Feature Extraction and Reconstruction by Using 2D-VMD Based on Carrier-Free UWB Radar Application in Human Motion Recognition
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Two-Dimensional Variational Mode Decomposition (2D-VMD) Algorithm
2.1. Two-Dimensional Variational Modal Function Model
- (1)
- (2)
- The parsed signal of the intrinsic mode component is estimated for its center frequency , and then the spectrum of each is modulated onto its corresponding frequency baseband.
- (3)
- Finally, calculate the square of the demodulated signal gradient norm in Equation (2).
2.2. Solution of Two-Dimensional Variational Constraint Model
Algorithm 1: 2D-VMD |
Input: signal , number of modes , parameters . Output: modes , center frequencies . |
Initialize repeat for do Create 2D mask for analytic signal Fourier multiplier: Update : Update : Retrieve : end for Dual ascent (optional): Until convergence: |
3. Feature Extraction and Reconstruction Model of Human Motion 2D Echo Signal Based on 2D-VMD by Carrier-Free UWB Radar
- Step1:
- Acquire ten different types of human motion 2D echo signals using SIR-20 carrier-free UWB radar.
- Step2:
- Decompose the 2D echo signals of each type of human motion using 2D-VMD algorithm to extract 2D mode components of n BIMFs.
- Step 2.1:
- Load the 2D human motion echo analysis signal data of the carrier-free UWB radar.
- Step 2.2:
- Initialize ;
- Step 2.3:
- Update , with Equation (10);
- Step 2.4:
- Update , with Equation (11);
- Step 2.5:
- Update retrieve , with Equation (12);
- Step 2.6:
- Update using Equation (13);
- Step 2.7:
- Step 2.7: Determine whether to converge using ;
- Step 2.8:
- Return , which represent the modes of the original signal.
- Step3:
- Screen the 2D mode components of the plurality of BIMFs extracted by 2D-VMD algorithm as feature of human motion.
- Step4:
- Reconstruct the original 2D echo signal of human motion according to the 2D mode component of BIMFs.
- Step5:
- Evaluate the effect of the 2D-VMD algorithm application in human motion echo signal feature extraction and reconstruction according to the PCC, UQI, and PSNR between the carrier-free UWB radar echo signal of human motion and reconstructed signal.
4. Experimental Result
4.1. Experimental Setup and Data Acquisition
4.2. Experimental Result
4.2.1. Feature Extraction
4.2.2. Reconstruction
5. Performance Analysis
5.1. Pearson Correlation Coefficient
5.2. Peak Signal Noise Rate
5.3. Universal Image Quality Index
5.3.1. Performance Analysis of Feature Extraction
5.3.2. Performance Analysis of Reconstructed 2D Echo Signal
6. Conclusions and Future Prospects
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Seyfioğlu, M.S.; Özbayoğlu, A.M.; Gürbüz, S.Z. Deep convolutional autoencoder for radar-based classification of similar aided and unaided human activities. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2018, 54, 1709–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fioranelli, F.; Ritchie, M.; Griffiths, H. Analysis of polarimetric multistatic human micro-Doppler classification of armed/unarmed personnel. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon), Arlington, VA, USA, 10–15 May 2015; pp. 432–437. [Google Scholar]
- Zenaldin, M.; Narayanan, R.M. Features associated with radar micro-Doppler signatures of various human activities. Proc. SPIE 2015, 9461, 94611D. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, H.; Lu, G.H.; Jing, X.J.; Wang, J.Q. A new ultra-wideband radar for detecting survivors buried under earthquake rubbles. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2010, 52, 2621–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ram, S.S.; Ling, H. Analysis of microDopplers from human gait using reassigned joint time-frequency transform. Electron. Lett. 2007, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ram, S.S.; Li, Y.; Lin, A.; Ling, H. Doppler-based detection and tracking of humans in indoor environments. J. Frankl. Inst. 2008, 345, 679–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, J.D.; Kwon, J.; Lee, N.; Kim, Y. Application of ultra-wide band radar for classification of human activities. