User talk:Rbrechko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rbrechko!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ангелівська доменна піч

[edit]

Вітаю. Дякую, що завантажили фото File:Anheliv Domna RB.jpg. Давно є потреба на фото Ангелівської домни у Вікіпедії. Нажаль, зображення на даному фото дещо тмяне і забагато сірого. Здається на фото не зовсім точна передача кольору мурування кожуха печі, реальний колір каміння у муруванні кожуха печі, здається, дещо інакший. Якщо буде можливість, зробіть більш яскраве фото Ангелівської домни для Вікіпедії, скажімо напровесні, коли буде зелена трава або влітку і бажано з різних ракурсів. Перепрошую за турботу. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні: Дякуємо!

[edit]

Вітаємо!

Ми дуже вдячні Вам за те, що Ви змогли взяти участь у конкурсі. Цього року конкурс проводився четвертий раз. Було завантажено 41675 фото (перше місце у світі!). Що важливіше, було завантажено світлини 13980 унікальних пам'яток, а з них 3773 — вперше цього року. Це просто неймовірні цифри, і це все завдяки Вам! Детальніше (зокрема і більше статистики) можете прочитати тут. Церемонія нагородження планується 21 листопада 2015 року у Києві. Деталі пізніше, але резервуйте день собі уже. Ми будемо раді бачити усіх

П. С. Будь ласка, переконайтеся, що у Ваших налаштуваннях увімкнена опція «Дозволити електронну пошту від інших користувачів».-- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 16:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ВЛП 2015

[edit]

Прохання завантажити у великій роздільності фото:

Ці фото були відібрані журі, у великій роздільності вони матимуть більше шансів на перемогу.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Зроблено. --User:Rbrechko
Hello, Rbrechko. You have new messages at [[User talk:[Rbrechko]#[ВЛП 2015]|[Rbrechko]'s talk page]].
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Запрошення на нагородження української частини «Вікі любить пам'ятки», 21 листопада 2015

[edit]

Привіт!

Запрошуємо Вас на церемонію нагородження переможців фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам’ятки» 2015 року. Захід відбудеться у суботу 21 листопада об 11:30 у Великій лаврській дзвіниці Національного Києво-Печерського історико-культурного заповідника. Конкурс в Україні відбувся вчетверте. Ми вважаємо, що потрібно підбити своєрідні підсумки, дуже хотілося б його поліпшити, а для цього потрібні ідеї, зокрема, Ваші. Як учасника. Тому ми будемо дуже вдячні, якщо Ви зможете прийти або поділитися своїми думками щодо цього на сторінці обговорення проекту чи на імейл оргкомітету wlm-ua@wikimedia.org. Детальніше про захід читайте тут: Оголошення церемонії нагородження переможців 2015.

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»--01:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horodkivka Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hubkiv Castle 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Обговорення української частини «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

[edit]

Привіт!

Запрошуємо Вас долучитися до обговорення як зробити конкурс кращим, що потрібно змінити. Первинне обговорення відбулося після церемонії нагородження переможців фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 2015 року у Національному Києво-Печерському історико-культурному заповіднику. Зі скороченим записом думок у порядку їх звучання можна ознайомитися тут: Записи з обговорення конкурсу. Свої міркування пишіть, будь ласка, на сторінці «Вікі любить пам'ятки». Можна писати на імейл оргкомітету wlm-ua@wikimedia.org.

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»--00:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Castle 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good.--Ahonc 13:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuty St Mykhail Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Privit Rbrechko, can you help me finding out the GPS coordinates of the object depicted in your photo? Thanks in advance, --Arnd (talk) 21:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure. Coordinates: 48°15′41.2″N 25°10′44.1″E --Rbrechko (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Категоризація зображень

[edit]

