temple at night.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 09:11:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 09:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 09:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe nice and artistic but not enough encyclopedic IMO -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khatchkar at Goshavank Monastery in Armenia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 19:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

created by Inna Zyuganova - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Aseghnagorts (The Needlecarved) khatchkar, carved in 1291 by the artist Poghos. Exhibited at Goshavank Monastery in Armenia.
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bulwersator (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Religious people of Maracaibo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 12:34:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by --The Photographer (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santhome Church.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 16:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Viswanath - uploaded by Viswanath - nominated by Viswanath -- Viswanath (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Viswanath (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective problems and I don't see a reason for b/w. Very poor categorization. --A.Savin 18:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Matthew's Church - Paisley - Interior - 5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2013 at 20:20:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes. Zoom viewer

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The interior of St Matthew's Church in Paisley. Designed by WD McLennan, it is considered by some to be the most important Art Nouveau church in Scotland, rivalling the work of Mackintosh. The stained glass window is by Robert Anning Bell. -- Colin (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV.--ArildV (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tabby cat (5685104407).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 13:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Emmanuel Huybrechts - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A cropped version is available at File:Tabby cat (cropped).jpg. russavia (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice cat --The Photographer (talk) 13:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per File:Cat November 2010-1a.jpg and more. J Kadavoor J e e 17:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Got to be something special for such a common everyday subject. This isn't. Colin (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cat is nice, but judging the image rather than the animal, I find the background line corresponding with the cat’s head rather confusing. Placing the camera a bit lower would have solved that. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination russavia (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Deer View.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 17:05:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Viswanath - uploaded by Viswanath - nominated by Viswanath -- Viswanath (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Viswanath (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is no reason for doing this in black and white. Commons photos shouldn't be artistic, they should be illustrative and educational. darkweasel94 18:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a reason for doing this in black and white: to concentrate on the pattern rather than the colour. I'm not sure it works in this case, however, as the background is distracting. There's absolutely nothing wrong with photos being artistic, and indeed it would be hard to get an FP if it had no artistic merit. We need to be careful the artistic qualities aren't to the severe detriment of the educational ones, and that they aren't the only merits an image has. Remember that people wanting educational photos want good-looking photos too. And sometimes black and white achieves something a colour photo can't. Colin (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 21:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 17:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sahrawi tribal men on horseback at the Tan-Tan Festival in Morocco

Info created by Priest Maxim Massalitin - uploaded and nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pic! Béria Lima ^msg 17:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment Yes, but the small size is a bit disappointing...--Jebulon (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Resolution could be higher. --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support On Flickr the resolution is doubled. -- И. Максим (talk) 20:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Original file uploaded here. И. Максим, you can upload directly in Commons without replacing it in Flickr, if you think so (in future). J Kadavoor J e e 09:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't know that. И. Максим (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect moment. Kleuske (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support We don't get many action photos at FP. Colin (talk) 12:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 14:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin --A.Savin 15:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shutter speed could have been higher, but nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic (to coin a word)! So much life in this, captured so well ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow ! (I'll try to remember this one when voting for POTY...)--Jebulon (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good now. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Usually I don't vote on feature picture candidates, but this one is too beautiful to ignore. :) Trijnstel_talk 18:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 21:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Zitronenfalter Gonepteryx rhamni.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2013 at 21:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 17:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Ugly background (should probably be more blurred), very average composition.Fotoriety (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Fotoriety -- Colin (talk) 14:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree, the background/foreground is too bussy, it is possible to improve using some filter for those areas in order to get it unsharp Poc o² 07:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 08:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Ermitage Saint-Antoine, Castelnau-de-Guers 05.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 18:42:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ermitage Saint-Antoine, Castelnau-de-Guers, France.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mid-day backlight. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lestes sponsa LC0314.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 09:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info An Emerald damselfly; created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 17:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support but some part of the end of tail portion is out of focus. --Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 03:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 14:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A pity that the tip of the tail is not sharp, but anyhow FP to me Poc o² 07:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:White Shoal Lighthouse.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 11:16:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White Shoal Light on Lake Michigan in August, 2008.

