User talk:Ary29
Grace Kelly
[edit]Hi, you have uploaded images of Grace Kelly. I was trying to find these images at the Library and Archives Canada without luck. Do you have any ID numbers or similar that would make it easier to identify these images? Thuresson 20:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your help. I found several celebrity photos at the Library and Archives Canada, Elizabeth II, de Gaulle and others, but most of them were a bit too small to bee useful for Commons. Thuresson 09:57, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
PC-van Vechten
[edit]If you could cast an eye on Image:Lotte Lenya.jpg and see if I handled that template the way it is supposed to, it would be great. // Habj 19:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Ciao Ary
[edit]E' proprio quello che intendevo evitare; avere foto messe a casaccio sotto una categoria. Se ti fai un giro sulle città italiane, puoi vedere che stiamo seguendo questo standard: categorie contengono solo categorie e pagine, pagine contengono foto. So che altri fanno altrimenti, ma in questo modo siamo riusciti a categorizzare un monte di foto, a dargli un senso comune, a dare qualche info in più senza dover necessariamente scaricare la foto (considera che spesso o i nomi delle foto non dicono niente o sono illegibili), a correggere delle indicazioni errate, a linkare tutte le pagine alla wiki italiana; anche la soluzione di avere sotto una categoria sia foto che pagine è poco furba, perchè per navigare tra le categorie spesso si è costretti ad aspettare il download di centinaia di foto, e poi non ha senso avere categorizzata una foto sotto una pagina appartenente alla cat e averla anche come foto sotto la stessa cat. In genere iniziamo con una pagina, poi se per una città si riescono a creare almeno due pagine creaimo la relativa cat. Così abbiamo fatto per torino e per le altre città. Quindi io preferirei ritornare ad avere solo la pagina, in alternativa vedi se ti sta bene come le ho messe ora. --Mac9 14:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Per quello che ho visto da un anno a questa parte, quando si crea un categoria, spesso le foto sono buttate a caso. Quando ci sono delle pagine tematiche c'è più collaborazione e le foto sono inserite nelle categorie. Considera che il redirect ha una sua funzionalità, comunque su questo punto non mi sento di insistere oltre. Quello su cui insisto è di evitare di avere sotto una cat. le foto che già compaiono su di una pagina e questo perchè:
- è inutile
- si spreca tempo ( e soldi ) aspettando il download quando si vuole solo andare a cercare una cat.
- la fot è già categorizzata in quanto sta in una pagina categorizzata; nulla vieta di avere le foto su più pagine.
Hai visto in giro come sono organizzate le città? ciao, --Mac9 15:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- scusa non sapevo del progetto; come ho messo le cat non va bene per te? ciao--Mac9 15:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- in ogni caso prima di togliere le cat da una foto, prima la inserisco in una pagina, proprio per non far sparire niente. --Mac9 15:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- forse ho lisciato una foto; se tu pensi sia meglio avere la foto 2 volte (sulla pagina e sulla cat) ok, vai avanti, se però non ti dispiace vorrei linkare a torino la pagina (ci penso io a creare la pagina con tutteeeeee le vostre fote) e non la categoria; ti va bene?--Mac9 15:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Ne aggiungo una sul Politecnico e ho finito. --Iron Bishop 15:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Your story about Image:Itwiki Oval Lingotto.jpg
[edit]I read what you wrote on COM:DEL. I can't believe they would do that!!!! That's outrageous. pfctdayelise (translate?) 04:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Libraries and Archives Canada
[edit]Hi there,
I noticed you uploaded a photo of Grace Kelly from the National Archives of Canada website. I've been attempting to keep track of which images are from there using Category:Images from Libraries and Archives Canada. I would appreciate it if you could add that category to any future pictures originating from that site. Its probably a dumb idea but I've just become rather frustrated with uncategorized images in the commons. thanks Dowew 21:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Bologna
[edit]Ary, volvo avvertirti che ho spostato le foto dei panorami di bologna, nella pagina "Panorami di Bologna" nella categoria di bologna. Spero che la cosa non ti di dispiaccia. Ciao --mac 15:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Deletion request
[edit]Image deletion warning | Image:Vigeland stampvoetend jochie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Van Vechten collection
[edit]There is a deletion request for all pictures from the Van Vechten collection. Maybe you would like to commont on that. --Fb78 09:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 08:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Michael Uhrmann.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Uhrmann.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wyglif 20:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Territorio Wikipedista
[edit]Ya la recuperé. Por favor añadile la información correcta sobre el origen y licencia a la brevedad. Saludos. Barcex 14:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Joerg_Ritzerfeld_2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Mormegil 12:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Library and Archives Canada non-public domain images
[edit]You have uploaded one or more images from Library and Archives Canada which is tagged as "copyrighted free use". Since Library and Archives Canada has made it clear they have not granted permission for free use of its photo catalogue, I have nominated all non-public domain images for deletion. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images. Thanks - some day, when your image(s) enter(s) the public domain, it can return to Commons! --Padraic 15:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Lennon_Ono_Trudeau_1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Jack_Lemmon_1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
File:Thelonious_Monk_1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sir Anon (talk) 22:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Norman_Bethune_Spanish_civil_war_1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
7 (talk) 02:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Martha_Graham_Bertram_Ross_1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
shizhao (talk) 19:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Mackenzie Scott 1948.jpg
- File:Barbara Ann Scott portrait 1946.jpg
- File:Barbara Ann Scott studing leap 1948.jpg
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
File:New York Americans 1929.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Interwiki
[edit]You removed interwikis from Category:Davenport, Florida, but as far as I can see these are mostly not in wikidata: only Italian is now showing up. - Jmabel ! talk 17:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016
[edit]Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste |
Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Yousuf-Karsh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ 23:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Modern Pentathlon 2004 Olympics.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Brady Canfield skeleton start.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Stepro (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
--PascalHD (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |