User talk:Braveheart

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Image Tagging Image:BC_Ferries_Queen_of_New_Westminster.JPG

[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BC_Ferries_Queen_of_New_Westminster.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 08:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich

[edit]
... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an info@wikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über verein@wikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest

[edit]

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suche den Standpunkt des Fotografen

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, bei Aufnahmen wie dieser oder dieser wäre es ein Gewinn, den Standort des Fotografen zu erfahren, entweder über Koordinaten, oder durch Beschreibung. Bei den beiden Bildern würde ich auf den Wasserturm tippen? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Da hast du ganz richtig geraten :-) Werd das in der Beschreibung ergänzen. LG, Braveheart (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016

[edit]

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Niederfelder Kapelle …

[edit]

… ist in Berndorf. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grad bemerkt, danke :-) Ist die Verschiebe-Berechtigung eine Adminfunktion oder bekommt man das anderweitig? Braveheart (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
filemover Help:RenameLink#How_to_become_a_filemover, kein admin --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thnx! Braveheart (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ortskapelle Matzlewald

[edit]

Hi, mE waren auf Category:Ortskapelle Matzlewald, Wenns auch zwei Bilder von Category:Ortskapelle Greith, Wenns zu sehen. Habe mal verschoben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, vielen Dank! Hab die Bilder im falschen Unterverzeichnis schubladisiert. Sorry! Braveheart (talk) 09:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

[edit]
... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 17:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienerberg City, Ansicht vom Wasserturm Favoriten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hilfe für WLE-Kampagnen

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, du kannst doch Seiten wie Campaign:wle-de-by bearbeiten, oder? Wenn ja, kannst du bitte in Category:Wiki Loves Earth in Germany upload campaigns bei allen 16 Bundeslandseiten die Jahresangaben aktualiseren? (je 2 x pro Seite 2015 zu 2016 ändern) Holger1959 (talk) 03:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Holger! Ja, kann ich machen - die Rechte zu bekommen sollte aber auch nicht allzu schwer sein, wenn ich dafür ein Maßstab bin ;-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Holger1959: - ich hab jetzt alle Kampagnen umgestellt, bitte kurz überprüfen und vielleicht ein oder zwei Probe-Uploads bis zum letzten Schritt vor der Veröffentlichung machen, damit sichergestellt ist, dass das passt. LG, Braveheart (talk) 11:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
super, habe grade eine Testbild damit hochgeladen, 2016 ist drin.
hab jetzt aber noch eine Bitte, hab bei Campaign:wle-ch gesehen, daß da "title": "Wiki Loves Earth Switzerland 2016", drinsteht. Kannst du bei den deutschen Campaigns zB. bei Campaign:wle-de-st "title": "Wiki Loves Earth in Germany: Saxony-Anhalt", einfügen? Also ohne das Jahr, aber mit dem jeweiligen engl. Bundeslandnamen? sieht irgendwie besser aus als nur wle-de-st in der Titelzeile. Holger1959 (talk) 14:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

[edit]

Servus Braveheart,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  Disk    15:06, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Braveheart,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich

[edit]
WLE logo
WLE logo

Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Braveheart,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Gamsberg

[edit]

You tagged File:Blick von der Penkenbahn (1800 - 630 m) in Richtung Tux - panoramio.jpg as Gamsberg. Is there a Gamsberg in Europe also? That category is used mostly for the Gamsberg in Namibia. We may have to make a distinction. JMK (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JMK: Oh, sorry - yes, there are probably several, since "Gams" is one of the the German names for w:Chamois. Since those mountain names aren't that common, I would suggest to delete that category from the picture :-) Best, Braveheart (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Locator-tool has been added to the gadgets

[edit]

You can remove the entry in common.js and enable it in your gadget preferences. – Simon04 (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Braveheart, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Braveheart, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2017 in Austria needing check

