User talk:MarisaLR

Welcome to the Commons, MarisaLR!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 19:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Medina_Ayllon.Cristo_Yacente.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Medina_Ayllon.Cristo_Yacente.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. MesserWoland COM PL 20:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Avenida Meridiana2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Avenida Meridiana2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cúpula del crucero.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CatedraldeJaén2.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Detalle de retablo.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Presbiterio Catedral de Jaén.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Relicario sacristía.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Retablo Pedro de Machuca.jpg.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non commercial images

Hello! Images with a non commercial license such as those from [1] are not allowed on Commons. We only allow CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. See Commons:Sobre las licencias for more information. Puedes encontrar un administrador que hable español en Commons:List of administrators by language. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Espiadimonis

Gracias por tu comentario. ¡Me gusta espiadimonis! Subiré más, pero poco a poco.--David Perez (talk) 15:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, MarisaLR!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mare de Déu de Baiasca.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2009.
Image:MBACO os 7 estudio de dos figuras masculinas pedro orrente.jpg was uncategorized on 27 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Clau de volta Verge de Misericòrdia.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Taula de sant Miquel-Mestre de Soriguerola.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Urna de san Cándido-MNAC.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Parte lateral urna sant Càndid-MNAC.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Part lateral urna sant Càndid2-MNAC.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bautismodecristocartujath0.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done --MarisaLR (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foto

Hola Marisa, aquí la tienes File:Porta bronzea di Barisano.jpg, pero no encontré la llave ;) Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:La_caricia_de_un_pájaro.jpg

File:La_caricia_de_un_pájaro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Léna (talk) 10:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear MarisaLR,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Saint-Petersburg loves you, thank you! :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pifia

Estar estaba, pero como habías subido tu pedacito con el mismo nombre quedaba en segundo lugar y era tu versión la que aparecería en los artículos. La he devuelto al original y borrado tu versión File:Catedral de Toledo.Altar Mayor (huge).jpg, así que si te propones ir subiendo detalles del retablo puedes nombrarlos como File:Catedral de Toledo.Altar Mayor (detalle1).jpg o algo por el estilo. Besos, facedora de entuertos :P Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Borra el caché y las cookies en el navegador que usas y vuelve a intentar la subida. Si no da resultado espera un par de días a ver si el software olvida que esa imagen fue borrada y si eso tampoco funciona me lo dices a ver qué se me ocurre. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¡Buen truco bruja lista! Al meterla en el programa de fotos otra vez has modificado los metadatos y el software wikero ya no ha podido reconocerla. A mí también me va a servir el truco, ya sabré lo que aconsejar al próximo que le pase lo mismo. Besos y feliz Nochevieja, que poquito nos queda ya. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josep Irla. Generalidad.jpg.JPG

File:Josep Irla. Generalidad.jpg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kippelboy (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lluís Companys.Generalidad.jpg copia.jpg

File:Lluís Companys.Generalidad.jpg copia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kippelboy (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josep Tarradellas. Genralidad.jpg.JPG

File:Josep Tarradellas. Genralidad.jpg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kippelboy (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Albarelo

Ya lo he resuelto, lee la sección del wikiproyecto :-) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tu cosaco

le he dado más watios. --Afilador (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¿Que

electricista, perdón, licencia usas al subir tus imágenes? --Afilador (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hago lo que sigue: Subir/Asistente para subir archivos/lo subo/abajo derecha dice: Usar una licencia diferente/Salen 3 opciones/ ¿cual tengo que elegir para que me salga la licencia que tú usas? Porque si miras los por mí subidos, mi licencia es demasiado simple, la tuya es más concreta. En esas 3 opciones no está la que tú utilizas. --Afilador (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Este es el texto que me gustaría que saliese en mi licencia y que sale en la tuya: atribución – Debes atribuir el trabajo de la manera especificada por el autor o persona que lo haya licenciado (pero no de manera que sugiera que estas personas te respaldan o respaldan el uso que hagas del trabajo). --Afilador (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ayuda

Vale, vale, reservaré los dedos y las neuronas para la próxima misión. Un par de cosillas, la imagen está categorizada y a la señora la veo en horizontal, aunque si tú la ves vertical puede que se esté preparando para huir de tus manejos . Un beso. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Te cuento, así te sirve de chuleta para el próximo recorte.

