Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 25 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Linggplatz 6 in Bad Hersfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Thomas church in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
--Knopik-som 04:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria-Magdalena-Hospital at Brühl 4 in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stavoren. Bollard + (artwork) on the harbor pier.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stavoren. Bollard + (artwork) on the harbor pier.
-
- Nomination The Dixie Fire in Plumas County and Butte County produces a pyrocumulus cloud. Such a fire cloud forms when scorched air and strong winds within a fire meet moisture in the atmosphere. On July 22, the Dixie Fire surpassed 100,000 acres, becoming the second California wildfire in 2021 to surpass that acreage milestone. --Frank Schulenburg 04:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vistula River near Tyniec Abbey in Kraków just after sunrise --Jakubhal 03:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vistula River near Tyniec Abbey in Kraków just after sunrise --Jakubhal 03:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dülmen ponies in the Wildpferdebahn in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harlekin sign of house “Prinzipalmarkt 22” and in the background historical town hall in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest trail with beeches on Kreuzbergl, 8th district "Villacher Vorstadt", Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fungi and fallen leaves at a forest trail, 12th district "Sankt Martin", Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castanea sativa at a forest trail, 12th district "Sankt Martin", Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castanea sativa at a forest trail, 12th district "Sankt Martin", Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree stump at the forest trail close to the former shooting range on Kreuzbergl, 12th district "Sankt Martin", Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cican Stankovic, goalkeeper of FC Red Bull Salzburg. --Steindy 00:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cican Stankovic, goalkeeper of FC Red Bull Salzburg. --Steindy 00:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pentecost, stained-glass window by Jean Ransy in Charleroi --Jmh2o 17:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion This one looks good. The other one looks slanted up to the left to me, but I'm not sure my eyes are accurate in perceiving that. -- Ikan Kekek 18:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunrise at Vistula river bend near Tyniec in Kraków. In the distance: Camaldolese Monastery, Kościuszko Dam and A4 Highway Bridge --Jakubhal 16:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunrise at Vistula river bend near Tyniec in Kraków. In the distance: Kościuszko Dam and A4 Highway Bridge --Jakubhal 16:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunrise at Vistula river bend near Tyniec in Kraków --Jakubhal 16:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination S. Nicolò in Lazise, Italy --Lo Scaligero 10:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An official portrait of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Uploaded by User:Hohum --RoanokeVirginia 09:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Only photographs created by Wikimedians are eligibile for QI, sorry. Rodhullandemu 09:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ponina Wildfire in Oregon 2021 --RoanokeVirginia 09:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Only photographs created by Wikimedians are eligibile for QI, sorry. Rodhullandemu 09:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross near Welschbillig-Hofweiler, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Hohenbrunn in St. Florian / Upper Austria --Hans Koberger 08:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination C-130J Super Hercules at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Dust spots behind the aircraft should be removed. --Hillopo2018 08:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination C-130J Super Hercules at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough. --Hillopo2018 08:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination C-130J Super Hercules at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Internal view of the Saint Anthony church. --Moroder 07:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
The photo has a strange blue cast--Hillopo2018 08:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC) @Hillopo2018: I revertet your review, please read the note on your discussion page --Moroder 13:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment This shade is from street light. White balance adjusted by the light in the room. let's discuss. --Knopik-som 13:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality for me. --Knopik-som 13:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Alladorf --Ermell 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hans Koberger 08:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Herzogenreuth --Ermell 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, but this place looks sad and boring. --Hillopo2018 07:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of the Martinus Church in Nankendorf --Ermell 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Balon Greyjoy 08:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spire of the Protestant parish church in Prichsenstadt --Ermell 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the Hirschberg Castle, Germany --Carsten Steger 06:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the Beilngries airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 06:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A roof top mounted electronic sirens. --Mosbatho 06:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frontal longitudinal side of the former town hall in Assenheim
--F. Riedelio 06:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Frontal longitudinal side of the former town hall in Assenheim
-
- Nomination Coat of arms on the former town hall in Assenheim
--F. Riedelio 06:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Coat of arms on the former town hall in Assenheim
-
- Nomination Face and frontal longitudinal side of the former town hall in Assenheim
