User talk:Ceranthor
Welcome, to my talk page |
A bird doesn't sing because it has an answer, it sings because it has a song. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please add new topics to the bottom of the list, and sign your entry by using four tildes. ~~~~ Click to start a new talk topic.Thanks!
|
Nice to see you
[edit]Nice to see you here (just realised who you were). Why the different name btw? I liked your other one better. Good to see you intend to become more active here. Best wishes, How do you turn this on (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the Christmas review!
[edit]Hi Ceranthor. I would like to thank you for the interest you have shown in my request for adminship, and for the time you have taken to review my profile. As a Christmas present I've just been given the admin tools, for which I'm thankful as well. I have understood all the remarks that have been made during the review period. I will take them into account and begin using the tools with much care, until I gain more experience and self-confidence. Thanks again, and Merry Christmas! --Eusebius (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
RfA Thanks
[edit]Thank you for supporting me in my RfA which just closed as successful. I really appreciate the trust that the Commons community has placed in me and look forward to expanding my contributions to Commons. Thanks again. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Flickr application request
[edit]Hello Ceranthor, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) PeterSymonds (talk) 23:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Always glad to help. Thanks, Peter! Ceranthor 00:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Geminids in georgia jimmy westlake.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Please see note by alleged author against image requesting that permission be sought. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:27, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, then why was it being used on a NASA website? I've no problem if the file's deleted, though. Thanks for the notification. Ceranthor 20:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Mount st helens crater.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Inactive Image-reviewers
[edit]Hello Ceranthor, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed you from this group per this discussion. When you return to editing, you can apply again at the relevant page. Thank you for your contributions to Commons. Green Giant (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)