Como tu imagen la has nombrado igual que la original, al subirla lo que has hecho es ponerla en primer lugar, fíjate que en el historial del archivo aparecen las dos versiones, pero ahora en los artículos solo se verá tu versión y esa es la que ha heredado las categorías de la otra, porque está en la misma página. Para no eliminar una imagen (de la vista de artículos) es mejor modificar el nombre, si al copiarla en tu ordenador la renombras con la coletilla (recortada) la puedes subir como una imagen nueva y entonces sí, le pones las categorías y la información de donde procede. Para eso puedes usar esta herramienta o si te resulta muy complicado me lo dices y pongo yo la info. La ventaja de renombrar es poder tener las dos versiones para utilizar la que más convenga.

Si te apetece puedes hacer el experimento con esta, así practicas y luego yo borro tu versión de la página original. Ale, esta clase va gratis, en la próxima ya te pasaré la factura ;) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pues va a ser que nones. He repasado toda la categoría de Henry Moore y tus contribuciones y la única imagen que aparece es File:Dartington Hall Gardens - geograph.org.uk - 126410.jpg (en tus contribuciones para indicar que has subido una versión nueva, nada más), si hubieras subido una titulada File:Dartington Hall Gardens - geograph.org.uk - 126410 (recortada).jpg además de verse aquí en azul, estaría con ese nombre tanto en la categoría como en tus contribuciones, como imagen independiente. Solo se me ocurre que en tu ordenador tengas dos, la imagen original descargada y la copia renombrada, y al subirla eligieras la equivocada. Si no es así, ya sabes quien te anda haciendo faenas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC) P.D: el ver tu versión recortada 2 horas después no es misterioso, es culpa de la caché (memoria) del navegador, a veces se actualiza al instante y otras puede tardar minutos u horas.[reply]

He movido tu imagen recortada File:Dartington Hall Gardens - geograph.org.uk - 126410 (recortada).jpg, por si la quieres usar en algún sitio. Un beso. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear MarisaLR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Обратите внимание: номинация Europeana GLAM

http://www.wikimedia.ru/blog/2012/11/27/wiki-loves-monuments-nominaciya-europeana-glam/ Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 08:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No lo había visto pero, de todos modos, como suspendí el cirílico en el parvulario me quedo a dos velas :( Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dice: «Nota: nominado Europeana GLAM» y lo firma «Anastasia Lviv» En la web dice: «Wiki ama monumentos: Nominado Europeana GLAM. Hasta el 5 de diciembre se abre el plazo para votar a favor del ganador de Europeana GLAM. Se realizará una selección de de 50 fotos, y por votación una ganadora, y el futuro de la exposición virtual, que se coloque en el lugar de Europeana, socio del concurso mundial de Wiki Loves Monuments. La votación se realiza en Facebook; para votar por una imagen, debe ser usuario. Entre los candidatos para el Premio incluyen a participantes de la parte rusa de la fotografía de concurso MarisaLR (publicado como todas las fotos del concurso bajo una licencia libre cc-by-sa 3.0).» Ale, más o menos. --DPC (talk) 07:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias a ambos, enterarme más o menos me había enterado, lo que comentaba era la sorpresa que he recibido (agradable desde luego).--MarisaLR (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah!, pues sí ¡menuda sorpresa! a mi nunca me han escrito tan raro :O. --DPC (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¿Y cuál es la foto? ¿y donde tengo que votar? --DPC (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Ah! Ahora voy pillando algo, gracias al don de lenguas de este caballero. Uséase, que esa preciosidad de foto es tuya y está nominada a algo así como el Óscar fotográfico, pues no me extraña. Voy a googlear un poco a ver si me entero de dónde se vota y a buscar un cilicio para mortificar mi ignorancia, que la bruja ya me ha regañado. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lo tengo. Esta es la web del concurso y ahí está el enlace para la página de Facebook donde se vota (si tienes cuenta). Me voy a ver afoticos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No soy de las primer, mujer, mi voto ha sido el 20. Y la única trampa que he hecho es votar antes de dejaros el enlace, no fuera a ser el sitio equivocado, o no supiera meter el voto en la urna...y tuviera que venir a preguntar. Tú asegúrate que explicas bien el sistema de votación, solamente hay que clicar en "me gusta" (se ve al poner el puntero encima de la foto) y cuidadín con el "ya no me gusta que aparece" después. ¡Suerte! ;) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

