User talk:Spongie555

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Spongie555!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, Royalty of Bhutan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support no geocoding but exceptional document --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support meets the criteria --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Geocoding missing without justification. Lycaon (talk) 17:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

 Support per Archaeodontosaurus Spongie555 (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Geocoding is not essential, and the image more than meets the criteria and is an outstanding image. --russavia (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Geocoding is a requirement, so that criterion is not fulfilled. Please read the guidelines. Lycaon (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Geocoding is a requirement, when relevant. It is my opinion that geocoding in this instance is not relevant. If it were a photo of a building, then yes, I would say it is relevant, but here is a photo of a person, and where they are in the world is not really all that relevant IMHO. --russavia (talk) 23:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
    • To quote the guideline (my bold emphasis): "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so. Exceptions include: studio and other non-place-related shots, unknown locations, illustrations, diagrams, charts and maps, situations where the publishing of a location might be prejudicial (for example, privacy concerns, endangered species)." This is not a place-related shot, it is related only to King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck. Does it matter if he is sitting somewhere in Bhutan? Mozambique? Antartica? Or even the Moon. Where he is, is not part of the photo subject, nor is it part of the scope of the category of which this is a valued photo. If it was being considered in the scope of King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck in Bhutan, then yes, geocoding may be relevant (but still not definite), but in this instance it isn't relevant at all. --russavia (talk) 18:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • I've seen no indication for a justification for the lack of geocoding on the image page. Lycaon (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

 Oppose - Per Lycaon. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

I think it should be an exception beacuse it is a studio shot and we do not know where the location of the picture taken. It's says it could be an exception if it had one of those two beacuse I read the criteria. Spongie555 (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support What is the goal in VI ? respect absolutely the criteria (not sure they are not, in this case) as unbreakable requirements, or recognize valuable and rare images ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I could have said "Oh, I recognize the wallpaper, this photograph was taken in Dechencholing Palace in Thimphu". More seriously, I consider that Spongie555 has given acceptable reason for the lack of geocode and I would willingly support this portrait, a fine one and the best we have, if a dedicated Category:Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck was created (see criterion 6 => must be well categorized at an appropriate level.) This notable person deserves it, doesn't he? --Myrabella (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info Note that at the time of the shot (March 2007), he wasn't officially crowned yet (occured on November 2008). --Myrabella (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Co-nominators should abstain from voting in a system where a single vote can decide the outcome. Lycaon (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Votes of Spongie555 and Extra999 are thus not valid as both are co-nominators.
    For geocoding issues see here. Lycaon (talk) 07:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Ok since Extra and mine votes dont count its still 3-2 support(counting the nominator) Spongie555 (talk) , 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Samurai with sword.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Samurai with sword.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good -- George Chernilevsky 10:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

English wiki

Thank you very much, both for the nominations and for the information. Wolf (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

That's not a problem, really. I've got other pictures that might get promoted some day. Wolf (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the nomination. I'm really happy you liked this picture. Feel free to nominate more Wolf (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kingdavidkalakaua dust.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kingdavidkalakaua dust.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama 360 Red Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, valuable.--MrPanyGoff 19:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obama Portrait 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very good photograph. --MichaelBueker 08:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkfuneral3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Ankara 13:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henri of Luxembourg (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good; useful. --Jonathunder 04:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20070616 Chris Young visits Wrigley (4)-edit3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, and very funny too, because useful to make a set with this one ? sorry, a little nervous breakdown...--Jebulon 23:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Qianlong Emperor in Ceremonial Armour on Horseback.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Qianlong Emperor in Ceremonial Armour on Horseback.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandenburg Gate Quadriga at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 10:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Women in tribal village, Umaria district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Already an FP here on Commons. Yes, it can be a QI too. --Avenue 11:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Edwards Pittsburgh 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 00:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Robert Kennedy CORE rally speech2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Robert Kennedy CORE rally speech2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laser Towards Milky Ways Centre.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laser Towards Milky Ways Centre.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission Santa Clara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments obvious --Carschten 13:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mission Santa Clara.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mission Santa Clara.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galerie Lafayette Haussmann Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steampunk-falksen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop at the bottom is a bit unfortunate, but otherwise very good. --Cayambe 20:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading File:Cardinal Bourne World War I troop review.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the file correctly? If you are not able to do this, the file will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the Help desk. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