--F. Riedelio 06:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Face and frontal longitudinal side of the former town hall in Assenheim
-
- Nomination Window of the St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche, Haute-Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Our Lady church in Marvejols, Lozere, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domain of the castle of Lascroux, Haute-Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Leodegar church in St-Léger-Magnazeix, H Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kalkkinen bridge. --Kallerna 05:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Karisalmi bridge, Asikkala, Finland. --Kallerna 05:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 07:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of Cornus mas --Uoaei1 05:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A 5 mm long shell of a Triphorid, Coriophora granosa --Llez 05:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Thomas church in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old industrial buildings in Charleroi --Jmh2o 13:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church St. Pantaleon in Lower Austria --Hans Koberger 10:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water iris (Iris pseudacorus) in a pond in the hillside forests of Ritzlhof. --Isiwal 07:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Brilliant. --Nefronus 19:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the St Symphorian church in Tersannes, H Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Our Lady church in Marvejols, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Our Lady church in Marvejols, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit in the Our Lady church in Marvejols, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 10:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the St Nicholas church in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Painting of a woman in a fish bowl. (by Yousef abdinejad) --GuavaTrain 17:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
No description available. --F. Riedelio 14:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy and a substandard image description. --Hillopo2018 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the St Martin church in La Canourgue, Lozere, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 15:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Looks like errors in perspective correction. The center window is tilted to the left, while the left and the right windows are upright. Building seems to become wider towards the top. -Johannes Robalotoff 06:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
It's not a perspective error. This is tilted in reality. --Tournasol7 19:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC) Comment If this is so, you should only adjust the black level a bit. (Darkest pixel is 36 of 255. This makes a faint impression. Move the black level, e.g., half-way by 18, and it will look much better.) --Johannes Robalotoff 20:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Support In my opinion it's okay even without the black point adjustment. --Nefronus 19:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View point of Durgam Cheruvu secret lake park, Hyderabad --IM3847 15:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Uncalibrated color space (sRGB recommended) --F. Riedelio 09:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: calibrated to sRGB, please check. -- --IM3847 11:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment Color space is OK but the visible chromatic aberration on the branches should be removed. --F. Riedelio 09:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Blown out sky. --Hillopo2018 08:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Bonn,_Rheinaue,_Schwäne_--_2021_--_9117.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Swans in the Rheinaue Park in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose The left one is blurred & the angle is not ideal in my opinion. Let us discuss. --Nefronus 20:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your reviews. --XRay 05:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Karl_Marx_street_House_4_(Gdov)_2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Karl Marx street House 4 (Gdov) --Reda Kerbouche 07:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose White areas on the right and left edges of the picture. also, the photo looks a bit noisy. --Hillopo2018 08:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC); the white areas are removed but for the rest I didn't agree.--Reda Kerbouche 13:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support If there is noise, you'd expect to see it in the sky. I see none. Rodhullandemu 13:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC) - Support What white areas? Flowers? The right side of the house is not perfectly sharp, but I think it's good enough at a large enough size. And about the noise: In the road? If so, who cares? -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: , the white areas at both sides. Look at the initial uploaded image that had been nominated!!! --Hillopo2018 08:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment OK, but since they're no longer there, you should cross that part of your remark out, if you're even eligible to vote. -- Ikan Kekek 18:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support A little bit blurred, but IMO ok. --Sebring12Hrs 15:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Monument_to_the_fallen_compatriots_in_Lyalitsy.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Monument to the fallen compatriots in Lyalitsy --Reda Kerbouche 07:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose the upper part of the image is not sharp and really overprecessed. --Hillopo2018 08:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Disagree, I see no difference between sharpness at the top and bottom of this iage. Rodhullandemu 14:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC) - Support It's a reflective surface, so it won't have the pinpoint sharp appearance a much less reflective surface could have. I find the sharpness adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 08:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Aerial_image_of_the_Aalen-Heidenheim-Elchingen_airfield.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Aerial image of the Aalen-Heidenheim/Elchingen airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 19:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I disagree, a bit too unsharp. --Hillopo2018 08:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Perfectly fine for an aerial shot, in which distant haze is always present, and from a moving platform. 1/800 at f.14 is fine. Rodhullandemu 10:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support This is aerial photography, good quality. --Knopik-som 10:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC) - Support per others. Good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 08:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:SHTZ 15-30 in Gdov tractor Of Gdov.jpg
