User talk:Derbeth

Please use Latin family name for plants categorization instead generic Category:Plants. See Linnaea borealis for example. --EugeneZelenko 03:26, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm not biologist too :-). If plant article contains something after word family (I assume somebody with biology background wrote this) use it as name for category. Again see Linnaea borealis as example. --EugeneZelenko 14:56, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Logo 200000.png

Hi, you added "redundant" template on my picture. It's not redundant, the SVG can't handle the font properly hence the PNG version. The SVG is just provided as a second picture if someone wants to modify it, but for display purpose, the SVG engine is still missing important features. Dake 15:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

oh I guess you have seen my advertising on the talk of the main page of polish Wikipedia :) Dake 15:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

British English pronunciation

Hi. Firstly, thanks for giving me my first commons talk message: it was lovely to see the orange bar. Secondly, well, I don't think I can bring myself to go through that whole category and sort it. I'll certainly do so from now on with new pronunciations, but the old ones, it seems like a lot of hard work for little gain.

As to my contribution to the Polish Wikibooks, no problem whatsoever. I was at a loose end, wondering what to do, so I found that Wikibook (don't ask me how - it's a long story). Anyway, I rambling. Sorry and thanks, —Celestianpower ^háblame 10:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, all images with my template (User:Celestianpower/audio) have been changed. Since it was only implemented recently, most are still as they were. Sorry. —Celestianpower ^háblame 11:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:G.W. Bailey, David Graf, Lance Kinsey.jpg

Hello, I have removed the delete notice on this image because it is not a film screenshot. If you had completed the deletion request I would have simply commented on it... but since you did not, I simply removed the delete tag. Please see the uploaders other uploads and his talk page. Also, the uploader's claims are consistent with his commentary on the Sweedish wikipedia. If you still have concerns, feel free to let me know... or bring them up on the village pump... but at this point I do not see a need to put deletion notices on single images. In any case, thanks for checking uploads! --Gmaxwell 00:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

newimages

Jasne kein problem - ja prawie codziennie oglądam cały upload :)

Pozdrawiam --WarX 08:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Noo +czasem fajne wektorki z jakimiś schematami idą - praktycznie bez szans na znalezienei inaczej niż oglądanie artykułów na obcych wikipediach ... Może zrobić gdzieś (pl.wiki?) stronę, na której będziemy linkować fajne grafiki do dalszego wykorzystania ?

Pozdrawiam --WarX 19:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Joe Strummer Exeter Festival.jpg

Ok, probably i don't understand the usage and the specifications of creative commons licence. This was my second upload...Excuse me for my english. --Giannib 23:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Znaczki pocztowe

Z dyskusji tutaj: [[1]] wynika, że nie ma problemu. --Hiuppo 08:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

A nie prościej zwrócić się do poczty polskiej i zapytać ich o zdanie? Rzecznik PP jest młodym człowiekiem lat 34. Co proponujesz? --Hiuppo 08:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

A czy ktoś z administracji Wikipedii nie może wysłać mejla do PP? Pytanie zabrzmi oficjalniej, jeśli zada je ktoś z ADM, a z decyzją o kasowaniu wstrzymać się jeszcze trochę? PP hostuje np taki serwis: [2], z którego z tego co wiem na Wikipedii jest trochę zdjęć. --Hiuppo 08:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:TaputapuateaMarae04.jpg

Licensing of this photo says you are the author and licence this photo under GFDL and Creative Commons licenses. Flickr page says author of this photo is borealis63 and it has all rights reserved. How can you explain this? --Derbeth ^talk 08:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

I sought and obtained the permission of Borealis63 to use photos of Taputapuātea marae. Here is the email (Flickr mail, I use the same account name Kahuroa there.

Flickr Email from Borealis63 to Kahuroa, 17 Sep '06, 9.40pm PDT: From: borealis63 Subject: Re: Little Man at Taputapuatea Dear Kahuroa,

My husband, Matthew, actually took this photo but I'm sure he wouldn't mind. New Zealand is close to his heart. Ever since he had the pleasure of visiting your country during the 2000 Olympics and had an amazing time. He hopes to revisit with me, of course!

I've been intrigued by the Polynesian culture, especially how it relates to my own Filipino culture. I felt quite at home in Tahiti. Actually within a couple of days, locals were speaking to me in French or Tahitian. It helped that my tall stature is closer to the Tahitian people than the petite Filipinas.

BTW, I'm going to post a couple more photos from the same marae grounds, which you may use as well, if interested.