Вітання! Будь ласка, додавайте категорії відповідно до норм Вікісховища та тематики. --Mykola Vasylechko 07:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Не вводьте людей в оману, додаючи світлини не пам’яток природи, якщо не знаєте, де насправді та пам’ятка є! Приклади: File:Yazl_dibr_1.jpg, File:Vadivska Buchyna RB.jpg, File:Dniester Canyon near Khmeleva village RB.jpg. --Mykola Vasylechko 05:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Дякую за виправлення! На жаль, не маю в наявності координат для більшості пам’яток природи, тому при визначенні місць керувався різноманітними текстовими описами, які вдалось віднайти, або ж по фото, які були прив’язані до об’єкту. Виходить, що і там бувають помилки.
Маю ще ряд фото з південних районів Тернопільщини (Монастириський, Бучацький, Заліщицький, Борщівський), але, на жаль, без координат пам’яток природи маю сумніви щодо правильності прив’язки. Якщо володієте даними про місця розташування пам’яток природи (в першу чергу півдня Тернопільшини), то був би вдячним, якщо зможете поділитись ними. --Rbrechko (talk) 10:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Я би по Тернопільщині вже рік тому виставив усі наявні в мене карти об’єктів, але не можу це зробити церез авторське право, хіба виставляти на локальну українську. По Бучацькому району можу без проблем перевірити чи відповідає дійсності, бо сходив майже всю Бучаччину вздовж і впоперек. Шкода тільки, що про ПЗФ інформацію отримав тільки три роки тому. Інакше б уже всі бучацькі об’єкти були зі світлинами. Координати міг би виставити по кожній пам’ятці, але це великі затрати часу, бо треба звіряти за мапами на папері і за Гугль-мапою. Якщо це поодинокі дерева чи скелі — точні координати можна виставити без проблем, але якщо це об’єкти з гектарами, то хіба на Гугль-мапах чи OpenStreetMaps перемальовувати. Потроху уточнюю і виставляю, наскільки дозволяє час. Перепрошую за може трохи різкий попередній коментар, але якщо маєте ще світлини, то завантажуйте чи в рамках конкурсу, чи як, але вказуйте координати зйомки при завантаженні, тоді я точно зможу перевірити чи відповідає відзняте наявним картам ПЗФ. Дякую за розуміння. Шануймося. --Mykola Vasylechko 10:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Можете перевірити по наявних у Вас мапах чи попадає це фото (File:Khmelivska_dilianka_1_RB.jpg) в межі Хмелівської ділянки? По описах ніби підходить (принаймі відклади девону є), фото зроблено зовсім поруч від вказаної точки в списку пам'яток. Дякую! --Rbrechko (talk) 22:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
За всіма ознаками — так. Якраз ота дорога до повороту вправо, вірніше весь цей видолинок, по якому частково йде ця дорога і є Хмелівською ділянкою: від майже берега Дністра трохи гострим кутом розширюється і той видолинок (чи яр — на жаль, не був там) аж до краю села. Тож цей берег справа від дороги і ще зо 10-12 м на повороті є західною межею ділянки. Може, маєте ще світлини лівого боку видолинку або з виглядом на Хмелеву? До речі, якщо маєте ще світлини з тої місцини, то отой лівий краєчок на світлині на пагорбі вдалині (за деревами урвище) — це частина Берем'янської наскельно-степової ділянки.--Mykola Vasylechko 03:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Так, від села до повороту з іншого боку від дороги там яр, місцями прямо біля дороги йде урвище, а місцями практично до дороги підступає ліс (на гугл-мапс цього не видно). Маю фото (точніше набір фото з яких ще треба зліпити панораму) практично з цього ж місця, але в напрямку Дністра з видом на франківську Хмелеву. Тернопільської Хмелеви звідти не видно. Думаю, що влітку знову буду в тих краях, то спробую зробити більше фото тієї ділянки. Власне, вище ще й тому питав про місця розташування пам’яток природи в тих краях - по можливості би пофотографував.
Про Берем’янську ділянку в курсі :) Викладав її фото з Дністра, де повністю видно схил. --Rbrechko (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Там не весь схил. Я теж раніше думав, що Берем’янська наскельно-степова ділянка, то, власне, Червона гора. Але ж ні, як виявилося. Ділянка — це крайня права частина Червоної гори (якщо дивитися з тої точки, де ви знімали Червону гору), метрів зо 150 з правого краю :) . --Mykola Vasylechko 19:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dzhuryn waterfall RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smotrych Canyon RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sokolyni Hory RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. --Peulle 10:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheremoszky Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dub Lytiatskyi RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good composition. --Hubertl 09:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staroushytskyi Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bezodnia Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Yavorivskyi 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidkamin Ostanets RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Buchach Cathedral of the Annunciation RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mykola Vasylechko 08:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samchyky Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Jkadavoor 04:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasperivskyi Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0009 Kuty St Mykhail Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0009 Pidhirtsi Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0012 Pidhirtsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-203-0102 Horodkivka Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 08:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0047 Buchach Statue of Jan Nepomuk RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 16:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-216-0028 Rakovets Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality, but the resolution for this kind of image could be better. --XRay 15:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-104-0035 Berdychiv Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 05-243-0076 Tulchyn Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-0069 Losiach Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael church in Kuty, Ukraine. View from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chesnyky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Excellent detail and handling of difficult light, perspective in line with the hillside it's built on. --W.carter 10:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0010 Pidhirtsi Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0107 Nyrkiv Castle 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 15:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0015 Podobovets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0213 Dubno Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Horodkivka Catholic Church RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Horodkivka Catholic Church RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-252-0017 Sniatyn Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. Vertical lines are not straight. --Halavar 10:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done @Halavar: I've tried to correct perspective. Could you check? Thank you in advance. --Rbrechko 21:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 18:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0001 Berezdivtsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 12:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've tried to fix it. --Rbrechko 20:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 21:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0051 Shchyrets Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo from which quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0021 Buchach Halytska 130 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0002 Berezdivtsi Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Clare in Gorodkivka, View from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0017 Koropets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hnizdychiv Catholic Church RB 46-215-0018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I suppose that the day was so dark... If not, brighten it a bit, please. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0004 Verkhnia Bilka Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. There is a small spot (see note), probably a far away bird, because it looks too sharp to be a dust spot. Nevertheless I'd suggest to clone this out. --Smial 10:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-1986 Lviv Church of St George RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RLP Hutsulshchyna RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0228 Dubno Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-227-0028 Zhovkva Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality IMO. Dust spot correction is not perfect, but better--Lmbuga 15:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-104-0001 Mukachevo Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SKas 14:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-218-0024 Mytulyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Berezdivtsi, View from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-242-0070 Mezhyrich Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church_of_Saint_Nicholas,_Podobovets, View from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanivtsi Wooden Church RB 46-215-0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image needs a perspective correction. BTW, the quality would get better if you brightened the shadows and lowered the highlights a bit. --Basotxerri 16:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've tried to fix it. --Rbrechko 21:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now thank you. Did you notice that the cross was slanting this way when you were there? I suppose it was, how strange. --Basotxerri 18:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Запрошення на церемонію нагородження переможців фотоконкурсів ВЛП та ВЛЗ 3 грудня 2016

[edit]

Доброї пори доби! Дякуємо за участь у фотоконкурсі/ах, що проходили за підтримки «Вікімедіа Україна», та запрошуємо на церемонію нагородження переможців «Вікі любить пам'ятки» та «Вікі любить Землю» 2016 року, що відбудеться 3 грудня (субота) у Національному музеї історії України (м. Київ, вул. Володимирська, 2), початок об 11:00. Подія у Facebook.

