skip to main content
10.1145/3522783.3529524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswisecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Automatic Machine Learning for Multi-Receiver CNN Technology Classifiers

Published: 16 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are one of the most studied family of deep learning models for signal classification, including modulation, technology, detection, and identification. In this work, we focus on technology classification based on raw I/Q samples collected from multiple synchronized receivers. As an example use case, we study protocol identification of Wi-Fi, LTE-LAA, and 5G NR-U technologies that coexist over the 5 GHzUnlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) bands. Designing and training accurate CNN classifiers involve significant time and effort that goes to fine-tuning a model's architectural settings (e.g., number of convolutional layers and their filter size) and determining the appropriate hyperparameter configurations, such as learning rate and batch size. We tackle the former by defining architectural settings themselves as hyperparameters. We attempt to automatically optimize these architectural parameters, along with other preprocessing (e.g., number of I/Q samples within each classifier input) and learning hyperparameters, by forming aHyperparameter Optimization (HyperOpt) problem, which we solve in a near-optimal fashion using the Hyperband algorithm. The resulting near-optimal CNN (OCNN) classifier is then used to study classification accuracy for OTA as well as simulations datasets, considering various SNR values. We show that using a larger number of receivers to construct multi-channel inputs for CNNs does not necessarily improve classification accuracy. Instead, this number should be defined as a preprocessing hyperparameter to be optimized via Hyperband. OTA results reveal that our OCNN classifiers improve classification accuracy by $24.58%$ compared to manually tuned CNNs. We also study the effect of min-max normalization of I/Q samples within each classifier's input on generalization accuracy over simulated datasets SNRs other than training set's SNR, and show an average of $108.05%$ improvement when I/Q samples are normalized.

References

[1]
B. Chen, J. Chen, Y. Gao, and J. Zhang, “Coexistence of LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi on 5 GHz with corresponding deployment scenarios: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7--32, 2016.
[2]
S. Muhammad, H. H. Refai, and M. O. Al Kalaa, “5G NR-U: Homogeneous coexistence analysis,” in Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM'20, pp. 1--6, 2020.
[3]
Y. Gao and S. Roy, “Achieving proportional fairness for LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi coexistence in unlicensed spectrum,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 3390--3404, 2020.
[4]
T. J. O'Shea, J. Corgan, and T. C. Clancy, “Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks,” in International conference on engineering applications of neural networks, pp. 213--226, Springer, 2016.
[5]
T. J. O'Shea, T. Roy, and T. C. Clancy, “Over-the-air deep learning based radio signal classification,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 168--179, 2018.
[6]
W. Zhang, M. Feng, M. Krunz, and A. H. Yazdani Abyaneh, “Signal detection and classification in shared spectrum: A deep learning approach,” in Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM'21, pp. 1--10, 2021.
[7]
N. Bitar, S. Muhammad, and H. H. Refai, “Wireless technology identification using deep convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. of IEEE PIMRC'17, pp. 1--6, 2017.
[8]
T. Jian, B. C. Rendon, E. Ojuba, N. Soltani, Z. Wang, K. Sankhe, A. Gritsenko, J. Dy, K. Chowdhury, and S. Ioannidis, “Deep learning for RF fingerprinting: A massive experimental study,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50--57, 2020.
[9]
K. Sankhe, M. Belgiovine, F. Zhou, L. Angioloni, F. Restuccia, S. D'Oro, T. Melodia, S. Ioannidis, and K. Chowdhury, “No radio left behind: Radio fingerprinting through deep learning of physical-layer hardware impairments,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 165--178, 2019.
[10]
T. Roy, T. O'Shea, and N. West, “Generative adversarial radio spectrum networks,” in Proc. of ACM WiseML'19, pp. 12--15, 2019.
[11]
M. Patel, X. Wang, and S. Mao, “Data augmentation with conditional GAN for automatic modulation classification,” in Proc. of ACM WiseML'20, pp. 31--36, 2020.
[12]
S. Soltani, Y. E. Sagduyu, R. Hasan, K. Davaslioglu, H. Deng, and T. Erpek, “Real-time and embedded deep learning on FPGA for RF signal classification,” in Proc. of IEEE MILCOM'19, pp. 1--6, 2019.
[13]
C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi, Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol. 4. Springer, 2006.
[14]
F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, Automated machine learning: methods, systems, challenges. Springer Nature, 2019.
[15]
L. Li, K. Jamieson, G. DeSalvo, A. Rostamizadeh, and A. Talwalkar, “Hyperband: A novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 6765--6816, 2017.
[16]
Y. Shi, K. Davaslioglu, Y. E. Sagduyu, W. C. Headley, M. Fowler, and G. Green, “Deep learning for RF signal classification in unknown and dynamic spectrum environments,” in Proc. of IEEE DySPAN'19, pp. 1--10, IEEE, 2019.
[17]
Y. Wang, J. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Yang, and G. Gui, “Deep learning-based cooperative automatic modulation classification method for MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 4575--4579, 2020.
[18]
S. Falkner, A. Klein, and F. Hutter, “Bohb: Robust and efficient hyperparameter optimization at scale,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1437--1446, PMLR, 2018.
[19]
“WLAN toolbox version 3.2,” R2021a. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.
[20]
“LTE toolbox version 3.5,” R2021a. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.
[21]
“5G toolbox version 2.2,” R2021a. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.
[22]
R. P. e. a. Jianhan, L., “TGax channel model. IEEE 802.11--14/0882r4,” R2021a. September 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Countermeasuring Aggressors via Intelligent Adaptation of Contention Window in CSMA/CA SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.341623212(88216-88230)Online publication date: 2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WiseML '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Workshop on Wireless Security and Machine Learning
May 2022
93 pages
ISBN:9781450392778
DOI:10.1145/3522783
  • General Chair:
  • Murtuza Jadliwala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 May 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 5g nr-u
  2. automl
  3. cnn
  4. hyperband
  5. hyperopt
  6. lte-laa
  7. multi-receiver
  8. sdr
  9. signal classification
  10. wi-fi

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

WiSec '22

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)119
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Countermeasuring Aggressors via Intelligent Adaptation of Contention Window in CSMA/CA SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.341623212(88216-88230)Online publication date: 2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media