Sincerely, Borealis (aka Aurora)

I selected licence type CC2.0 - that is where the self bit came from. What should I have used - I told Borealis I could use a CC licence, but the reply above doesn't actually require that. Kahuroa 04:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message Derbeth. The impression I got was that the copyright holder was happy to release these specific images relating to Taputapuātea marae. However, I can contact them again thru Flickr. If you'd like me to do that, what particular things should I spell out so no doubt remains? Kahuroa 07:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I think it would be better to ask the author one more time about agreement to terms of [3] (in my opinion better than just free use) for images: Image:TaputapuateaMarae03.jpg and Image:TaputapuateaMarae04.jpg. --Derbeth ^talk 07:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

How about Cc-by-sa-2.5 instead? I'd feel better about asking them about that, and I have changed the files accordingly (you can revert if you like) to simplify the process of asking them. How's that?

Kahuroa 08:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

My images from Flickr

HI. Clindberg has pointed out the 'no-commercial' requirement on some of the Flickr photos that I uploaded. This was a genuine error on my part because of my ignorance of the intricacies of the cc licences. I have gone thru my recent uploads and flagged the offending ones for copyvio. I just don't have the time to chase up the copyright holders for permissions for these particular images. I am however, doing my best to improve the email permission status of the Taputapuātea images and a couple of others relating to Mt Te Aroha and Waiorongomai that I got permission for from the copyrightholder. Thanks again for your vigilance. Kahuroa 00:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Golpe Estado Tailandia.jpg

Ok, thanks. I will take into account your advice in the future. --Crisneda2000 14:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Anthurium scheranum and Image:Abrente37.jpg

Hello, When using the { {delete}} template. You must put the reason on Commons:Deletion requests. (See Template:delete for more info.) --Az1568 03:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Category:Tatra Mountains

Przyznaję, że nie bardzo rozumiem o co ci chodzi. Zdjęcia zapisuję w konkretnych artykułach, np. Ornak, Rakoń (wtedy najłatwiej je znależć, ponadto można w Wikipedii tworzyć link do danej galerii zdjęć). Artykułom tym przyporządkowuję kategorię (West Tatra Mountains) w tym przypadku). Proszę o bliższe sprecyzowanie. Ponadto z podkategoriami jezior jest tam trochę namieszane. Selso 09:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Jeszcze tych ostatnich nie zdążyłem, zaraz się to zrobi. Selso 09:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Waxworkmovieposter.jpg

It already clarifies the dispositions of the license.--Yucalpeten 09:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Fotografie kaszy

Dzięki za uwagi, postaram się uwzględnić przy kolejnych zdjęciach (postaram się zrobić jeszcze raz te same obiekty). Niestety sprawy techniczne są dla mnie dość problematyczne, bo:

• mój aparat to straszna małpka bez większych możliwości ustawiania (na dodatek ma plamę na... no właśnie, nie wiem na czym, w każdym razie w okolicach lewego górnego rogu... najlepiej widać na tym zdjęciu),
• nie mam dobrych reflektorów do doświetlenia zdjęcia... może popróbuje w dzień na zewnątrz.

Generalnie jestem straszliwym amatorem bez sprzętu. Zdjęcia są takie jak umiem. Muszę postarać się o lepszy sprzęt.

Zdjęcie ryżu jest rzeczywiście fajne i postaram się kaszę zrobić podobnie.

Ss181292 21:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Sortowanie w kategorii

Ok, chcialeem tylko lekko uporzadkowac kategorie :) Mozesz rzucic link do opisu zasad sortowania nagran w kategoriach, o ktorych mowiles? Pzdr, -- odder 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Po pierwsze: Nie zycze sobie, bys jakiekolwiek z moich edycji nazywal partactwem, nieuctwem i bezczelnościa. Po drugie: twoje zadanie mojego autorevertu mija sie z celem, bo wszystko, co zepsulem, poprawil (i dobrze, teraz widze, ze popelnilem blad) Marcowy Zajac. Po trzecie: gdybys choc troche pomyslal, sprawdzilbys czas wykonywania mojej edycji i czas Twojego napisania do mnie: ostatnia edycja, 12:49 24 November 2006. Twoja wiadomosc, 22:49, 24 November 2006, porownanie edycji. Dz, Nieuk & partacz 15:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I jeszcze jedno: widze, ze brales udzial w edytowaniu szablonu be civil/pl. Prosilbym, zebys stosowal sie do tego, co tam napisano, szczegolnie do zdania: "Przed napisaniem odpowiedzi prosimy więc o jej dokładne przemyślenie, opanowanie i uprzejmość".