З повагою, оргкомітети конкурсів.--20:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Buchach Agnon Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mykola Vasylechko 13:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
File:61-212-0050 Buchach Shevchenko Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

lNeverCry 02:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

lNeverCry 02:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-5003 Kyiv Volodymyrska Hirka RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-204-5023 Sokolyni Hory RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please correct me if I'm wrong but the image seems a bit too yellowish, doesn't it? Could you check the WB, please? --Basotxerri 15:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've uploaded new version of file. --Rbrechko 18:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks more natural now, thank you. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine

[edit]

Вітаємо!

Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlm@wikimediaukraine.org.ua

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-212-5007 NNP Skolivski Beskydy European Bizon RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-212-5007 NNP Skolivski Beskydy European Bizon 2 RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-5089 Dniester Canyon RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-215-5012 Livchytsi Alley RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks tilted to me --Poco a poco 11:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Fixed I've uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 11:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svirzh Grupa Vikovyh Dubiv i Lyp RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 04:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Yavorivskyi 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-9002 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 05-243-0080 Pechera Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-5054 NNP Synevyr RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5003 NNP Yavorivskyi RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-5089 Dniester Canyon 2 RB 18 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary church in Sniatyn, View from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Intercession, Mytulyn, View from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vyshnivets Castle, View from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-224-5003 Smotrych Canyon RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. IMO sharpness could be better, but it's acceptable. --XRay 07:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-5012 Chervonohorod Waterfall RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-115-5003 Ferdinand RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0107 Nyrkiv Castle 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The image looks like downscaled. Please upload the full resolution. --XRay 11:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Rbrechko 19:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable sharpness. Thank you. --XRay 04:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-5089 NNP Dnister Canyon 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:21-224-5054 NNP Synevyr RB 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:21-224-5054 NNP Synevyr RB 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Anthony, Losyach, View from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-235-5014 Nimchych RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Svirzh Castle, View from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2018 в Україні

[edit]

Вітаємо!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартувала українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Цього року є трохи змін у правилах конкурсу:

  • фотографії пам'яток, для яких на момент початку конкурсу (відповідно до відомої Організаційному комітету інформації) не було жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт рівний 7 (для кожної пам'ятки);
  • фотографії автоматично вантажаться у категорію, яка бере учать у номінації за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації за найкраще фото потрібно вибрати необхідні налаштування у завантажувачі.

Також у конкурсі є спецномінація банерів для статей у Вікімандрах, детальніше за посиланням.

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 22:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0009 Pidhirtsi Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-0148 Kyiv Warm Sophia's Church RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-0151 Kyiv St.Sophia's Cathedral RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-0151 Kyiv St.Sophia's Cathedral RB 18 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-9007 Kyiv St.Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-5005 Shypit Waterfall RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit of purple CA in the top --Poco a poco 18:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done I've removed CAs --Rbrechko 22:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great --Carschten 11:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB 18 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But: Categorization should be better: Dawn? Entrance? --XRay 14:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-1247 Kyiv Khmelnytsky Monument RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-242-0082 Novomalyn Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK imo. --ArildV 18:35, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-0548 Lviv Latin Cathedral RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not super sharp but good enought, nice composition and winter mood. --ArildV 14:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-1408 Lviv Korniakt Tower RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sharpness isn't the best, noise, categories for snow and night missing. --XRay 14:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Tried to fix this. --Rbrechko 15:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Weak support. Better, but sharpness is still not the best. --XRay 06:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Intercession, Verkhnia Bilka, View from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-104-0039 Kamianets-Podilskyi Bridge RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress RB 18 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be it's leaning out a little bit. --XRay 10:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0228 Dubno St Elias Church RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell_tower_of_the_Exaltation_of_the_Holy_Cross_church_in_Berezdivtsi, View from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0012 Pidhirtsi Church Interior RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0213 Dubno Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0107 Cherwonohorod Castle RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Please add an English description (such as the one you wrote here) to the image page (I did it for you). Also you added your image to the quality image category before it even got reviewed, that's not OK. --Trougnouf 22:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Category "Wiki loves monuments in Ukraine 2018 - Quality" doesn't mean that photo is quality image. There are two nominations in photo contest "Wiki loves monuments in Ukraine 2018": quality and quantity. And this category just means that image takes part in quality part of contest. Please don't remove this category. --Rbrechko 09:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC) Thank you. I removed the misleading Template:collection of quality images which had been added to Category:Wiki loves monuments in Ukraine 2018 - Quality by User:XRay. --Trougnouf 11:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-203-0102 Horodkivka Church RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is that cross really bent back like that? --Daniel Case 02:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. You can see this cross on other photos of this church ([[1]]) --Rbrechko 09:52, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK; it checks out --Daniel Case 03:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-212-0048 Buchach Bandera Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вікіпошта

