User talk:Pradigue
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
SieBot 19:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Phenix.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
William Avery 13:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Classification des images
[edit]
Bonjour !
Merci de contribuer à Wikimedia Commons. Gardez à l'esprit que les images déposées sur le serveur doivent pouvoir être utilisées par l'ensemble des utilisateurs des projets Wikimedia. Ceci n'est possible que si vos images peuvent être trouvées par d'autres que vous.
Nous avons élaboré un système de classification par catégories dans lequel vous devriez intégrer les images que vous déposez ici, de façon à permettre aux autres de les trouver en parcourant l'arbre des catégories. Ceci signifie que vous devez ranger les images dans les bonnes catégories et éventuellement les ajouter aux galeries, ces pages qui couvrent un sujet donné (voir Commons:Catégories).
Pour trouver des catégories pertinentes pour vos images, vous pouvez vous aider de l'outil CommonSense. À travers cette galerie, vous pourrez obtenir un récapitulatif pratique des fichiers que vous avez déposés sur Commons.
Ce qui est important, c'est que les images soient placées quelque part dans la structure générale. Il y a actuellement un grand nombre d'images sans aucun lien avec notre système de classification par catégories. Si vous désirez donner un coup de main pour ranger certaines de ces images à un endroit judicieux où on pourra les trouver, n'hésitez pas !
Merci. Yuval Y § Chat § 16:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Motyé_carte.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Motyé_carte.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 07:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I hereby grant permission to use the map, provided that "(c) Livius.Org" is mentioned somewhere. Jona Lendering / Livius2 (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Motya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I hereby grant permission to use the photo, provided that "(c) Livius.Org" is mentioned somewhere. Jona Lendering / Livius2 (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:TermeFemminili.jpg is uncategorized since 3 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Beirut Museum.jpg is uncategorized since 8 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Gilded Bronze statuette .jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
- Image:Inscription édilitaire MNC.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Céramiques MNC.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Ganymede musee paleochretien 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Stèle éléphant musée carthage.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Batteries longueville.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Louvre AO Stele scène religieuse.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:MNC Chapelle cintas.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Masque baal MN Carthage.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Gallieno - erf rp2774.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
- Image:Sbeitla vue générale.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
- Image:Sbeitla thermes.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
- Image:Sbeitla forum.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Motyé_carte.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rocket000(talk) 12:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Chemtou
[edit]Salut Pradigue. Merci beaucoup pour votre message et pour vos encouragements. Je mets souvent des photos sur wikimedia commons dans le cadre du projet wiki Tunisie, surtout sur la wikipédia arabe, où je suis administrateur... Très enchanté de faire votre connaissance et ça serait toujours un plaisir de correspondre avec vous ici sur wikimedia commons (surtout que je vous connais à travers vos collaborations avec Moumou82 dans le cadre du projet fr wiki Tunisie, et tous vos exploits et récompenses que vous avez eu dans ce projet-là). Alors, faites-moi savoir vos demandes de photos que je serai enchanté de les fournir (dans les limites du possible, parfois), ainsi que vos critiques. N'hésitez surtout pas à me contacter. Merci beaucoup.--DrFO.Jr.Tn (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Grand merci. Pour ce qui est du site archéologique de Chemtou: Je m'en excuse, car je n'ai pas d'autres photos. Toutefois, j'essaierai de remédier à cela dans le futur proche, dès que l'occasion se présente. Pour ce qui est de Kerkouane, ça tombe à pique, car demain j'ai une amie autrichienne qui va aller visiter ce site archéologique, et elle va pouvoir faire de belles photos (sur ma demande que je viens de lui faire à l'instant). N'hésitez pas à contacter pour toute demande ou suggestion. Bonne soirée ou bonne journée.--DrFO.Jr.Tn (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Photos Flickr
[edit]Hello,
Tu as dernièrement chargé des photos Flickr de l'amphithéâtre d'El Jem. Certaines d'entre elles n'ont aucune description. Pourrais-tu t'en charger ? Merci, Moumou82 (talk) 08:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ilôt_amirauté_carthage.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ilôt_amirauté_carthage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ilôt_amirauté_carthage.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 07:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Musée historique de Haguenau - voiture du maire Nessel
[edit]Bonjour
J'ai vu et apprécié vos photos du musée historique de Haguenau, un musée que j'aime beaucoup, notamment pour le pittoresque de sa décoration intérieure. Auriez-vous l'occasion d'y retourner ? On trouve en effet dans ce musée la voiture du maire Nessel, une automobile splendide datant des années 1900, en parfait état de conservation. Malheureusement, il n'existe pas de photo sur Internet - à ma connaissance en tout cas - de ce bijou de l'industrie automobile de nos aïeux. Pourriez-vous la photographier sous divers angles ? Et aussi, puisque vous y serez - si jamais vous y êtes - la cage d'escalier, le vestibule et la salle à coupole du musée, trois intérieurs particulièrement magnifiques ?
Il manque aussi des photos du musée de Saverne relatives à sa collection archéologique très riche et à son fonds médiéval, assez présentable. J'ai cru comprendre que vous étiez de la région ( je ne le suis pas ) - pourriez-vous en prendre également, un jour ?
