Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Archita78

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Archita78}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Archita78 - 6

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]

I found these accounts in the morning after checking target pages. Same behaviour as first: re-uploading a deleted file. On the 6th of November Thirdspite uploaded File:New ross 2011.jpg, which is, as I mentioned earlier, a re-upload of deleted file. The following files are exactly the same as this one: File:New ross by me.jpg, File:Ross1.jpg, File:NRoss.jpg, File:Newross.jpg, etc etc. Therefore I want to request if this is again the LTA Archita78, although en:WP:DUCK would apply to this. Regards, Wiki13 20:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]

Yep, Confirmed. Found also User:Viewshort and User:Roleinner. All non-SUL; I blocked all of them and deleted the uploads. Thanks. Trijnsteltalk 21:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archita78 - 5

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]

Here is another sockpuppet Wiki13 just found. I file this request on his behalf. Rfedsfdsd9 re-uploaded an image (File:New ross by me.jpg) another sockpuppet, Ki325648, uploaded earlier (File:New ross by parid3.jpg). It's an obvious duck, but please check if he created more accounts on the underlying IP/range. And is it possible to block a range or more? Thanks in advance for the help. (I archived all other requests, but if you wish to see them please click on Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Archita78.) Kind regards, Trijnsteltalk 14:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added new account Hf656 which uploaded File:Newross.jpg. --Wiki13 15:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Added again a new account of this LTA: Plmnbv. Same image as before, but with different name: File:Ross1.jpg. --Wiki13 12:28, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And another one: Jgfjgf, with File:NRoss.jpg. Lymantria (talk) 12:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And yet again, now user Rewrter uploading File:NewRoss.jpg again. Lymantria (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And after doing some checks on his targets I found an older one: Gdfsfgd54. Uploaded File:Skunk Live in Roma.jpg, which is like the others, deleted earlier under a different name. --Wiki13 17:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Archita78 stopped with uploads about New Ross and continues on his next subject: The Cranberries. Sdaad is his newestt sock and he uploaded File:Thecranberriesliveinrome.jpg, which was deleted after the other one was deleted. Hifriend78 did not do edits or uploads here but is having a account here. Already thanks in advance. --Wiki13 10:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Found another: Hblbl54. This account uploaded File:Ross20.jpg. --Wiki13 17:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And he's back at New Ross with this upload. The name of the used account is Fdsgdsf423. --Wiki13 13:17, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And the newest sock Fsdsd890 (talk · contribs) who uploaded File:SkunkinRomebyParide.jpg. Trijnsteltalk 21:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please check this older sock too: Hbfasddsf89 (talk · contribs) (+ IP 212.118.232.88). I still think this one is unrelated: Arash1391. Trijnsteltalk 13:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And now also Repeat78 as he uploaded with File:Cranberries live in Roma by Paride.jpg. --Wiki13 09:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another sockpuppet added to the list: Aqwedsew (talk · contribs). Trijnsteltalk 14:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]

All of the accounts listed above are Likely socks of Archita78. In addition, I found the following:

All 14 are now blocked indefinitely, some by colleagues before I got to them, the rest by me. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim: please read the email I send to you. Trijnsteltalk 18:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since I now have the CheckUser buttons myself, I decided to complete this request. The latest three additions are clearly Archita78, though the CU tool doesn't really help all the time. I digged some more and I found a few more 100% Confirmed sockpuppets: Fdbgbdf454 (talk · contribs), Everytimeme (talk · contribs), Hipeople (talk · contribs) and Retry78 (talk · contribs). I re-checked Arash1391 and that one is definitely Unrelated to Archita78. I unblocked that account. Trijnsteltalk 17:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archita78 - 4

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]

Xi3248 uploaded this file here on commons and replaced other good images with this one on several wikis. Also, i've seen that image before under a different name and that one was deleted. My question: Is this again a new sock of LTA Archita78? --Wiki13 19:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]

Xi3248 is Likely an Archita sock -- blocked indef. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archita78 - 3

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]

New uploads of images with low quality on pages mentioned here. Are those 2 accounts socks of Archita78? Note: please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Archita78 for 2 requests done before for this person. --Wiki13 16:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]

Both Likely socks of Archita78. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archita78 - 2

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]

Results

[edit]
  • Romeparis
  • Punrockpunk
  • Hellowiki1994

are all Likely socks of Archita78. All three are blocked indefinitely. There are no other accounts that appear to be related..     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archita78

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]
  • Reason: All three users vote to keep this file over here and have the same poor grammar. There's also a lot of cross-wiki changing of the photo to this particular one via dynamic Telecom Italia IP addresses. See for more information this page on nl.wikipedia created by an user. Many thanks in advance - TBloemink talk 22:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]
As you know, I am still learning the CU job. I blocked the two sockpuppets because they are not permitted, but it is my understanding of this case that Archita78 has done nothing wrong in that persona, so I have not blocked the Archita78 account. Do you disagree with that handling?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Archita78 is the main account, uploaded the low quality image (which I deleted per session yesterday) and replaced the pics cross-wiki by that image. So imo he did something wrong too... See also this file on the Dutch Wikipedia (in English): nl:Gebruiker:Wiki13/Skunk Anansie POV pusher. Trijnsteltalk 15:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. Thank you. Blocked indef, new accounts disabled.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.