Info created by NarparMI - uploaded by NarparMI - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special or wow here, centered composition. I am sorry --The Photographer (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:F02f.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2013 at 11:38:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by vinothchandar - uploaded by ahura - nominated by ahura -- AHURA♠ 11:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 11:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is below 2MP in resolution.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anableps anableps 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 05:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Four-eyed Fish, Anableps anableps

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 19:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Asti Il Municipio.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 17:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Valerio Manassero - uploaded by Valerio Manassero - nominated by Valerio Manassero -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred, Underexposed, Noise, tilt, bad composition, perspective problem. Iḿ sorry --The Photographer (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 18:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Autographa gamma on Trachelospermum jasminoides

Info Autographa gamma on Trachelospermum jasminoides. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please reduce background noise level. --Ivar (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it really so bad? I'll try to improve that. --Kadellar (talk) 19:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can't really improve it~~, I take it back~~. --Kadellar (talk) 15:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you very much, Ivar, it's much better now. I'll keep the nomination then. --Kadellar (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 16:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vamps (talk) 09:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2013 at 08:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The King of Aragon staircase, carved into the cliffs of Bonifacio, Corsica, France. Wonderful site, excellent picture, very impressive. -- Jebulon (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Lighting is unfortunately a bit suboptimal here, causing the colors to be muted. Sunrise occurred at 6:43 AM, so I think a picture taken within one or two hours of that would have been better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing, but I'm afraid I don't quite understand your remarks about the colours and the time. In that place, the sea is of a deep bue that can tend to ultramarine; the limestone cliffs are a kind of whitish/yellowish rocks, and the tiled roofs are that kind of orange/red ochre. Please note that on the picture, West is on the left and East on the right; I guess that two hours before, from that point of view, the place would have been more in the shade. --Myrabella (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, assuming your location marker is accurate with respect to Google Maps, the corresponding time before sunset would have yielded ideal lighting without worrying about shadows, since it's just ocean to the left. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much, Jebulon, for this nomination; I truly feel honored. --Myrabella (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My pleasure. Surpriiiiise ! --Jebulon (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  08:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice place, poor light, poor focus. B.p. 17:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben voilà, chère Myrabella, te voici habillée pour l'hiver, comme on dit ! ...--Jebulon (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Le 10 septembre 2013, Myrabella a ressuscité B.p.! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oui, cette nomination par Jebulon me rend fière par bien des aspects ! --Myrabella (talk) 06:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I too feel something wrong while comparing with File:Bonifacio vue des falaises.jpg. May be the other picture I ref. is over sharpened and with false colors. But that composition is more appealing to me. J Kadavoor J e e 16:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with KoH, sorry, lighting, and also sharpness, are not at FP level. Furthermore I personally would reduce the exposure a bit, it looks overexposed, specially the sky Poc o² 07:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it's too blue, and that it should look something like this: File:Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon c.jpg. The modifications should be done to the RAW-file ideally, of course. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion; however, I beg to desagree that it should look like in your proposition, way to yellowish IMO. Actually, the colors under plain light would look more like this: File:Bonifacio_falaises_Grain_de_Sable.jpg. I will give a try by the end of the week end. --Myrabella (talk) 09:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Supportable now, imo. Much better. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version uploaded, considering reviewers' remarks --Myrabella (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Budapest culture.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 12:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by --The Photographer (talk) 12:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ A really nice capture, but there are some technical defects that prevent me from supporting: 1) microphone slightly in the way; 2) people on the sides cropped awkwardly (especially guitarist on left); 3) people in back out of focus. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I could remove it ? --The Photographer (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, what thing are you referring to that you say you could remove? I mentioned several points in my vote. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1 and 2 done, 3 is imposible and I think that main subject is more important here and it is focused. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 02:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Photoshop work, I will change my vote to weak

Support. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice rework. --Kadellar (talk) 11:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I like it, but depiction is misleading. This is Macedonian folklore group. --Mile (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that something is wrong in the description, please Be bold. Description was made by a user of Budapest, so I recommend you write to him. :) --The Photographer (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capitol at Dusk.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 15:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At first glance, I like the symmetry of this image. However, I can see some details as to the quality. The sky is observed noisy and some artifacts that waste overall quality (see statue at the height of the Capitol). Additionally, there are people who hinder the composition. Obviously shadows were lifted without gain details, noise reduction inefficient. Poor quality and artifacts widespread --The Photographer (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Now honestly, the sky isn't really noisy - imo. I shot at ISO 100, applying exposure to the right i.e. deliberately overexposing the picture. That's why I didn't lift shadows, actually I even lowered some very bright areas a bit. As far as the general IQ in the extreme corners is concerned: This is basically as good as it gets (unfortunately), using an ultra wide angle zoom on a full format camera. At least to me it seems impossible to get a better image from this position without stitching techniques and/or (maybe) using very expensive prime lenses. And as the capitol complex is extremely popular with tourists, photographers, and local joggers alike, I was very happy just having to deal with a comparatively small number of people in the image... Any other oppinions here? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info new version! I denoised the image a bit more and tried to improve some details. Still, only minor changes. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Remove the peoples and I will change my vote, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too dark foreground, there is more potential in this pic. -- -donald- (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'll withdraw this image and upload a new picture of my capitol series that might address the issues mentioned here better --08:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Saint-Pontien, Roquebrun, Hérault 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 09:25:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chapel of Saint-Pontien, Roquebrun, Hérault, France.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer this image: as for me, the light is slightly more pleasant and the chapel maybe appears more eye-catching (but don't ask why). --A.Savin 18:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done You're right for the light, I was thinking the same thing, new version with lightning less cold. And me too, I like the other image, but I have had to choose. I think I will nominate the other too. --Christian Ferrer 19:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that this chapel is as notable to deserve more than one FP on commons... --A.Savin 20:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination for both --Christian Ferrer 17:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Ok, you have answered before I asked, you can choose this alternative version (have I the right to do that?) --Christian Ferrer 20:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 21:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this is not an "alternative version", but really another image.--Jebulon (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination for both, ok I renominate only this one --Christian Ferrer 17:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