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2012, 6, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Nam, S. Short-time Fourier transform of deeply located tunnel signatures measured by cross-borehole pulse radar. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 8, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, A.; Okaya, D. Frequency-time decomposition of seismic data using wavelet-based methods. Geophysics 1995, 60, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stockwell, R.G.; Mansinha, L.; Lowe, R.P. Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1996, 44, 998–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zheng, X. Spectral decomposition using Wigner-Ville distribution with applications to carbonate reservoir characterization. Lead. Edge 2008, 27, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallat, S.G.; Zhang, Z. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1993, 41, 3397–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, N.E.; Shen, Z.; Long, S.R.; Wu, M.C.; Shih, H.H.; Zheng, Q.; Yen, N.C.; Tung, C.C.; Liu, H.H. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. A 1998, 454, 903–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Huang, N.E. A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 2004, 460, 1597–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.; Liang, Q.; Durrani, T.S. An EMD Based Sense-Through-Foliage Target Detection UWB Radar Sensor Networks. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 29254–29261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.L. Analysis of micro-Doppler signatures of vibration targets using EMD and SPWVD. Neurocomputing 2016, 171, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, M.E.; Colominas, M.A.; Schlotthauer, G.; Flandrin, P. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on Acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 22–27 May 2011; pp. 4144–4147. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomiretskiy, K.; Zosso, D. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2014, 62, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y.J.; Cao, J.X.; Wang, D.X.; Du, H.K.; Yao, Y. Application of the variational-mode decomposition for seismic time-frequency analysis. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2016, 9, 3821–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, N.; Chen, H.; Cai, G.; Fang, L.H.; Wang, Y.Q. Mechanical fault diagnosis of high voltage circuit breakers based on variational mode decomposition and multi-layer classifier. Sensors 2016, 16, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Q.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Li, W.X.; Yang, L.X.; Dong, M.L.; Zeng, Z.M. Adaptive DSPI phase denoising using mutual information and 2D variational mode decomposition. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2018, 29, 045203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zosso, D.; Dragomiretskiy, K.; Bertozzi, A.L.; Weiss, P.S. Two-dimensional compact variational mode decomposition. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 2017, 58, 294–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, J.C.; Bouaoune, Y.; Delechelle, E.; Niang, O.; Bunel, P. Image analysis by bidimensional empirical mode decomposition. Image Vis. Comput. 2003, 21, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomiretskiy, K.; Zosso, D. Two-dimensional variational mode decomposition. In International Workshop on Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 197–208. [Google Scholar]