... no tengo Facebook , pero le daré publicidad. --DPC (talk) 07:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He votado a través de la página de una amiga :). Y a mi también me escriben en «raro», para que veas. En este caso no soy capaz de entender nada, es de la Wiki macedonia. --DPC (talk) 09:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Traducción

Hola Marisa, me parece recordar que sabías algo de francés. ¿Podrías ayudarme con la traducción de un pie de foto? Gracias --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 22:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Felices fiestas a ti también. Sobre lo otro, no te preocupes, ya lo he resuelto. Un saludo --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 22:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Adam and Eve- Brauner-euresponsive 4.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Adam and Eve- Brauner-euresponsive 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Adam and Eve- Brauner-euresponsive 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Painter Victor Brauner died only in 1966. Thereby his works are protected til end of 2036. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep this discussion at one place. I fail to see the basis for this image being in the public domain. As I told you already, his works should be copyrighted til end of 2036 (death-year +70) and this includes any reproductions of this works. Even the image file source says "Rights: © c/o Pictoright Amsterdam 2011", whatever that means. If you prefer a broader discussion woth input from other user, we could open a deletion-discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Marisa, sí, Túrelio tiene razón. Hasta el 2036 no la podrás subir, esperemos que aún tengas ganas de hacerlo entonces ;). --DPC (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 2c29d496afa0d860c2d7445aa2c5ce0d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Murals ceràmica Sant Andreu

No crec que ningú ho hagi escrit fent-se passar per ell, no tindria cap sentit :) Com que tinc vigilada la Taverna de Commons ho he vist. --Dvdgmz (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear MarisaLR,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,

the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Message delivered by odderBot on 14:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detalle de columnas con adornos renacentistas del Palacio Nacional de Barcelona.jpg

File:Detalle de columnas con adornos renacentistas del Palacio Nacional de Barcelona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!

Acabo de categorizar un par de imágenes tuyas, y he decidido pasarme a saludar. Y de paso, felicitarte por la cantidad de fotografías que has decidido compartir aquí. No las he visto todas aún, pero algunas son para quedarse con la boca abierta. También aprovecho para enseñarte algunas fotos en Flickr de la catedral de Jaén, si ves alguna interesante que podamos subir aquí me lo comentas, comprobamos la licencia y la subimos. Todavía recuerdo con nostalgia el reportaje de fotos que me pediste, y no quería dejar pasar la ocasión de enseñarte esas fotos. ¡Un saludo! Kordas (sínome!) 13:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Anunciación Greco-Sigüenza.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anunciación Greco-Sigüenza.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Los Cuatro Elementos, Jaen--¿dos versiones?

Hola! Estoy buscando una foto de la fuente de Los Cuatros Elementos de Jaén, Andalucía, por Paco Tito, y hace unos años creo que ví dos versiones de este por usted. Uno es ésto-

El otro fue la misma fuente pero al otro punto de vista, y fue mojada en lugar de seca. Fue borrado del Wikimedia? Si todavía lo tiene, sería posible ponerlo otra vez en Wikimedia?

Muchísimas gracias!

Katschra (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Benet Viñes.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Benet Viñes.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Benet Viñes.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hola Marisa, desconozco el caso que mencionas, pero me da la impresión de que no tenía mucho que ver con esto; yo también me he encontrado burradas en es:wiki, en un sentido y en otro. Me hablas del nombre conocido actualmente más correcto. No especificas cuál, podrías indicarme cuál es y por qué lo es? Te lo comento porque, a través de terceros, he oído hablar de tu buen nombre y prestigio (no me he cruzado mucho contigo, pero cuando he visto alguna edición tuya la he considerado más que fiable); y en fin, me da la impresión de que cuando hablas de algo, sabes de lo que hablas.

En relación a lo que comentas, yo también he aportado datos, bastante sólidos creo y de la misma manera que yo no desprecio los datos aportados por otros (razón por la cual estoy dialogando con Panotxa), espero lo propio a los datos que yo he aportado, sin presupusiciones de que tal nombre es correcto y es el más conocido. Como le he dicho a Panotxa, el hecho de que diversas instituciones y culturales (que son una autoridad) tengan criterios dispares sencillamente me hacen sentar la duda de que la que se suponía forma correcta...sea tal, fuera del ámbito catalán y que fuera del ámbito catalán sea también la más empleada.

