Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 20 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ораниенбаум._Долина_реки_Карасты_в_парке_01.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --MB-one 15:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The_Greater_one_horned_Rhinoceros 1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination One horned Rhinoceros in Chitwan National Park, Nepal (by Prasan Shrestha) --Gpkp 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 20:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Advertisements or signatures in image are forbidden by rules --Екатерина Борисова 02:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Екатерина. --Plozessor 05:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Great photo, but I have to oppose per above, until the sign is removed from photograph --Jakubhal 09:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok then! --Plozessor 04:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support without watermark. --GRDN711 05:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now --Jakubhal 05:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Prasan Shrestha: @Gpkp: Without the watermark, IMO this image has potential for an FP rating if you want to enter it. I might crop a little off the top and the empty area on the right to better present the rhinoceros. --GRDN711 21:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Białystok_2023_111_Branicki_Palace_Sphinx_Sculpture.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Branicki Palace Garden Sphinx Sculpture --Scotch Mist 07:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unfortunately the palace is just out of focus --MB-one 10:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Will changing description to "Sphinx Sculpture in Branicki Palace Garden" change review? --Scotch Mist 16:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  • The composition doesn't work with this DoF. But maybe others will see this differently. --MB-one 17:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The composition is questionable but interesting. But first of all the picture is too dark and has a blue tint. (It was taken around noon.) --Plozessor 05:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Euro_Camping_Emirates_Tourist_Center_Azrou_Ifrane_4.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane Morocco. --User:Mounir Neddi 18:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Clear tilt --Poco a poco 19:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thank you
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, the image needs a perspective correction. --Radomianin 23:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment If you think so, then please oppose and set to "/Discuss" instead of reverting to "/Nomination". Reverted to "/Promotion" --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Reset to nomination (assuming that the building ins cylindrical) --Poco a poco 12:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Many thanks to Robert and Poco for your comments. I had accidentally selected 'Nomination' instead of 'Discuss', sorry about that. At first glance it looks conical because of the sloping wall pillars. In this example I have corrected the perspective. Best regards, --Radomianin 13:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support From this official picture it seems that the towers are neither straight nor conical, but straight on the inside and conical on the outside. I guess that Mounir who has been there and took the picture can judge the correct perspective better than we do. --Plozessor (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Stryi_Park_Nyzhankivskoho_RB.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Park Nyzhankivskoho, Stryi, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 11:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice view, but the flowers of the left plant are blown out and lack details --Екатерина Борисова 02:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Екатерина. Probably the burned out spots can be fixed with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 04:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:F-WXLR,_ILA_2024,_Schoenefeld_(ILA45416).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Airbus A321 XLR (F-WXLR) landing after a flying display at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 13:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose underexposed --Kallerna 14:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 17:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No contrast between the plane and the sky; therefore no QI for me. -- Spurzem 13:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Plozessor 04:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:46-258-5002_Deers_in_Roztochchia_Reserve_RB.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Deers in Roztochchia Reserve, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 08:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not that sharp, a bit noisy and motion blur on one of the ears. --A. Öztas 12:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Adequate for moving animals on a cloudy day. --Plozessor 11:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Plozessor --Nikride 12:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:46-206-0036_Busk_Court_RB.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Townhall in Busk, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 10:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • May need some perspective correction; also the level of detail seems a bit low – fixable? --A. Öztas 12:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question Could you explain where you see problems with perspective? Because windows in each buildings looks ok for me. The same question for details. Thanks. --Rbrechko 23:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment The perspective is completely correct. However, I find the poor lighting unpleasant; the main subject is in the shadow. -- Spurzem 10:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No issue with sharpness and perspective, but shadows are too dark - taking a picture of the shady side of an object on a bright sunlit day is not optimal. Probably it can at least be improved with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 11:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:61-220-0002_Koshylivtsi_Church_RB.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Old church in Koshylivtsi, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 10:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction --A. Öztas 12:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment The church building is not straight. If you look at fence and buildings behind, you can see that they are not tilted. --Rbrechko 13:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No issue with perspective but with exposure. It's too dark. --Plozessor 11:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)