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, danke, dreimal danke dafür, aber lt Katbeschreibung arbeitest du gegen mich. Nach Entfernen der Kat scheinen die Dateien ja immer noch unter https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=1213325 auf. Mir wär's lieber, wenn die irgendwie geprüften Bilder in den verschiedenen check-done-Kategorien landen würden (in diesem Fall: Category:Media from WikiDaheim in Austria check done). Damit erwischen wir auch die, die sich gar nicht für die Überprüfung angemeldet haben, weil sie auf ganz anderen Wegen hochgeladen worden sind. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: Sorry - ich hab mir eingebildet, dass bei dem erwähnten Bild die "check done"-Kategorie schon drin war. Müdigkeitsfehler meinerseits. LG, Braveheart (talk) 05:33, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FF und Fire station

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, das ist ein Unterschied, den ich auch mit Herzipinki besprochen habe und ich mich um die Feuerwehren kümmere - Fire station istr das Haus und ff ist die Organisation -und ein Auto hat in der Fire staion nix zu suchen, dafür aber der Florian am Haus -- bitte bring nicht wieder alles durcheinander - danke K@rl (talk) 07:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Karl Gruber: Hi Karl! Das System ist mir momentan etwas unverständlich - category:Fire stations in Sitzendorf an der Schmida hat nun beide Bilder doppelt (unter verschiedenen Namen?). Es wäre hilfreich, wenn das für die Kategorisierung leicht nachvollziehbar wäre. D.h. die "Fire brigades" umfassen die Personen plus das Haus, die "Fire stations" nur das Gebäude? LG, Braveheart (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist auch nicht korrekt. Ich habe dazu auch schon Manfred angesprochen, der das ja im Abstand mehrerer Stunden zweimal hochgeladen hat ;-) wodurch das passiert weiß ich nicht, er müsste dazu ja die warnung krigen. - Zum zweiten Fire brigades umfassen Teile der Organisation also Haus, Personen, Fahrzeuge, Einsätze, etc. während fire station nur rein das Haus ist. Dazu kommt, dass ja zahlreiche Gemeinden mehrere Feuerwehrhäuser haben, die alle in der Kategorie Fire stations (der Gemeinde) sind, während die Feuerwehren dann in fire brigades der Gemeinde und im Ort (village) sind.
Ok, alles klar, thnx! Braveheart (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheim@wikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

Wiki Science Competition 2017 in Austria

[edit]

Danke für Deine Teilnahme bei der Wiki Science Competition 2017 in Austria! Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag zu mehr freien Mediendateien zum Thema Wissenschaft geleistet. Die Gewinnerfotos sind nun veröffentlicht. Wir freuen uns weitere Beiträge von Dir auf bei Wikimedia Commons! Liebe Grüße im Namen des Orgateams --Ailura (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leopoldstraße 44, Innsbruck.jpg

[edit]

Deine unfreundliche Anschuldigung[[1]] geht völlig daneben. Werke von Max Spielmann sind noch bis Ende 2054 geschützt. D.h., dieses Foto ist nur deshalb zulässig, weil FoP-Austria hier greift. Genau das signalisiert der Baustein und soll u.a. unnötige Löschanträge von Dritten vermeiden, aber auch Nachnutzer anderer Jurisdiktionen darauf hinweisen, dass sie die Rechtslage in ihren Land prüfen müssen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: - Sorry, aber das versteh ich nicht ganz, denn was soll ein Italiener prüfen, wenn er dieses Foto verwendet, doch nicht das italienische Recht, sondern das österreichische Recht gelt doch und damit ist es freigegeben. K@rl (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WLM in Austria

[edit]

Hi Braveheart, I noticed that the upload campaign for Austria is not according to the standards of the Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest, but is about WikiDaheim. (It is also not preferred to use WLM infrastructure for other contests.) This means that in the current situation, there is no Wiki Loves Monuments participation as the special upload wizard is not having the required infrastructure we need for WLM. Beppo pointed me to you to ask. I think we need to go back to the 2016 version, so that it works again and adds again the WLM templates as before. Romaine (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: What changed from last year? The files are categorised as files for WLM 2018, we can add WLM 2018 to the template if a mention is required, but I don't quite see what's different to last year. Braveheart (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
CCing @Herzi Pinki and AleXXw: . Braveheart (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: What is WLM infrastructure? In that special case. What is the required infrastructure? What is the problem? We have various campaigns, but regarding WLM you could only mean campaign:wlm-at. The only point I could imagine is that we additionally allow cc-zero. We use different templates, but in the end the same categories (at least that is what is intended) best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(after bwc) Hi Braveheart, I might have missed it last year, also as the relationship between WLM and WikiDaheim might have not been that clear to me. The image category of WikiDaheim is added to the WLM category, but that looks weird and it does not clarify the relationship between WLM and WikiDaheim. With Wiki Loves Monuments in every participating country, all files uploaded as part of the photo contest get the WLM template and are categorised in both the national WLM category and the international WLM category. If I look at for example this image: File:Alte & neue Pfarrkirche Admont.jpg, nothing indicates that it has been uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments (no template saying so) nor any categories (normally added by the WLM template). Another thing is the infrastructure. The infrastructure of WLM is vulnerable (as this is how the software is) and for that reason I follow closely all the relevant pages. Any deviation from the basic setup is a risk, as we have learned over the years, as that enlarges the amount of places where it can go wrong. In every upload campaign WLM is running is used to define the start and end time, an highly crucial element. For some reason in the Austrian upload campaign WikiDaheim is running is used, as well as Tdd-at is running. This last template is still set for 2017! Another issue is that in all upload campaigns of WLM the infrastructure is at least available in both the local language(s) as English, for some reason not for WikiDaheim. And these issues I just found at first sight, not even have dugged through the whole setup of WikiDaheim. For the participant in WLM/WikiDaheim it might look the same, but learned from eight years running WLM I have concerns. Romaine (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for elaborating on the points you're concerned about - the problem is that WikiDaheim has a longer running time than WLM, i.e. WLM is only part of the whole contest and handing over the start and end date to a page we can't change ourselves makes the whole thing less manageable for us (therefore the separate template). Changing back to 2016 isn't an alternative, because WLM in Austria isn't a separate entity anymore. Are there any changes we can make to the current setup to make life easier for the international team? Maybe User:Jean-Frédéric or User:Effeietsanders have an opinion on this too. :-)
Good point about the campaign templates not being in English, I'll get to that ASAP. Braveheart (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(after bwc)

(2016 is unsuitable example, as Austria did not participate in 2016, so I compare with 2015)
We can easily do two things:
Both things can be done by template changes and thus also for already existing images. Will this help you?
Regarding the time span of the competition, we have a different interval and last year we had multiple parallel competitions with overlapping but non-identical intervals. See File:WLoves_WMAT_2017_Wettbewerb.svg as an overview of last year's parts of WikiDaheim. So I decided to branch from your central WLM is running-template, as it did not well adopt for multiple parallel contests with different start and end dates, where each image can be part of more than one contest depending on upload date and topic of the image.
In reality we do not have WLM in Austria any more (as a local competition, with jury and prizes), but we deliver the top ranked images from the WikiDaheim competition that show Cultural heritage monuments to the international jury.
May I add some general personal remark: we are stuck in pleasing others. We please our partner BDA by doing a dummy contest, we please the same partner by integrating with their Tag des Denkmals, we please WMAT by collecting as many images as possible (their funding seems to depend on it), we please WLM international by delivering some images, we please individual stakeholders inventing new contest and not caring about, we try to please image uploaders to make it easier for them, we please maybe many more I even do not know about, and if there is something left of empathy in the end we try to please the people doing the final backoffice processing, checking scope, syntax, object identification, categorizing, etc. In the end the number of useful images harvested by WLM is decreasing year by year, we have more and more images of the major POIs, but the WLM competition does not help to fill the gaps. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fünfeckiger Stein Änderung Styria

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart

Ich habe gesehen dass du die Category Monuments and memorials in Styria für die 3 Bilder Fünfeckiger Stein hinzugefügt hast.

