User talk:Rosiestep
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Yann (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Sarann Knight-Preddy.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 05:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Jessica Anderson GA
[edit]Hello, I was looking at the list of language and literature Good Articles on Wikipedia and noticed a couple years back that you added the Jessica Anderson article to the "biographies" section. The article is a biography, but that section of the GA page is for articles about biographies. Anderon's article would go in the "writers" section at the bottom of the page.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- The Devil's Advocate - Sorry about that. Is this fixed now, or do you want me to try and sort it out? --Rosiestep (talk) 03:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- I can't edit Wikipedia, which is why I'm contacting you here.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- The Devil's Advocate I'd be glad to fix my mistake, but I don't understand where the article should be moved. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- It would go at the bottom section of the same page under the heading "Writers, publishers, and critics" between Algonquin Round Table and Bai, Mah Laqa.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll deal with it in the next few days. Traveling now. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Are you still traveling?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- No, and thanks for the reminder. I moved it. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Are you still traveling?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll deal with it in the next few days. Traveling now. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- It would go at the bottom section of the same page under the heading "Writers, publishers, and critics" between Algonquin Round Table and Bai, Mah Laqa.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- The Devil's Advocate I'd be glad to fix my mistake, but I don't understand where the article should be moved. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- I can't edit Wikipedia, which is why I'm contacting you here.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi there! I started cleaning the Category:Images by Commons users when I saw that most uncategorized pictures were yours. Could you delete this category from your pictures or categorize them under Category:Photographs by Rosiestep? Thanks! Triton (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Triton - yes, that's exactly what I meant to do (put them in Category:Photographs by Rosiestep. So the mistake is mine and I apologize for that. I will try to fix this as quickly as possible but note I am on international travel at the moment so I appreciate if you would be patient with me. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Of course! no problem and no rush, we don't have any deadline here ;) Have a nice trip! Triton (talk) 21:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
File types
[edit]Hello! Thanks for your multitude of images, and Wikipedia articles to go with them! I notice you upload the majority of files as PNG (.png). This makes it a little more difficult to modify/retouch the images if need be (e.g. convert from blue/sepia to B/W, reduce Moiré effect, touch up blemishes, etc.), especially since most are probably stored as .jpgs online already, and common image editing programs like Photoshop or GIMP don't handle PNGs as well. Commons:File types suggests "if the original file is in JPEG, it generally makes no sense to convert it to PNG". While PNG does seem to be preferred due to its losslessness, for the low-quality scans you're uploading, I think the versatility of JPGs might be the better option. But if you have a good reason for choosing PNGs, don't change on my account!
Secondly, I notice that many of your historic images come from Google Books. From my experience I've found that higher quality scans of the same book can often be found on Internet Archive (compare Google versus Archive). In addition Internet Archive often has multiple copies of scanned books from different libraries, allowing for the best version to be selected, and in full color versus Google's black & white scans. I've seen some Google Book scans that even preemptively remove images to avoid "copyright" issues, even if the book is in the public domain. Anyways, just wanted to give you some things to think about. All the best! --Animalparty (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Animalparty for all the points you make. Like you said, food for thought, and I'll see what I can do differently when I upload other images. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Susitna River Bridge
[edit]How can Category:Susitna River Bridge be under Category:Bridge construction in the United States? - Jmabel ! talk 03:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Jmabel. It was a mistake. I've removed it. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Requested help to resolve this issue here: Commons:Help desk# What is the correct licensing for a cropped file?. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
YWCA
[edit]Why [1] this change? An individual YWCA facility is normally called "a YWCA", and the plural of that is "YWCAs". - Jmabel ! talk 10:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Jmabel. The change makes the category more inclusive, to include not only the YWCAs (buildings), but also other other information related to YWCA/USA, e.g. the different publications, people, etc. who were/are affiliated with the US org. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- OK, that makes sense. - Jmabel ! talk 18:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Schenson_Uppsala_domkyrka_1889_-_Restoration.jpg&curid=49058981&diff=345208657&oldid=337603469