[edit]

Доброго ранку! Перевірте, будь ласка, Вам мав надійти лист із формою. Дякую! --アンタナナ 23:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Добрий день! Прийшло, заповнив. Дякую! --Rbrechko (talk) 10:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshyn Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Quality and well balanced and composed. Acabashi 21:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0011 Svirzh Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 15:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Elijah the Prophet Orthodox church in Dubno, View from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0001 Monastyryska Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Acabashi 19:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-246-0002 Skoryky Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Added cats. Acabashi 16:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-242-9004 Samchyky Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5011 Nemyriv Wellsping N2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Ascension, Monastyryska, View from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-253-0001 Danylovo Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 21:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0002 Bibrka Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-253-0007 Sokyrnytsia Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:53, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-204-0064 Hubkiv Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source number 2 "Nemiroff", View from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:46-101-0548 Lviv Latin Cathedral RB 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:46-101-0548 Lviv Latin Cathedral RB 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5003 NNP Yavorivskyi RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
better categorization needed --MB-one 09:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Rbrechko 10:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Chenspec 11:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 травня!

[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня триває сьомий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом травня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Цього року є деякі зміни в правилах, зокрема:

  • фотографії пам'яток, які на момент початку конкурсу не мали жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт 10 в кількісній номінації. Якщо ви маєте фото ще не проілюстрованих пам'яток — це збільшить ваші шанси на перемогу;
  • окрема спецномінація для аерофотозйомки (фото з дронів тощо).

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wle@wikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English). 22:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image 68-104-9007_Kamianets-Podilskyi_Fortress_RB_18_2.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!


Good luck! I liked it very much. Cmao20 (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress RB 18 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress RB 18 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cmao20 (talk) 06:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартує українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До кінця вересня Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше про те, як взяти участь, можна прочитати за посиланням.

Із детальними правилами можна ознайомитися тут. Для тих, хто раніше уже брав участь у конкурсі — зауважте, що цього року є певні зміни:

  • у номінації «Найкраще фото» — файли повинні мати не менше 4 МПкс;
  • у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — оцінка фотографії пам'ятки складається із суми базового та додаткових балів (в останній враховується чи ця пам'ятка вже фотографувалася іншими авторами та скільки фотографій пам'яток уже є з цього населеного пункту);

Нагадаємо, що фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Також цього року маємо спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина» та «Млини». Також окремо відзначатимуться найкращі відео із пам'ятками.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна».

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medzhybizh Wall RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kminfo (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-242-0026 Koropets Kahanets Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 08:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mukachevo Kyrylo and Mefodiy Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:21-104-0088 Mukachevo Dukhnovych Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lviv Lychakiv Cemetery Grave Krushelnytska RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Опитування щодо «Вікі любить Землю» 2020 / Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Ukraine Survey

[edit]

English version below

Доброго дня! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо раніше брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні.

Зараз організатори конкурсу проводять опитування для учасників, аби вирішити, чи варто його проводити цього року — і якщо так, то коли. Видається, що через пандемію COVID-19 було б недоречно проводити українську частину «Вікі любить Землю» у традиційні дати, тобто протягом травня. Однак ми можемо провести його у червні або липні. Щоб визначитися, нам цікава ваша думка.

Детальніша інформація і опитування — за посиланням. Опитування буде відкрите до 14 квітня включно.

Якщо маєте питання, пишіть на wle@wikimedia.org.ua. Дякуємо! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! You are getting this message because you have participated in Wiki Loves Earth in Ukraine before.

Organizers of the contest are holding a survey for participants to decide on whether to hold the contest this year — and when to do it. It seems that holding Ukrainian Wiki Loves Earth within traditional dates in May would not be reasonable because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, we can hold the contest in June or July. To decide, we need your opinion.

More info and the survey can be found by this link. The survey will be open by April 14th.

If you have any questions, contact us at wle@wikimedia.org.ua. Thanks! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Білокриницький дендропарк

[edit]

Вітання! Раджу ознайомитися з план-схемою, перед тим як щось завантажувати на цю тему. --Микола Василечко (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Раджу подивитись на дати завантаження схеми і моїх фото. По опису ("Розташований у селі Білокриниці Кременецького району Тернопільської області, в межах садиби Кременецького лісотехнічного коледжу.") межі ПЗФ визначити важко, а фото зроблені на території коледжу, навколо якого парк. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Посилання на картосхеми ПЗФ Тернопільщини я виклав ще 26 липня 2016 року! --Микола Василечко (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ви справді думаєте, що багато людей (з тих, що завантажують фото на конкурс) бачили дане посилання (яке розташовується десь в обговореннях статті)? --Rbrechko (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:61-242-0027 Koropets Shevchenko Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 06:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 липня: Долучайтеся!

[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 липня триває восьмий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом липня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи.

Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз. Інструкцію, як взяти участь, читайте тут. Також ознайомтеся зі списками пам'яток природи України і переліком основних та спеціальних номінацій конкурсу

У порівнянні з минулим роком у регламент були внесені невеликі зміни, читайте про них тут.

Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися на wle@wikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English) 09:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. З найважливіших змін цього року:

  • у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — збільшився додатковий бал за фотографії пам'яток (якщо світлин пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено, то можна отримати 21 бал.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року теж є спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини» та «Відео». Також є спеціальна номінація від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — у ній автоматично беруть участь світлини всіх пам’яток міст України, через які пролягає Via RegiaДубно, Рівне, Острог, Львів, Броди, Городок (Львівська область), Луцьк, Володимир-Волинський, Радомишль, Житомир та Київ. Цього року у Завантажувачі не передбачено окремих параметрів для спецномінацій — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 06:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2020 в Україні: залишилося два тижні! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Ukraine: two weeks are left!

[edit]

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» триватиме ще два тижні, до 30 вересня!

За перші два тижні учасники завантажили понад 16 тисяч фото українських пам’яток. Це поки найбільший результат серед усіх 29 країн, які цьогоріч організовують конкурс. Свої роботи на українську частину конкурсу вже подали 239 авторів, половина із них вперше долучилися до змагання. На знімках представлені пам’ятки з усіх регіонів України. Загалом сфотографовано 5568 об’єктів із конкурсних списків.

Найменш представленими поки є Луганська (69 фото 45 об’єктів) і Херсонська (81 фото 38 об’єктів) області та місто Севастополь (136 фото 39 об’єктів). Якщо у вас (чи у ваших друзів та знайомих) є світлини з цих регіонів — без вагань долучайтеся до фотозмагання!

У рамках спеціальної номінації «Єврейська спадщина» завантажено понад 650 світлин 126 пам'яток, з яких знімки 42 — завантажено вперше. Якщо ваш населений пункт має об'єкти єврейської культурної спадщини, але їх нема у списках, напишіть нам, щоб ми їх додали до списків!

Спеціальна номінація «Млини» — понад 640 фото 144 об'єктів, знімки 44 — завантажено вперше. Загалом база млинів зараз нараховує понад 615 об'єктів, і вона постійно доповнюється.

Вперше цього року ми втілюємо спеціальну номінацію від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — на жаль, ще зовсім нема світлин із Бродів та Радомишля. І з Житомира є тільки 7 світлин, а з міста Рівного — 8 фото.

У спеціальній номінації «Відео» — понад 20 робіт.

Попереду ще два тижні конкурсу. Встигніть долучитися самі та запрошуйте друзів.

Чекаємо на ваші роботи!

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться тут: wlm.photo. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки» раніше чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цього конкурсу).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. 22:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 в Україні пройде з 1 по 30 червня

[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — цього року конкурс відбудеться протягом червня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу буде таким же, як у минулі роки. Протягом травня ми опублікуємо детальні умови та можливості для участі у спеціальних номінацій. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Фейсбуці, Інстаграмі або у блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Під час зйомок у заповідних територіях просимо дотримуватися правил їх відвідування і встановлених карантинних обмежень. Найважливіші правила ми зібрали тут.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у червні! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 13:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress RB 18 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 проходить до 30 червня: Долучайтеся!

[edit]

Вітаємо!

До кінця червня триває щорічний конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні. Його метою є зібрати якомога більшу базу фотографій пам'яток природи України; для переможців передбачені цінні призи у різних номінаціях. Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз.

Корисні посилання

Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу та у соцмережах (ФейсбукІнстаграмТелеграм). Якщо у вас є запитання, можете писати на wle@wikimedia.org.ua --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 15:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:Berezhany Shevchenko Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 08:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

[edit]
Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0
Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон К-ть пам'яток К-ть фото
Севастополь 1 1
АР Крим 12 51
Закарпаття 26 96
Миколаївщина 29 81
Рівненщина 36 186
Херсонщина 36 83
Житомирщина 55 324
Донеччина 57 153
Тернопільщина 62 234
Буковина 75 220
Луганщина 82 90
Львівщина 82 351
Кіровоградщина 88 181
Волинь 98 270
Одещина 115 383
Сумщина 129 414
Дніпропетровщина 139 278
Київ 159 248
Хмельниччина 166 538
Полтавщина 171 594
Харківщина 175 625
Київщина 181 651
Черкащина 186 455
Прикарпаття 240 305
Вінничина 242 775
Запоріжжя 253 317
Чернігівщина 305 519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 18:59, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, rubin16 (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Долучіться до опитування — допоможіть визначити, як проводити конкурс «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у 2022 році

[edit]

Вітаємо! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо брали участь в українській частині міжнародного конкурсу «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у минулі роки. Зараз організаційна команда конкурсу вирішує, як проводити його під час повномасштабної війни в Україні.

Ми розуміємо, що цього року ми не зможемо провести конкурс у звичному форматі — зокрема тому, що фотографування об'єктів в Україні зараз ускладнене міркуваннями безпеки. Однак наша місія із документування української культурної спадщини є як ніколи важливою, тому розглядаємо варіанти, як можна провести конкурс у обмеженому форматі.

Для цього хочемо запитати поради у спільноти конкурсу. Просимо приділити 5—7 хвилин (не пізніше середи, 6 липня), щоби висловити свою думку.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 17:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Horodkivka Catholic Church RB.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

Цього року українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» пройде з 1 по 31 жовтня — через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки світлини зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно будуть прийматися в основній частині конкурсу.

В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже водинадцяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року знову пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

5 днів Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / 5 days of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

[edit]

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» вже почалася — за 5 днів фотозмагання Україна вийшла на 12-е місце за кількістю світлин у світі. Не кількістю єдиною, звісно, але гарно було б не надто сильно відстати від російської частини конкурсу, і хоча б потрапити до почесних топ-5.