[edit]- Nomination SKHTZ-NATI tractor Of Gdov, just next to the museum of History --Reda Kerbouche 18:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Main object in the shaddow, a bit noisy. --Hillopo2018 08:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC), sorry but I didn't agree.--Reda Kerbouche 12:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support It would be nice to mention the town of that museum in the description, otherwise OK for QI. --Palauenc05 14:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. The city is in the file name and description. City Gdov, in Pskov Oblast. --Knopik-som 04:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC) - Support Shadow is not a problem. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:2017-05-27_Plac_Zamkowy_w_Warszawie_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Castle Square in Warsaw --Maxim75 07:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose I find it too noisy. --Hillopo2018 09:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Bottom crop not well done because of the cut legs --Michielverbeek 05:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC) - Oppose Surprisingly strong noise, also clearly visible CA, and a slight perspective correction would probably be needed as well. I don't understand the criticism of the cut legs thing. This is a street scene, there will always be some people cut off. --Smial 10:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Albert-Einstein-Straße_Infotafel_Hof_20210530_DSC00166.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Information board about a new department of the Hof university, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 08:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Honestly, what deserves this temporarly placed wooden sign to be a quality image? The image design in general is unfortunately not convincing. In terms of craftsmanship, there is actually no really outstanding performance. --Hillopo2018 08:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Support This is not an FP nomination. Technical quality is fine, composition is fine. Rodhullandemu 10:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC) - Support per others. And Hillopo2018, photography is not only an art but also a form of documentation, and all aspects of the universe merit documentation. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Yes, we don't know what kind of value this might have in the future, so QIC is only about judging the photographic quality.--Peulle 14:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:001_2016_06_11_Rahmung.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Look through to Langeneß, framed by the Föhr sculpture with the outline of the halligen from the south beach of Wyk auf Föhr
--F. Riedelio 12:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC) - Decline
- Oppose The structure is unsharp. It might have been the purpose to 'see through' the sculpture, but the panorama is not much eye-catching, the colored chairs get the attention. Perhaps it would be useful to take this photo to the discussion. --Nefronus 17:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp --Hillopo2018 08:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:End-to-end_optimized_image_compression_with_competition_of_prior_distributions_(poster).pdf
[edit]- Nomination "End-to-end optimized image compression with competition of prior distributions" poster as shown at P.A.I.S.S. 2021. --Trougnouf 09:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Can typeset documents in pdf be nominated? --Nefronus 20:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't know but I assume yes. PDF is a vector format that is most appropriate for content containing lots of text and mixed media, and vector / vector-based images qualify for QI (given they are made with free software or have high resolution, both apply, it was created in LibreOffice Draw). --Trougnouf 09:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose this is an pdf, not a photograph. Nothing special with this pdf file. Oppose. --Hillopo2018 08:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC) - Question How should we evaluate this? In terms of how the layout looks? The images in it? Its comprehensibility? I feel like this is a brochure that includes images, not really an image, and that it would have to be evaluated in a different way from an image. -- Ikan Kekek 09:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Bonn,_Rheinaue,_Graugänse_--_2021_--_9153.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Greylag geese in the Rheinaue Park in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but only the goose at the center is completely sharp. The exposition is adequate to the lighting conditions, yet the DoF is imo too low and there is some motion blur. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 11:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)- Comment The depth of field has obviously been deliberately chosen by the photographer, and so is fine by me. Withhold vote because I don't know if the thing with the slightly overexposed white feathers can be fixed. --Smial 10:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I tried to fix the white feathers - a little bit. I don't know if it's really good, but unfortunately more was not possible at this point. --XRay 04:24, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The depth of field has obviously been deliberately chosen by the photographer, and so is fine by me. Withhold vote because I don't know if the thing with the slightly overexposed white feathers can be fixed. --Smial 10:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- weak Support When 11 gooses are in motion, it's difficult, to get them all sharp. All in one goood quality. --Steindy 12:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)