Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:"1930"_Pur_Sang_Type_35_Replica_in_Brooklyn,_black,_front_right.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A Pur Sang Bugatti Type 35 recreation in Brooklyn --Mr.choppers 00:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Could you lighten it a bit up? It is partially hard to difference subject from background --Poco a poco 09:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
    — nah, I like it like that. Go ahead and decline. Mr.choppers 12:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
     Support shiny black car in front of faded black wall is an interesting contrast --Axel Tschentscher 20:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree per Poco o poco. This is a good image but needs better separation between car and background as well as a little boost in the shadow detail to bring out the quality. If done, it would be an easy QI and I would suggest you consider it for FP nomination as well. --GRDN711 09:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I've seen images with far worse background considered QI here. --Smial 22:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Der Hintergrund dürfte ein wenig heller sein. Aber wenn ich bedenke, was an Hintergründen hier schon alles hochgejubelt wurde, dann ist dieser hier hervorragend. -- Spurzem 23:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:1912rdg-p12.png

[edit]

  • This isn't SVG, it's PNG.--Peulle 08:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • You misunderstand. SVGs are excepted from the 2mpx rule, PNGs are not.--Peulle 08:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Man kann die Anwendung von Regeln (2 Megapixel) auch übertreiben. Sie ist durchaus sinnvoll etwa bei Landschaftsaufnahmen, bei derart kleinen Objekten ist sie jedoch nicht meiner Meinung nach nicht notwendig. --Manfred Kuzel 04:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:1912rdg-p13.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Army praporshchik shoulder straps of Palace Grenadier Company. Enlisted in the reign of Emperor Nicholas II. 1912. By User:Polygon vNiklitov 20:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. It's quite pixelated, low resolution, SVG should be used --Podzemnik 21:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good quality. This is not possible to do in SVG, it has already been discussed and «Because only raster graphics can make images quite realistic». Are there two megapixels (2 MPixels is a hard limit)? — Niklitov 11:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Below minimum size requirement. The filename is not meaningful. --Milseburg 11:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is a decent photo, but it doesn't fulfill the 2MP requirement. --Cayambe 15:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 2 megapixels is minimum.--Peulle 10:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Man kann die Anwendung von Regeln (2 Megapixel) auch übertreiben. Sie ist durchaus sinnvoll etwa bei Landschaftsaufnahmen, bei derart kleinen Objekten ist sie jedoch nicht meiner Meinung nach nicht notwendig. --Manfred Kuzel 04:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:27, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:1912rdg-p17.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Grenadier shoulder straps of Palace Grenadier Company. Enlisted in the reign of Emperor Alexander II, 1912. By User:Polygon vNiklitov 20:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. It's quite pixelated, low resolution, SVG should be used --Podzemnik 21:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good quality. This is not possible to do in SVG, it has already been discussed and «Because only raster graphics can make images quite realistic». Are there two megapixels (2 MPixels is a hard limit)? — Niklitov 11:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Below minimum size requirement. The filename is not meaningful. --Milseburg 11:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment Milseburg, about "The filename is not meaningful". This is a special file name for fast wikification. 1912 — year, rdg — Palace Grenadier Company, p — shoulder straps (погон), 17 — rank, r — rotate version. — Niklitov 17:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
      • Too cryptic for me. A commonly understandable title is part of a quality image. No need to be in a hurry. --Milseburg 18:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg. --Cayambe 15:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 2 megapixels is minimum.--Peulle 10:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The file name is completely unimportant and with this subject it does not have to be 2 MB. Here isn't Quality Filename Candidates or Quality Filesize Candidates. --Ralf Roletschek 15:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Man kann die Anwendung von Regeln (2 Megapixel) auch übertreiben. Sie ist durchaus sinnvoll etwa bei Landschaftsaufnahmen, bei derart kleinen Objekten ist sie jedoch meiner Meinung nach nicht notwendig. --Manfred Kuzel 04:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)