About the closeup of the coat on the throne of Don Rifan

I've done a closeup of the coat on the throne of Don Rifan, taking a small part of the throne as well, you can see the picture and if I do want a closeup lowest unfortunately a resolution better than this is not possible. The image is here. Kaiser Guilherme II (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Cassock request

Sorry for the late reply, I've been quite busy with exams and looked over your comment. I assume it is a variant of File:Cassock (Anglican Bishop).svg]. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

That's quite possible too, the colours might vary a bit in the photograph. I'll see if I can find out more about it. If he's allowed to wear the cassock of a bishop, it might also be so that he was wearing a choir dress, and removed his rochet and mozetta. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, a quick Google search gave some results. While it is not sourced, a comment on this blog says: The Ordinary is entitled to wear the purple cassock on account of his juridiction. He is now entitled to wear it because of his rank, also. The Prelates of Honour may also make use of the purple cassock as choir dress alone, on certain occasions. Other comments seem to agree with this. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 09:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Requests

Hola Spongie555

Con mucho gusto haré los escudos que usted solicita, pero necesito imágenes con mejor calidad. Varios detalles me llaman la atención en el escudo de Baraga, por ejemplo la cinta y el lema están arriba y no abajo como es lo usual, el escudo esta dividido en tres secciones todos de color verde, demás todos los elementos internos son son blancos, aunque es heráldico, se ve muy monótono que todas las divisiones sean verdes y que todos sus elementos sean blancos. (Online translation: Hello Spongie555. I will gladly make the shields that you request, but I need better quality images. Various details catch my attention on the coat of Baraga, such as ribbon and the slogan are up and not down as usual, the shield is divided into three sections all green, all internal elements are are white, although it is heraldic, looks very monotonous that all divisions are green and all its elements are white.) --SajoR (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

• Este es el primer escudo realizado, dígame que tal le parece, que detalles deben ser mejorados. (Online translation: This is the first made shield, tell me that it seems you, that details must be improved.)

---

Hola Spongie555

Tengo casi terminado el escudo de Baraga, solo falta determinar los colores. Para salir de dudas busqué nuevas imágenes del escudo y encontré estas: [1], [2], [3], [4].

Para la representación monocromática de los escudos (grabados, escultura, etcétera) los colores son representados por rayados convencionales. (For the monochromatic representation of the shields (prints, sculpture, etc.) the colors are represented by conventional scratched.)

Creo que el escudo realmente no es verde, ademas, según las nuevas imágenes, el escudo tiene una franja purpura que divide el escudo. Para salir de dudas, sugiero que por favor se comunique con la Diócesis de Marquette, y solicite una imagen a color o la descripción oficial del escudo. Encontre dos libros sobre el obispo Baraga, posiblemente digan algo sobre el escudo, pero están en esloveno [5], [6], [7]. .

(Online translation: I have almost finished the coat of Baraga, just need to determine the colors. To find out for sure looked new images of the shield and found these: [8], [9], [10], [11].

I think the shield is not really green, in addition, according to new images, the shield has a purple stripe that divides the shield. To find out for sure, I suggest that you please contact the Diocese of Marquette, and request a color image or the official description of the shield. I found two books on the Bishop Baraga, possibly say something about the shield, but are in Slovenian [12], [13], [14]. ) --SajoR (talk) 02:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Mira, así esta quedando el escudo de Baraga [15]. Lo único seguro es que el escudo esta dividido por una franja purpura y creo que todo el escudo es blanco, Solo falta definir el color de las piezas internas, los corazones posiblemente sean rojos. La Diócesis de Marquette ha contestado?. (Online translation: Look, so this being the shield of Baraga [16]. The only thing sure is that the shield is divided by a fringe purple and I think that the coat of arms is white, just need to define the color of the internal parts, hearts are possibly red. The Diocese of Marquette answered?.) --SajoR (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Que bien que enviaron una imagen del escudo, curioso lo del galero, se que antes de 1902 la heráldica eclesiástica era un poco desordenada, fue el papa Pío X que en ese año la reguló definitivamente. Por favor sube la imagen y envíame la dirección, estaré pendiente. (Online translation: Glad you sent an image of the shield, curious what the galero, is that before 1902 the ecclesiastical heraldry was a little messy, it was Pope Pius X who in that year definitely regulated. Please upload the image and send me your address, I'll be pending.). --SajoR (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Escriva relic chicago.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escriva relic chicago.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escriva relic chicago.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Those are recent paintings in Chicago of Josemaria Escrivá de Balaguer, who died in 1975. Too recent to be published without the painter's explicit permission. Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)