Цього року вперше у конкурсі є спеціальна номінація «Фотоплівка» — на неї можна подавати скани світлин, зроблених на фотоплівці — мова може йти й про скани самої фотоплівки і скани з віддрукованих знімків із неї. Ця спецномінація покликана мотивувати оцифровувати й ділитися своїми фотоархівами: частина об'єктів уже виглядає дуже відмінно, а частина — більше не існує… Враховуючи сучасну ситуацію із російським вторгненням і можливість потенційної втрати таких фотоархівів, ця спецномінація — актуальна. Врахуйте, що для того, щоб світлина потрапила на спецномінацію, потрібно вибрати відповідне поле у Завантажувачі.

Автори світлин маловідомих пам'яток України зможуть позмагатися за відзнаку від «Україна Інкогніта».

Також уже традиційно пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук. У нас також є сторінка в інстаграмі та твіттері.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Приймаються тільки ті світлини та відео, які були зняті до 23 лютого 2022 року включно.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Ще 3 дні! Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні триває до 31 жовтня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що ви та ваша родина у безпеці. Нагадуємо, що залишилося три дні до завершення конкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», і якщо у вас є можливість взяти участь у конкурсі цього року — долучайтеся!

Трохи статистики за результатами чотирьох тижнів конкурсу:

  • завантажено понад 11000 світлин, які зображують майже 3700 об’єктів культурної спадщини;
    • з них фотографії 180 пам'яток — вперше подані на конкурс;
  • понад 500 світлин подано у спецномінації «Фотоплівка»;
  • вже більше 220 учасників та учасниць;
    • з них більше 130 — зареєструвалися вже під час конкурсу.

Найменш представлені регіони — Севастополь (1 фото), Донецька (19), Миколаївська (20), Кіровоградська (58), Крим (72), Херсонська (74) та Луганська (80). Конкурсні списки за регіонами можна переглянути тут: списки пам'яток.

Переглядайте свої фото- та відеоархіви й приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 08:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:46-101-0548 Lviv Latin Cathedral RB 18.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2023 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня

[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Важливо! З міркувань національної безпеки та безпеки учасників і учасниць до участі у конкурсі допускаються тільки фото та відео, зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно!

Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні!

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».10:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».10:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: перший тиждень

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За перший тиждень конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 4000 фото, взяли участь майже 90 учасників.

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Єдиний виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри» можна подавати світлини без обмежень за датою створення.

Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут (серед нових спецномінацій цього року: «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Інтер'єри» та «Німецька спадщина»).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще тиждень залишився! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last week of the contest!

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс ще триває трохи більше тижня, до 31 жовтня, тож у Вас є ще можливість приєднатися.

У конкурсі є серйозне обмеження за часом створення фото- та відеоматерілів — тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно приймаються. Однак, є виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри», де можна подавати файли, які зроблені й під час конкурсу. Також, якщо є, можна відсканувати світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 17:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще 4 дні завантажити фото чи відео! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last 4 days to upload pictures or videos!

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Залишилося ще дні завантажити власні фото чи відео пам'яток України!

Зверніть увагу! Попри те, що в конкурсі беруть участь тільки роботи, зроблені до 30 червня 2023 року, фото та відео інтер'єрів пам'яток обмежень за датою не мають. Також можна відсканувати власні світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом, на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – з повагою від імені оргкомітету «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 14:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

File:61-248-0109 Pidhaitsi Lesia Ukrainka Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lviv Lychakiv Cemetery Grave Ivasiuk RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня!

[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.

Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні! -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 03:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

«Вікі любить Землю» 2024: декілька днів до завершення української частини конкурсу!

[edit]

Вітання!

Нагадуємо, що конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні триває вже більше трьох тижнів і до його завершення залишилось декілька днів. У вас ще є можливість завантажити свої унікальні фото української природи до 31 липня включно.

Вже майже 65 учасників та учасниць завантажили майже 4 000 світлин.

Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.

Ви також можете подати свої фото для міжнародної спеціальної номінації «Права людини та довкілля», яка має на меті збільшити доступ до знань про захист довкілля та вплив людини на природу. Детальніше читайте тут.

Статті у Вікіпедії можна допоповнювати не лише фотографіями, а й відео. Для цього також проводимо окрему спецномінацію, де відзначаємо відеоролики, які зображають пам’ятки природи України. Відео цього року можна завантажувати як звичайні фото, вони будуть враховані на спеціальну номінацію автоматично.

Просимо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій.

Приєднуйтеся та отримайте шанс на перемогу!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».

Message sent over by Aafi on behalf of OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) through MassMessage. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-212-0055 Novosilka Shevchenko Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-212-0097 Porokhova WW2 Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 09:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня запрошуємо до участі в українській частині міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є дев’ять спеціальних номінацій та відзнак: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина» (включаючи караїмські), «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Польська спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2024 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Тільки фото інтер'єрів памяток можна подавати без обмеження за датою створення.

Приєднуйтеся!

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Мирного неба!

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 16:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine: перший тиждень

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За перший тиждень конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 6000 фото, взяли участь більше 90 учасників.