File:Chlorophyllum molybdites Crop 2013-09-10.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 17:55:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment some Underexposed aceptable only in QI. The composition is normal, I cant see the fungus completely --The Photographer (talk) 20:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info New version uploaded. --Laitche (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 14:54:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panorama of Drottningholm Palace theatre built 1766. The theatre is perfectly preserved and the theatrical machinery, designed and built by the Italian Donato Stoffani, is still fully intact and still in use. Since 1991 part of Royal Domain of Drottningholm World Heritage site. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 14:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 14:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes very good but left and right are leaning in --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Done--ArildV (talk) 06:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry to be perfectionist but it's a bit tilted on right --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support Anyway a good picture --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 03:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:FEMA - 44359 - Oklahoma tornado destroyed home.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2013 at 06:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Win Henderson/FEMA - uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by Ks0stm -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 06:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 06:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the green of that grass natural in Oklahoma's climate? I live far away from there but it seems a bit bright to me. darkweasel94 18:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, it's a lawn in front of a house. You can have a well-maintained lawn anywhere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 05:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 20:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I second the oppose vote from the last time around. Interesting composition of a powerful image, but the stuff on the right distracts too much from the whole picture. –Fredddie ™ 22:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks fine to me. T C N7JM 00:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support any. J Kadavoor J e e 05:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative cropped version

Comment I've added a cropped version as an alternate. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as well. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the image could use some contrast, but good anyhow Poc o² 07:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

7 or 9 supports; anyway featured. :) J Kadavoor J e e 06:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golgotha (Church of the Holy Sepulchre).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 20:13:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Golgotha (Calvary). Orthodox Crucifixion altar.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Maxim Massalitin -- И. Максим (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- И. Максим (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lots of noise, esp chroma noise. Highlights blown. Verticals not straight. The rod running across the middle is very distracting. Lower iso and longer exposure on tripod is needed here. Colin (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grünliche-Waldhyazinthe Platanthera chlorantha.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2013 at 12:39:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by :Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spondylus varius Thorny Oyster Fiji by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 22:06:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --The Photographer (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 03:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I could hardly say that it is an underwater shotPoc o² 07:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ----Querstrebe (talk) 17:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough edits to vote. --Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --P e z i (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 12:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Titan's atmosphere.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2013 at 15:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diagram of the layers of Titan's atmosphere

Info Titan, Saturn's biggest moon, is special cause it has an atmosphere—1.6 times heavier than Earth's.
Titan's atmosphere has layers too, named to the corresponding layers in Earth's atmosphere (based on convective patterns, temperature, location, etc).
All by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like this type of artwork and high encyclopedic value is excellent. However, I think it is too simple and easy to do --The Photographer (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'd like to see a replica this friday. And no peeking inside my file (that's cheating). 😑 —Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not put the Lord your God to the test --The Photographer (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

…what?—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for another great piece of work! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun and educational to watch it render. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 05:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 19:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Twin Towers-NYC.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 13:13:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Battery Park City and the former Twin Towers at the World Trade Center

Info created by w:Carol M. Highsmith - uploaded by 7mike5000 - nominated by Soerfm. Compared to original TIFF this image has had adjusted colors and has been rotated slightly. -- Soerfm (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Soerfm (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The crop is to be corrected (lower left corner) for sure, and maybe some perspective correction is to be applied too. I'm not sure about a small pincushion distorsion. All easily correctible. Nice picture nevertheless. I'll probably support when done.--Jebulon (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose distortion problems --The Photographer (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Троїцька церква в Драбівцях.jpg

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trinity Church in Drabivtsi, Cherkasy Oblast, Ukraine

Info created by Haidamac - uploaded by Haidamac - nominated by Шиманський Василь. --Шиманський Василь (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Шиманський Василь (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is far below 2MP in resolution.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allium oleraceum - rohulauk Keilas2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2013 at 18:21:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Allium oleraceum - field garlic at golden hour, all by Ivar (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 14:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vamps (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 08:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

US Capitol at dusk as seen from the eastern side

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC). New image of my capitol series that might be better than the nomination I've already withdrawn.[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noise stacking would help, but I think it's really good now. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I've been looking more closely at the photograph. Pixelation is observed widespread, particularly in lampposts. Additionally perspective deformation of the corners. An excessive amount of noise reduction in certain places that make losing detail. --The Photographer (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well, especially the border resolution of the EF-17-40 at the very short end is mediocre at best. I had to stop down to f/11 to obtain at least some level of details. Nevertheless I consider this image superior to my first nomination, to me it appears simply more balanced as a whole. Removing people was also relatively easy in this case. ;-) Nevertheless, thanks for your input! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment There's something about the quality and details, I would say aggressive noise reduction (when only should be in the shadows) and oversharpening additional noise in the sky--The Photographer (talk) 17:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry, fine details are smeared. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I hate the fucking pixel peeping that goes on here. Brilliant photo. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems better than File:US Capitol Building at night Jan 2006.jpg. J Kadavoor J e e 17:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful --PierreSelim (talk) 22:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the composition and colours, good work --Kurkoe (talk) 02:30, 20 September 2013 (BST)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 17.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 20:44:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gravestones in St. Anne's Chapel, Malbork Castle, Poland

Info Gravestones in St. Anne's Chapel, Malbork Castle, Poland. All by me, Poc o² 20:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course...--Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why did you make the area of the left window grey? The reflection on the ground clearly says "bright light source above" to my brain, but above it is only a grey area. I find that confusing. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good question, I totally agree with you, it was actually a mistake. New version uploaded Poc o² 08:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tomascastelazo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Idem. Great atmosphere. Kleuske (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 13:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--JLPC (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally this is the kind of picture people nominate but have not gotten right, so it doesn't get promoted. This one does ... the balance of light and shadow is perfect. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Ermitage Saint-Antoine, Castelnau-de-Guers 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2013 at 06:43:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hermitage Saint-Antoine, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault, France.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benreis (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support a scenery like in a picture-book, very good! --A.Savin 22:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - beautiful! -- Felix König ✉ 10:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Face of urban decay.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 18:55:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No Wow, no interesting for me. I'm sorry --The Photographer (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I really like the subject – looks like a face. Would it be possible to re-shoot this one with a higher camera position, more or less at level with the windows? Then it would look less stretched/deformed and you might even be able to get rid of some of the wires at the bottom … --El Grafo (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good find.  Richard [®] 12:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kleuske (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:India - Varanasi green peas - 2714.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2013 at 20:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, I really like it :) --A.Savin 22:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support, unconventional but I like it; DOF is a little shorter than I'd prefer. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think they are green chickpeas (Cicer arietinum); not green peas (Pisum sativum). JKadavoor Jee 06:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You're probably right. Tomer T (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great  Richard  [®]  12:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great compo and Homogeinity of colors --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great ! --Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support All we are saying, is give peas a chance ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)--Cayambe (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

File:Kowloon Waterfront, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2013 at 20:35:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Row of typical Hong Kong taxis at the International Commerce Centre with the skyline of Hong Kong island in the background, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Info Row of typical Hong Kong taxis at the International Commerce Centre with the skyline of Hong Kong island in the background, Kowloon, Hong Kong. All by me, Poc o² 20:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it has been over-processed photo. Unnatural colors. 've seen recently with great concern a large number of outstanding images. All with changes in their colors, such as blue sky as bora bora or excesive noise reduction, dramatic filters. There is a perception of mine, since these photos were taken in places and times where I was there. My concern is that this bill becomes 500px.com --The Photographer (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is fantastic. Yes, there's some clipping, but can't do much about that given the high-contrast scene. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was in Kowloon that day and I feel like I'm right back there when I look at it. Yes, again, there's not much you can do about the clipping. But it's a small part of a great image of the skyline, sky and taxis. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good editing, IMO the back of the first car need a very little noise reduction but very good --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 07:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 07:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 12:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~{o}~~ Support Good composition, good idea and funny image, but I agree with The Photographer, I find this very kitschy, it looks than an oversaturated american advertising of the 50s, + annotated dustspot in the sky.--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC) I think it is far much better now, seems less agressive to me. Therefore I change my vote and I support, because of the beginning of my first assessment, still accurate.--Jebulon (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with King of Hearts. The problem of having sun on the skyscrapers and shadow over the taxis has been nicely solved. But Jebulon is right and there's a spot there, can you fix it, please? --Kadellar (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded addressing the dust spot and with a selective denoising around the first taxi. Regarding the "unnatural" look of the picture I'd just like to add that the current picture is not that far of the original one, I mostly lightened up the darker areas in the foreground, no big editing Poc o² 18:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poco, Could you upload the RAW file to Commons Archive?. I would compare the original version of the current. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to verify my statement I can forward you the RAW file, but I wouldn't really like to upload it there. Poc o² 16:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, send me that to my email, then, I will change my vote. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but you don't have to change anything Poc o² 21:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much better with the denoising around the first taxi. There is two dustspots more, see note --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gone sharp eye, thanks, Poc o² 20:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for send me the RAW. Now you can easily see the difference in color of the sky bora bora version and real version. Clearly this is not just a change of lighting, this is a total change of the picture, especially in colors --The Photographer (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, maybe the sky can be brightened a little but very good editing by Diego --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredo, please, stop this. I am getting tired of your attempt to prove I don't know what. You are not supposed to change my nomination into a before-later comparison contest with a file that I haven't even publish and I sent you privately. You didn't even ask me.