Cordiales salutations et remerciements très vifs
Edelseider (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pour améliorer les photos, il faut s'adresser ici, ils font des miracles et même l'impossible.--Edelseider (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- C'est vrai que File:Haguenau musée hall.JPG ne peut être sauvé ( un flou est un flou ), mais pour les reflets, les spécialistes les élimineront rapidement. Bonne soirée ( je vais me mettrre au lit ), --Edelseider (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
plan de Rome
[edit]Bonjour,
C'est très gentil de ta part de trouver que mes photos sont réussies. Et encourageant. Je n'ai pas de photos en stock du plan, mais ne demande pas mieux que d'en faire dès que possible. As-tu des souhaits particuliers ? (plan général, ou autres...)
Cordialement, Michel wal (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Merci de ta prompte réponse. J'ai été bluffé par la belle photo de la mosaïque, qui est extraordinaire.
- L'idéal pour le plan serait d'avoir des vues globales sur divers angles, et aussi si possible des vues de détail d'éléments emblématiques : par exemple le Colisée, le Panthéon, le Mausolée d'Auguste, le forum de Trajan...C'est selon l'envie et la possibilité ! La particularité du plan de Bruxelles est d'être peint ainsi que tu le sais. L'idée est de travailler l'article de wikipedia francophone (j'y travaille principalement des articles d'archéologie). Je dois aller photographier à nouveau le plan de Caen (j'ai quelques photos en stock aussi). Pour dire tout, j'ai également demandé la mise à disposition sur commons de photos du plan de Gismondi.
- Bien cordialement, Pradigue (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
le Bardo
[edit]Bonjour Pradigue, J'ai pris quelques photos des mosaïques d'Achola et de vénus, j'espère qu'ils sont les bonnes --Rais67 (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Chiragan
[edit]Bonjour ! J'en ai pas mal en réserve (et User:PierreSelim aussi, on va les mettre en ligne le plus rapidement possible (là, on s'occupe déjà des photos de Stade toulousain/Agen :)). Au pire on habite pas très loin du Musée Saint Raymond et on pourra y retourner le 4 mars.
Salut,
Il semble que tu avais jugé ce fichier comme fantaisiste et non fiable. Si c'est le cas, je suggère de le proposer à la suppression, sachant que tu as sûrement plus d'arguments au niveau historique que moi. Moumou82 (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Salut Mourad,
- Je confirme que ce plan est une invention. Si c une "vue d'artiste" pourquoi ne pas conserver mais la position du temple d'Eshmoun est supposée dans le prolongement de l'agora alors que sa position était sans doute sur Byrsa, en face donc du quartier de Magon actuel. Pradigue (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, j'ai modifié les descriptions en conséquence. Je te laisse voir si tu souhaites préciser qqch. Moumou82 (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Pas mal comme ça. J'ai été contacté par l'auteur sur wiki espagnol (j'ai ôté l'image des articles historiques, faut être sérieux). Pradigue (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, j'ai modifié les descriptions en conséquence. Je te laisse voir si tu souhaites préciser qqch. Moumou82 (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 16:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: . Idem pour ce fichier c'est du vieux (je ne vais pas regarder assez ma page de discussion commons !) Pradigue (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Tunisie en Suisse
[edit]Hello,
Lors d'une expédition Wiki Loves Monuments au Palais des Nations à Genève, j'ai eu le plaisir de tomber sur ceci. J'ai immédiatement pensé à toi . Moumou82 (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Salut,
- Je veux bien la même ! Super ! au fait il semble que l'original ne soit plus dans la salle du harem du Bardo, en sais tu davantage ? Pradigue (talk) 16:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Non, je n'en sais pas plus à ce stade. Moumou82 (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Pradigue, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Copyright status: File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 1.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 3.JPG
- File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 4.JPG
- File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 5.JPG
- File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 6.JPG
- File:Ganymede - L. Rahmouni 7.JPG
- File:Ganymede- L. Rahmouni 2.JPG
Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Vénus de Montagne
[edit]Salut ! La cour du Sphinx est fermée au public depuis des lustres : elle sert de réserve dans le cadre du plan inondation. Cela dit il est question de la rouvrir. Je passerai voir où ça en est. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- La dernière fois que je suis passée, en janvier, une partie des œuvres sous bâche avaient été déménagées de la salle du Sphinx, on peut donc espérer, même si je ne sais pas ce qu'il y aura dedans… Un certain nombre des œuvres annoncées comme étant salle du Sphinx sur la base Atlas sont en fait exposées ailleurs. Donc j'irai faire un tour et on en aura le cœur net, idem pour la Phénicie et Carthage. Je ne suis jamais allée faire de photos à Bordeaux (c'est une bonne idée cela dit). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Vénus salle 31
[edit]Bonjour,
j'ai transféré qqs photos que tu peux voir ici. Bon article, --Mbzt (talk) 18:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze
[edit]Hallo Pradigue,
in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.
Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.
In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.
Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
[edit]Hallo Pradigue,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
File:Musée Normandie Donville.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Pradigue,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Eugène Boudin, Marine, 1883.jpg
[edit]Hi and congratulations for your work! However, this painting's real author is Boudin and should be in the public domain without any personal licence - as other paintings from Boudin do. Consider to change your copyright or to add the CC0 "licence". Best regards
File source is not properly indicated: File:Carthage chrétienne 1910.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carthage chrétienne 1910.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: Pourrais tu restaurer le fichier au moins temporairement pour que j'ajoute la source ? Les cartes que je poste sont toutes anciennes et je n'ai pas vu le msg. Merci ! amicalement Pradigue (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Dans l'aboslu pas de problème mais par précaution, pourrais-tu d'abord me donner la source pour que je vérifie ? (je te fais confiance mais on ne sais jamais, le copyright peut être rapidement piégeux et 1910 est dans la zone grise). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour @VIGNERON: mais il faudrait m'envoyer le fichier par mail --mail masqué-- que je l'identifie ça fait perpète que j'ai fait le transfert (ça doit être audollent mais il faut vérifier). merci Pradigue (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ah d’accord, je n’avais pas pensé à ce « détail », j’ai donc restauré le fichier et je te fais confiance pour mettre la source (rapidement si possible avant qu'un autre admin ne re-supprime le fichier). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Merci c'est bien Auguste Audollent, passé de vie à trépas en 1943 donc c'est ok. Pradigue (talk) 10:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Merci, j'ai crée et mis le modèle Creator pour Auguste Audollent, c'est encore mieux ainsi. Par contre, Auguste Audollent est l'auteur, pour être parfaitement dans les règles, pourrais-tu aussi indiquer la source ? (j'imagine que c'est un livre mais lequel ?) Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Merci c'est bien Auguste Audollent, passé de vie à trépas en 1943 donc c'est ok. Pradigue (talk) 10:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ah d’accord, je n’avais pas pensé à ce « détail », j’ai donc restauré le fichier et je te fais confiance pour mettre la source (rapidement si possible avant qu'un autre admin ne re-supprime le fichier). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour @VIGNERON: mais il faudrait m'envoyer le fichier par mail --mail masqué-- que je l'identifie ça fait perpète que j'ai fait le transfert (ça doit être audollent mais il faut vérifier). merci Pradigue (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Dans l'aboslu pas de problème mais par précaution, pourrais-tu d'abord me donner la source pour que je vérifie ? (je te fais confiance mais on ne sais jamais, le copyright peut être rapidement piégeux et 1910 est dans la zone grise). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
[edit]
Dear Pradigue,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
[edit]
Dear Pradigue,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Monument aux morts la rue saint pierre.jpg
[edit]I have nominated this image for as quality image candidate. If it gets a slight improvement it will gat passed. See here: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#July_15,_2020 --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 12:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you ! Pradigue (talk) 20:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Before the image can be promoted, it needs some processing by you. User:Poco a poco said "It needs a perspective correction, CA removal and a more specific category than the comune" --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 13:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour, @VIGNERON: j'ai envoyé le mail à l'auteur pour prise en charge OTRS sous licence compatible. Bien cordialement, Pradigue (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Claude Golvin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Salut Pascal,
Je viens de trouver cette catégorie donc je te la signale au cas où tu l'aurais manquée. Moumou82 (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Salut Mourad,
Merci je n'avais pas vu. Pradigue (talk) 14:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Participation à l'édition 2020 de Wiki loves monuments en France
[edit]Saut et merci pour ta participation à l'édition 2020 de Wiki Loves Monuments en France.
J'ai toutefois dû retirer les photos File:Église saint aubin de saint aubin sur algot.jpg, File:Église Saint-Martin de Repentigny façade.jpg, File:Église Saint-Martin de Repentigny 2.jpg, File:Église Saint-Martin de Repentigny vue du chevet.jpg car - sauf erreur - il ne s'agit pas de monuments admissibles au concours WLM.
Cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Salut Vigneron, Merci de m'informer. Après j'ai fait ça un peu à l'arrache comme je t'ai dit. Les photos seront utiles sur les projets je l'espère. ~Cordialement Pradigue (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Pradigue,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Beccut 1 Mouelhi Chaker.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Beccut 1 Mouelhi Chaker.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Beccut 1 Mouelhi Chaker.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Ticket OTRS [Ticket#2021010110001615],
- Regards, Pradigue (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Chapelle Saint Louis Carthage Frédéric Gadmer.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Chapelle Saint Louis Carthage Frédéric Gadmer.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Chapelle Saint Louis Carthage Frédéric Gadmer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Atelier de Jean-Claude Golvin, Vieux 2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Desman31 (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Mosaiques categorisées
[edit]Bonjour Pradigue. Pour information, j'ai mis des catégories sur des photos de mosaiques romaines venant de Tunisie et récupérées au Louvre. Les photos sont issues du fond Françoise Folliot, en espérant avoir mis les bonnes catégories. Ci-contre, les clichés.
Copyright status: File:Au pied du mur - Aspect de l'église st julien du Mans.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Au pied du mur - Aspect de l'église st julien du Mans.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Au pied du mur - Aspect de l'église st julien du Mans.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)