Meiner Meinung nach ist der Fünfeckikge Stein in Niederösterreich.

Da ich die Motivation für die Änderung nicht genau weiß und ich auch nicht so viel in wikipedia mache, habe ich mir gedacht ich informiere dich 'mal, bevor ich beinhart einfach die Category von Monuments and memorials in Styria auf Monuments and memorials in Lower Austria ändere.

Referenz: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:F%C3%BCnfeckiger_Stein_Ansicht_G%C3%B6sing_und_Strass.jpg&diff=0&oldid=321577236 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.115.63.54 (talk) 17:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, habs korrigiert! Dachte an das falsche Strass... LG, Braveheart (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

[edit]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedächtniskapelle Purzelkampbrücke 2019-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berliner Hütte (DSC00618).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortskapelle Edelprinz 2019-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortskapelle Wiederfeld 2019-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

[edit]

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

[edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside shrine, Sibratsgfäll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luftschutzstollen an der Schloßbergstraße, Bregenz 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Braveheart,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Braveheart,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth in Austria 2020

[edit]

Hi, @Braveheart: !

I've seen today you added Austria to the WLE participating countries list, great news you are in this year! Before your contest starts, please:

1. Add instructions on how to participate and all detailed info about your contest to your website (more info what to include).

2. Add your translations for the banner and upload campaigns templates. It's important to have them ready as soon as possible, so we can activate it on time. Thank you!

I'm project manager for the International WLE this year. Please, contact me if you have any questions or need any support from the international team at anastasiia.petrova@wikimedia.org.ua. Here is our team email as well — wle-team@wikimedia.org.ua. Excited about the start of your contest!

Best, Anastasia (talk)

Hi @AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA): , I've answered via email, hope that's ok :-) Braveheart (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What categories are

[edit]

Guy, you’re gonna revert yourself the vandalism you did here, now. No need to appologize to me for your snide anglocentrism, nor to the community about your smug ignorance. Or don’t, and instead of being goaded into edit-warring and incurring in its penalties, I will bring you to AN/U myself. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tuvalkin: Not sure why you are attacking someone from Austria on Anglocentrism, it just seems that we have differing views on what categories are for. In my opinion they should collect media that depicts a certain topic, not collect them solely based on the name, but you see this differently, and that's ok. Commons is already a pretty toxic community, no need to make it even more hostile. Braveheart (talk) 09:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada is open!

[edit]

Hello! We are happy to announce that Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada is now open. Your participation will help us to document the nature of Canada and show it to the world through Wikipedia and other projects. Please go to the page of the contest to read the rules: wmca:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Home. There you can also find out how to take part in the contest. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us: wmca:Talk:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Home. Thanks,
the organising committee of Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada - 09:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you took part in the contest before

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada débute !

[edit]

Bonjour ! Il nous fait plaisir de vous annoncer que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada est maintenant en cours. Votre participation nous aidera à documenter la nature du Canada et de la montrer au monde à travers Wikipédia et d'autres projets. Veuillez vous rendre sur la page du concours pour lire les règles: wmca:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Accueil. Vous pouvez également y trouver comment participer au concours. Si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter: wmca:Talk:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Accueil. Merci,
le comité d'organisation de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada - 09:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé à la compétition auparavant.

good guy

[edit]

Da du jetzt die Rolle des Good Guy übernommen hast, danke dafür, magst du dich weiter um Anna Saini kümmern? Die Bilder haben die gleichen Mängel wie schon immer, vielleicht kannst du da auch bei der Uploaderin eine Verbesserung erreichen? Auf ihrer Disk gibt es auch ein Vorlagen-/Kategorieproblem, mag mich nicht drum kümmern. Vielleicht triffst du den richtigen Ton. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Braveheart!