As I already explained you via email I haven't done anything especial with this picture that I don't do with all other my pictures, apart from the fact that I had to lighten up the darker areas in the foreground heavily, as I already explained. You seem to have a problem with the colors, which IMO are okay and are the result of my standard settings. After almost 9000 pictures uploaded it is the first time I have this kind of discussion. I only shot RAW and RAW needs per se to be developed and requires some adjustments like sharpness, contrast, saturation (little in my case: value 7 in LR is my standard setting). Please, stop this and judge the result, you have already expressed your opinion clear enough (even in other pages complaining about "Bora Bora skies"), if you don't like the picture, keep your oppose vote, but let this nomination run and don't boicot it. Thank you for your understanding Poc o² 07:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo creo que este tema se salio un poco de control, no es para tanto. Simplemente no puedo creer que esté equivocado?, aparentemente así es por la cantidad de personas que están votando a favor. Creo que tendré que reconsiderar que es lo que es la realidad, la realidad desde el punto de vista del observador. Yo sinceramente no termino de ver esta imagen bien, algunos usuarios me han pedido que te pida, valga la redundancia, disculpas por haber subido una versión RAW JPG de Lightroom. Yo considero que el que nada teme, nada debe, además creo que me habrías dado permiso para subirla igualmente. Anteriormente no critique tus fotos porque yo no estuve alli para observar ese cielo en ese momento y en ese lugar, sin embargo, en este caso me atrevi a hacerlo. Si todos estos votos te apoyan, yo debo estar equivocado posiblemente, sin embargo, es mi punto de vista. No hay necesidad de hacer un drama a todo esto, no estoy llevando ninguna campaña en tu contra, si te pones a ver, he hecho comentarios similares a otras fotos inclusive en QIC. --The Photographer (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scene. I've downloaded this and opened in Photoshop on a factory-calibrated monitor. The colours don't look unnatural (though I wasn't there). ~~My only issue is it looks like you've been a bit over-generous with the "clarity" slider on Lightroom.~~ Quick note: if your monitor is a wide-gamut one and you are looking at this in a web browser, there's a good chance the red will appear over-saturated because the browser isn't handling the colourspace properly. I don't think looking at an unprocessed raw file is fair, nor is legal to publish it without permission so it should be deleted imo. Colin (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your assessment Colin!, I have reduced the contrast of the mid-tones following your suggesting to be more moderate with the clarity slider and uploaded accordingly a new version. Will definitely buy a new monitor and get it calibrated. Poc o² 10:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't have a general problem with the way this was edited but I do think the brightness gradient is very obvious in the top third of the photo and not really necessary there. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--The Photographer (talk) 02:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 30.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 18:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I dont like the centered compositions. If the blood is real, I will change my vote --The Photographer (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Blood wasn't real, but real enough for a concert! Rule of thirds isn't the holy rule, would you oppose this centered-composed picture?: http://tenis.as.com/tenis/2013/09/09/album/1378759866_195554.html#1378759866_195554_1378774325 (obviously I don't want to compare with mine, just an example) --Kadellar (talk) 12:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice shoot, Not every rule for every situation, be flexible --The Photographer (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you Tomer! Concert FPs are difficult. I had planned to nominate one picture of this band, but I still had to choose. --Kadellar (talk) 11:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 12:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