[edit]I'm not quite sure why you removed the category - it's a photo made by a notable female photographer, as part of a WIR event, after all. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Adam Cuerden, I removed it as I thought I had made a mistake adding it. I'll go ahead and put it back. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, aye, no worries. Just spotted that and got confused. It's one of those "notable work by" things. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Erna Morena - Feb 1921.png
- File:Fern Andra - Feb 1921.png
- File:Henny Porten - Feb 1921.png
- File:Mia May - Feb 1921.png
Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, Mutter Erde. I replied on the deletion request talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deletion request of: Parliament of the World's Religions 2009 (Melbourne)
[edit]Hi, Mutter Erde, I created this, Parliament of the World's Religions 2009 (Melbourne), in error. I meant to create it as a category, which I subsequently did. Can you please delete Parliament of the World's Religions 2009 (Melbourne)? Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Rosiestep, I'm not able to delete anything. Please ask here Commons:Help desk. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Beverley Smith - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped1).jpg
- File:Beverley Smith - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019.jpg
- File:Carla Groom - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped1).jpg
- File:Carla Groom - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped2).jpg
- File:Carla Groom, Kate Ogilvie, Beverley Smith, & Rose Waite - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019.jpg
- File:Carla Groom, Kate Ogilvie, Beverley Smith, Rose Waite - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019.jpg
- File:Fiona Deans - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped).jpg
- File:Fiona Deans - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019.jpg
- File:GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 cake.jpg
- File:Kate Ogilvie - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped1).jpg
- File:Kate Ogilvie - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped2).jpg
- File:Rose Waite - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped1).jpg
- File:Rose Waite - GDS Academy 5th birthday London 2019 (cropped2).jpg
Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Ira D. Schwarz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
DS (talk) 04:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rosiestep,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File:YouthSummit - DFID UK launches on Snapchat.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rosiestep,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- @RMaung (WMF): I received this same notice in a different communication channel and completed the survey using that link. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know, Rosiestep! I'll make sure you don't receive a message about taking this survey here again. We appreciate your feedback! --RMaung (WMF) (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Training
[edit]Thank you so much for teaching me the basics of wiki-editing, and more so for showing me the importance of this work in representation! Thank you for the inspiration! -DocOptics — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocOptics (talk • contribs) 06:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- @DocOptics: you're welcome. Very happy to have met you, and glad the work resonates. Happy editing. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Traci Guariniello, NAVFAC EURAFSWA head counsel - 2015 EURAFSWA Counsel Recognition (16256545967) (cropped).jpg
[edit]File:Traci Guariniello, NAVFAC EURAFSWA head counsel - 2015 EURAFSWA Counsel Recognition (16256545967) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tguariniello (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Women wearing purple dresses
[edit]"Women wearing purple dresses" is a subcategory of "purple dresses". If adding the first category to an image that already has the second category, the first category should be removed - unless of course the image shows a different purple dress not being worn in addition to the purple dress being worn by a woman. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Eg File:DesireDAmourMissExoticWorld2006.jpg, the only purple dress I see is the one being worn by the woman. Why do you have it categorized as showing a purple dress IN ADDITION TO "women wearing purple dresses"? Redundant. Hope this helps. Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for stopping by, Infrogmation. It's sorted out now. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Great, thank you for your work. Cheers, -- 23:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for stopping by, Infrogmation. It's sorted out now. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
File:YouthSummit 2015 - 20736843963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Milica Babić-Jovanović 1961 (cropped).JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Milica Babić-Jovanović 1961 (cropped).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 07:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Milica Babić-Jovanović 1961 (cropped).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bojan Talk 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sylvia Earle 2013 (cropped).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sylvia Earle 2013 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sylvia Earle 2013 (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 09:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red social media banners has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Vania Vargas 2016 (cropped).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vania Vargas 2016 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vania Vargas 2016 (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Vania Vargas 2016 (cropped).jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logo - Young African Leaders Initiative.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo - Young African Leaders Initiative.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Timtrent (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Rebecca Vanderburg 1999 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ата (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Rhiannon Waryck 2017 at ASU (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