[edit]

Beim Wettbewerb Wiki-Daheim ist mir leider ein Missgeschick passiert: Ich dachte, die UTC-Zeit, wie bei Commons üblich, wäre ausschlaggebend. Darf ich ausnahmsweise noch schnell die Wiki-Daheim Tags in die Fotos einfügen? Das wäre super nett! Danke und LG --Tesla - 💬 23:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IntelTesla: Bei drei Monaten kommts auf 40 Minuten nicht an :-) Bitte irgendwo vermerken, dass UTC-Zeit angenommen wurde und auf diese Diskussion verweisen. LG, Braveheart (talk) 07:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
siehe auch, User_talk:Herzi_Pinki#Hallo,, danke fürs Ignorieren der Regeln. Ich hätte dich eh so eingeschätzt. Ich bin raus. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Herzi Pinki, ich hab dir auf deiner Disk geantwortet, ich wollte dich nicht vor den Kopf stoßen. @Braveheart, du hast das ganze doch mit organisiert, oder? Daher habe ich mich dann an dich gewandt. LG --Tesla - 💬 10:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@IntelTesla: Ja. Herzi Pinki hat Recht, dass die Bilder nach Mitternacht zwar am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, aber spätestens in der Jury Probleme bekommen würden. Wenn du die Bilder nach Mitternacht als Teil des Projekts sehen möchtest, ist das aus meiner Sicht kein Problem, aus Sicht der Jury für den Wettbewerb allerdings schon. Sorry, dass das nicht schon vorher kommuniziert wurde. LG, Braveheart (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entsprechend der Kommunikation per Mail werden diese Bilder nun als "not for prejury" markiert. Braveheart (talk) 10:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alles klar, danke dass ihr das nochmal nachgeprüft habt. Dann sind das praktisch WikiDaheim-Bilder ohne Bewertung, damit kann ich auch leben. Schließlich geht es ja primär darum, gute Bilder für Commons zu finden und das Gewinnen ist er zweitrangig ;) Und immer wenn es am Ende auch Geldpreise gibt, kann Unmut entstehen, selbst bei Kleinigkeiten, denn Geld regiert bekanntlich die Welt ;) Sonst mache ich mich mal weiter ans Bewerten der Bilder... --Tesla - 💬 13:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorie-Entfernung

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, du hast hier die Kategorie "Nockberge" entfernt, obwohl die Hütte sich sehr wohl in den Nockbergen befindet. Zumindest laut österr. Alpenverein, siehe: [2]. Folge ist, dass sie jetzt keinem Berg bzw. Gebirge mehr zugeordnet ist. Gruß Bwag (talk) 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bwag: Soll ich stattdessen eine Kategorie zur Hütte anlegen? Gibt immerhin schon zwei Bilder, dort kann man dann auch die Nockberge unterbringen. Braveheart (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Warum fragst du, wenn du meine Antwort eh gar nicht abwartest? Bwag (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bwag: Weil ichs nimmer erwarten konnte ;-) Passt das aus deiner Sicht jetzt oder gäbe es noch was anzupassen? Braveheart (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Passt schon. Ich frage mich nur, warum jetzt nach einen Tag noch immer nicht die Data-Infobox angezeigt wird. Gruß Bwag (talk) 17:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Glaub das ist ein Problem mit dem Cache, oder irgendwas mag da im Backend net so ganz ;-) Braveheart (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Braveheart,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Tolles Anfangstempo, chapeau!

[edit]

am Beispiel von File:Pfarrkirche Semmering in winter.jpg lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

schade dass wir unsere Zeit mit Datumskategorien vertrödeln, könnte längst vollautomatisch gehen, über SD gehen, ... es ist traurig. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Herzi Pinki: Gern :-p Ich frag mich nur grad wieso ich bei der allgemeinen Wikidaheim-Kampagne keine Vorlage eingebunden bekommen habe... und ja, die Monats-Kategorie ist eigentlich überflüssig, weil theoretisch automatisch darstellbar, aber ich fand das Bild eigentlich sehr interessant für den Monat Februar in NÖ :-) Mehr sinnfrei find ich eigentlich, das Baujahr einer Kirche auf Commons eintragen zu müssen, wenns schon auf Wikidata eingebunden ist... Braveheart (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Musst ja eh nicht das Baujahr eintragen. Nur bei der Kategorie und da ist es meistens schon da. Alternative:
  • Antrag bei {{Wikidata Infobox}}
  • Pflege der Baudaten in Wikidata / Ergänzen der Commonscats
  • danach löschen des Datums aus den Commonscategorien.
lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Zumindest der erste Schritt ist gesetzt :-) Braveheart (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template Wikidaheim