Поки зовсім відсутні світлини з АР Крим та Севастополя. Дуже мало робіт із Луганської (1 фото), Миколаївської (2), Донецької (35), Херсонської (42). Менше 100 робіт із Хмельницької (55), Кіровоградської (63), Черкаської (65), Рівненської (70), Одеської (73) та Запорізької (96) областей. Можливо, у Вас є світлини пам'яток з цих регіонів? Або Ви знаєте людей чи організації, до яких можна звернутися, щоб завантажили?

Також нагадуємо, що цього року є спеціальні номінації, де можна завантажувати і ті об'єкти, які не охороняються офіційно — «Єврейська спадщина» (включаючи караїмські), «Німецька спадщина» та «Польська спадщина». Якщо у Вас є інформація про пам'ятки, які не включені у списки ще, звертайтеся до оргкомітету wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи на сторінку обговорення.

Якщо у Вас є світлини пам’яток, зруйнованих у ході війни, завантажте їх на «Війна руйнує пам'ятки». Якщо потрібної пам'ятки там нема — теж пишіть оргкомітету.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 07:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine: екватор конкурсу

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За першу половину конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 10000 фото, взяли участь більше ніж 130 конкурсантів та конкурсанток.

Станом на сьогодні уже є хоча б по одній світлині із кожного регіону України, але все ще дуже мало світлин із АР Крим, Севастополя, Луганської, Миколаївської, Донецької, Херсонської областей.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 20:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine: ще 10 днів конкурсу!

[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За три тижні конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 14000 фото, взяли участь більше ніж 160 учасників.

Станом на сьогодні все ще дуже мало світлин із Севастополя (6) та Миколаївської області (16). Якщо у вас раптом є у фотоархівах — долучайтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 09:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-218-0001 Zolochiv Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024: дякуємо! Опитування та інші новини / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine: thank you!

[edit]

(text in English at the bottom)

Привіт! Ми дуже вдячні, що Ви взяли участь у конкурсі! Україна посіла другу сходинку у світі за кількістю завантажень. Детальніша статистика (за об'єктами, завантажувачами тощо) буде трохи згодом. Стежте за оновленнями у наших соцмережах.

Дуже просимо пройти опитування, щоб ми могли удосконалити наш конкурс наступного разу: відгук у Google-формі.

Інформація про те, як отримати електронний сертифікат учасника конкурсу (якщо такий потрібен) — в опитуванні.

Протягом наступних двох-трьох місяців журі буде оцінювати роботи, а оргкомітет — переглядати світлини й виправляти помилки. Якщо Ви помітили якісь неточності (не та пам'ятка на конкурсних фотографіях тощо), будь ласка, напишіть нам на електронну адресу: wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук, інстаграм.

Тим часом Ви можете номінувати найкращі зі своїх світлин на «якісні» чи «вибрані» у Вікісховищі. Детальніше про це тут: «Вибираємо значущі, якісні, вибрані зображення». А також ілюструвати світлинами статті у Вікіпедії, де це буде доречно.

Також з 1 грудня до 31 січня проходитиме кампанія оцифрування документів про нерухому культурну спадщину «Вікіджерела люблять пам’ятки». Якщо Ви ще ніколи не редагували у Вікіджерелах, перегляньте відеоуроки за посиланням, можливо Вас зацікавить проєкт?

Мирного неба!

З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 14:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)


Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine! Thanks to also your contributions we were able to finish on the 2nd place in the world by uploads! For the next 2-3 months the jury would be working with the pictures, updates will be shared on our social media. Meanwhile you can nominate the best of your photos for «Quality images» or «Featured pictures». If you have any feedback to the organising team - please write to us at wlm@wikimedia.org.ua. Thank you!