199.71.239.39 17:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Eva-Marie Ramsaran, Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class - 2015 EURAFSWA Frocking Ceremony (18761348680) (cropped).jpg
[edit]File:Eva-Marie Ramsaran, Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class - 2015 EURAFSWA Frocking Ceremony (18761348680) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
216.24.45.26 17:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 EPSC - Wikipedia. Learn to edit. Fill the gaps.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 EPSC - Wikipedia. Learn to edit. Fill the gaps.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 BIPOC Wikipedia edit-a-thon.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 BIPOC Wikipedia edit-a-thon.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:AdaWiki24.org - Wiki Women in Red initiative on 12 Oct 2021.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AdaWiki24.org - Wiki Women in Red initiative on 12 Oct 2021.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2021 Capacitação de usuárias Wikimedia - Women in Red.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2021 Capacitação de usuárias Wikimedia - Women in Red.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 SPIE Photonics West - Let's edit Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 SPIE Photonics West - Let's edit Wikipedia.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 Parliament of World Religions - 1000 Women in Religion editathon - Why Wikipedia Why Women.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 Parliament of World Religions - 1000 Women in Religion editathon - Why Wikipedia Why Women.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 OzgurKon - Wikipedia’s gender gaps in the COVID-19 era.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 OzgurKon - Wikipedia’s gender gaps in the COVID-19 era.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 NAS - Knowledge gaps & systemic bias at Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 NAS - Knowledge gaps & systemic bias at Wikipedia.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:44, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2021 Wikimania - Women in Red.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2021 Wikimania - Women in Red.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 03:29, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2017 Cisco - Wiki Tech Women.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2017 Cisco - Wiki Tech Women.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 08:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2017 Wikipedia Day LA - He who writes the history books wins.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2017 Wikipedia Day LA - He who writes the history books wins.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 08:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2017 WikiWomenCamp - Be bold on a budget of $0 at Women in Red's Ideas Cafe.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2017 WikiWomenCamp - Be bold on a budget of $0 at Women in Red's Ideas Cafe.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 08:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2018 OCLC DSS - Wikipedia’s gender gap, and what would Hari Seldon do about it.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2018 OCLC DSS - Wikipedia’s gender gap, and what would Hari Seldon do about it.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2019 UCI - Wikipedia, how to edit it, and the case for gender equity.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2019 UCI - Wikipedia, how to edit it, and the case for gender equity.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 06:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2019 WCNA - Let's edit Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2019 WCNA - Let's edit Wikipedia.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2019 Wikimania - Business 101 at Women in Red.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2019 Wikimania - Business 101 at Women in Red.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 06:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020 AfroCROWD & Women in Red - Juneteenth at Wikipedia.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020 AfroCROWD & Women in Red - Juneteenth at Wikipedia.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Andel (talk) 06:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Tytti Viinikainen 2018 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Julle (talk) 12:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Joya Chatterji 2019 (cropped).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Joya Chatterji 2019 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joya Chatterji 2019 (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Jenifer Owen 2006 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Linda Davis, Reserve Army nurse 2011 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Elizabeth Ferrara 2006 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Brittany Hand 2006 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Annie Mannino 2006 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Chae Kim 2008 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JPF (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Please provide source
[edit]Hi, some of your presentations files are tagged without a source since October 2021. Can you please add the source for each photograph included or the files will be deleted (you can do it either in the file description page or by adding a final slide for photo credits, like you've done in other presentations).