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, nur eine Frage, wie ist das wenn man in der Vorlage mehrere Topics einsetzen will - also Burgenland und Natural heritage? Ist dann die Vorlage mehrmals einzutragen oder topic=x,y --danke -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 10:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Karl Gruber: Seh ich jetzt erst, dass das auf einmal ein eigenes Thema ist - d.h. wenn du beide Themen drinnen haben möchtest, brauchst du zwei Vorlagen :-/ bin mir nicht sicher wieso das Burgenland auf einmal ein eigenes Thema ist, @Raimund Liebert (WMAT): , das wird auch nirgendswo auf WikiDaheim als Vorlage gesetzt? Besser wärs, das nur als eigene Kategorie zu haben, die überall mit eingetragen wird. LG, Braveheart (talk) 11:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Das Burgenland war jetzt ein Beispiel, könnte ja auch Denkmalschutz und öffentliche Einrichtung sein, wie denkmalgeschützte Schule oder Bilderwunsch und Natur? ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 11:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Karl Gruber: Momentan gibts eine Rangfolge auf der Website, z.B. Denkmalschutz sticht Gemeingüter aus, Natur sticht Bilderwünsche aus (Naturschutz basiert immer auf WP-Listen momentan), Gemeingüter sticht Wikidata aus. Das Problem am "Thema" Burgenland ist, ist, dass es kein Thema ist, sondern eine geographische Abgrenzung, mit potentiell allen anderen Themen kombinierbar. Sollte es tatsächlich zwei Themengebiete betreffen, brauchts immer zwei eingebundene Vorlagen - oder man fügt die entsprechende WikiDaheim-Subkategorie ein. Braveheart (talk) 11:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
okay, danke, dann werde ich das mit der zusätzlcihen Cat machen. lg -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nur funkts net ganz, denn ich habe bei allen Unspecified eingesetzt und es erscheinen alle unter Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2021 in Austria/Missing or unknown topic ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Karl Gruber: "topic=" hat gefehlt :-) Braveheart (talk) 12:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
eh klar, wenn man deppat ist, dann bleibt man es :-) - danke -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Karl Gruber: Solche Fehler passieren mir ständig, gibts einen Club? :-) Braveheart (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fürchte da wären wir Gründungsmitglieder :-) ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 14:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shigeo Nagashima plaque, Tokyo Dome.jpg

[edit]
File:Shigeo Nagashima plaque, Tokyo Dome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tanken in Zeiten der Klimakrise

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, danke für dein immer wiederkommendes Bedanken. Für etwas was ich nicht für dich mache. In welcher Rolle bedankst du dich da? So ganz allgemein dazu. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: Als Kollege, der auch die Check-Kategorien bestmöglich abarbeitet :-) Mach ich z.B. bei Karl und Maclemo auch öfters. LG, Braveheart (talk) 12:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

[edit]

Quest’anno partecipi al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments?

Da domani sarà possibile caricare di nuovo le foto, fino al 30 settembre!

Come ogni anno, e questo è il decimo anniversario, torna Wiki Loves Monuments, il concorso fotografico più grande al mondo che negli anni ha coinvolto quasi 50 nazioni e più di 15.000 persone e hanno prodotto un database di oltre 360.000 immagini di monumenti, patrimonio culturale dell’umanità intera a disposizione di tutti su Wikimedia Commons.