Best regards, Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine organising team 14:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-105-0008 Berezhany Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0051 Buchach Jesus Christ Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0213 Dubno Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0019 Buchach Shkilna 8 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0015 Olesko Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice photo but external walls of castle appear to be leaning out suggesting PC required. --Scotch Mist 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Info I replaced it with a version with fixed verticals. --Rbrechko 14:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarakaniv Fort, top down view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Великий і Малий Канусяки з полонини Плісце.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-107-0001 Kremenets Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress 2 RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zolochiv Castle, top down view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0002 Buchach Catle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-204-5016 RLP Nadsluchanskyi RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 08:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Added geo location. --Rbrechko 08:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-5004 Svirzh Trees RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-246-0002 Skoryky Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-212-5007 NNP Skolivski Beskydy Kamianka Waterfall RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice photo - can you improve sharpness? --Scotch Mist 10:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Improved --Rbrechko 11:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality --Tzim78 14:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-5036 Travertine Rocks RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0107 Nyrkiv Castle 2 RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0032 Pisky Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-215-0006 Piatnychany Tower RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Background is a bit bright but I think it's OK. --Benjism89 18:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle 2 RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Nice photo but needs some perspective correction and if possible a bit more sharpness of the castle (right edge appears to be leaning in). --Scotch Mist 15:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I tried to fix this. --Rbrechko 23:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality --Tzim78 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0016 Yazlovets Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-9007 Kyiv Golden Domed RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit noisy. Otherwise very good --MB-one 14:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Reduced noise. --Rbrechko 23:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pchany Aleya Vikovyh Lyp RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storozhynetskyi Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozdil Sanatorium Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --David Osipov 09:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0013 Zolotyi Potik Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Brightness should be reduced and the perspective corrected. --Ermell 20:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version with corrections. --Rbrechko 12:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0043 Stare Selo Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-104-9007 Kamianets-Podilskyi Fortress 2 RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support ok --Sandro Halank 13:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berezhany Castle, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-5017 Botanical Garden of Ukrainian National Forestry University RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-5009 Rozhirche RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0009 Pidhirtsi Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-5003 Kyiv Volodymyrska Hirka RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 80-391-5009 Kyiv Shevchenko Park RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-242-0082 Novomalyn Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-107-9001 Kremenets Jesuit College RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-221-0008 Iziaslav Bernardine Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-104-0036 Berdychiv Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly leaning out on the left --Plozessor 04:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fixed and redeployed. --Rbrechko 16:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now! --Plozessor 18:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0037 Pidhaitsi Jewish Cemetery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 22:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:68-104-0039 Kamianets-Podilskyi Bridge RB 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:68-104-0039 Kamianets-Podilskyi Bridge RB 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zbarazh castle, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0022 Buchach Khmelnytskoho 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unfortunate lighting -- Spurzem 12:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 14:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-0073 Malyi Liubin Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0041 Yazlovets Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-258-0048 Sutkivtsi Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Perspective correction required? --Scotch Mist 14:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done tried to fix this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 17:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Still appears to require some PC. --Scotch Mist 06:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I corrected perspective for church. But if you say about sides, it will require additional crop and as result I'll loose the fence. I think that it will be better to save the fence as part of complex, so let it be as is. Thanks. --Rbrechko 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-218-0025 Mytulyn Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:61-220-0336 Dorohychivka WW2 Monument RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 07:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozhirshe Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0071 Settlement RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0008 Hodovytsia Catholic Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-234-0092 Bilokrynytsia Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Leaning out on right. --Scotch Mist 11:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fixed and redeployed. --Rbrechko 16:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brody Fortress, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidhirtsivskyi Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 16:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RLP Nemyrivske Pobuzhia RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lviv Park Kmelnytskoho RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-227-0001 Zhovkva Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0008 Berezhnytsia Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0074 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 31 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svirzh Castle 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment - nice photo but slight CW rotation seems desirable. --Scotch Mist 10:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneI did small rotation and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 13:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemyriv Wellspring N2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5002 Deers in Roztochchia Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Koropets palace, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shklo Park 24 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piatnychany Tower RB 46-215-0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0026 Iosypovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The wires in the sky are unfortunate, but it’s obviously impossible to avoid them in a view from this side. --Aristeas 15:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0027 Iosypovychi Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshyn Wellspring N4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0061 Nyrkiv Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shklo Park 24 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piatnychany Tower RB 46-215-0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0026 Iosypovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The wires in the sky are unfortunate, but it’s obviously impossible to avoid them in a view from this side. --Aristeas 15:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0027 Iosypovychi Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-250-0063 Budaniv Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-101-0001 Ternopil Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the Church of the Intercession, Mytulyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-109-0001 Ostroh Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-0069 Losiach Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Tzim78 13:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0014 Novyi Myliatyn Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shypit RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-5011 Medova Cave RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Good photo but is it possible to reveal a little detail within the cave entrance? --Scotch Mist 12:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It's too dark inside and if you look at other photos from this category, you'll see the same result with too dark part inside. So I think just HDR can help in this case. --Rbrechko 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shklo Park 24 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khresczatycko Zveniaczynsky Preserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grofa Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-5006 Velykyi Liubin Wellspring 1K RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velykyi Lubin Sverdlovyna 1K RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-239-0003 Lopatyn Catholic Church RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaklad Park ХVIII st RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AVDLCZ 07:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemyriv Park Lv RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It seems to be 4.5MPix, but the camera is 12.3MPix - can you upload the highest resolution version please? --Mike Peel 22:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done It had 7.3Mpix, but I found the original file (although it wasn't easy) and redeployed it. --Rbrechko 12:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lviv Botanical Garden LNU RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mezhyrich Monastery, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-0030 Skala-Podilska Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5003 NNP Yavorivskyi 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 11:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-107-5004 Morshyn Wellspring N4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0027 Obroshyno Palace RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Fine but lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)}[reply]
✓ Done Deployed new version with fixes. --Rbrechko 14:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-246-0051 Toky Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fixed and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 15:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Toky, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-110-5020 NNP Karpatskyi RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-234-5012 Bilokrynytsia RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gooe quality --Michielverbeek 07:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-5011 Nemyriv Wellspring 2 RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Vylkove RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA --Nikride 17:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Could you explain where you see them? Beacuse usually I can see CA on branches with the sky on backgound, but I don't see them here. --Rbrechko 07:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the corner of the first house on the left, on the first tree on the left near the path and the largest one on the slate (шифер) in the lower right corner --Nikride 08:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. Removed CAs. --Rbrechko 12:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-218-0029 Pomoriany Castle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archbishops' residence in Obroshyne, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-107-5001 Morshyn Bonifatsii RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-107-5001 Morshyn Wellspring N1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skala-Podilska Castle, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-0017 Kudryntsi Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-227-0001 Zhovkva Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 13:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-242-5004 Rudky Arboretum RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good enough for me. --Красный 10:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
All Saints church, Hodovytsia, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-230-9002 Medzhybizh Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Svirzh Castle 1 RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Svirzh Castle 1 RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herburt castle in Dobromyl, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]