Dzieki, Nieuk & partacz 15:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

okulary

Ok, też mi się wydawało, że powinienem to zapisać z małej litery, ale rzeczywiście zmyliło mnie to, iż większość znajduje się w kategorii z dużej. Idzimy z tłumem, heh ;) --Marcowy zając 14:46, 26 Nov 2006 (UTC)

Heem... pozwoliłem sobie pozmieniać wszystkie wielkie na małe literki, spójrz do Polish Pronunciation. Jeśli jest źle, to krzycz, będę odkręcał. --Marcowy zając 15:31, 26 Nov 2006 (UTC)

Grafika do usunięcia

Wiem, że zajmujesz sie grafiką na Commons i mam do ciebie prośbę. Uzbierało mi się trochę zdjęć, które błędnie nazwałem, błędnie opisałem, lub są duplikatami. Mimo, że wkleiłem już dawno szablon grafiki do usunięcia (może źle to zrobiłem, dzisiaj ponownie wkleiłem nieco zmieniony) grafiki te leżą już od dawna nieusunięte (niektóre wiele miesięcy). Czy mógłbyś je usunąć?

Image:Ciemniak a12.jpg, Image:Liliowe Turnie i Ornak.jpg Image:Siwa Przełęcz a4.jpg Image:Wielka Turnia a3.jpg Image:Opalone a1.jpg Image:Kamień Karłowicza.jpg Image:Kozie Czuby a1.jpg Image:Kondracka Przełęcz a1.jpg Image:J--Informationuncus trifidus a4.jpg Image:Kondracka Przełęcz a2.jpg Image:Salix repens a1.jpg

11:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Selso

Dzięki i pozdrawiam. Selso 19:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Selso

My German Audiofile: your corrections

Hi Derbeth,

thanx a lot for eding my files. It was my first try and I failed completely (wrong filenames, wrong description and I even ruined the layout of a wiktionary-Site) :(

Reading your correction was a short and helpful tutorial! Now my personal template for audio-descriptions is edited. I hope it will save you the work in the future. :)

I actually worked as Webadmin before and I wonder what kind of language is used at Wikipedia / Wiktionary in general. It's not really html, is it? In case you know an explaination site, pleased drop a line at my discussion site.

In addition I wonder how to delete the De-gemocht.ogg, because you are completely right, De-gemocht2.ogg is actually the correct file, but I couldn't find out how to delete No. 1 and rename No. 2. So in case you know where to find to do list for deletion or are an Admin yourself, please delete De-gemocht.ogg because it is crap and rename De-gemocht2.ogg to De-gemocht.ogg.

I'd like to ask you another favour: the Polish version of the German "I love You" Site (http://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/ich_liebe_dich) - then under Polnisch: [1] kocham cię (pl), ja ciebie kocham (pl) doesn't exist yet, just for the sake of having it online by february, 14 th and in audio-files, can you help? Pleeeeease :)? Might add to World Pease finally, you know... ;)

Thanx again, Leni Berlin

PS: I really liked your photos. Good stuff. :)

Paciorkowiec

Dzięki, poprawię Akira.pl 12:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Transformer Nomination

Hi, Derberth, greetings to Poland from Zagreb, Croatia!

Tank you for your kind remark that the image is not bad. True, I am not a graphic artist. I hope I can count on your willingness to help me make it better with your advice. The project is GNU GFDL, and free. I hope it could improve science class, even for poor countries and the unprivileged.

The image is auto-generated, from a CGI rendering engine (please spare time to try it):

http://magrf.grf.hr/~mtodorov/xformer/transformer-1.64.html

I have taken your comment as a challenge to improve. I hope to have your support here in general interest. I do not strive so much to become a Featured image artist, as to improve my work and help the kids to learn transformers.

Thank you very much in advice for all effort on this behalf.

Mirsad Zagreb, Croatia

Hello. The script is very impressive and I appreciate how much work it needed. I added my vote for "oppose" because I found other pictures better candidates to Featured Picture. I can't say what's wrong with your scheme - it does its job well, I'm not an expert on physics and electricity to advise you what to improve. The difference between an "interesting" and "ordinary" image is hard to define and rather a subjetive thing. My personal feeling is that other pictures should to be displayed on main page - that's it. But apart from Featured Pictures, most of images on Commons are just "ordinary" - so it's nothing wrong with an image being not stunning; images on Commons serve educational purposes. --Derbeth ^talk 19:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, I was hoping for some suggestions. Thank you for the commendation on script. I realize there is much more work to be done to become a "Featured" render artist. Thank you.

Regards, -- Mtodorov 69 09:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

wymowa

Co, gdzie, jak, co się dzieje, po co te nerwy :)

• szablon: ten szablon to przez kulawe oprogramowanie, którym to ładowałem na Commons. W nocy zamierzałem (no, nadal zamierzam) to poprawić, przy okazji sortując to w ramach kategorii, bo wszystko jest pod I (Image)
• autor: przecież nigdzie nie napisałem, że ja to wymawiam, ani że wymawia to tsca.bot! Ja to tylko nagrałem i obrobiłem/podzieliłem w Audacity. Licencja Public Domain nie wymaga podania autorstwa.
• data: jaki amerykański format? Przecież to pierwszego marca, a nie trzeciego stycznia.