Con la tua partecipazione hai sostenuto lo sviluppo turistico del nostro Paese perché rende disponibili a tutti le sue bellezze. L’obiettivo è la valorizzazione dell’immenso patrimonio culturale italiano sul web. Le fotografie dei monumenti vengono condivise su Wikimedia Commons, il grande database di immagini di Wikipedia, con licenza libera CC-BY-SA. Wiki Loves Monuments contribuisce infatti a diffondere la filosofia di Wikimedia Italia e di tutti i progetti wiki, che si basano sulla libera condivisione della cultura.

L’Italia nelle sue prime 9 edizioni (dal 2012 al 2020) conta 145.000 immagini 15.000 monumenti, 2.000 fotografi, 2.000 enti. Uno dei 2.000 fotografi sei tu e quindi anche quest’anno non puoi mancare, partecipa!!!

Ti aspettiamo. Questo messaggio ti è stato consegnato perché hai partecipato al concorso italiano nel 2020

Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not for prejury

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, warum machst du das [3], noch dazu ohne Begründung. Hast du keine Angst, da Mitarbeiter*innen zu vergraulen? Diesmal hat der Benutzer ja eine e-mail Adresse und die Größe des Bildes ist 1.536 × 2.048 (= 3145728 > 2 Megapixel). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fragen von einem kompletten Neuling

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, danke für die Ergänzungen bei meinen bisher fünf hochgeladenen Fotos.

Ich würde gerne noch weitere Fotos hochladen, bin mir aber noch nicht sicher, ob alles so in Ordnung ist, wie ich es bis jetzt gemacht habe.

  • ) Zuordnung zu den entsprechenden Kategorien: gibt es eine Liste mit vorhandenen Kategorien? Schreibt man sie exakt ab oder gibt es Vorlagen oder wie immer man das nennt?
  • ) wie stelle ich fest, ob sie für den Wettbewerb markiert sind. Beim Hochladen der fünf Fotos in WikiDaheim erfolgte nur einmal die Abfrage, ob das Foto teilnehmen soll.

Danke im Voraus für Deine Unterstützung. --Heimfoto (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Heimfoto: Hallo! Die Kategorie-Zuordnung hat schon so gepasst :-) Es braucht etwas Erfahrung, um die jeweiligen zusätzlichen Kategorien zu kennen, und sie sind leider nur auf Englisch verfügbar. Eine Vorlage gibt es nicht, aber du kannst in deinen Einstellungen unter "Helferlein/Kategoriehelferlein" HotCat aktivieren, mit dem du direkt auf der Seite Kategorien hinzufügen kannst. Dort gibts dann auch Eingabehilfen, z.B. wenn du "Aerial photographs of" eingibst, wird dir eine Liste aller Gebiete angezeigt, für die diese Kategorie existiert.
Alle Bilder nehmen generell im Wettbewerb teil, es sei denn sie sind in der Kategorie Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2021 in Austria not for prejury enthalten. Deine bisherigen Bilder waren schon sehr interessant! :-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 15:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gemeindeamt Seeham

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, die von einem Benutzer angelegte Kategorie zum Gemeindeamt in Seeham hat dasselbe Objekt zum Inhalt wie das denkmalgeshcützte Objekt Category:Schmiedbauerngut Seeham. Da ich mich mit wikidata nicht auskenne, weiß ich nicht, wie man das zusammenführen sollte. Kannst du das machen oder in die Wege leiten? Danke. lg --Eweht (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eweht: Ich hab die beiden Items auf Wikidata zusammengeführt und auch die Kategorie auf Commons entleert und einen Redirect draus gemacht. Hoffe das passt jetzt so :-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 09:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ich danke. Gruß Eweht (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos im RAT

[edit]

Hallo Braveheart, kannst du bitte auch meine Bitte unter Commons talk:Tracking external file usage unterstützen, kommen doch viele Fotos aus Wikidaheim im RegiowikiAT vor. danke und lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 08:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Braveheart,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Throne of Cards IV, April 2017 16.jpg

[edit]
File:Throne of Cards IV, April 2017 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 01:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Braveheart&oldid=877411950"