User talk:Elucidate

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Elucidate!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Not Cape gooseberry flowers

Hello Elucidate,
I didn't manage to find out what species this flower 50px was, but this is obviously not Ribes uva-crispa (look at what it could look like 50px), nor any other Ribes species.
I think it could belong to Solanaceae or Convolvulaceae family, but I am not sure at all. Was it a vine? Have you any other pictures of the same flower under other angles ? You could try to ask the question on this page : Category:Unidentified plants though it doesn't seem very active and answers do not arrive very quickly, but you could be lucky once.
Cheers.
--B.navez (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Damn ! I knew I knew it !

Gooseberries in Europe apply to some of Ribes species, but in South Africa it concerns Physalis peruviana, belonging to the Solanaceae family. Delicious by the way.

--B.navez (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Not so simple to change a file name

You must upload again the picture with the right name.

Then you put the template {{dupe|rightnamedimage.jpg}} at the top of the text of the wrong named image and a robot will do the deletion in a couple of days.

--B.navez (talk) 18:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality images

What are you doing with the promoted QIs??? Why are you removing them? --Eusebius (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dew on nasturtium leaf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wrong identification (could be Tropaeolum). -- Lycaon 13:48, 27 October 2008 Lycaon 17:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Comment Has been identified correctly as Tropaeolum majus. Elucidate 08:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)(UTC) Support --Mrmariokartguy 03:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flowers of Lantana montevidensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Missing geotag. I would limit the scope to the flower, no other part of the plant is visible. Closest competitor. --Eusebius (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks ok to me. --Eusebius (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loquat leaf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Twdragon 18:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Dummy Image Generator

hi elucdate,

i wanted to inform you (and say a big thank you) that we use one of your images on http://dummy-image-generator.com/

the credits list you find here:

http://dummy-image-generator.com/credits

best regards immo