- Humeau-Heurtier, A.; Abraham, P.; Henni, S. Bi-dimensional variational mode decomposition of laser speckle contrast imaging data: A clinical approach to critical limb ischemia? Comput. Biol. Med. 2017, 86, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Hu, C.; Peng, Z.X. Multi-dimensional variational mode decomposition for bearing-crack detection in wind turbines with large driving-speed variations. Renew. Energy 2018, 116, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bülow, T.; Sommer, G. A novel approach to the 2D analytic signal. In International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Shen, H.; Yuan, Q.; Lu, X.L.; Zhou, C.P. A universal destriping framework combining 1-D and 2-D variational optimization methods. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2018, 56, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J.; Hong, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y.S.; Gu, C.; Zhu, X.H. Through-wall multiple targets vital signs tracking based on VMD algorithm. Sensors 2016, 16, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Fan, W.; Li, X.; Wang, L.Z. Weak Degradation Characteristics Analysis of UAV Motors Based on Laplacian Eigenmaps and Variational Mode Decomposition. Sensors 2019, 19, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Du, W. Research on Fault Diagnosis of Gearbox with Improved Variational Mode Decomposition. Sensors 2018, 18, 3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Luo, Z.; Huang, J.; Yan, S.Z. A Comparative Study of Four Kinds of Adaptive Decomposition Algorithms and Their Applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, W.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.D.; Zhao, H.M.; Wu, J.Z. Research on an Adaptive Variational Mode Decomposition with Double Thresholds for Feature Extraction. Symmetry 2018, 10, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Cheng, G.; Pang, Y.; Kuai, M.S. Planetary gear fault diagnosis via feature image extraction based on multi central frequencies and vibration signal frequency Spectrum. Sensors 2018, 18, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, J. A novel feature extraction method for ship-radiated noise based on variational mode decomposition and multi-scale permutation entropy. Entropy 2017, 19, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Bao, H.; Qi, X. Seismic Random Noise Attenuation Method Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Correlation Coefficients. Electronics 2018, 7, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Cheng, G.; Chen, X.; Pang, Y.S. Planetary gears feature extraction and fault diagnosis method based on VMD and CNN. Sensors 2018, 18, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, J. Research on ship-radiated noise denoising using secondary variational mode decomposition and correlation coefficient. Sensors 2018, 18, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Bovik, A.C. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2002, 9, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, H.; Zhao, H.; Peng, Z.; Li, H.; Gu, C.; Li, C.Z.; Zhu, X.H. Time-varying vocal folds vibration detection using a 24 GHz portable auditory radar. Sensors 2016, 16, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Center frequency | 400 MHz |
Time window | 20 ns |
Scanned sample points | 512 p/s |
Resolution | 16 Bit |
Scanning frequency | 50 Hz |
Transmit repetition rate | 100 K |
Number | Motion Category | Specific Motion Description |
---|---|---|
(a) | Walk forward | The two hands swing alternately and walk slowly towards the antenna towards the radar |
(b) | Walk backward | The two hands swing alternately, starting close to the antenna position, and slowly walk backward, slowly moving away from the antenna |
(c) | Run forward | The two hands swing alternately and run toward the radar antenna |
(d) | Run backward | The two hands swing alternately, starting close to the antenna and run backward, away from the antenna |
(e) | Fall forward | Standing 2 m away from the antenna, fall forward slowly, and finally lying on the ground |
(f) | Fall backward | Standing 2 m away from the antenna, fall backward slowly, and finally lying on the ground |
(g) | Walk around | Standing 2 m away from the antenna and walk around |
