Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Danesman1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Danesman1
[edit]- Danesman1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Pollycat (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale
[edit]- Reason: After creating his user page with a "Hello" message, went directly to the QIC page to promote within 1 hour 12 pictures of the user Danesman1 (also rejected one of Danesman1 and approved another one from a third user), which didn't deserve that status (me and JDP90 moved them to the CR section). It took me years to find the QIC page. Hard to PGF Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Results
[edit]Likely These three accounts appear to be the same person and have made interlocking and mutually supportive edits:
- User:Danesman -- oldest account, not blocked
- User:Danesman1 --
blocked - User:Pollycat --
blocked
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Turns out to be not quite as described above, see my unblock at User talk:Danesman1. Danesman and Danesman1 are the same person, the latter created by misunderstanding. Pollycat is a friend of Danesman who edits using his computer. I am going to unblock her and suggest that she avoid the appearance of meatpuppetry. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- How did you come to the conclusion that we are dealing with 2 different persons? Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.