Pozdrawiam // tsca [re] 20:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Nie, tam nie jest napisane "own work", tylko "own recording". Ja bardzo szanuję prawo do bycia rozpoznawanym jako autor i często na to zwracam uwagę na Wiki, jak i poza. Tutaj jednak nie zachodzi taki przypadek - osoba, która na moją prośbę przeczytała te kilkanaście słów do mikrofonu wyraźnie powiedziała, że nie życzy sobie podawania jej danych w Wikipedii. Dlatego nie ma tych danych (które, szczerze mówiąc, i tak nikogo nie interesują), i licencja jest właśnie taka, a nie inna. Co do daty, to wydaje mi się to kwestią całkowicie bez znaczenia. Co za różnica, czy dane słowo zostało nagrane w styczniu, czy w marcu? Ważne, że w XXI wieku i w którym regionie. Oczywiście, jeśli chcesz zmieniać format tej dany, nie będę protestował. // tsca [re] 22:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

dziękuję bardzo.

W sumie to moje podwórko - ale szczerze dziękuję za poprawki i szablon. --Beentree 14:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Pronunciation files

Thank you for your help. Could you tell me how to rename files? Or do I have to upload them again? Thanks. --F.G. comm 21:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I am uploading files again :-) (I should really read FAQ before asking quiestions, sorry) --F.G. comm 21:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

One more question, if I have the word Božić, should i use Hr-Bozic.ogg (how I have done) or Hr-Božić.ogg ? --F.G. comm 22:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, I think I got it this time. I've added bad name to the old files. Thanks again. --F.G. comm 23:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, me again. :-) I need to record the Croatian word "luk" but the problem is the word depending on on the accent has different meaning. So I have to record two versions but they are written the same. Should I just add "2" at the end of the file? In Croatian we have accents to differ that but they are usually not written ("lûk" and "lȕk"). Any ideas? F.G. comm 09:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I add all of my pronunciations manually anyway. :) F.G. comm 18:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Plakat

Witaj, mój kolega przerobił ten plakat w jakimś programie graficznym. Jako oryginał posłużył podobny plakat reklamujący niemiecką Wikipedię, ale to w sumie na jedno wychodzi, czy przerobisz mój plakat, czy tamten oryginalny, jako że obydwa wykonane są w formacie PNG. Pozdrawiam. Pimke 19:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Old Book Bindings in poster

Sure, you can feel free to use my old book bindings image in the poster without attribution. Brighterorange 14:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured article discourse

Please review the guidance of the section, Above all, Be polite, of Commons:Featured_picture_candidates page. Even when you are attacked, that is no reason to respond in kind. For the most part, to do so is to end reasoned discussion, not to further it. Please consider striking remarks that might be considered uncivil and impolite. Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

FP

Hi Derbeth. You forgot to sign here. regards Lycaon 21:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Przesuwanie stron

Cześć. Źle nazwałem plik (na początku powinno być Pl-). Chciałem przesunąć tę stronę, ale jakoś nie znalazłem przycisku move na górze -.-' to jak to się teraz robi? Marcowy zając 11:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Nie da się ukryć, że sprytnie to wymyślili ^^' Marcowy zając 19:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Pozwolisz, że się podczepię.
Słuchaj... jak się tu teraz odtwarza pliki dźwiękowe? Bo próbuję, ale za Chiny Ludowe nie mogę. Czemu wprowadzono te dziwne odtwarzacze? Pomijam fakt, że są brzydkie jak ospa wietrzna, bo to kwestia gustu, ale po co tak utrudniać życie ludowi? I stwarzać pokusy. Wiesz, że na islandzkim Wikisłowniku wprowadzili te odtwarzacze do szablonu audio? Okropnie wygląda i nie ma nawet podpisu pod plikiem! Marcowy zając 17:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Prawie sie udalo.ogg

O konwencji nazewniczej nie wiedziałem, a właściwie to zbyt późno się zorientowałem, już po uploadzie. Co do polskich liter, to specjalnie je wyciąłem, bo tak radzi okienko w kwestii nazywania plików, "without special characters". Denerwujące jest strasznie to, że nie można w normalny sposób zmienić nazwy pliku, co powoduje, że trywialna poprawka staje się wielką operacją. Mathrick 19:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

User_talk:Yug#User:M4RC0.2Fbw

Hello Derbeth, please see explanations in my talk page. Yug 06:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Want you his email ? => "Marco" < Marco //AT// crans.org > . Yug 07:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

put everything in GPL or Public Domain if there is a problem. it's ok for me .. thank for you mail. --M4RC0 15:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Prywatna fotogaleria

Co zrobić ze zdjęciami typu Image:005Pieniny.JPG (w kategorii: Pieniny Właściwe), które wg mnie nie mają wcale związku z Pieninami, lecz są prywatną kolekcją?. W kat. tej jest jeszcze kilka zdjęć, na których pierwszoplanową rolę odgrywają nie Pieniny, lecz ludzie. Selso Selso 13:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

