Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 06 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Robert_Burns_House,_Dumfries.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Robert Burns House in Dumfries, Scotlad. Burns lived here with his family from 1793 until his death in 1796. This is a Category A Listed Building in Scotland. --DeFacto 21:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Verticals are well done, but roof is not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 23:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Roof is not so important for me, but I dont like the stones and Door with shield -and think flowers have CA. Looks like (IMO) using a cheap noisefilter. Development it again and sharpen it with PS-Boardtools --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 17:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. @Michielverbeek and Michielverbeek: I have re-processed it with lens profile correction enabled and CA removal, plus I sharpened it slightly. Please reevaluate. DeFacto 17:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  mild oppose The house doesn't look too bad, but that sky ... I mean, it's blown, isn't it?--Peulle 16:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
    • @Peulle: yes it is quite bright with little detail in the centre, but it's not actually blown. DeFacto 19:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 19:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC))

File:Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 007.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hiking in autumn by Wijnjeterper Schar. Raw biotope in autumn colors.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There's a problem of light, in my opinion --Basile Morin 01:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Seems acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image is leaning to the left, while there is a problem of perspective. The crop includes disturbing branches on the corner top left, while the cloudy sky is not good to reveal the colors of this biotope (topic of the photo from the description). -- Basile Morin 11:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Correction WB and perspective. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 12:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_la_Asunción,_Establés,_Guadalajara,_España,_2017-01-07,_DD_24.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of the Assumption, Establés, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 06:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment The tower is not sharp. Can you repair.--Famberhorst 06:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Poco a poco 18:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, I'm not convinced. Other opinions please.--Famberhorst 06:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not convinced either. Maybe this is a case where less perspective correction is more... --Rafesmar 22:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Left side is quite unsharp. IMO not reasonably fixable. --Basotxerri 16:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not perpective issue - reason is lens correction --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:17, 03 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Das Bild ist schlicht verwackelt, die Randunschärfen kommen da nur noch oben drauf. Würde bei einer alten 6-MPixel-Kamera vermutlich gar nicht weiter auffallen. War der IS trotz Stativ eingeschaltet? Oder war es zu windig für's Stativ? Wobei die Doppelkonturen auch auf Spiegelschlag hindeuten könnten. --Smial 10:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 12:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)