User talk:DocteurCosmos
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image:Spain_Madrid_El_Monasterio_de_las_Descalzas_Reales_interior_view.jpg
[edit]Bonjour, juste une question, pourquoi ne défendez-vous pas votre photo sur FP ?--Doalex 10:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Je le ferais volontiers si j'étais plus à l'aise en anglais et en technique photo ! Je reconnais que la photo a peut-être quelques défauts techniques mais j'estimais sa composition intéressante (le jeu des lignes en particulier et l'opposition verre brouillé/verre non brouillé). Un jeu d'ombre et de lumière aussi. Cordialement, DocteurCosmos 13:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- C'est aussi ce que j'ai vu et écrit en votant pour mais malheureusement les personnes qui jugent sont, à mon avis, très critiques techniquement, ça manque de poésie et de recul.D'ailleurs et par curiosité je suis allé voir la galerie de certain(e)s et je me demande vraiment d'où sortent-ils leurs jugements hâtifs ? Bref il y a peu de temps je me suis fait sortir avec une photo d'orchidée(j'ai vu aussi votre galerie) et je n'ose plus rien présenter compte tenu des commentaires abstrus que j'ai lu.--Doalex 14:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Karak_Castle.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Karak_Castle.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Tarawneh 17:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Catégories
[edit]Il ne faut pas mettre de parenthèses ; dans l'historique du fichier, c'est Mediawiki qui les ajoute pour une raison mystérieuse. Il suffit de remplir la fenêtre d'upload comme si c'était une fenêtre d'édition normale (à cette différence près qu'on ne peut pas prévisualiser). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ça fonctionne vraiment tout pareil qu'une fenêtre d'édition normale. Là, c'est le modèle {{Information}} qui n'est pas appelé correctement ; tu aurais le même problème dans la fenêtre d'édition normale. Conseil : tu ouvres la fenêtre d'édition de l'une de tes anciennes images, genre Image:Table football field close up.jpg. Tu copies-colles le tout dans la fenêtre d'upload et tu modifies ce qui doit l'être (typiquement la ligne « description »). Et zou, roule Marcel. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sundial Lannion Brittany France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Ça veut tout simplement dire que je pensais que le cadran solaire était peut-être pas mal haut sur le mur et non à hauteur d'homme. Félicitations, Arria Belli | parlami 13:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Excavator in Brittany France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heurtoir orleans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parement de lauze Lannion Bretagne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
coucouuuuu :)
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:MediaWiki base error.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MediaWiki base error.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:MediaWiki base error.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
^^ (oui je chipote ) Lilyu (talk) 11:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Je venais pour dire la même chose… Lilyu m'enlève les mots de la bouche ! :p →Diti the penguin — 11:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pourtant on est pas le premier avril... Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas exactement ? DocteurCosmos (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ton screenshot est un travail dérivé, mais les auteurs de l'oeuvre originale ne sont pas crédités (ce texte a été publié sous GFDL ?)--Lilyu (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nan, pour moi, ce texte est une sortie du logiciel MediaWiki… enfin je pense. Moi, ce qui me gêne sur l'image, c'est que tu dis qu'elle est sous GPL, et en dessous, tu la mets sous GFDL. C'est normal ? JChipotons, chipotons ! →Diti the penguin — 09:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Euh... J'ai simplement utilisé l'entrée du formulaire qui dit GFDL... Et oui, c'est bien une capture de MediaWiki. DocteurCosmos (talk) 10:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Nan, pour moi, ce texte est une sortie du logiciel MediaWiki… enfin je pense. Moi, ce qui me gêne sur l'image, c'est que tu dis qu'elle est sous GPL, et en dessous, tu la mets sous GFDL. C'est normal ? JChipotons, chipotons ! →Diti the penguin — 09:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ton screenshot est un travail dérivé, mais les auteurs de l'oeuvre originale ne sont pas crédités (ce texte a été publié sous GFDL ?)--Lilyu (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pourtant on est pas le premier avril... Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas exactement ? DocteurCosmos (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Selma_to_Montgomery_marches_-_historic_route.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 11:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Echaffaudage cordiste.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Action bloquer.jpg was uncategorized on 8 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Support d'ampoule.jpg was uncategorized on 13 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Champignons shiitake cuisinés.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pain au lait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Maison des Chapeliers
[edit]Arf, j'y ai pourtant cru. Mais en effet, à mieux y regarder, rien de semblable à ces décoration sur la dite maison. Mea Culpa. Creasy (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Y a pas de mal ! ;-) DocteurCosmos (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Like some of your pics!
I am new to wiki, can I use them on my online article, if I provide a reference to your profile here? Bluenine (talk) 15:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |
- Hi!
- Which pictures do you like ?
- DocteurCosmos (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:18548000849097l.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:18548000849097l.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:18548000849097l.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth_O (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Penne all'arrabbiata.jpg
[edit]Hello Docteur, excuse me for for changing the image size. This happened by mistake – I didn't want to do that. I wanted to adjust the white balance, because I think it should be corrected a little bit. (That's what I still think) --Burgkirsch (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hello !
- You're welcome to do this as Dereckson describes it on your talk page.
- DocteurCosmos (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Équipe d'intervention Playmobil.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vikiçizer (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Campagne L'été des villes
[edit]Bonjour, je vous invite de participer à la campagne L'été des villes et villages en France. Des photo's télechargées entre le 21 juillet et le 21 septembre 2015 peut-on marquer avec la ligne
{{L'été des villes}} [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]]
ainsi elles compteront pour la campagne et seront montrées ICI . On peut également utiliser la uploadwizard de la campagne, qui ajoute cette ligne automatiquement. Amicalement.--Havang(nl) (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Rebonjour, je m'excuse: il ne faut pas supprimer la Category:Images from Été des Villes 2015 par catalot ou hotcat, puisque cela enlève le modèle {{L'été des villes}} qui est nécessaire. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Je me suis contenté d'ajouter la catégorie [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]], ça ne ne suffit pas ? DocteurCosmos (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Malheureusement, non, il y a une faute sur la page de la campagne, voir fr:Discussion Projet:Illustration des communes françaises#Page gallery et categories sur commons et il faut modèle + catégorie nommé ci-dessus. Puisque l'on ne semble pas pouvoir changer la page campagne, j'ai demandé une adaptation du modèle, voir User talk:Jules WMFr#template:L'été des villes + autre question. Amicalement. --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Je me suis contenté d'ajouter la catégorie [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]], ça ne ne suffit pas ? DocteurCosmos (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Empalement
[edit]Bonjour,
Vous n'avez pas sourcé une photo d'empalement que vous avez manifestement prise sur un livre ancien (circa 1596 ?). Si vous vous vous souveniez du nom du livre, et de l'auteur, ce serait formidable... Merci d'avance. --Schoffer (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Je m'en souviens bien .
- J'ai complété la description.
- Bien à vous, DocteurCosmos (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Super, merci ! --Schoffer (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Looking to this file, I would guess: (clockwise) 2 glasses of Suze, one glass of vermouth, one glass of lemonade and one glas of whisky. Am I correct? thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Funny question ;-). You're right about the Suze and the whisky but the red one is rather a glass of Porto (Port wine) or maybe a glass of Banyuls. I can't remember what the soft drink was and, more surprisingly, who was with us in the garden 17 years ago... DocteurCosmos (talk) 20:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks DocteurCosmos for coming back on this. It's the glass that confused me. This is the kind of glass I would drink port wine from. But then again,... in the garden, it is safer to use a less delicate style. I guess. Cheers Lotje (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)