(h) | Jump up and down | Standing 2 m away from the antenna, up and down in a periodic beat |
(i) | Jump forward | Standing 2 m away from the antenna, continuously jumping forward at a constant speed |
(j) | Jump backward | Starting point close to the antenna position, continuously jumping backward at a constant speed |
Parameters | Meaning | Value |
---|---|---|
alpha | the balancing parameter for data fidelity constraint | 5000 |
tau | time-step of dual ascent (pick 0 for noise-slack) | 0.25 |
K | the number of IMFs to be recovered | 5 |
DC | true, if the first mode is put and kept at DC (0-freq) | 1 |
init | 0, if all omegas start at 0 1, if all omegas start initialized randomly | 1 |
tol | tolerance of convergence criterion |
BIMF1 | BIMF2 | BIMF3 | BIMF4 | BIMF5 | Max | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 104,080 | 161,640 | 203,096 | 22,260 | 125,302 | 256,749 |
40.54% | 62.96% | 79.1% | 8.67% | 48.8% | --- | |
(b) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 108,615 | 174,474 | 16,994 | 202,551 | 119,377 | 256,749 |
42.3% | 67.96% | 6.62% | 78.89% | 46.5% | --- | |
(c) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 85,874 | 102,506 | 153,095 | 178,683 | 154,012 | 251,249 |
34.18% | 40.8% | 60.93% | 71.12% | 61.3% | --- | |
(d) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 99,881 | 159,628 | 184,590 | 77,948 | 17,432 | 233,249 |
42.82% | 68.47% | 79.14% | 33.42% | 7.47% | --- | |
(e) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 116,402 | 116,483 | 196,009 | 22,401 | 230,051 | 293,249 |
39.69% | 39.72% | 66.84% | 7.64% | 78.45% | --- | |
(f) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 112,246 | 219,052 | 126,029 | 231,726 | 17,090 | 312,499 |
35.92% | 70.1% | 40.33% | 74.15% | 5.47% | --- | |
(g) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 80,762 | 160,198 | 11,623 | 95,162 | 154,590 | 215,499 |
37.48% | 74.34% | 5.39% | 44.16% | 71.74% | --- | |
(h) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 26,662 | 30,706 | 52,388 | 56,167 | 38,701 | 77,749 |
34.29% | 39.49% | 67.38% | 72.24% | 49.78% | --- | |
(i) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 51,368 | 118,507 | 6248 | 89,280 | 108,569 | 156,749 |
32.77% | 75.6% | 3.99% | 56.96% | 69.26% | --- | |
(j) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | ||||||
PCC | 53,625 | 78,197 | 97,097 | 24,057 | 138,874 | 172,749 |
31.04% | 45.27% | 56.21% | 13.93% | 80.39% | --- |
K = 2 | K = 3 | K = 4 | K = 5 | K = 6 | K = 7 | K = 8 | K = 9 | Max Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 248,617 | 256,726 | 256,597 | 247,953 | 254,928 | 255,932 | 249,085 | 249,307 | 256,749 |
96.83% | 99.99% | 99.94% | 96.57% | 99.29% | 99.68% | 97.02% | 97.10% | ||
UQI | 0.55205 | 0.97805 | 0.9716 | 0.73616 | 0.86540 | 0.96673 | 0.82585 | 0.83218 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 21.77 | 47.33 | 39.03 | 21.15 | 28.18 | 31.72 | 21.76 | 21.89 | --- |
(b) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 247,787 | 256,059 | 241,372 | 253,784 | 254,555 | 248,860 | 241,441 | 254,916 | 256,749 |
96.51% | 99.73% | 94.01% | 98.85% | 99.15% | 96.93% | 94.04% | 99.29% | ||
UQI | 0.4776 | 0.97532 | 0.81668 | 0.93662 | 0.94284 | 0.83562 | 0.81843 | 0.87802 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 19.51 | 32.16 | 18.20 | 25.84 | 27.16 | 21.35 | 18.22 | 27.92 | --- |
(c) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 250,961 | 251,246 | 251,197 | 251,117 | 251,249 | 251,249 | 251,248 | 251,249 | 251,249 |
99.89% | 99.99% | 99.98% | 99.95% | 100% | 100% | 99.99% | 100% | ||
UQI | 0.88342 | 0.98640 | 0.95510 | 0.96638 | 0.98709 | 0.98738 | 0.98531 | 0.98791 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 36.35 | 56.28 | 43.78 | 39.72 | 64.80 | 66.33 | 59.44 | 67.70 | --- |
(d) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 228,903 | 194,715 | 220,596 | 201,151 | 221,035 | 223,169 | 230,969 | 227,036 | 233,249 |
