Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose
The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines
All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators
Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements
- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator
- Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements
More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution
Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality
Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colours. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting
The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value
Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate
Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations
No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images
Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }} to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }} to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion
If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision
QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2024.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2024.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)
Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 18 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process
Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review
To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 12:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
|
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).
|
|---|
December 18 2024
December 17 2024
December 16, 2024
December 15, 2024
December 14, 2024
December 13, 2024
December 12, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 10, 2024
December 9, 2024
December 8, 2024
December 7, 2024
December 6, 2024
December 3, 2024
Consensual review
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}or{{oppose}}will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add
Oppose and 
Support if necessary. - Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Untere_Bergbahn_Heidelberg,_Station_Schloss,_Blick_nach_unten.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Ponte_di_Rialto_Venice_2.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Swineherd_statue_in_Riedlingen_(2).jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Palacio_de_Topkapı,_Estambul,_Turquía,_2024-09-30,_DD_59.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Naso_unicornis_A74259020241123.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:At_Frankfurt_am_Main_2024_019.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Baños_romanos,_Ankara,_Turquía,_2024-10-03,_DD_24-29_PAN.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Long-tailed_Broadbill.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:0413маура.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:0248ашишкина_нива.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Стрельна._Орловский_парк._Башня-руина01.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Стрельна._Орловский_парк._Башня-руина02.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Усадьба_А._Ф._Орлова._Конюшня_(западная),_флагодержатель.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Pag_(HR),_Veliko_Blato_--_2022_--_0074.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Pag_(HR),_Sonnenuntergang_--_2022_--_0144.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Zadar_(HR),_Meerenge_von_Maslenica_--_2022_--_0024.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Münster,_Überwasserkirche,_Giebelhüüskesmarkt_--_2024_--_6568.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Withdrawn
File:Чайковского_10_04.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:46-251-0004_Dobromyl_Castle_RB.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Wildpark_Schloss_Tambach_Sakerfalke-20240908-RM-111006-6.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Озеро_Белое._Рыбаки_на_закате.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:0222_26р_шишкина_нива.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:20240514_UrbanArt_Biennale_02.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Open_wing_Nectaring_of_Pareronia_hippia_(Fabricius,_1787)_-_Indian_Wanderer(Female)_WLB_8.jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:A_temple_inside_the_Achyutaraya_complex_(01).jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
File:Aerial,_Heidelberg_(P1180511).jpg
Commons:Quality images candidates/en-ca/Discuss
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)
- Tue 10 Dec → Wed 18 Dec
- Wed 11 Dec → Thu 19 Dec
- Thu 12 Dec → Fri 20 Dec
- Fri 13 Dec → Sat 21 Dec
- Sat 14 Dec → Sun 22 Dec
- Sun 15 Dec → Mon 23 Dec
- Mon 16 Dec → Tue 24 Dec
- Tue 17 Dec → Wed 25 Dec
- Wed 18 Dec → Thu 26 Dec