ścięgno

hej, nie wiem za bardzo o co Ci chodzilo, bo link który wkleiłeś do niczego nie prowadził. Tak przy okazji, prosze nie pisz do mnie "jak wiesz z informatyki", "jako programista wiesz/powinnas wiedziec" itp. Tylko dlatego ze studiuje programowanie to nie znaczy, ze wszystko wiem ;p Ty zapewne wiesz więcej o programowaniu na Wiki niż ja, wiec prosze tłumacz mi jak komuś kto sie nie zna ;p Wszystkie wskazówki sie przydadzą, bo nie znam sie za bardzo na Commons. Frizabela 17:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

o tak? a dlaczego ścięgno wyświetli sie przed ścianą? czy to dlatego bo "ę" bedzie(nieprawidłowo) jako pierwsze wyświetlone przed "a" (ścięgno = ściana)? czy mam tak sortować każde słowo, czy tylko słowa, które zawierają polskie znaki? Frizabela 18:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

ahaa, wszystko rozumiem :) Frizabela 18:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

moze mozesz mi pomoc z tym :Commons:Village pump#reusing part of image? Frizabela 19:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

dzieki :), mozesz mi jeszcze powiedziec jak to sie zapisuje? np. mam photo z licencją {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}, to nie moge w przerobionym pliku napisac to samo, bo to nie jest mojego autorstwa, wiec jak to wkleic zeby nie pisało "I, he copyright holder of this work..." tylko "This image has been (or is hereby) released by its author..." Frizabela 21:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Neg's sound files

I'm confused. Why have you re-uploaded my sound files? Just because of the capitalization? --Neg 20:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

DerbethBot

Please stop uploading files with DerbethBot until you have gotten a bot flag. This is important for the reasons outlined at COM:BOT#Bot_Flag. It's really messing up the new files list as well. Patstuart 18:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko 15:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

usunąć

Czy mógłbyś przyśpieszyć usunięcie zdjęcia Lymnea auricularia2pl.jpg. Zjadłem w nazwie literę a plik z prawidłową nazwą jest obok Lymnaea auricularia2pl.jpg. Ten błędny wisi już 2 miesiące jeszcze ktoś rzeczywiście go sobie podczepi do jakiejś strony. Aung --87.207.157.234 15:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

problem

mam problem ponieważ zdjęcie które wysyłam jest ciągle usuwane z uwagi na prawa autorskie - jednak uważam że mam do niego prawo ponieważ posiadam zgodę aktorki na nim widocznej - mojej mamy oraz znam osobiście operatora i reżysera filmu. tak więc nie wiem co zrobić by moje prawo do zamieszczenia tego zdjęcia było uznane. Proszę o pomoc!

• już rozwiązaliśmy ten problem - wkleiłem zdjęcie z albumu, wykonane przez mojego dziadka, którego jestem spadkobiercą... ,zamiast kadru z filmu.

Pozdrawiam

Jaqqb 00:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Canon A540

Hejka. Sam mam Canona A530, ale widzę, że Twoja 40-ka ma podobny problem. Chodzi o ostrość. Widać to przykładowo na Twoim zdjęciu z podejścia nad Czarny Gąsienicowy - praktycznie cała prawa połowa od krawędzi jest nieostra. No i tu powstaje pytanie - jak sądzisz (a może wiesz) czy to można zrzucić na karb wady produkcyjnej? Czy tak mają wszystkie te modele? Próby z ustawianiem przysłony na max potwierdzają nieznaczną poprawę - w stopniu dalece niezadowalającym. Dzięki za odpis.--83.12.91.242 19:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)--83.12.91.242 19:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

To akurat zdjęcie jest po prostu prześwietlone, sknocone i ogólnie bardzo kiepskie :) Dużo zależy też od powietrza, wysokości (nie używam filtrów) - tego dnia zdjęcia wychodziły mi lekko rozmyte na dalszym planie. Ogólnie ostrość zdjęć w aparacie nie jest rewelacyjna, ale moim zdaniem np. tu czy tu jest zadowalająca. --Derbeth ^talk 06:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

• No właśnie, jak sam stwierdzasz, ogólnie ostrość nie jest rewelacyjna - czyżby to była ogólna przypadłość aparatów Canona...? a co do tych dwóch zdjęć - one również nie są tak do końca cacy - na obu lewy dolny róg i lewa krawędź się rozmywają: w pierwszym - na pierwszym planie, w drugim na dalszym. Pozdrawiam.--83.12.91.242 22:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

