User talk:Breeze
re; oil price chart; I made it myself Paulrevere2005 02:43, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Good work, and I agree with your opinion. Thank you for it! Kisses, viavia
Hello, Good work, and I agree with your opinion. Thank you for it! Kisses, viavia
Why do you deleted this flag?
It belongs to a complete serie of flag. You can read about it at http://commons.wikimediaorg/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests&oldid=39416#Flag_images_by_user:Marc_Mongenet
I have using these flags at es: wikipedia (See e.g. es:Banderas nacionales)
Restore it if possible.
Saludos. --Sanbec 10:35, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The delete-tag was since yesterday evening in this image, because there was a bigger version Image:Austria flag 300.png. I deleted it at 10:25 and you start with your action at 10:35, so I can't see that. I can't restore it. Sorry —Breezie 10:45, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I have restored the image yet. :-) --Sanbec 11:08, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
P.D. you must answer in my discussion page; if you answer here, I dont see the message: You have new messages.
Coat of Arms and Flags of Mecklenburg and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
[edit]Hallo!
I don't know, what can I think about your intelligence! How do you want to explain, that "Image:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (coat of arms).jpg" is ok, but "Image:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (lesser Coat of Arms).jpg" isn't ok! If you can't it, the second file is a derivation of the small Coat of Arms from the first file! And "Image:Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Great Coat of Arms).gif" is more accurate version of the great Coat of Arms of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania! So it's legal, because it's official!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's also interesting that "Image:Saxony-Anhalt (Flag 1947-1952).gif" is ok, but "Image:Mecklenburg (flag).gif" isn't! Both are historical flags! And how do you want to explain, that "Image:Flag de-mecklenburg vorpommern civil 300px.png" is ok, but "Image:Flag de-mecklenburg vorpommern service 300px.png" isn't ok?! Both are official flags so their using is legal! See https://www.fotw.info/flags/de-mv.html
Oj danke für die Nachricht, hätte ich sonst garnicht mitbekommen. Habe auf den Löschkanidaten was dazu geschrieben. -guety 21:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hi Breeze - Paddy meinte, diese Liste könnte dich interessieren. Wäre toll wenn du helfen könntest! Danke -- Duesentrieb 11:52, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Jo, schaut gut aus. Ich hab nächste Woche aber keine Zeit mehr, ich werd es mir ein anderes Mal anschauen. danke —Breezie 11:59, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hallo nochmal - danke dass du dich am aufräumen beteiligst. Leider hat der Dopplungsbug wieder zugeschlagen, ich versuche gerade das zu reparieren. Bitte hab' beim bearbeiten ein Auge darauf - danke! -- Duesentrieb 15:27, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hallo Breeze, ich verstehe Deutsch ziemlich gut, but sometimes it's not quite clear to me. The above image comes with the following condition, is it equivalent with a "free license"?
Die Bilder in digitaler Form können weltweit in allen Medien eingesetzt werden, sofern sie Publikationen über die Schwäbische Alb oder verwandte touristische Themen betreffen, in denen die Schwäbische Alb Bestandteil ist und genannt wird. Die Bilder sollen zur Förderung bzw. Unterstützung des Tourismus der Landschaft Schwäbische Alb eingesetzt werden.
Regards, Thuresson 02:02, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hi Thuresson, I think it's no problem for us and we can use it. We must only write the words "Schwäbische Alb" in there and use the image in an article that have something to do with the "Schwäbische Alb" (for example touristic things). I think it's just public domain with restrictions.
- By the way, there is also an English Version (http://www.schwaebischealb.de/english/index_e.htm)
- The digital pictures can be used worldwide, provided that they concern publications about the Swabian Alb or treat similar touristic topics regarding the Swabian Alb, and in which the Swabian Alb is mentioned. The pictures should be used to enhance and support the tourism in the landscape of Swabian Alb. schöne grüsse -- Breezie 12:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Deletation
[edit]OH, sorry, it's because te extension: they're in Capital letters (*.PNG) instead in *.png. I've also end uploading *.png images. Could you please turn all them or delete them? I'm very busy in es:. Thanks. --Guillermo Romero [@] 18:25, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, I will delete it. regards -- Breezie 18:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
Magnus-carlsen.gif
[edit]What is your basis for putting in a deletion request on this image? I generated it myself! Chess games are NOT copyrighted. --Malathion 15:58, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
- There was no licence. -- Breezie 18:13, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Image:Andrzej z Helu.JPG
[edit]At May 5th you put a request for deletion of Image:Andrzej z Helu.JPG among other files. This is was a personal image of a user at pl: . He asked me to learn what was the cause of removal, if it is possible to get it back and what is needed for it to stay if it is restored or re-uploaded. Could you please answer those questions? Matusz 15:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- We can't restore it, but he can re-upload it, if he give a licence. (see: Commons:Copyright tags)
- thanks. Matusz 19:27, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
wrong name
[edit]These pictures are not of diamond structures but of fcc (face-centered cubic) structures.--TD 16:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
India flag
[edit]Hi! I had put up Image:India flag 300.png for deletion as it had the wrong colours and we have better India flags. I hadn't followed up its developments till today. I noticed you removed the delete tag. Was there any problem with the deletion? Nichalp June 27, 2005 18:58 (UTC)
- Hi Nichalp, you can see all reasons here: Commons:Deletion_requests/Archives04#Image:India_flag_300.png. The most important are:
- why is it the wrong colour?/where do you know it from?
