User talk:Dream out loud
Usage:
photos
[edit]Hey!
Please do not downsample photos before upload - there is no need for that!
--WarX 17:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Underground Production for Merchandise — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 114.122.73.32 (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Boydtinsley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Siebrand 11:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
BART map SVG
[edit]Hi, can you explain why you tagged Image:Bart-map.svg as {{BadSVG}} and then {{SupersededPNG}}? It has no embedded rasters. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 21:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- The text in the image seemed to get distorted at some resolutions. When clicking on the image itself ([1]), you can see how the text appears very large and out of place. A PNG image corrects this issue, so the image is just one layer and appears the same at all resoltions. I think that the image has too many objects to be uploaded as an SVG. –Dream out loud 21:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- That has nothing to do with resolution, that is due to the font rendering in your browser. It renders properly in Wikipedia and in Inkscape. I'm removing those tags and marking the PNG for deletion. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Your Avenue Q photos have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. If the files are up for deletion because they have been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the files may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new files. |
Image deletion warning | Image:SEPTA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
AEMoreira042281 15:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Temple text logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Patstuart 15:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Underground.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Patstuart 15:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Burger King sign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Patstuart 16:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Macys.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Patstuart 16:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:GSPkwy Shield.svg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:GSPkwy Shield.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Patstuart 16:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Iphone menu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Lokal_Profil 13:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Fulton_St_Transit_Center_CGI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
ChrisRuvolo (t) 03:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you please fix the shading of the inner and outer circles? Thank you. The flag also needs a bit of work, and the text seems a bit off. --NE2 00:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know that the logo is not perfect, but it took me several hours to make because I had to make the entire image from scratch, aside from tracing a low-resolution GIF image, found here. It looks pretty accurate compared to that image, but I know that it not exactly what the shield looks like. I have searched all over the internet to find a decent sized image of the shield, and I couldn't find anything, which is why I drew it the way I did. If you know of a better image to trace from or copy off of, I'd be happy to fix it up. Dream out loud 01:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- How about the existing PNG? [2] and especially [3] and [4] look pretty close to it. --NE2 12:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The White Album.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Balabiot 14:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Facebook.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
PiotrKapretski (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Missouri_S&T.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:U2 3D Sao Paulo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-128.205.122.113 14:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Coldplay_Viva_la_Vida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
JD554 (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Category:SEPTA Subway-Surface Lines
[edit]Another category exists named Category:SEPTA Subway-Surface Trolley Lines. I added the category for two of the images that have the red-cat "SEPTA Subway-Surface Lines," and I'd like to know if you'd consider letting me delete your version. ----DanTD (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:U2 3D Santiago.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Best regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Underground.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 52b1e5c78cb6890ff11773ad609c4309
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Dream out loud (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 11:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Koyaanisqatsi.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Bart-map.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:I Love New York.svg was uncategorized on 20 September 2009.
- Image:PopMart setlist.svg was uncategorized on 15 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
File:National_Rail_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sv1xv (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Swindon_Magic_Roundabout_eng.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Dream out loud (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
File:The Walt Disney Company.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Killiondude (talk) 03:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Tube_map_1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
212.225.108.96 23:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Castaway_Cay_anchors.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Powers (talk) 03:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
File:MBTA_Boston_subway_map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Prosfilaes (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Caylee_and_Casey_Anthony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Caylee_and_Casey_Anthony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Courcelles (talk) 17:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:HiawathaNoNames.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:HiawathaNoNames.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HiawathaNoNames.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
It was almost an year ago amongst the countless DR I worked in, plus I was a freshman as admin at time. Maybe next time would be better that such kind of licence tags are overviewed by an admin coming from the U.S. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The photo of the DART Rail map is mine. I took that photo two years ago with an old iPhone on one of the trains and I cropped it. Before I cropped it you could see out of the train window. In other words, that photo does not belong to DART nor was it lifted from their website or any other DART publications. I have an original with the wall of the train and the scenery outside of the window visible. Would it still be a copyright violation to post that? Is it a copyright violation to take pictures inside of a train--or even of the trains or stations? Kevin1086 (talk) 03:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I understand the photo was yours, but the map of which you took a picture is copyrighted by DART. Because the entire photograph consisted of a copyrighted map, the image does not belong on Commons. Dream out loud (talk) 03:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Jlkcenter.jpg
[edit]Actually, File:Jlkcenter.jpg does have a source. It was originally uploaded by User:FrickFrack on Wikipedia, and I uploaded it to the commons with the licenses still in tact. I thought that was pretty clear there. ----DanTD (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- That only notes that it was transferred from Wikipedia, but doesn't indicate the original source of the image (e.g. website, publication, self-made, Flickr). Dream out loud (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, did you contact the original uploader about this? ----DanTD (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- You still haven't told User:FrickFrack about this, so I did. ----DanTD (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, did you contact the original uploader about this? ----DanTD (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bono Liberty Medal.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bono Liberty Medal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bono Liberty Medal.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
shizhao (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
File:The Walt Disney Company.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elisfkc (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Koyaanisqatsi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:CITT summit poster.jpg
[edit]Are you sure? I realize the county logo may be copyrighted, or the partial render of the train, but it takes up a small amount of the photo. Unless the entire poster placed on a public street in Government Center, is copyrighted, the details are coincidental. Millions of photos catch a logo or typeface that's copyrighted such as the naming rights on buildings, stadiums, and smaller items like cups and packaging. If it ultimately is "too copyrighted" (this topic must get quite gray), could it be uploaded directly to Wikipedia under fair use as are album covers? At any rate, by next year it should be unnecessary as the rolling stock will be debuting at some point. Thank you. B137 (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Nevermind! :D Sorry for the copyvio, it was not intentional. B137 (talk) 06:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Wandervogel greif.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
File:National Rail logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
File:American Airlines Group logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Metrolink (St. Louis) maps
[edit]Your very good improvements to the St. Louis Metrolink maps inadvertently left out the recent extension of the Blue Line east to Fairview Heights station. Do you mind fixing that? I don't mind doing it myself if you prefer, but I figure you might rather not have me mucking around with it. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Done, thanks for bringing it to my attention Dream out loud (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
File:I Love New York.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Boston college town map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Boston college town map.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Boston college town map.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Missvain (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 10 September 2022 (UTC)