---

To mój pierwszy aparat cyfrowy, kupiony za nie znowu takie duże pieniądze (wtedy 1000 złotych), więc ciężko mi dokładnie ocenić. Większość moich znajomych, z którymi porównuję zdjęcia, ma lustrzanki, więc to nie ta półka. Ale ok, jeśli miałbym narzekać, to czasem denerwuje mnie za mała ostrość zdjęć w wydawałoby się dobrych warunkach. W przyszłości myślę o kupnie Nikona. Jeśli chciałbyś mieć dobry materiał porównawczy, fantastyczną możliwością są grupy aparatów na Fickrze - tu jest grupa Canona 540. Przyznaję, większość zdjęć nie jest rewelacyjna. Może faktycznie z tego aparatu ciężko wyciągnąć naprawdę dobre zdjęcia. Aha, co do wad produkcyjnych - czasem z niewiadomego powodu rozładowuje mi akumulatory. Mój numer seryjny pasuje do serii Canonów, które wg Canona mają problem z wystającym kawałkiem drutu koło baterii. Miałem zamiar przesłać im do wymiany, ale w sklepie, gdzie kupiłem aprat, nastraszono mnie, że oni o niczym takim nie wiedzą i jakby okazało się, że nie stwierdzą wady, to obciążą mnie jakimiś kosmicznymi kosztami. Choćby za takie traktowanie nie mam zamiaru kupować żadnych Canonów. --Derbeth ^talk 08:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Aalen-um-1900.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aalen-um-1900.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 14:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

What about the source. For example: "Scanned by me", "It was on BBC website (with a link)", "In book ...". Thanks!--OsamaK 13:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The "Trust of image", Who knows if this image is right? Who knows if this is the real author? Who know if this date is right? We're on a wiki, that everyone can edit (Someone wants to say "about 1890", who cares, it's expired!), so, you have to give a trust source, Because we will use this image in the largest encyclopedia. Thank you!--OsamaK 01:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

50 miliardów dinarów

Blisko dwa lata temu zgłosiłeś do usunięcia wizerunek jugosłowiańskiego banknotu z uzasadnieniem, że "z pewnością" podpada pod prawa autorskie. Jako, że od czasu, kiedy banknot ten był w obiegu minęło już mnóstwo czasu, nie umiem zrozumieć skąd u Ciebie owa "pewność"? Większość krajów, które chronią wizerunek swoich banknotów, czyni to tylko z powodu ochrony nie tyle praw autorskich (te wobec urzędowych znaków i symboli nie mają zastosowania), co z przyczyn bezpieczeństwa. W przypadku tego banknotu jest to całkowicie nieuzasadnione. Przecież nawet Jugosławii już nie ma, a w Serbii po ostatnich wojnach, podziałach państwa i inflacjach od roku 1993 było już kilka wymian pieniędzy. Usiłowałem znaleźć coś na temat reprodukowania starych jugosłowiańskich banknotów na stronach Banku Serbii, ale bezskutecznie. Natomiast na stronach, gdzie cytowane jest prawo autorskie tak Serbii, jak Chorwacji wchodzącej teoretycznie wówczas jeszcze w skład Jugosławii, to w przepisach tych krajów jest podobnie jak w innych - dokumenty urzędowe nie podpadają pod prawo autorskie. Wszystko zatem wskazuje, że podobnie jak w przypadku innych krajów, wizerunek starych jugosłowiańskich pieniędzy jest w domenie publicznej (w tym przypadku na zasadach {{PD-SerbiaGov}}). Zamierzam zatem przywrócić zdjęcie tego banknotu i zilustrować nim hasło hiperinflacja (zresztą kiedyś ilustracja ta tam była), chyba że wskażesz mi dowód, że jestem w moim wnioskowaniu w błędzie. Julo (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

• odtworzyłem, opatrując licencjami {{PD-Yugoslavia}} oraz {{PD-SerbiaGov}}. Julo (talk) 10:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Dodałem taką bo uważałem ją za słuszną, zgodnie z tym co pisze w przewodniku.

Dzięki

miło się odwdzięczacie za pomoc w rozwoju wiki. zamiast sluzyc rada jesli sa bledy to je odrazu kasujecie. nie mozna bylo powiedziec co trzeba poprawic?

Image:Pl-pieniądz.ogg

Co do tego nagrania, to po prostu dostałem prośbę, od User:Trevas o ponowne nagranie tego i kilku innych haseł, bo hasła, które są nagrane są niepoprawnie wymawiane, dlatego zastąpiłem stare hasła nowymi --Wyksztalcioch (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

---

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you. ~/w ^/Talk 13:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Zmiana nazwy

Najlepiej jest zgłosić to do CommonsDelinkera na stronie User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands. Wystarczy dodać linijkę:

{{universal replace|zła nazwa|dobra nazwa|reason=powód}}

Nie wiem czy działa to też, gdy nie ma pliku docelowego, ale można spróbować. Pozdr. Yarl ✉ 23:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Tak, wrzucasz to na stronę dyskusji a jakiś admin to po czasie przenosi na User:CommonsDelinker/commands. Yarl ✉ 09:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

import colection

hi derbeth, i would know if it's possible to import this colection here into wolof wiktionary? if it's possible can you do it with your bot please? it will be very important for people who study wolof. thinks ibou

thinks for the uploaded ibou.

