Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bruno Bertoldo Jackson

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bruno Bertoldo Jackson}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Bruno Bertoldo Jackson

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: Christian Chávez Fan (talk · contribs) is a Bruno Bertoldo Jackson (talk · contribs)'s proven socket puppet. They were both active on Pt.WP until they were indef. blocked for sock puppetery. Here, on Commons, both accounts are, still, active and uploading copyvio images.SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 06:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any uploads that are not already deleted, and the users appear inactive since the final warning. Which kind of result could a positive check have? --Krd 06:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Krd My intention was to ask a block (as they are proven socks and vandals) per DUCK. We did the check at the Pt.WP. But I asked how to proceed on COM:AN/U and they told be to open a case here.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 07:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined - Per comments above. 1) Per COM:RFCU: "This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges." (underline added) This is not an administrator noticeboard and not the venue to request blocks (blocks do not require CU privileges); 2) note that {{Duck}} is under the "request declined" header, as "Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases" and 3) the relationship has already been confirmed at pt.wiki; there would be no benefit from a redundant Commons CU. Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
    above, in a new section.