Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lucifer2000
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Lucifer2000
[edit]- Lucifer2000 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Carachos (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Elector Factor (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Escéptico Antisectas (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Godhi (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- RenovadorCR (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Romalva (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Rosaura García SGI Budismo CR (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Spockdg (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- TV Guy (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: All the accounts above have already been locked at Meta (meta:Steward_requests/Global/2021-08#Global_lock_for_Lucifer2000), or in Spanish Wikipedia (es:Categoría:Wikipedia:Títeres bloqueados de Lucifer2000, es:Usuario:TV Guy), as sockpuppets of a single user, this is a request to complete the categorization in Commons as Category:Sockpuppets of Lucifer2000 lacks many of the known sockpuppets in the other sister projects. Roqz (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Declined - CU findings for SUL accounts are valid across projects, so no (redundant) check is necessary to categorise accounts (note also that all but two accounts above would be Stale anyway.) Further, as all accounts are globally blocked, there is no articulated disruption that would be prevented by a new check. Эlcobbola talk 15:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Got it, I will add the template to the accounts, I thought that only checkusers could do that and didn't want to overstep. I filed a similar SPI at enwiki, I will withdraw it then. Thanks for the detailed explanation! :) Roqz (talk) 00:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
- Got it, I will add the template to the accounts, I thought that only checkusers could do that and didn't want to overstep. I filed a similar SPI at enwiki, I will withdraw it then. Thanks for the detailed explanation! :) Roqz (talk) 00:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Dereck Camacho
[edit]- Dereck Camacho (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Mahendra Sidh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Mahendra Sidh is re-uploading those files which were uploaded by Dereck Camacho earlier. ✓Jæ✓ 13:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Confirmed, as well as Rosaura García SGI Budismo CR (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ). Socks blocked. --Krd 08:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.