Swedish audio files import bug

Hello,

Do you think you could give a hand here? There was some bug and hence an overlap of files on the same place. Give me a nudge if you need help with deleting files, etc. Thank you, Patrícia ^msg 16:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LaTeX desc-newline.png may be deleted

---

The File:LaTeX desc-newline.png which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 20:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Polynomialdeg5.png

Hi, you requested a notification, if one of your files is altered. I replaced the image with a vector version Polynomialdeg5.svg. Geek3 (talk) 21:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Wolne licencje

Już dwa razy pomagałeś mi na commons. Jeszcze raz zwrócę się z prośbą.

Wiem, że zdjęcia zapisywane są tutaj na wolnych licencjach. Ale mam pewne wątpliwości w rozumieniu tego. Czy oznacza to, że każdy może to zdjęcie zapisane w takiej licencji przerobić, np. zmienić kolory, napisy, wyciąć z niego tylko fragment itp i zapisać na commons jako nową wersję ?. Czy może to zdjęcie skopiować, przerobić w ulubiony przez siebie sposób, a następnie pod inną nazwą zapisać na commons? Jeżeli nie możesz mi odpowiedzieć – to może znasz kogoś, kto potrafi mi odpowiedzieć w polskim języku ? Selso (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Cs-bílý.ogg

File:Cs-bílý.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 20:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Pl-twardy-2.ogg

File:Pl-twardy-2.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vearthy (talk) 16:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Derbeth⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Derbeth,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Bot de-flagging notification

Hi Derbeth, I'm writing to you because your bot DerbethBot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (10 May 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

odp. Nazewnictwo plików

Dzięki, oczywiście zastosuję się w przyszłości. Nie trafiłem na taką instrukcję a bardzo się przyda. Szukałem kategorii Pronunciation Polish :) Borys Kozielski (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivity

Hello! Your bot User:DerbethBot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

zgoda na wykorzystanie zdjecia

Dzien dobry. Chciałbym przesłać zdjecie, ale z zastrzeżeniem, że materiał nie bedzie zmieniany i tylko w oryginalnej postaci. Rozumiem, że wysyłając zgodę na wykorzystanie zdjęcia wybieram licencję CC-BY-ND. Zależy mi na zachowaniu materiału w oryginalnej postaci. Będę wdzieczny za podpowiedź. z góry dziękuję za pomoc. --Snowbll (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Snowbll

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Derbeth,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Derbeth,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

How does your bot work

Hi Derbeth,

How does your bot work in relation to adding audio pronunciations to en.wiktionary entries? Do you have some screenshots or written description?

I am uploading many audio files and adding them to Wiktionary entries using pywikibot but maybe your way is more efficient.

Thanks for your time. --Commander Keane (talk) 07:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

AU vs AUS

Hi again. It is my impression that Australian accent pronunciations use "Audio (AU)" rather than "Audio (AUS)". Maybe both are ok, I am not sure. Example.--Commander Keane (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Wrong naming of imports from the Shtooka project

Hi, I'm active on Wikidata working on lexemes. I'm not happy with the names choosen during import of e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sv-and.ogg&action=history from http://shtooka.net/listen/swe/en%20and. It should have been named "Sv-en_and.ogg" instead. Could you fix that on all the imported ogg's? Thanks in advance.--So9q (talk) 13:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Wrong pronunciation in File:Fr-adapteur.ogg

frwikt shows the right one is [a.dap.tœʁ]. This seems not a work by wikimedian, not sure how to deal with it. EdwardAlexanderCrowley (talk) 03:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. The prononciation is correct (from northen france, most probably urban), but the naming is incorrect. The only thing (apart from being misnamed) is that the saying is « un adaptateur » (an adaptator) instead of just « adaptateur » or « adapteur » (which is rarer) - but I would'nt delete it for that. Just changing the name will be enough. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 08:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Does it really need renaming? 'un' is an article. There is no need for separate recordings of 'un adapteur' and of 'adapteur'. Hence I don't see a need for 'freeing' the name of Fr-adapteur. --Derbeth ^talk 16:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fi-hyvin.ogg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fi-hyvin.ogg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

defective recording in File:Sv-bolag.ogg

The pronunciation is cut off after the first syllable of the noun and is missing "-lag". This file and entry should be deleted because now it is very misleading. -- Espoo (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Hinzufügen von Hörbeispielen

Hallo Derbeth,

ich hab vor kurzem angefangen, mithilfe von Lingua Libre Hörbeispiele einzusprechen für Wörter, zu denen ich Einträge im deutschen Wiktionary erstellt habe. Werden diese automatisch von deinem Bot hinzugefügt oder muss ich da erst auf eine Liste hinzugefügt werden, damit bestätigt ist, dass ich wirklich Muttersprachler bin und diese Hörbeispiele verwendbar sind?