* Support Duchamp (talk) 09:33, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm afraid this vote is invalid, because of less than 50 edits by this user. Therefore the result below seems wrong.--Jebulon (talk) 23:43, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porto Covo March 2013-1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 15:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A risky nomination! ~~So far none of my sea storm photos at Porto Covo have succeeded.~~ (not so, there is at least this one) Maybe I am the only one appreciating these soft shades of grey... A B&W version is below. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info B&W version -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support No amazing but interesting. Well done Alvesgaspar --The Photographer (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2013 at 07:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ruins of the St Olof Church (built in the 1100s) in Sigtuna. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 07:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kneeling was a very good idea, nice perspective. --Kadellar (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Do you have a good picture in this AOV? JKadavoor Jee 13:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I found and uploaded 2 images with asimilar but not identical AOV Image 1 and Image 2.--ArildV (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good works; even though a bit too close for my taste. Something from a distance to include the surroundings like this may ideal. J Kadavoor J e e 15:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2013 at 09:30:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P e z i (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 15:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect! Just in time for WLM 2013 ... would you like to consider it a submission for that? It'd be neat to have one entrant already be an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks! What do I need to do? (Honestly, I already thought about participating but couldn't find Monticello using the WLM tool... ;-) ) Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tunel El Paraiso.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 14:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Tunel El Paraíso. All by --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, regretfully. Everything is there technically, and I can see what you must have been thinking (and, having taken similar angles on roads myself I can appreciate too well that it is a challenging picture to take). But I don't see anything featurable in this—just a very well-done photo of a tunnel portal. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically very good, and especially a picture that makes sense. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Take a picture in Caracas poor zone is extremely difficult. The difficulty is not only for photography in itself, but because it was made in the third world's most violent city. In 2012, Caracas was considered the 3rd most dangerous city in the world by the Citizen Security Council, Justice and Peace, with a murder rate of 119 homicides per 100.000 people. I think it is important to emphasize this effort. --The Photographer (talk) 13:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in COM:IG about the photographer's courage. If we want to reward that, let's set up a separate award. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --JLPC (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - maybe not the best quality ever, but nice compo, and good documentary of poverty. Btw, the place reminds me of this one a bit ;-) --A.Savin 17:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How is it a "good documentary of poverty" all by itself? The neighborhood above the portal may indeed be poor, I'll take your word for it, but without someone explaining that it is I can't see that it is from the photo. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the huts do not really look as a nice place to live in - especially when viewed at 100 % :) --A.Savin 09:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Archaeo and A.Savin. --Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I added some English description. J Kadavoor J e e 03:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe could you consider a crop below ? I find the yellow color at left a bit agressive and too much eye catching. Anyway, I'm with Archaeo in this case (sorry, bad joke...)--Jebulon (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ¡Buen trabajo! Poc o² 07:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kasir (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benreis (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 12:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's an interesting picture, it's not just about the highway, but also about the contrast between the planned modernist highway system from the 1960s and the unplanned poor districts. Tells you a little about Venezuelan history in the postwar period.--ArildV (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Carex muricata - siiltarn Keilas.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2013 at 11:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Carex muricata - prickly sedge, all by Ivar (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why so many plant profiles in golden hour? Although look attractive; they hide the real colours, so not suitable for the info boxes. They are good for other purposes though. J Kadavoor J e e 11:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Because the light is simply beautiful, soft, diffused and warm. We have a composition without harsh shadows or blown-out highlights. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then please consider adding a picture in daylight too. Otherwise chances for rejection at EN:FPC; as they prefer natural color for specimens. J Kadavoor J e e 14:35, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I wouldn't say, that golden hour has hidden real colors. The shot was taken about a hour before the sunset and the yellow-red light was not intensive. The pic, that you did mention before, was taken in a different month (may - shortly after flowering; mine was taken in august). The fruits of Carex muricata are getting darker during ripening and in full ripe they are very dark (almost black). Regards, --Ivar (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Let us see what other people say. I like your works. J Kadavoor J e e 15:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wonderful colors for me --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 07:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - 25082013 - Laconnex 53.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 11:20:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A young woman getting the mug during a Mug Shuffle game int he 4th round of the Swiss Mounted Pony Games 2013

Info created by Pleclown - uploaded by Pleclown - nominated by Pleclown -- Pleclown (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pleclown (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI of course, but, composition is too tight --The Photographer (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info A square version. Created by Pleclown - uploaded by Pleclown - nominated by Pleclown -- Pleclown (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Another quality picture of a female athlete. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Attica 06-13 Sounion 18 Cape Sounion stitch.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 18:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cape Sounion - the southernmost point of Attica, Greece. Stitched pano.