Esto me recuerda al caso de Francisco Ferrer Guardia. Él nunca usó la forma "Francesc Ferrer i Guardia" como su nombre (su tumba es bastante ilustrativa al respecto), esto será la forma moderna que en Cataluña se ha adoptado de forma oficial o semi-oficiosa para referirse a él, pero eso ni lo convierte en su nombre ni es el más empleado ni es el correcto. Y mira qué categoría tiene. Y aquí planteo lo mismo, más allá del cambio inicial que hice. Mi traslado será discutible, cuestionable, opinable, pero la forma anterior es bastante cuestionable que por sentado la correcta, oficial y la más usada...globalmente. Manuchansu (talk) 11:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, sí que es cuestión de datos, de pararse a pensar las cosas, y quizás menos dar por sentadas las cosas como si se tratara de un dogma incuestionable. No está de más reexaminar las cosas, sobre todo lo que suele darse por hecho.

Que la grafía no estuviera normalizada no es argumento para renombrar nombres 10, 40 o 70 años después, eso sería semejante a lo que en derecho es la aplicación retroactiva de las leyes. Para mi sorpresa hace años descubrí que Pompeu Fabra no era tal cuando nació, sino Pompeyo Fabra; es motivo eso para cambiarlo? No, nadie, o casi nadie lo conoce o se atreve a llamarlo de esa forma. ¿Por qué? Porque es un 99,9999999999999999999999999999% conocido como Pompeu Fabra, porque la mayor parte de su vida se le conoció como Pompeu Fabra, punto. No tiene más historia (si acaso da para nota historiográfica).

Pero entiendo yo que aquí la cosa cambia. Y en este caso (el de Guimera/Guimerá/Guimerà), ni en vida usó una única forma, ni después de muerto se ha usado una única forma. Y el hecho es que no es difícil encontrar distintas formas, porque a diferencia de otros escritores modernos, no tiene un único criterio y no es difícil encontrar distintas versiones incluso a día de hoy. Y es a partir de esa premisa, es de donde se debe partir. Respecto a lo último que comentas de las tildes, una de las propuestas de Panotxa es precisamente dejar la categoría sin tildes, cosa que después de todo me pareció una buena idea.

Por último, comentarte que me parece acojonante (perdón por la palabra) que en ca:wiki lleguéis al extremo de estas cosas, sobre buscar apoyos artificiales para inflar la pelota y buscar un administrador "amigo" para tratar de manipular los procesos normales de Commons...no inspira mucha confianza en cuanto a la cuestión de Guimera. Lo que me parece sorprendente es que varios han tenido constancia de esto y no han hecho nada, pero bueno, tampoco me sorprende. Manuchansu (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sólo trataba de dar mi opinión y podeer dialogar un poco sobre el tema en cuestión. Otras situaciones no me importan mucho. --MarisaLR (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

`

Manipuláis la historia y para intentar saliros con la vuestra, creáis confusión, así que me da que poco más hay que decir. Está claro que la buena opinión que tenía sobre ti está sobrevalorada, a la vista de las últimas intervenciones que he visto en el hilo de Guimerá. Manuchansu (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnus Dei St. Climent de Tahüll.JPG

File:Agnus Dei St. Climent de Tahüll.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Iruka13 (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fotografías

Hola Marisa, el grabado es de Frances D. Cage, confirmado por la edición digital de History of Woman Suffrage, Volume I, referencia que, de paso, he añadido en la imagen. De Hannah Tracy Cutler no he encontrado ni dibujos, ni grabados, así que he tenido que borrarla para que no siga suplantando a la otra dama.
Un abrazo bien fuerte (que por aquí es seguro) y cuídate mucho, sobre todo de ese mal bicho que anda despendolao. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MarisaLR

Image Tagging Image:Medina_Ayllon.Cristo_Yacente.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Avenida Meridiana2.jpg

Non commercial images

Espiadimonis

Tip: Categorizing images

Foto

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Some stroopwafels for you!

Re:Pifia

Re:Albarelo

A tu cosaco

¿Que

Re:Ayuda

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Обратите внимание: номинация Europeana GLAM

Traducción

File tagging File:Adam and Eve- Brauner-euresponsive 4.jpg

TUSC token 2c29d496afa0d860c2d7445aa2c5ce0d

Murals ceràmica Sant Andreu

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Hola!

Copyright status: File:Anunciación Greco-Sigüenza.JPG

Los Cuatro Elementos, Jaen--¿dos versiones?

File source is not properly indicated: File:Benet Viñes.jpg

Re:

Re:Fotografías

Navigation menu

Search