- file:2020 Parliament of World Religions - 1000 Women in Religion editathon - Why Wikipedia Why Women.pdf
- file:2020 SPIE Photonics West - Let's edit Wikipedia.pdf
- file:2021 Capacitação de usuárias Wikimedia - Women in Red.pdf
Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 12:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Houda Darwish 2018 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Huda darwish (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:(Some representative women of Tennessee, 1902) 06.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:(Some representative women of Tennessee, 1902) 06.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:(Some representative women of Tennessee, 1902) 06.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, AntiCompositeBot. Yes, please delete per my request. If you check its history, you'll see that it is Public Domain. But I never intended to upload it. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- I fear you have replied to a bot, but see below where I have asked for your request to be acted upon 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Timtrent. I didn't know how to find that deletion template. Glad you stepped in. Thanks again. Rosiestep (talk) 12:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Things always work out in the end. You may find a speedy deletion tool in your left hand margin. I just typed the reason in 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Timtrent. I didn't know how to find that deletion template. Glad you stepped in. Thanks again. Rosiestep (talk) 12:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- I fear you have replied to a bot, but see below where I have asked for your request to be acted upon 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Timtrent, thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Category:Featured_pictures_supported_by_WikiProject_Women_in_Red has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Wilfredor (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
Цього року українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» пройде з 1 по 31 жовтня — через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки світлини зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно будуть прийматися в основній частині конкурсу.
В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже водинадцяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року знову пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
File:Asta Nielsen - Feb 1921.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2023 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня
[edit]Доброго дня!
Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.
Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.
Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.
Важливо! З міркувань національної безпеки та безпеки учасників і учасниць до участі у конкурсі допускаються тільки фото та відео, зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно!
Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.
Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні!
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.
Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».10:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.
Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».
Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс.
Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».10:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!
You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!
Конкурс наукових зображень 2023: Подавайте свої зображення та вигравайте призи
[edit]Вітаю! Розпочалася українська частина міжнародного Конкурсу наукових зображень 2023.
Ви брали участь в українських наукових фотоконкурсах раніше, тож, сподіваємося, вас зацікавить і цей. Подавати зображення можна у п’яти категоріях: «Люди в науці», «Мікроскопія», «Живі організми», «Загальна категорія», «Нефотографічні зображення». Також є спеціальна відзнака для зображень, які показують наслідки російського вторгнення в Україну. Конкурс триватиме до 20 грудня.
Якщо у вас є релевантні зображення в архіві — наприклад, світлини науковців за роботою чи фото з наукових експедицій — саме час розібрати їх, подати на конкурс і поборотися за цінні призи на українському та міжнародному рівні. Своєю участю ви також допоможете проілюструвати Вікіпедію — найбільшу онлайн-енциклопедію, яку читають мільйони людей.
Якщо ви маєте багато досвіду участі в конкурсі у минулі роки, зверніть увагу на новий ресурс — підбірка порад для учасників та учасниць конкурсу від журі. Якщо ж хотіли б згадати, як подавати роботи на конкурс, запрошуємо долучитися до вебінару 21 листопада о 19:30; реєструйтеся у Google-формі за посиланням (навіть якщо не зможете долучитися онлайн у цей час, ми надішлемо корисні відеоматеріали зареєстрованим учасникам та учасницям).
Якщо будуть питання, пишіть на SciencePhotowikimedia.org.ua — а також підписуйтеся на нас у Фейсбуку і Телеграмі, щоб стежити за новинами.
--Антон Процюк [ВМУА] (від імені організаційної команди конкурсу) 17:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Natalia Batista, Göteborg 2013 (2) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Paracel63.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Erna Morena - Feb 1921.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Henny Porten - Feb 1921.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Mia May - Feb 1921.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Participate in the world's largest nature photo contest!