Info All by A.Savin --18:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 18:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer 18:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but the composition and colors aren't particularly remarkable for this type of seascape. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is not the best, centered, construction and the element is cut the grass, in front, not end to fit and seems to be placed necessarily --The Photographer (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per The Photographer. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 21:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernard Tomic 2, Wimbledon 2013 - Diliff.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 16:39:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bernard Tomic in the first round of the 2013 Wimbledon Championships.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Nikhil
Support -- Nikhil (talk) 16:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposure and bloom. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow.--Claus (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2013 at 07:58:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment CAs on the far left. Both the far top and the bottom area of the historgram aren't used (black point should be adjusted imo). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done For both, thanks -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diego Kravetz-edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2013 at 22:24:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded by Psabbia - retouched by JBarta nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A clear portrait like this is very useful for Wikipedia. But for FP, the quality isn't as fine as we typically expect and the pose has all the charm of a passport photograph. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Or a mug shot, or a corporate ID badge ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferronor GR12U 412 Montadon - Potrerillos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2013 at 22:43:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

EMD GR12U climbing the grade to Potrerillos, Chile

Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 22:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info EMD GR12U with empty sulfuric acid tank cars climbing the grade between Montadon and Potrerillos, Chile.
Comment Not sure if everybody's going to like the composition, but my options were slightly limited ;) so I'll try it anyway.
Comment If you ask me, this is probably the most spectacular railway in Chile, and the bar is pretty high. And probably the world's filthiest (that's not black paint). And damn loud, too. (not my video)
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 22:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 04:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like your wider views more; but off course, these too are very informative. J Kadavoor J e e 06:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 10:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Godhulii 1985 (talk) 11:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow.--Jebulon (talk) 19:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 20:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different from so many of our other railroad shots in that it's not really about "Hey! Look at this cool train!" but more "Hey! Look at this barren mountainscape!". And of course well done ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow factor and everything is definitely there; I think if the train had a color with more contrast to the background it would be even cooler but this is still a FP. darkweasel94 08:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 21:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support We not want to be on the train --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! -- MJJR (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Frauenkirche - Iglesia de Nuestra Señora.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 14:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Pedro J Pacheco -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are certain details like the sound quality, for example. However, my vote is due to the composition, which despite being symmetrical harmony is not noticeable. Additionally there are strong chromatic aberrations at the bases of the columns. --The Photographer (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great image! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective, daring. I like it. Kleuske (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn´t vote myself, as long as I see this is allowed Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose perspective. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perspective Poc o² 21:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Removed CA Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gettysburg National Military Park.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 14:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Significant detail of the Gettysburg National Military Park in Pennsylvania

Info created by DoctorJoeE - uploaded by DoctorJoeE - nominated by Pedro J Pacheco -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I cant underestand why this quantity of sky, I cant see the main subject --The Photographer (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benreis (talk) 11:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hafnium pellets with a thin oxide layer.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2013 at 10:57:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 13:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Would prefer to trade a little noise for a little less blurred detail though. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am having a hard time imagining what more detail would even look like. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm a "sciences-incompetent", so I cant say anything about the value (seems high, anyway). But I think that this picture is fascinating, and the level of details is exceptional. Looks like a human made work of art. But this one is due to the work of Nature. Fantastic !--Jebulon (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 20:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. --Avenue (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks and Minerals

File:Le Départ des Volontaires (La Marseillaise) par Rude, Arc de Triomphe Etoile Paris.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2013 at 14:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by François Rude - Photographied, uploaded and nominated by me, -- Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This famous relief (1833-1836) by François Rude on the Arc de Triomphe de l'Etoile in Paris, France. The official name of this composition is "the Departure of the Volunteers in 1792", but it is better known as "La Marseillaise", referencing the name of the french national anthem.-- Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think a good improvement from File:Paris July 2011-16a.jpg. J Kadavoor J e e 15:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LC-de (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 21:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 13:48:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose foreground disturbing, dof and focus problem --The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 15:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect AOV; it will be affected if camera was raised to avoid the blurry leaf edge on foreground. Less details compared to File:Green Malachite (Siproeta stelenes) butterfly.jpg; but I prefer the natural colour in natural lights here. Both are taken with the same lense; but the full frame drastically reduced the DOF here. Böhringer, I like your macros from your D300s, more. Otherwise, buy a 200mm. J Kadavoor J e e 05:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you're right - my 105mm Macro does not fit on the 800 camera. Maybe I'll buy the 200 :-) Thank you for the hint. --Böhringer (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I preffer a real FP Quality --The Photographer (talk) 22:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's from a Bridge camera; we can't expect that much DOF from a DSLR. Off course, DSLR has many other advantages; if combined with a suitable lens. J Kadavoor J e e 13:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Here we evaluate image quality of the photos regardless of cameras. I myself have taken photos without a good lens --The Photographer (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Not for arguments; but for a healthy discussion) Yes; a generic lens that you used here has better DOF even though other limitations. See this. Here everything in focus including the legs. But people complained about the busy background (agree with it). So we have to choose a combination of equipment that produce enough DOF but controlling the BG, considering other factors like subject size. I agree that this is not the best work of Böhringer, considering his 100+ FPs. And, we are missing Paolo's works and thoughtful suggestions too. J Kadavoor J e e 16:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poc o² 07:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P e z i (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 12:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LC-de (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 20.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2013 at 18:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zdrojowy Square and Promenade pier viewed from the Sopot Lighthouse, Sopot, Poland