Viele Grüße --Mighty Wire (talk) 00:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Hallo! In diesem Fall muss ich dich zur "akzeptierten Lingua Libre Autoren" Liste hinzufügen. Der Grund ist, auf Lingua Libre werden viele Hörbeispiele hochgeladen, deren Qualität sehr niedrig ist. Deswegen wurde ich gefragt, nur vorher akzeptierte Autoren zuzulassen. Ich habe die Liste aktualisiert und in der Zukunft werden deine Hörbeispiele automatisch auf Wiktionary von dem Bot benutzt. Grüße --Derbeth ^talk 08:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Fix description

Hello, can you please explain why edits like this one are an improvement? I'm not sure about that. Has it been discussed somewhere? Thank you. Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Poco a poco, thanks for asking. Open File:Bodegas de Mileștii Mici, Moldavia, 2023-11-02, DD 74.jpg and you will see for yourself. Click 'Open in Media Viewer' and you won't see the correct description ('Wine cellars of Mileștii Mici, Chișinău, Moldova'). Because of the template inserted where it does not belong, what will be visible will be just 'This file illustrates a cultural heritage monument in Moldova, ID', which is not just not much useful, it's also broken (ID that is visible when seeing full page is omitted). This problem appears not just in 'Media Viewer'. Wrong description is used in pages like Commons:Picture of the Year/2023/Gallery. Probably also in other pages like galleries in Wikipedia. I'm not sure what would be the best way to discuss this, so your suggestions are welcome. For now I'm focusing on making those photos displayed correctly, without waiting weeks for a discussion to come to some conclusion. --Derbeth ^talk 16:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Derbeth, thanks for explaining the changes you also made to the file pages of my photos. Unfortunately, you also moved the Photo credit box template to the bottom. This makes the page look messy and untidy. I find this unsatisfactory. As for the cultural heritage templates, it would be better if they were placed in the Summary field so that reusers could see this information immediately. If this is a problem for Media Viewer users, I think it should be discussed on the appropriate page and changed by the programmers if necessary. Thanks also to Poco a poco for your message, which can be an impulse to change something in the Media Viewer. This seems more efficient than changing thousands of file pages. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Radomianin. I moved the credit box on the purpose. I don't see anything useful in this box for a viewer of the picture. It's contains information useful for a person wanting to reuse the picture, but there is a section meant for this purpose ('Licensing'). What looks messy to me is giving licensing information twice, and in different parts of the page. Things that are closely related should be in close visual distance on the page, so I edited with this purpose in mind. --Derbeth ^talk 17:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Derbeth, thank you for your explanation. You are certainly right in terms of pure logic. But from experience, the License field is often overlooked because reusers don't scroll down. So custom info templates are right and important. There are many users who proceed in a similar way, as you can see in this picture for example. I would really recommend discussing this problem on the appropriate forum so that changes can be made to the Media Viewer. I think that at least three users like XRay, Poco a poco and myself should be enough to go the long way instead of the work intensive way of many file page changes. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I started the discussion in Commons:Village_pump/Technical#Templates_in_description_field_cause_empty_caption_in_Media_Viewer so that the visibility of the problem is broader. Note that discussions take a long time (I bet someone will say the buggy functioning of the Media Viewer is correct and what I expect is wrong), it also takes a long time to find someone with both technical knowledge and free time to do the coding work, the work is not easy as it affects how wikipedia.org works, and finally since Media Viewer operates in multiple MediaWiki instances (Commons, Wikipedia, maybe Wikibooks and others as well) it may be hard to push those changes through everywhere. Due to those factors, I don't expect the situation to improve in any way before Christmas or so, so I prefer to edit and see the results now, when I'm voting for POTY. But let's hope I'm wrong and it gets fixed soon. --Derbeth ^talk 18:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Derbeth. The long road is certainly rockier, but if in the end the problem can be solved by technical means, then in my opinion this is the more effective way. Thanks for your patience and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

IMHO the monument ID does belong to the description and if the Media Viewer doesn't doesn't come along with it the solution for the issue is not moving the box (it would apply to approx. 10,000 of my pictures on Commons) but fixing the Media Viewer. I'm not sure either how often the Media Viewer is in fact used. That would be an interesting information. Anyhow and apart from this topic, Derbeth, it is always healthy to kick off a discussion and gain some kind of consensus before starting massive edits with arguments like "I don't see it useful". Thank you for the new thread in the Village Pump. My impression overall is that it feels like using a sledgehamer for cracking a nut. Poco a poco (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

I must thank Poco a poco and Radomianin for their statements and want to second them. – Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)