98.14% | 83.48% | 94.58% | 86.24% | 94.76% | 99.96% | 99.02% | 97.34% | ||
UQI | 0.60115 | 0.77158 | 0.82678 | 0.79566 | 0.80585 | 0.80606 | 0.90814 | 0.81756 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 24.08 | 12.28 | 19.06 | 14.27 | 19.20 | 20.11 | 26.91 | 22.39 | --- |
(e) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 56,054 | 291,277 | 290,966 | 238,999 | 287,545 | 288,283 | 290,736 | 291,399 | 293,249 |
19.11% | 99.33% | 99.22% | 81.50% | 98.05% | 98.31% | 99.14% | 99.37% | ||
UQI | 0.29763 | 0.91554 | 0.94855 | 0.77029 | 0.84442 | 0.85204 | 0.89245 | 0.88551 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 5.34 | 28.66 | 28.02 | 12.59 | 23.96 | 24.58 | 27.61 | 28.91 | --- |
(f) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 303,796 | 291,571 | 240,028 | 299,649 | 309,522 | 306,990 | 307,261 | 308,575 | 312,499 |
97.22% | 93.30% | 76.81% | 95.89% | 99.05% | 98.24% | 98.32% | 98.74% | ||
UQI | 0.49477 | 0.70406 | 0.74781 | 0.82720 | 0.86639 | 0.8460 | 0.80333 | 0.84758 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 20.72 | 18.02 | 10.77 | 20.01 | 26.63 | 23.87 | 24.09 | 25.35 | --- |
(g) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 209,543 | 184,028 | 215,335 | 211,657 | 212,841 | 210,810 | 213,809 | 208,729 | 215,499 |
97.24% | 86.39% | 99.92% | 98.22% | 98.77% | 97.82% | 99.22% | 96.86% | ||
UQI | 0.56117 | 0.51705 | 0.97469 | 0.84398 | 0.85368 | 0.83513 | 0.86004 | 0.83124 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 21.10 | 13.27 | 37.27 | 23.47 | 25.14 | 22.58 | 27.11 | 20.89 | --- |
(h) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 75,522 | 77,747 | 77,748 | 77,749 | 77,749 | 77,749 | 77,749 | 77,660 | 77,749 |
97.14% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99.89% | ||
UQI | 0.52529 | 0.97924 | 0.97985 | 0.98051 | 0.98103 | 0.98140 | 0.98167 | 0.90281 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 18.73 | 51.27 | 54.77 | 57.45947 | 59.42 | 60.59 | 61.23 | 33.85 | --- |
(i) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 154,341 | 156,737 | 152,633 | 155,394 | 153,670 | 155,549 | 156,155 | 156,292 | 156,749 |
98.46% | 99.99% | 97.37% | 99.14% | 98.04% | 99.23% | 99.62% | 99.71% | ||
UQI | 0.60568 | 0.98305 | 0.83415 | 0.86706 | 0.83474 | 0.86286 | 0.91473 | 0.89895 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 23.28 | 46.31 | 20.57 | 25.71 | 21.93 | 26.25 | 29.33 | 30.44 | --- |
(j) type carrier-free UWB radar human motion 2D echo signal | |||||||||
PCC | 145,729 | 172,746 | 172,748 | 170,687 | 171,190 | 172,003 | 172,394 | 172,609 | 172,749 |
84.36% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 98.81% | 99.09% | 99.57% | 99.79% | 99.92% | ||
UQI | 0.20419 | 0.98297 | 0.98348 | 0.85448 | 0.86438 | 0.87910 | 0.90366 | 0.95810 | 1 |
PSNR (dB) | 13.69 | 53.07 | 56.98 | 24.79 | 26.03 | 29.22 | 32.48 | 36.52 | --- |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, L.; Zhou, X.; Che, L.; Rong, S.; Wen, H. Feature Extraction and Reconstruction by Using 2D-VMD Based on Carrier-Free UWB Radar Application in Human Motion Recognition. Sensors 2019, 19, 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091962
Jiang L, Zhou X, Che L, Rong S, Wen H. Feature Extraction and Reconstruction by Using 2D-VMD Based on Carrier-Free UWB Radar Application in Human Motion Recognition. Sensors. 2019; 19(9):1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091962
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Liubing, Xiaolong Zhou, Li Che, Shuwei Rong, and Hexin Wen. 2019. "Feature Extraction and Reconstruction by Using 2D-VMD Based on Carrier-Free UWB Radar Application in Human Motion Recognition" Sensors 19, no. 9: 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091962
APA StyleJiang, L., Zhou, X., Che, L., Rong, S., & Wen, H. (2019). Feature Extraction and Reconstruction by Using 2D-VMD Based on Carrier-Free UWB Radar Application in Human Motion Recognition. Sensors, 19(9), 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091962