- the image is in too much articles (see the check usage)
- there was just one person for deletion (and one if you change the links in the articles)
- Please load up the correct one as Image:India flag 300.png and give us a short reason why the colour is wrong. -- Breezie June 28, 2005 16:41 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I'll upload the correct image over the old. you may compare the two images: ,
Seville girls
[edit]Hi I am Dubaduba. I uploaded some images but one of the girls asked me kindly not to upload images of her so I marked them for deleting. Please remove them.
% pages
[edit]I have explained at Template:Deletion requests#% articles of User:SPUI. If you had asked me for their purpose before listing them for deletion, you would have saved some time. --SPUI 18:22, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete images
[edit]Hi Breeze, because I have the news fotos and your loking Images Siedlce --Janusz J. 17:23, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
German coins
[edit]I have several German coins (1922, 1941-1943, 1950, DDR). Are coins images copyrighted in Germany? Or I could claim them as PD? Which tag I should add for Nazi coins images due Nazi symbols? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 16:54, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- I think they are, but I'm not sure. All images with Nazi symbols should be tagged with {{Nazi symbol}}. Sorry that I'm not able to give you a better answer.-- Breezie 17:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
I just have seen that my image Image:Flag_de-mecklenburg_vorpommern_service_300px.png had been deleted, without even contacting me. This is not correct, as the rules for deletion requests state that one has to "Notify the uploader on their talk page" --Mevsfotw 20:30, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hi Mevsfotw, this was correct, when I made it: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests&diff=130802&oldid=130753 (there was nothing about "Notify the uploader on their talk page"). But I think it's better now with the template (and I use it also). -- Breezie 17:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Bilder aus Category:Z
[edit]Du hast teilweise die falschen Duplikate gelöscht. Ich hatte mir etwas dabei gedacht, den Schnelllöscheintrag jeweils dort einzutragen:
Die Bildverweise im deutschen Wikipedia-Artikel habe ich auch schon (wieder) angepasst.
Zum URV-Vorwurf äußere ich mich auf meiner Diskussionsseite. --Eldred 12:46, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, die Rechte an den Plan-Bildern zum Neubau der Gelehrtenschule des Johanneums
- hält nicht das Johanneum, sondern das Architekturbüro. Danke für den Anstoß.
- Die Bilder werden aber schon bei meiner Quelle in einem Zusammenhang gebraucht, wo das Architekturbüro nicht einmal genannt wird: [1] Und bei Fotos bestehender Gebäude muss ja auch nicht der Architekt genannt werden. - Kann man daraus nicht irgendwie ein Bleiberecht der beiden Fotos hier ableiten? :) --Eldred 17:44, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- Ich denke nicht. Am besten wäre es einfach, wenn du in einer kurzen Mail das Architekturbüro fragen könntest. Schöne Grüsse -- Breezie 18:02, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Den Kommentar beim Löschen von Sued hättest du dir sparen können. Ich habe auch keine Absage, sondern einfach gar keine (abschließende) Antwort bekommen, und möchte die Bilder solange raushaben. Bitte entferne auch:
- Image:Johanneum Hamburg - Neubau 2005 Plan Ansicht West.jpg
- Image:Sacrifice game fanart drawing - Charnel and Stratos beer.jpg
--Eldred 13:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ich hab die beiden auch noch gelöscht. Das mit dem Kommentar bitte nicht so ernst nehmen, ist mir einfach so rausgerutscht. Sorry und schöne Grüsse -- Breezie 18:28, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! Ich war etwas angespannt, die "Schnell"löschanträge nach zwei Tagen auch wirklich gelöscht zu kriegen. Nächstes Mal nehme ich es weniger ernst. --Eldred 09:14, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
tartans
[edit]I saw you have put the tartans on the on the delete list. The website said that those images are in the public domain.
http://www.celticdistrict.com/CeltDance.shtml.
I'd like you to put the images of the delete list.
MacTartan 23:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- The tartans are, but the drawings? Feel free to remove the deletion tag and add a license tag. -- Breezie 17:40, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Apidae
[edit]Hi, Breeze. Please remember that article-to-category redirects do not currently work, and are not recommended. I can get you the meta: reference if you'd like. Best, Taragüí @ 20:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Could you identify the specific or general location this flag was found? ¦ Reisio 21:10, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
I know this is a little late, but what was it redundant to? Image:WikinewsSkin-1024.png was an older version of it. see also Wikinews:Wikinews:Custom skin Bawolff 23:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Ventspils.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
(fixed your deltion request) --Deadstar 10:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Dein Bild
[edit]Hallo Breeze. Ich nehme an, du bist Schweizer? Gut, dann erlaube ich mir folgende Frage: Empfindest du Sympathien für die Schweizerische Volkspartei? Wenn nicht, schau dir mal die Webseite der SVP Sarganserland an. Die verwenden dein Bild angabefrei vom Schloss Sargans... obschon es unter der GNU Lizenz für freie Dokumentation lizenziert ist. --dvdb 06:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)