Info Zdrojowy Square and Promenade pier viewed from the Sopot Lighthouse, Sopot, Poland . All by me, Poc o² 18:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view and perspective --Christian Ferrer 18:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pedro J Pacheco 20:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition  Richard  [®]  11:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry I dislike the crops below and left. I'd expected that the quarter circles should be complete. Thus, I find the composition not very good.--Jebulon (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Opole (Oppeln) - Klein-Venedig.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 22:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image has a very good quality, however, the composition does not stop to amaze. There is not a main subject in the scene, the play of the elements is not well managed. --The Photographer (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question I'm a bit confused. It seems it is somewhere at Opole; but Klein-Venedig related to something else. Not geo-coded. J Kadavoor J e e 06:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard [®] 12:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Praha by Ricardo Liberato.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2013 at 17:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Bellevue, Prague, Czech Republic. Created by Ricardo Liberato - uploaded by Jirib - nominated by Jirib -- Jirib (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jirib (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disappointing quality in the front left and small chromatic aberration aceptable --The Photographer (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Quality is not great there but acceptable IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reykjavík Old Harbor.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2013 at 00:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Old Harbor of Reykjavic, Iceland --c|u|n by  Richard  [®]  00:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  00:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are you sure the file is valid? It doesn't thumbnail properly and when I downloaded and tried to open it in Photoshop, it complained "Could not complete your request because a JPEG marker segment length is too short (the file may be truncated or incomplete)." --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you King. I've reuploaded the picture and now it's fixed.  Richard  [®]  06:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 1x "purge" and ready ... now correct visible. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and detailed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Black frame to remove (see note) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where?  Richard  [®]  12:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the top at right , I'added a note --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.  Richard  [®]  12:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 06:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benreis (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 23:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work for me. The photo shows very little unless you zoom far in, and even then, things are stacked on top of each other so that it's hard to perceive the layout of the harbour. Despite great technical quality, this doesn't work for me, sorry. Needs a little ccw rotation. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as Julian H. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2013 at 09:54:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Interior of Stockholm Central station. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 09:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-aligned wide-angle scene. It is a little bit gloomy. Perhaps that is how it is, but I'd be tempted to try to cheer it up a little with an increase in exposure in Lightroom -- though not if it makes it unrealistic. Colin (talk) 12:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

or Gimp :) --The Photographer (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Done Thank you. I uploaded a new version. Increase exposure (0,3 EV) and less highlights correction.--ArildV (talk) 12:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done --The Photographer (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 14:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 20:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Love the symmetry and detail. We will put it to good use on Wikivoyage. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Duchamp (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits are needed. --Joydeep _Talk 18:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 21:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Unload wheat by the combine Claas Lexion 584.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2013 at 13:32:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler] -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Resolution is a bit low, but otherwise great image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support More balanced composition for me than the previous FP. J Kadavoor J e e 06:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very good, resolution high enough. -- Felix König ✉ 10:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 10:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 21:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:F016f.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2013 at 08:46:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ladydragonflyherworld - uploaded by Ahura - nominated by Ahura -- AHURA♠ 08:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 08:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No identification, no categorization and subject not fully in focus. --Joydeep _Talk 18:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per JDP. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:F03f.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2013 at 08:55:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by vinothchandar - uploaded by Ahura21 - nominated by Ahura21 -- AHURA♠ 08:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 08:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

--Kadellar (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:F11f.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2013 at 08:50:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by calliope - uploaded by Ahura - nominated by Ahura -- AHURA♠ 08:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 08:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice scenery, but the quality is far from FP standards. --A.Savin 12:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just random pumpkins in a field. Nothing visually striking. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Церква Святого Пантелеймона 17.jpg, not featured

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Klymenkoy - uploaded by Klymenkoy - nominated by Шиманський Василь (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Шиманський Василь (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]