[edit]
Hello Rosiestep, Project Korikath welcomes you to take part in Wiki Loves Earth Bangladesh 2024! Wiki Loves Earth (WLE) is an annual international photographic competition held throughout May and June. Project Korikath is the organizer of this year's Wiki Loves Earth in Bangladesh! You can visit the contest page for more details. You'll find the rules to take part in the contest there. You can also read this handbook for details about the campaign. Help us to showcase the breathtaking beauty of Bangladesh in Wikipedia and its sister projects. Let’s aim to bring Bangladesh to the top of the winner list among countries from all over the world this year!
|
You're getting this message because you've participated similar Wikimedia photography contests in the past. If you'd prefer not to receive these updates from Project Korikath, you can unsubscribe by sending an email to korikath-ownerlists.wikimedia.org
Hello Rosiestep, since you crated the category, I was wondering a rename now to Category:SPIE would be an option, since SPIE? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Lotje, and thanks for connecting with me. I don't have any opinion on this, and, ergo, support whatever others decide to do. -- Rosiestep (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Daniela Alcivar - La casa morada 2020 (cropped 2022).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ivetteceli.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Patroller!
[edit]
Hi Rosiestep,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. Kadı Message 17:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня!
[edit]Доброго дня!
Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.
Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.
Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.
Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.
Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.
Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні! -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 03:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Template:Idw/layout Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2024: декілька днів до завершення української частини конкурсу!
[edit]Вітання!
Нагадуємо, що конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні триває вже більше трьох тижнів і до його завершення залишилось декілька днів. У вас ще є можливість завантажити свої унікальні фото української природи до 31 липня включно.
Вже майже 65 учасників та учасниць завантажили майже 4 000 світлин.
Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.
Ви також можете подати свої фото для міжнародної спеціальної номінації «Права людини та довкілля», яка має на меті збільшити доступ до знань про захист довкілля та вплив людини на природу. Детальніше читайте тут.
Статті у Вікіпедії можна допоповнювати не лише фотографіями, а й відео. Для цього також проводимо окрему спецномінацію, де відзначаємо відеоролики, які зображають пам’ятки природи України. Відео цього року можна завантажувати як звичайні фото, вони будуть враховані на спеціальну номінацію автоматично.
Просимо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій.
Приєднуйтеся та отримайте шанс на перемогу!
Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».
Message sent over by Aafi on behalf of OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) through MassMessage. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Template:Idw/layout Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2024 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
З 1 по 31 жовтня запрошуємо до участі в українській частині міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.
Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є дев’ять спеціальних номінацій та відзнак: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина» (включаючи караїмські), «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Польська спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».
Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2024 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Тільки фото інтер'єрів памяток можна подавати без обмеження за датою створення.
Приєднуйтеся!
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!
You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!
Мирного неба!
З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 16:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
And also:
- File:WCNA 2024 Barnraising … From 19th-c temperance movement women to 21st-c Wiki movement women.pdf
PDF files are currently unusable, Owing to apparent limitations or technical issues, PDF display is currently unreliable.Please use an alternative format such as DJbu for multi-page doucments. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Owing to technical limitations or a fault condition, PDF display is currently unreliable. Please upload an alternative format for multi-page doucments like Djvu. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rosiestep. Please would you kindly explain to me why you have categorised the front page of this journal as a cover? "Journal" in 1901, when it started, was another term for a newspaper, and newspapers did not have covers. It is the front page, or page 1. The next page is called page 2. Yes, its modern incarnation is a magazine with a cover, and its modern page 1 is inside. But in the early days it was a newspaper (albeit a gossipy one), with no cover. Page 1 was printed on the same flimsy paper as all the other pages. In my opinion, the above categorisation of page 1 as a cover is misleading. Storye book (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Storye book, sorry then; my mistake. Didn't intend to be misleading. I'll shift the file's category. The category itself can be marked for deletion. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Please would you kindly send me a link to the new category? Storye book (talk) 16:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Storye book. It's this one (where the file was originally categorized).--Rosiestep (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- That is fine. Thank you very much. Storye book (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Storye book. It's this one (where the file was originally categorized).--Rosiestep (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Please would you kindly send me a link to the new category? Storye book (talk) 16:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)